F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wound dressings were
changed timely and as per physician orders for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for skin conditions
(Resident #5).
Residents Affected - Few
The findings included:
Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Integrity-Skin Tears implemented on 01/09/23 with no revision date
documented, it is the policy of this facility to provide proper treatment and care to maintain skin integrity
.licensed nurses will conduct skin assessments .RNs (Registered Nurses) and LPNs (Licensed Practical
Nurses) will participate in the management of skin tears .by following physician orders, assessment of
residents .
Review of Resident #5's clinical record documented an admission date to the facility on [DATE] with no
readmissions. The resident diagnoses included Renal Insufficiency, Hypertension, Metabolic
Encephalopathy, Chronic Kidney Disease, Anemia, Atrial Fibrillation, Congestive Heart Failure, and
Infection of the skin- subcutaneous tissue.
Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief
Interview of the Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that the resident had no cognition impairment.
The assessment documented under Functional Status that the resident needed extensive assistance with
most of his Activities of Daily Living and total assistance from the staff with transfers via a mechanical lift.
Review of Resident #5's physician order dated 07/16/23 documented wound care orders dressing /ointment
type: dry dressing: wound location and care instructions: cleanse healing skin tear left lower leg and right
lower leg with normal saline, pat dry, apply xeroform gauze, cover with dry dressing every third day and as
needed (prn) until resolved.
Review of Resident #5's care plan titled, Resident's skin will remain without skin integrity compromise
initiated on 04/05/23 and revised date on 07/05/23 documented an intervention that read .assess skin daily
.monitor skin during care for red or open areas and notify the nurse . The care plan did not address actual
wounds.
On 07/24/23 at 12:10 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #5 in his room who stated no
concerns with the care provided. The resident was accompanied by an aide and were playing a table game.
Resident #5 stated that the aide was his private aide (PA) who had been with him for two years.
Observation revealed a dressing on the resident's right leg dated 07/19/23, and a dressing on his left
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 7
Event ID:
105668
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105668
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/27/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Memorial Manor
777 South Douglas Road
Pembroke Pines, FL 33025
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
lower leg. The surveyor was unable to see the left leg dressing date because he was sitting and facing the
aide. The resident stated that he was taking blood thinners and his skin was thin from the blood thinners.
The PA stated the resident loves to put bandages on his skin. The PA was asked to state the date on the
resident's left lower leg and stated it was dated 07/19/23.
On 07/26/23 at 9:33 AM, observation revealed Resident #5 in bed and he continued to have a right leg
dressing dated 07/19/23 and had a dressing on his left lower leg dated 07/25/23. Subsequently, a joint
interview was conducted with the resident and his PA. The PA stated that the nurse changed the resident
dressing on his left leg but did not see the dressing on the right leg. During the interview, Staff E, Licensed
Practical Nurse (LPN) came into Resident #5's room and stated she was there to say hello to the resident.
Consequently, an interview was conducted with Staff E who stated that she did not do the resident's
dressing change on 07/25/23. Staff E was apprised of the right leg dressing dated 07/19/23 and stated that
the dressing was for protection maybe and offered to remove it. Observation revealed Staff E performed
hand hygiene, donned gloves, and removed Resident #5's right leg dressing dated 07/19/23. Staff E, LPN
stated the skin tear was healed. Observation revealed a small scratch like skin mark. The removed dressing
had a piece of xeroform gauze in it. Staff E confirmed that the piece of xeroform gauze was in the dressing
removed.
0n 07/26/23 at 9:43 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) who stated there
was nothing on Resident #5's right leg and added that all that the nurse needed to do was remove the
dressing and discontinue the order. Staff B was apprised that the dressing on his right upper leg (thigh) and
left lower leg, were dated 07/19/23 when the observation was made on 07/24/23.
On 07/26/23 at 9:52 AM, a joint interview was conducted with Staff B, RN, Staff E, and the Assistant
Director of Nursing (ADON). The ADON confirmed that Resident #5's physician order's frequency for the
right leg and left leg was to be changed every third day and should have been changed on 07/22/23. Staff E
confirmed that the right leg dressing was dated 07/19/23 and the left leg dressing was dated 07/25/23. The
ADON was apprised that the right leg dressing was on for 7 days and the left leg dressing was changed 6
days rather than every third day as ordered.
On 07/26/23 at 10:08 AM, a side by side review of Resident #5's clinical record was conducted with Staff B,
RN/Unit Manager. Staff B confirmed that the resident's physician orders dated 07/16/23, included wound
care orders dressing /ointment type: dry dressing: wound location and care instructions: cleanse healing
skin tear left lower leg and right lower leg with normal saline, pat dry, apply xeroform gauze, cover with dry
dressing every third day and prn (as needed) until resolved. Continued review revealed that Resident #5's
wound care documentation for 07/22/23 documented skipped by the nurse on duty for the day. Staff B
stated that the dressing change was not done on 07/22/23. Further review revealed that the resident's
dressing changed on 07/25/23 was not documented.
On 07/26/23 at 10:27 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff E, LPN who stated she took the physician
orders for Resident #5's wound care for the right and the left leg, but that somehow did not prompt the
nurses to do it.
On 07/26/23 at 3:09 PM, an interview was conducted with the MDS Coordinator who stated that Resident
#5's annual assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident had skin tear (s) during the review.
On 07/27/23 12:03 PM, surveyor was approached by the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated that the
facility did meet with the managers and the wound care nurse, and that they were addressing the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105668
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 7
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105668
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/27/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Memorial Manor
777 South Douglas Road
Pembroke Pines, FL 33025
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
dressing change problem. The DON was apprised that Resident #5's dressing on both legs were in place
for over 6 days and the physician orders were to change it every third day. The DON was informed that the
dressings were dated 07/19/23 for both legs, and the left leg dressing was changed on 07/25/23 but the
right leg dressing was not.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105668
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 7
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105668
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/27/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Memorial Manor
777 South Douglas Road
Pembroke Pines, FL 33025
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0693
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and
provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the tube feeding regimen according
to the Physician ' s orders for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #66).
The findings included:
In an observation conducted on 07/25/23 at 7:30 AM, Resident #66 was noted with the tube feeding
Isosource 1.5 (tube feeding formulary) running at 55 ml (milliliters) an hour. Closer observation showed that
the tube feeding was started at 4:00 PM, the night before and was at the 800 ml mark out of a 1500 ml
capacity bag. The tube feeding mark showed that 700 ml of tube feeding was infused during the night.
In an observation conducted on 07/25/23 at 8:07 AM, the breakfast tray was brought into Resident #66's
room. The breakfast tray showed a sliced cheese omelet, ground ham, white toast, and grits. Closer
observation showed that the tube feeding was still running with Isosource 1.5 (tube feeding formulary) at 55
ml (milliliters) an hour. In this observation, Resident #66 said, I am not hungry.
Upon continued observation at 8:18 AM, Resident #66's tube feeding was still running with Isosource 1.5 at
55 ml an hour. The breakfast tray was noted to be 100% untouched. At 8:50 AM, the tube feeding was still
running in the room while Resident #66 was trying to eat her breakfast tray. Resident #66 ate a few bites of
her breakfast tray.
In an observation conducted on 07/26/23 at 8:13 AM, Resident #66 was trying to eat her breakfast tray in
her room. Closer observation showed the tube feeding was still running at 55 ml an hour. The tube feeding
bag was at the 800 ml mark out of a 1500 ml capacity bag. This showed that 700 ml of formulary was given
instead of the 880 ml as ordered by the Physician. Continued observation at 8:22 AM showed that the tube
feeding was turned off, and Resident #66 did not eat anything on her breakfast tray. At 8:40 AM, the
breakfast tray was still 100% untouched.
A record review showed that Resident #66 was readmitted on [DATE] with severe malnutrition and
respiratory failure diagnoses. An order was noted for tube feeding continuously every 16 hours to start at
4:00 PM and stopped at 8:00 AM to provide 880 ml dated 07/14/23-diet order for mechanical soft ground
dated 03/30/23.
A nutrition progress note dated 06/06/23 showed that the tube feeding order meets 74% (percent) of
Resident 66's daily caloric needs and 78% of Resident #66's daily protein needs. Resident #66 ' s
estimated caloric requirements range between 1785 to 2024, and estimated protein needs range between
77 to 102 grams of protein.
The care plan showed that Resident #66 is at risk of unintended weight loss in nutrition parameters due to
total dependence on Enteral Feeding (delivering nutrition straight to your stomach or small intestines) for
fluids and hydration. A caloric daily intake was conducted on 04/04/23 for the three daily meals, which
showed that Resident #66 was eating 30% of her caloric needs and 38% of her protein needs.
In an interview conducted on 07/26/23 at 12:10 PM with Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN), it was
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105668
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 7
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105668
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/27/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Memorial Manor
777 South Douglas Road
Pembroke Pines, FL 33025
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0693
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
stated that Resident #66 tolerates her tube feeding well. The tube feeding runs from 4:00 PM the night
before until 8:00 AM the next day for 16 hours. When asked why the tube feeding was running past 8:00 AM
while Resident #66 was eating her meals, she said that the tube feeding pump would beep when it was
done, and that is when she turned the tube feeding off. Staff A further reported that it is okay for the tube
feeding to run while the Resident eats her meals.
Residents Affected - Few
In an interview conducted on 07/26/23 at 12:20 PM, Staff B Registered Nurse (RN) stated that it is not best
practice to run tube feeding while a resident eats. She further said that the tube feeding should have
stopped while Resident #66 was eating her lunch meals.
In an interview with Staff D, Registered Dietitian, on 07/27/23 at 8:45 AM, stated that Resident #66 Tube
feeding runs 16 hours starting at 4:00 PM and stopping at 8:00 AM running at 55 ml an hour. She adjusts
the tube feeding based on how well the Resident eats, and Resident #66 sometimes fluctuates. She was
only eating 10% to 30% of her meals for a while. This is why she based her needs from the tube feeding on
the higher end of needs. She further stated that you should run the tube feeding at a different time than
Resident #66 is eating her meals.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105668
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 7
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105668
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/27/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Memorial Manor
777 South Douglas Road
Pembroke Pines, FL 33025
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0806
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies,
intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food accommodating resident
preferences, choices, and tolerances. The facility did not follow its menu regarding food portion sizes during
multiple dining observations for Resident #74, Resident #148, Resident #14, Resident #55, Resident #20,
and Resident #71.
The findings included:
A review of the facility's 4-week menu cycle revealed the following: Tuesday's menu showed lunch served
was had roast beef (3 ounces), gratin potatoes, green beans, and a soft roll. For Wednesday, the menu
showed lunch served was glazed pork loin, baked potato, and mixed vegetables.
1. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Stroke and Hypertension. The
Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)
score of 09, indicating mild to severe cognitive impaired. The diet order showed a mechanical soft cardiac
heart healthy dated 10/2/122.
In an observation conducted on 07/25/23 at 8:07 AM, Resident #74 was eating his breakfast meal. Closer
observation revealed a meal ticket, documenting 6 ounces of grits, 2 ounces of eggs, ground ham, and a
slice of white bread. Further observation revealed Resident #66's tray did not have the 6 ounces of grits as
noted on his meal ticket.
2. Resident #148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Diabetes and Severe Obesity.
The MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed a BIMS score of 15, indicating cognitively intact. Diet order
noted for cardiac heart-healthy carbohydrate control dated 07/24/23.
In an observation conducted on 07/25/23 at 8:44 AM, Resident #148 was in his room with a breakfast tray.
His meal ticket showed a diet for cardiac carbohydrates controlled with eggs, white toast, coffee, and sugar
packets. In this observation, Resident #148 stated that they gave him sugar packets on his tray and that he
has diabetes.
A review of the facility's week-at-a-glance menu breakdown showed that on the carbohydrate-controlled
diet, sugar substitutes would be provided instead of sugar packets.
3. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia and Parkinson's
disease. The MDS dated [DATE] lacked documentation of a BIMS score. The order noted for regular diet
dated 03//02/22.
In an observation conducted on 07/24/23 at 12:15 PM, Resident #14 was noted with a lunch tray. Closer
observation showed a regular diet meal ticket with 3 ounces of roast beef. The lunch plate was noted with
two round slices of roast beef.
In an interview conducted on 07/25/23 at 3:50 PM, Staff C, Registered Dietitian, stated that for the lunch
menu, the roast beef is sliced and placed on the scale to ensure that each slice is 3 ounces. When asked
by the surveyor of why some residents received two round pieces of roast beef and some residents
received one portion, she said that they might be less than 3 ounces, and if they looked
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105668
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 7
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105668
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/27/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Memorial Manor
777 South Douglas Road
Pembroke Pines, FL 33025
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0806
smaller, they would provide two pieces.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
4. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Anemia and Diabetes. The MDS
assessment dated [DATE] with a BIMS score of 14, which is cognitively intact. Diet order for cardiac,
carbohydrate controlled dated 03/01/22.
Residents Affected - Few
In an observation conducted on 07/24/23 at 12:10 PM, Resident #55 was noted with her lunch tray. Closer
observation showed a lunch plate that consisted of 1 slice of round roast beef and potatoes. The meal ticket
showed Resident #55 has a cardiac carbohydrate-controlled diet with 3 ounces of roast beef.
5. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes and Hypertension. The
MDS assessment dated [DATE] with BIMS score of 13, indicated the resident cognitively intact. Diet order
noted for carbohydrate control diet dated 03/01/22.
In an observation conducted on 07/24/23 at 12:13 PM, Resident #20 was noted with her lunch tray. Closer
observation showed a lunch plate that consisted of 1 slice of round roast beef. The meal ticket showed that
Resident #20 has a carbohydrate-controlled diet with 3 ounces of roast beef.
Another observation was conducted on 04/26/23 at 8:12 AM, Resident #20 was eating her breakfast meal.
The meal ticket showed a diet for carbohydrate control with 4 ounces of juice and sugar substitute. Closer
observation showed 4 ounces of juice on the breakfast tray and 8 ounces of regular hot chocolate.
6. Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Dementia and Kidney Stones.
The MDS assessment dated [DATE] has a BIMS score of 08, indicating moderate to severe cognitive
impairment. Diet order noted for a regular diet; send side gravy/sauce with the meal and omit the baked
ham and roast pork dated 02/11/23.
In an observation conducted on 07/25/23 at 12:25 PM, Resident #71 was noted in the room with his lunch
tray. The tray showed a tuna sandwich and one soft roll. Closer observation showed a meal ticket for a tuna
salad sandwich, soft roll, and ½ cup of mixed vegetables, which was not on the tray.
In an interview conducted on 07/25/23 at 3:50 PM with Food Service Director, it was stated that there is
one staff member that is assigned to the tray line to ensure that the appropriate food items are placed on
the correct diet trays. Any food items listed on the meal ticket will be on the tray unless the resident request
something different it will write in pen on the meal ticket.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105668
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 7