Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

MEMORIAL MANORCMS #1056681 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician was notified regarding the resident's blood pressure medications that were held for three consecutive days due to low blood pressure for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #2). The findings included:Review of the facility's Standard Practice policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition Status revised on 01/2025 documents it is the policy of (name of facility) to consult with the resident immediately and notify the Attending Physician of the following:.a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status; a need to alter treatment significantly or a decision to transfer or discharge the resident from the facility. The resident's legal representative or interested family member is to be notified of these changes as soon as possible.Resident/Family/Physician notification is to be documented in the Nurses' progress notes. Review of the facility's policy titled Administration procedures for all medication PH 180-113 revised on 01/2024 documents .notification of Physician/Prescriber: held medications for pulse, blood pressure.resulting in medications being held.Review of Resident #2's clinical record documented a readmission to the facility on [DATE] and a transfer to a local hospital on [DATE]. The resident's admitting diagnosis was Toxic Metabolic Encephalopathy and Hypertension. Review of Resident #2's care plan titled (Resident #2) is at risk for cardiovascular complications related to HTN (hypertension), hypokalemia and Anemia initiated on 07/25/25 with interventions to include: monitor vital signs to include BP (blood pressure) and Pulse. Notify physician of abnormal findings. Review of Resident #2's nurses notes dated 09/13/25 at 1:13 PM, documented a heart rate (HR) of 84, a blood pressure (BP) of 90/55. The nurse note lacked written evidence that the resident's physician was notified of a change of the resident's low BP. Review of Resident #2's nurses note written by Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) dated 09/14/25 at 9:00 AM documented a HR of 114, a BP of !84/50 (the BP reading was documented in red and had a question mark next to the reading), BP low again this AM, resident denies dizziness, fatigue or blurred vision, but HR of 114. Resident has no appetite for current meal. The clinical record lacks written evidence that the physician was notified of a change of the resident's low BP and elevated HR. Review of Resident #2's nurse note dated 09/15/25 at 8:20 AM documented a HR of 111, a BP of !76/52 (question mark next to the reading noted). Appears weak with poor appetite despite encouragement. PA (Physician Assistant) evaluated. Pending new orders.Review of Resident #2's September 2025's MAR documented that the resident's blood pressure medications:Irbesartan (Avapro) 150 milligrams (mg) daily at 9:00 AM that was started on 08/04/25, was not given on 09/12/25, 09/13/25 and 09/14/25. -Metoprolol (Toprol XL) 24-hour tablet 50 mg daily at 9:00 AM that was started on 08/02/25, was not given on 09/12/25, 09/13/25 and 09/14/25. - Nifedipine (Adalat) 24-hour tablet 60 mg daily at 9:00 AM that was started on 08/02/25, was not given on 09/12/25, 09/13/25 and 09/14/25. Further review revealed no written evidence of Resident #2's physician notification regarding low BP, elevated HR and not given/held the resident's blood pressure medications on Residents Affected - Few (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 105668 Printed: 05/28/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 105668 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 11/14/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Memorial Manor 777 South Douglas Road Pembroke Pines, FL 33025 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete 09/12/25, 09/13/25 and 09/14/25. On 10/27/25 at 11:52 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN), who was asked what do you consider a resident change in condition and stated a mental status change, appetite not as usual and vital signs off from normal. Staff A was asked what would you do then and replied she will call the doctor.On 10/27/25 at 2:10 PM, an interview and a side-by-side review of Resident #2's clinical record was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The review revealed the resident had a low BP on 09/13/25, and on 09/14/25. The DON was apprised the resident's BP readings were off from her baseline, prior documented readings were anywhere from 130's 150's and 160's with HR readings between 70's and 80's and had an elevated HR 144 on 09/14/25. The DON was asked to submit written evidence regarding Resident #2's physician notification of low BP, an elevated HR and not given BP medications for three (3) consecutives days. The DON stated she did not see any written notification to the physician. On 10/27/25 at 3:12 PM, an interview was conducted with Staff B, RN who was asked what would you do if your resident has a change in vital signs and replied, call the supervisor, call the doctors, get new orders, send them out and call the family. Consequently, a side-by-side review of Staff B's nurses note dated 09/14/25 for Resident #2 was conducted. Staff B was asked if she notified Resident #2's low blood pressure reading of 84/50 and the heart rate of 114 to the physician and stated she rechecked the blood pressure one hour later and it was okay. The RN was asked why she did not notify the physician of the changes to the BP and HR and stated she looked at the history and noticed the blood pressure reading was kind of baseline, was asymptomatic, added the resident was not eating, having a low BP and elevated HR she was dehydrated, got report she was not eating very well, but make up by drinking ensure. Staff B was asked if she thought Resident #2 was dehydrated, why did not call the doctor? Staff B stated she would like more proof, rechecked the BP in one hour and it was okay for not calling the doctor. There was no written evidence that Staff B rechecked the resident's elevated HR. Staff B stated the resident was hypertensive and believed she held the medications and stated, critical thinking is thinking on your feet and will call the doctor after she exhausted all of her nursing knowledge, will call the supervisor after all of steps were done, added this where we are, what do I do now. Staff B was asked if she discussed Resident #2's low blood pressure and elevated heart rate with the supervisor and stated she did not. On 10/27/25 at 5:59 PM, during an interview, the DON was asked if the nurse was to call the physician with changes on vital signs and medication held due to low blood pressure and stated a standard of practice is to hold the medication if the BP is low. The DON stated the physician should have been notified and added a low blood pressure could be due to multiple reason, a sustained low BP is a cause to call the physician. Event ID: Facility ID: 105668 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 14, 2025 survey of MEMORIAL MANOR?

This was a inspection survey of MEMORIAL MANOR on November 14, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at MEMORIAL MANOR on November 14, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.