F 0554
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct medication self-administration
assessments to ensure safety for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications, of a total
sample of 43 residents (#49, and #305).
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
1. Resident #49 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hypertensive
urgency, encephalopathy, and malignant neoplasm of the bladder.
A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of
12/24/24 revealed resident #49 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which
indicated he was cognitively intact.
On 2/10/25 at 12:27 PM, resident #49 was observed sitting upright in bed. His bedside table was over his
lap, with personal items, including a 30-ounce jar of herbal blend [NAME] Neuro Ease, Vitamin D3-K2,
Elderberry capsule 1000 milligrams (mg), Vitamin C tablet 400 mg, Zinc tablet 10 mg, Sea Moss,
Turmeric-Curcumin capsule 1500 mg, Ultra-Magnesium complex capsule, Vital Grow male enhancement
gummies, N 2 boosters capsules, Vitamin E capsules, Super Reds amino capsules, and Super Greens
capsules. The resident stated he stopped taking Gabapentin because the herbal blend [NAME] Neuro Ease
worked better.
On 2/11/25 at 10:11 AM, Primary Registered Nurse (RN) F, observed the resident's bedside table. She
acknowledged the 30-ounce jar of herbal blend [NAME] Neuro Ease, Vitamin D3-K2, Elderberry capsule
1000 milligrams (mg), Vitamin C tablet 400 mg, Zinc tablet 10 mg, Sea Moss, Turmeric-Curcumin capsule
1500 mg, Ultra-Magnesium complex capsule, Vital Grow male enhancement gummies, N 2 boosters
capsules, Vitamin E capsules, Super Reds amino capsules, and Super Greens capsules. A review of the
resident's physician orders with RN F revealed no orders for Gabapentin or the above items found on the
resident's bedside overbed table. The RN explained that for someone to self-administer medications, they
must have a physician order and a self-administration evaluation completed. RN F stated there was no
order for herbs, supplements, and vitamins and that the resident had not completed a self-administration
evaluation.
2. Resident #305 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a fall from a motorized
mobility scooter, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and muscle weakness.
A review of the admission the MDS admission assessment with an assessment reference date of 2/04/25
revealed resident #305 had a BIMS score of 12 out of 15, which indicates he was moderately impaired
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 23
Event ID:
105671
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0554
cognition.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
On 2/10/25 at 11:21 AM, resident #305 was observed standing next to his bed. The nightstand was
observed with a bottle of 300 mg/100 caplets Tylenol 8 hour arthritis pain. The resident stated he keeps the
Tylenol at his bedside because he has arthritis pain in the knees.
Residents Affected - Few
On 2/10/25 at 12:08 PM, the resident's nightstand was observed with (RN) F Primary care nurse. She
acknowledged the bottle of 300 mg/100 caplets Tylenol 8 hr arthritis pain. A review of the resident's
physician orders with RN F revealed no orders for Tylenol found on the resident's nightstand. The RN
explained that for someone to self-administer medications, they must have a physician order and a
self-administration evaluation completed. RN F stated there was no order for Tylenol and that the resident
did not have a completed medication self-administration evaluation.
On 2/12/25 at 2:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated residents should not have medications at the
bedside to prevent overdose. She also explained a self-administration assessment must be completed to
ensure residents could safely self-administer medication. She confirmed residents #49 and #302 were not
evaluated for medication self-administration.
A review of the facility's policy and procedure for Self-Administration of Medication Program dated 6/26/24
revealed, It is the policy of the facility to allow the resident and or the legal representative of the resident the
right to self-administer medications when it has been deemed by the interdisciplinary team that it is
clinically appropriate.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0558
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light device was within reach for
1 of 3 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, of a total sample of 43 residents, (#52).
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
Review of the medical record revealed resident #52, a [AGE] year old female was admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorder, chronic pain syndrome,
major depressive disorder, persistent mood disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, Pseudobulbar Affect
(uncontrollable crying/laughing), and cognitive communication deficits.
The most recent Minimum Data Set Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of
12/30/24 revealed during the look-back periods, resident #52 had impaired vision, was rarely/never
understood, and unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Staff assessed the resident had
short term and long term memory problems, was severely cognitively impaired, had continuous inattention
and disorganized thinking that did not fluctuate, delusions, and was dependent on staff to complete all
Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The resident did not walk, required a wheelchair, was always incontinent of
bladder and bowel functions, required scheduled and as needed pain medication, a mechanically altered
diet, and received high-risk anti-depressant and opioid medications.
The Order Summary Report included active physician's medication orders for Donepezil (enzyme blocker)
10 Milligrams (MG) at bedtime for dementia, Levothyroxine (thyroid hormone) 112 Micrograms once daily
for thyroid disorder, Nuedexta (central nervous system agent) 20-10 MG every twelve hours for
Pseudobulbar Affect, Tramadol (opioid pain) 50 MG three times daily for chronic pain, and Trazodone
(anti-depressant) 25 MG at bedtime for depression.
The Comprehensive Care Plan included focuses for diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorder, incontinence, risk
for skin breakdown, impaired communication and hearing, risk for falls, dementia with behaviors, high-risk
medication adverse effects monitoring, squamous cell cancer, required staff assistance for all ADLs, and
Long Term Care (LTC) with a goal to assure maintenance of the resident's safety and comfort, and
observance of distress.
On 2/10/25 at 10:45 AM and 3:56 PM, resident #52 was observed in her room awake and lying in bed. The
call light cord with a squeeze bulb activator was lying on the floor under the resident's bed on the left side.
On 2/11/25 at 3:12 PM, the resident's door was closed; the call light cord and bulb were observed on the
floor in the same location.
On 2/11/25 at 3:40 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J said she knew resident #52 well, as she was
often included in her assignment. The CNA explained the resident was able to use her hand and arms to
activate a call light bulb.
In a joint observation on 2/11/25 at 3:43 PM, CNA J and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K observed
resident #52's call light cord and squeezable bulb lying on the floor under the bed. LPN K picked up the
device and clipped it to the resident's bed sheet so the bulb was within reach of the resident's hand. LPN K
explained, staff were expected to check and make sure the device was within reach so the resident could
use it if needed. The LPN said when the room door was closed, staff were unable to hear her yell out and
confirmed the call light shouldn't be on the floor.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0558
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
On 2/11/25 at 3:55 PM, the Unit Manager explained she expected staff to check residents' call lights and
ensure they were safely within reach every time before they exited a room. She said CNAs typically
checked on bedbound residents every two hours for incontinence care and repositioning and stated, they
shouldn't leave the room with a call light on the floor.
Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] noted the facility provided person-centered care for
persons with dementia, staff responded to residents' requests for assistance promptly in order to promote
resident dignity, and staff training and competency included resident call lights.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0584
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited
to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for residents who
ate in the dining rooms on the two (North and South) nursing units. This affected all residents who chose to
eat in the nursing unit's dining areas, which varied from approximately 8-20 residents per meal of the 98
residents at the facility.
Findings:
On 2/10/25 at 12:35 PM, four staff were observed serving trays to residents on the North unit from the food
cart. There were seven residents sitting at tables in the North unit dining room waiting to be served. There
were no tablecloths or centerpieces on the tables and the dishes were left on the serving trays.
On 2/10/25 at 1:38 PM, lunch was provided to approximately thirteen residents in the South unit dining
room. There were no tablecloths or centerpieces on the tables. All the dishes, flatware, cups and food items
were left on the resident's trays while they ate.
On 2/10/25 at 5:59 PM, residents were observed eating in the South unit room dining room from their trays.
The undecorated tables held newspapers and pieces of paper with word puzzles on them that had been
used earlier in the day.
On 2/11/25 at 1:18 PM, during the lunch service on the South and North unit's dining rooms the residents
ate from their trays on undecorated tables as they did the previous day.
On 2/12/25 at 5:21 PM, resident #77 described the dining area felt like a cafeteria, and could be made nicer
with tablecloths or decorations.
On 2/12/25 at 10:28 AM, the Registered Dietetic Technician (DTR) stated she thought everyone would
enjoy a little more decoration in the dining room, like centerpieces in the area in which they dine.
On 2/13/25 at 1:10 PM, the Administrator observed all residents in the South unit dining room ate from
trays. She acknowledged that serving all residents on trays could be considered a dignity issue because it
was more institutional, than home-like.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for
services as needed.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a new Preadmission Screening and
Resident Review (PASSAR) level I screen to ensure additional mental health services were not required for
1 of 5 residents reviewed for PASSAR, of a total sample of 43 residents, (#62).
Findings:
Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, cognitive
communication disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Other diagnoses were added later
and included Schizophreniform disorder on 9/14/23, persistent mood disorder on 10/02/23, and major
depressive disorder on 8/01/24.
Resident #62's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed he was severely
cognitively impaired and required substantial to maximum assistance for activities of daily living.
Review of resident #62's medical record revealed a PASSAR Level I had been completed on 8/08/23 with
diagnosis of anxiety disorder listed. The facility could not provide evidence of a new screening.
Review of psychiatric note dated 2/10/25, revealed that resident #62 was being treated for depression,
anxiety, dementia, insomnia, mood disorder, and schizophreniform disorder. The Psychiatric consult noted
that the resident had exhibited behaviors such as auditory hallucinations and sleeping issues.
On 2/14/25 at 2:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) jointly with the Regional Director of Clinical Services
said she was not aware resident #62 had a new diagnosis that required a new PASSAR screen. The
Regional Director of Clinical Services said she assisted the DON with PASSARs but was unaware a new
screening was required for resident #62 after the new diagnoses.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure nurses followed physician's orders to
monitor fingerstick blood glucose for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for change of condition, of a total sample of
43 residents, (#93).
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
Review of the medical record revealed resident #93, a [AGE] year old male was admitted to the facility from
an acute care hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (partial
paralysis), generalized anxiety disorder, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypertension (high blood
pressure), gastrostomy (feeding tube) status, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), encephalopathy
(brain dysfunction), stroke, and diabetes mellitus.
The most recent Minimum Data Set 5-day Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/26/24
noted during the look-back periods, resident #93 had difficulty swallowing, required a feeding tube for
nutrition and hydration, received insulin injections for 7 out of 7 days, and high risk antipsychotic,
antianxiety, antidepressant, anticoagulant (blood thinner), and hypoglycemic (blood sugar lowering)
medications.
The Order Summary Report noted active physician's medication orders included Diabetisource AC (before
meals) enteral (feeding tube) formula 60 milliliters per hour from 8:00 PM to 6:00 AM, Carvedilol 6.25
Milligrams (MG) twice daily for hypertension, Doxazosin Mesylate 1 MG at bedtime for hypertension,
Glargine Insulin 45 Units (U) twice daily for diabetes, Lispro Insulin 4 U four times daily for diabetes, and
Lispro Insulin, dosage per sliding scale finger stick blood sugar results before meals for diabetes.
The Comprehensive Care Plan included focuses for diabetes mellitus with interventions for nurse
monitoring of blood glucose and risk of complications, and dependence on enteral feeding for nutrition with
interventions for nurse monitoring of functioning/maintenance and risk of complications.
During a medication administration observation on 2/10/25 at 11:32 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E
collected resident #93's finger stick blood sugar with a result of 175 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl). The
nurse said physician's orders were to give the resident an extra 2 units of Lispro insulin. She explained, she
was unable to locate resident #93's Lispro insulin in the medication cart. The nurse explained the facility's
on hand emergency medication kit did not contain Lispro. At 12:04 PM, LPN E said she contacted the
physician and obtained orders to hold the Lispro and re-check resident #93's blood glucose every hour until
the refill arrived from the pharmacy.
Review of a nurse progress note completed by LPN E on 2/10/25 at 12:17 PM, read, insulin unavailable at
the moment awaiting pharmacy to deliver STAT [immediately/urgently] MD [physician] notified and said to
keep checking bs [blood sugar] once every hour until insulin gets here.
On 2/10/25 at 3:25 PM, LPN L said LPN E had left for the day and she received off-going report from her.
The nurse said LPN E had not mentioned resident #93 was out of insulin nor that the doctor had given
orders to check his blood glucose every hour until the refill arrived.
Review of the Weights and Vitals Summary Report noted a struck-out entry by LPN L on 2/10/25 at
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
3:31 PM, of a finger stick blood sugar measurement of 157 mg/dl and an additional measurement of 137
mg/dl at 4:30 PM.
On 2/12/25 at 10:47 AM, LPN E recalled on 2/10/25 at lunchtime, she obtained doctor's orders to re-check
resident #93's blood sugar once an hour. She said she completed re-checks every hour until the end of her
shift at 3:00 PM and stated, it was in a good range.
On 2/12/25 at 12:46 PM, the Unit Manager recalled on 2/10/25, LPN E obtained a doctors order to hold
resident #93's lunchtime insulin and re-check the blood sugar until the insulin was delivered because it
wasn't in the emergency medication kit. The Unit Manager checked the medical record and was unable to
locate any re-checks by LPN E on 2/10/25. She acknowledged there were no re-checks until LPN L's was
recorded at 4:30 PM, four hours after LPN E received physician's orders. The nurse stated, she didn't check
it every hour per the MD [physician] order; it's important for them to re-check, especially if it was a brittle
person.
On 2/14/25 at 10:13 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained nurses were expected to follow doctor's
orders and monitor residents for abnormal blood glucose to prevent re-hospitalization and complications.
The DON stated, the nurse should have monitored the resident.
Review of the facility's standards and guidelines titled Change in Condition Process dated 3/02/19 noted
nurses were expected to evaluate the resident's status and document findings in the electronic medical
record.
The Facility Assessment noted the facility provided nursing services and care including management of
medication and medical conditions including diabetes.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor identified weight loss and impaired
nutrition risk for 2 residents (#52, #15); and failed to properly monitor the clinical condition for 1 resident,
(#34), out of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition, of a total sample of 43 residents.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #52, a [AGE] year old female was admitted to the facility
on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorder, chronic pain syndrome,
major depressive disorder, persistent mood disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, Pseudobulbar Affect
(uncontrollable crying/laughing), and cognitive communication deficits.
The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date
(ARD) of 12/30/24 revealed during the look-back periods, resident #52 had impaired vision, was
rarely/never understood, and unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Staff
assessed the resident had short term and long term memory problems, was severely cognitively impaired,
had continuous inattention and disorganized thinking that did not fluctuate, delusions, and she was
dependent on staff to complete all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The resident did not walk, required a
wheelchair, had no weight loss or gain, required scheduled and as needed pain medication, a mechanically
altered diet, and she received high-risk anti-depressant and opioid medications.
The Order Summary Report included active physician's orders for monthly weights. Medication orders
included Donepezil (enzyme blocker) 10 Milligrams (MG) at bedtime for dementia, Levothyroxine (thyroid
hormone) 112 Micrograms once daily for thyroid disorder, Nuedexta (central nervous system agent) 20-10
MG every twelve hours for Pseudobulbar Affect, Tramadol (opioid pain) 50 MG three times daily for chronic
pain, and Trazodone (anti-depressant) 25 MG at bedtime for depression.
The Comprehensive Care Plan included focuses for diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorder, incontinence, risk
for skin breakdown, impaired communication and hearing, risk for falls, dementia with behaviors, high-risk
medication adverse effects monitoring, squamous cell cancer, required staff assistance for all ADLs, and
Long Term Care (LTC) with a goal to assure maintenance of the resident's safety and comfort, and
observance of distress.
On 2/11/25 at 10:45 AM, resident #52 was observed awake and lying in bed in her room. The resident did
not answer questions and was unable to participate in an interview.
On 2/11/25 at 3:43 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J said resident #52 was often included in her
assignment, required staff assistance to eat, and needed cues and reminders to ensure she was eating
enough.
Review of the Dietary Progress Note dated 10/03/24 noted resident #52 was evaluated for weight loss,
insufficient intake, and a low Body Mass Index (BMI). Orders for calorically dense supplements twice daily
between meals and fortified foods were implemented for weight loss and low BMI.
The Weights and Vitals Report showed on 9/12/24, resident #52 had a 8.7% or 11 pound weight loss over
two months. Additional weights were not completed after 11/07/24, for three months.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
In a joint interview with the Dietary Technician (DT) and Registered Dietician (RD) on 2/12/25 at 12:09 PM,
the DT said she visited the facility once weekly to complete evaluations for new admissions and concerns
when she was informed by nursing. She said weight loss was tracked from a facility provided report and
was acted on for identified weight loss. She explained that typically, nutritional supplements were added to
help avoid nutritional complications of weight loss and weights were often re-checked more frequently with
weight loss in vulnerable, aging residents.
On 2/12/25 at 1:56 PM, the Unit Manager said all residents were weighed on admission, and at least
monthly and it was assigned by the Director of Nursing (DON). She explained the facility's Dietician
monitored residents for any weight loss concerns.
In a joint interview with the DT, RD, and DON, the DT checked resident #52's medical record and said the
last progress note dated 10/03/24 showed the resident triggered for significant weight loss. She said orders
were added for Med Pass (supplement) and fortified foods. She checked the medical record and said no
weights had been completed for the resident since 11/07/24, so she was not aware of the resident's status
since that time. The RD stated, weight maintenance is important because it affects wound healing and
optimal health and well-being.
2. Review of the medical record revealed resident #15, a [AGE] year old female was admitted to the facility
on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis, osteoarthritis, dementia, pulmonary embolism
(blood clot of lung), major depressive disorder, seizures, muscle weakness, and vitamin D deficiency.
The most recent MDS Quarterly Assessment with an ARD of 11/29/24 revealed during the look-back
periods, resident #15 scored 1 out of 15 on the BIMS which indicated she was severely cognitively
impaired. The assessment showed the resident had range of motion functional limitations in both upper
extremities (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand), and she was fully dependent on staff to complete all ADLs,
including eating. The resident did not walk, required a wheelchair, had no weight loss or gain, and she
received high-risk anti-coagulant (blood thinner) and anti-convulsant (seizure) medications.
The Care Plan Report included focuses for staff dependence to complete all ADLs including eating related
to limitations in both shoulders with a goal to receive assistance necessary to improve/maintain quality of
life, and an intervention for physician notifications for significant intake changes. Additional focuses
included, incontinence, risk for skin breakdown, depression and anxiety, risk for falls, impaired cognition
and thought processes/memory loss, high-risk medication adverse effects monitoring, multiple sclerosis
with interventions to monitor diet and intake, missing natural teeth, expected LTC needs due to limitations
with a goal to assure maintenance of the resident's safety and comfort, and observance of distress and
nutritional problems related to chronic conditions, varied intake, and vitamin deficiency with an intervention
for the RD to evaluate, monitor, and make recommendations.
On 2/11/25 at 9:22 AM, resident #15 was observed in her room lying in bed. She did not respond to
questions and her uneaten breakfast tray was observed on the bedside table.
On 2/11/25 at 3:43 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K said resident #15 required staff assistance to eat
her meals. The nurse said the resident was confused and was dependent on staff to make sure she ate
enough.
Review of the Weights and Vitals Summary noted the resident was weighed on 9/12/24, 10/02/24,
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 10 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
10/03/24, 10/04/24, and 11/07/24. In two months, the resident had a weight loss of 5.6 pounds. The
resident was not weighed again until 2/07/25, for three months and showed a weight loss of 18.8 pounds or
12.6%. Since the resident was admitted to the facility, she had a total weight loss of 24.4 pounds, or 15.8%,
over 5 months.
Residents Affected - Few
Active physician's orders included monthly weights.
The Nutrition Comprehensive Evaluation/Risk Screen dated 9/05/24 noted resident #15 had abnormal
nutrition related labs, other risk factors, a low Body Mass Index (BMI), and she was at nutritional risk. The
dietician recommended increased larger protein portions at breakfast to meet nutritional needs.
A Dietician progress note dated 2/12/25 showed resident #15 was re-evaluated for significant weight loss
over 90 days with recommendations to increase protein portions for all three meals.
In a joint interview with the DT, RD, and DON on 2/12/25 at 2:05 PM, the DT said she completed a
comprehensive nutritional assessment for resident #15 when she was admitted in September 2024 that
showed some nutritional risks, so she recommended additional protein intake at breakfast. She explained
the facility did not report any weight loss in the monthly reports she received until 2/07/25 and a
re-evaluation was completed on 2/12/25 for significant weight loss. The Dietary Technician explained,
resident #15's weight loss wasn't reported for three months because the medical record showed the
resident wasn't weighed and a re-evaluation would have been completed if the facility had reported it. She
checked the medical record and confirmed resident #15 triggered for weight loss and required another
assessment and possibly additional interventions.
On 2/12/25 at 2:15 PM, the DON said the facility's policy was to weigh all residents at least monthly by the
8th of every month, and more frequently when needed. She explained reports were generated monthly and
CNAs completed weights for all residents due, as directed by the DON. The DON said she could not explain
why there were no monthly resident weights completed between November 2024 and February 2025 and
stated, it's important to get weights to make sure they're not losing weight, to maintain nutrition and monitor
underlying medical conditions or comorbidities that may affect their health and well-being.
Review of the facilities standards and guidelines titled Weight Management and dated 3/22/19 noted all
residents were weighed at least every month, monitored by Dietary, and re-weights were obtained for any
gain or loss of 5 pounds from the previous weight.
3. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal
Disease (ESRD) with dependence on renal dialysis, chronic pain syndrome, secondary malignant
neoplasm of breast, gout, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and primary insomnia. The admission
Evaluation completed on 1/13/25 indicated the resident's initial weight was 00000 (not taken). This
evaluation also indicated the resident's skin had some redness but was intact without any skin breakdown,
and had no issues with her appetite.
Resident #34's care plan indicated she had a Stage IV pressure ulcer on her coccyx with interventions to
monitor nutritional status and obtain weekly skin checks, document, and notify Medical Doctor (MD) of any
changes in skin integrity (initiated 1/14/25). The Care Plan also indicated this resident had nutritional
problem related to cancer, dementia, dialysis, therapeutic diet, and varied oral intake with a goal of resident
tolerating diet and not having significant weight loss through review
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 11 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
date. One of the interventions was to provide and serve supplements as ordered (initiated 1/16/25).
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
The Nutrition Comprehensive Evaluation dated 1/16/25 indicated resident #34's food intake varied between
25-100% of meals and was inadequate to meet her needs which were estimated to be between 2400-2800
calories and 96-112 grams protein/day. The nutritional assessment indicated the resident did not have any
skin issues/ pressure ulcers which was obtained from the resident's nursing admission assessment. This
was in conflict with the care plan which indicated the stage IV pressure ulcer upon admission. The
assessment indicated her current body weight was 80.27 kilograms (kg) or 176.59 pounds (lbs.) from the
weight recorded during her recent hospital stay, the resident reported her appetite was diminished and she
was not interested in the food being served. A recommendation for one Nepro oral nutritional supplement
was made due to varied food intake and dialysis.
Residents Affected - Few
Resident #34's medical record revealed a physician order dated 1/14/25, which indicated nurses were to
complete a weekly skin observation every night shift on every Wednesday. The Weekly Skin Observation
nursing reports dated 1/16, 1/30, and 2/05/25 all indicated the resident had no old or new skin conditions.
On 2/11/25 at 9:23 AM, resident #34 stated she had a wound on her backside that hurt.
On 2/12/25 at 10:28 AM, the DTR stated the initial admission weight used by the facility for the nutritional
assessment was from a prior hospital admission because there was no initial weight obtained when
resident was admitted to the facility. She acknowledged that use of a weight measurement completed by
another facility was not best practice for assessments or for projected weight change in the future. The DTR
stated obtaining an initial weight at the facility was important. She stated she routinely emailed
recommendations to nursing to obtain initial weights if they were missing from a resident's record, but
confirmed she had not requested one for resident #34 to be weighed. The DTR verified she forgot to put in
the order for the nutrition supplement she had recommended, which she acknowledged was her
responsibility. She indicated her email to nursing should also have indicated the start of Nepro daily for
varied food intake on dialysis. The DTR confirmed that no food preferences were obtained to assist the
resident to improve her food intake through alternative meal choices and trying to mimic the meals the
resident normally liked to eat. At that time, the Regional Director of Clinical Services (Regional Nurse)
reviewed the resident's Head and Toe Initial Assessment which she confirmed did not contain an initial
weight upon admission.
On 2/14/25 at 9:30 AM, the Regional Nurse stated when nursing identified a weight loss or skin breakdown,
they would make the RD or DTR aware through emails. She added after the RD/DTR assessed a resident
and decided on supplements, they sent their recommendations to nursing via email. The RD/DTR would
keep that resident on their caseload and follow them until their issues were resolved. She added the
physician oversaw the RD/DTR recommendations and orders and decided whether they were appropriate
or not. The Regional Nurse was not able to provide email communication from nursing to the RD/DTR that
made them aware of skin breakdown for resident #34.
The RD/DTR Progress Note dated 2/13/25 reported resident #34's weight at 69.4 kg or 152.68 lbs., which
was a 23.91 lb. weight difference, and a 13% weight loss from her weight reported during the initial nutrition
assessment on 1/16/25, one month prior. This significant weight loss could not be verified as accurate since
the initial weight used was taken from a different facility's record, but it did reinforce the high risk nature of
this resident's nutritional status, and the importance for obtaining an initial weight for each resident upon
admission.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 12 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
The facility's policy entitled, Weight Management, dated 3/2/19 indicated all residents admitted to the facility
would be weighed upon admission and dietary staff would evaluate all weights each month. The policy
described the facility would attempt to obtain weights at the same time of the day, preferably in the morning,
and with the same scale to ensure accuracy and that the physician and resident or resident's representative
would be notified by the nurse of any significant unexpected or unplanned weight changes.
Residents Affected - Few
The facility's policy entitled, Food and Nutritional Services, dated 3/2/19 indicated the facility would ensure
facility staff supported the nutritional well-being of the residents while respecting their right to make choices
about his or her diet. In addition the facility would employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies
and skill sets to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services, taking into consideration resident
assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident
population in accordance with the facility assessment. A member of the Food and Nutrition Services staff
must also participate on the Interdisciplinary team.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 13 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0695
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide emergency equipment available for
accidental extubation for a resident on mechanical ventilation with a tracheostomy (trach) per nursing
standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tracheostomy, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#22).
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
Resident #22 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included
chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen), anoxic brain damage, dysphagia (trouble swallowing),
hypertensive heart disease, and tracheostomy status.
A tracheostomy (also called a tracheotomy) is an opening surgically created through the neck into the
trachea (windpipe) to allow air to fill the lungs. After creating the tracheostomy opening in the neck,
surgeons insert a tube through it to provide an airway and to remove secretions from the lungs. The person
with a tracheotomy breathes through the tracheostomy tube (trach tube or obturator) rather than through
the nose and mouth. An extubation (when the trach tube is displaced) creates an emergency that requires
an obturator be readily available and staff are knowledgeable to reinsert it, (retrieved on 2/16/25 from
www.hopkinsmedicine.org).
On 2/13/25 at 10:09 AM, resident #22 was observed in bed, calm, and awake with oxygen tubing
connected to the oxygen concentrator. The oxygen tubing and the suction tip which was bedside were
undated. A bag valve mask (BVM) or Ambu bag was in a clear plastic bag on the wall directly over the head
of the resident's bed, but there was no emergency trach kit in the clear plastic bag nor at the bedside. The
assigned Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G was in resident #22's room at that time and validated the
observations. LPN G stated it was the night shift nurses' responsibility to change and date the oxygen
tubing along with the suction tip but she did not know how often the tubing needed to be changed. LPN G
explained she thought the night shift set up the equipment. She explained she knew how to perform trach
care and suction the resident, but was unsure about what to do if there was an emergency and was
unaware of the need for an emergency trach kit at bedside. LPN G was unsure who was responsible for the
emergency trach supplies at bedside but felt it was possibly Central Supply.
A review of the resident #22's medical record revealed physician orders for trach care to be done every day
and as needed, oxygen mask tubing /humidifier mask to be changed every week, on night shift every
Friday. The physician's orders did not contain an order for emergency supplies including replacement
obturator needed for resident #22. A review of the resident's Care Plan identified the resident had a
tracheostomy but did not contain interventions for emergency supplies at bedside.
On 2/13/25 at approximately 10:45 AM, the Unit Manager (UM), Central Supply staff and a Regional Nurse
were in resident #22's room and verified there was no emergency trach kit at the bedside. The Central
Supply staff confirmed it was her responsibility to place the emergency trach kit at the bedside. The UM
confirmed that emergency trach supplies were supposed to be at bedside and said, this is not what is done
here, [she was] not sure what happened .
On 2/13/25 at 1:47 PM, the UM said she helped with the education of staff and participated in in-services
because the facility did not have a Staff Educator. She verified the importance of having the emergency kit
at bedside for residents with a tracheostomy and stated the assigned nurse LPN G
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 14 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0695
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
could get nervous at times but thought she knew what to do in an emergency. The UM explained that the
Director of Nursing (DON) was responsible for staff orientation after hire.
On 2/13/25 at 1:51 PM, LPN H said that she had worked with resident #22 and knew the importance of
having the emergency kit at bedside because, if [the tube] accidentally dislodged they can use items in kit
to replace the trach. She explained at least once a shift she should ensure that the emergency supplies
were at bedside.
On 2/13/25 at 2:16 PM, the DON who was working on the floor because of a nurse call out, explained the
training process for new staff nurses. She said upon hire; she would go over the facility's policy then place
the new nurse with a preceptor. She explained that new staff were oriented depending on how experienced
they were, she would get feedback from the preceptor and proceed accordingly. The preceptor was
responsible for showing the orientee most tasks and would have referred to her if they were not comfortable
with something. The DON stated she had a plan to do an in-service on trach care because one nurse
reached out to her specifically.
On 2/14/25 at 11:51 AM, the DON stated the expectation was for the nurses to have verified that resident
#22 had an emergency kit at the bedside in case of an accidental dislodgement.
The Facility's Policy and Procedure for Respiratory/ Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning revised 3/26/21
indicated, the facility will ensure that residents who need respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and
tracheal suctioning is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the
comprehensive person-centered care plan and resident goals and preferences.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 15 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0755
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a
licensed pharmacist.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain insulin medications timely for 1 of 26
residents reviewed for medication administration, of a total sample of 43 residents, (#93).
Findings:
Review of the medical record revealed resident #93, a [AGE] year old male was admitted to the facility from
an acute care hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified fall, generalized anxiety disorder,
dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), high blood pressure, gastrostomy (feeding tube) status, atrial fibrillation
(abnormal heart rhythm), encephalopathy (brain dysfunction), stroke, and diabetes mellitus.
The most recent Minimum Data Set 5-day Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/26/24
noted during the look-back periods, resident #93 had difficulty swallowing, required a feeding tube for
nutrition and hydration, received insulin injections for 7 out of 7 days, and high risk antipsychotic,
antianxiety, antidepressant, anticoagulant (blood thinner), opioid, hypoglycemic (blood sugar lowering), and
anticonvulsant (seizure) medications.
The Order Summary Report noted active physician's medication orders included Diabetisource AC enteral
(feeding tube) formula 60 milliliters per hour from 8:00 PM to 6:00 AM, Glargine Insulin 45 Units (U) twice
daily for diabetes, Lispro Insulin 4 U four times daily for diabetes, and Lispro Insulin, dosage per sliding
scale finger stick blood sugar results before meals for diabetes.
The Comprehensive Care Plan included focuses for diabetes mellitus with interventions for nurse
monitoring of blood glucose and risk of complications.
On 2/10/25 at 11:32 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E was observed obtaining a fingerstick blood
glucose level from resident #93. She said the resident required 2 U of Lispro insulin per physician's orders.
She checked the medication cart and said the resident didn't have any Lispro insulin. She then left to check
the facility's emergency medication kit. At 12:17 PM, LPN E explained the emergency kit did not contain
Lispro insulin. She said she called the physician who said none of the emergency medications on hand
could be used as an alternate, so an order was placed with the pharmacy for delivery expected later that
afternoon. LPN E said the physician wanted hourly fingersticks until the insulin arrived.
On 2/10/25 at 3:25 PM, LPN L said LPN E had left for the day and she received oncoming report for the
3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift. The nurse explained that LPN E had not mentioned resident #93 was out of
Lispro insulin and the afternoon pharmacy delivery had not arrived yet.
On 2/12/25 at 12:46 PM, the Unit Manager recalled on 2/10/25, LPN E asked her to assist with locating
Lispro insulin for resident #93 because he didn't have any, and there was none in the emergency kit. She
explained medication re-orders were a simple electronic process and nurses were expected to ensure
adequate insulin was available. She said nurses should have ordered the insulin when it was low before it
ran out. The Unit Manager conveyed resident's insulin was very important to keep on hand, especially for
brittle diabetics to ensure treatment interventions were available at the facility to avoid possible
re-hospitalization and stated, it must've not been ordered on time.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 16 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0755
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
On 2/14/25 at 10:13 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained she expected nurses to re-order
medications from the pharmacy before the supply was depleted to ensure timely delivery. She conveyed
insulin supplies were important to maintain so nurses could administer doses if needed to avoid possible
serious complications. The DON did not explain why resident #93's insulin supply was not ordered timely.
Review of the facility's standards and guidelines titled Reordering, Changing, and Discontinuing Medication
Orders dated 7/01/24 noted medication reorders could be made electronically, in writing, by phone, or
facsimile.
Review of the facility's standards and guidelines titled Medication Shortages/Unavailable Medications dated
8/01/24 noted when insufficient medication supplies were observed, nurses were expected to immediately
reorder from the pharmacy to ensure receipt by the next scheduled delivery and obtain it from the
Emergency Medication Supply and/or arrange for an emergency delivery.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 17 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0806
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Many
Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies,
intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food to accommodate residents'
preferences for 4 of 43 sampled residents, (#77, #403, #34, and #59).
Findings:
1. Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of right tibia fracture, muscle
weakness, major depressive disorder, and chronic lung disease. Her physician orders revealed a regular
diet was prescribed.
On 2/11/25 at 9:01 AM, resident #77 stated she was not going to eat her breakfast of a small donut and
sausage because she considered these foods to be unhealthy. She added she had been at the facility for
three months and was not aware she could request menu items for her meals. Resident #77 explained she
had just found out she could eat outside of her room after she had wandered around one morning about a
month after she had arrived. She stated no one had asked her what foods she liked to eat or what foods
she disliked.
On 2/12/25 at 11:16 AM, the Dietetic Technician, Registered (DTR) reviewed the nutrition assessment
completed for resident #77 on 1/02/25. The DTR confirmed the assessment indicated resident #77 was
eating well and met her nutritional needs. The assessment did not included any information about the
resident's food preferences. The DTR stated if there was not an issue with a resident's intake, she did not
discuss food preferences with the residents.
2. Resident #403 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of a crushing injury to his right hand, pain in right
hand, cellulitis of upper right extremity, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood.
His physician orders for February 2025 included a regular diet.
Review of the nutrition assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident #403's caloric needs were estimated at
2189-2975 calories/day.
On 2/11/25 at 9:30 AM, resident #403 stated he only got a sausage, a small donut, and a glass of juice and
milk for breakfast, and he was still hungry. He stated he had been at the facility about a week and a half and
he was not aware he could make food selections from the menu. Resident #403 added no one from the
staff had discussed his food preferences with him. Occupational Therapist (OT) M brought the resident a
2nd meal tray because he told her he wanted more food. OT M stated the tray she brought was a leftover,
untouched tray for another resident who had gone to the hospital. Resident #403 acknowledged the food
provided was cold, but stated he didn't care because he was hungry.
On 2/12/25 at 11:16 AM, the DTR confirmed resident #403's caloric needs were estimated at 2189-2975
calories/day and acknowledged his nutritional needs could be very difficult to meet when the menu
provided approximately 2000-2200 calories per day. She added snacks were available from the nursing
stations. The DTR stated the resident seemed fine with the food and confirmed she didn't discuss food
preferences with this resident. The DTR acknowledged the facility did not offer resident #403 large portions
or discuss options for the resident to fill out menus to better meet his hunger and nutritional needs.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 18 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0806
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
On 2/14/25 at 9:30 AM, the Regional Nurse stated they expected staff to check the resident's diet order and
go to kitchen to get a resident fresh, warm food according to their diet order, if they asked for more food.
The DON and the DTR were in agreement, and the DTR added that serving a leftover tray to another
resident was not acceptable. The DON stated she would have stopped the staff and told them to get fresh
food from the kitchen because any food that was out, could have been touched by someone else.
Residents Affected - Many
3. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal
Disease (ESRD) with dependence on renal dialysis, chronic pain syndrome, secondary malignant
neoplasm of the breast, gout, depression, anxiety, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and primary
insomnia. The physician orders for for February 2025 indicated resident #34 was on a Renal diet.
Review of the Nutrition Comprehensive Evaluation dated 1/16/25 revealed resident #34's food intake varied
between 25-100% of meals and was inadequate to meet her needs which were estimated to be between
2400-2800 calories and 96-112 grams protein /day.
On 2/11/25 at 9:23 AM, resident #34, acknowledged she had been at the facility about 4 weeks, and stated
she didn't like the food. She explained she had asked her aide to be able to select her meals herself but
was never given a menu to do so.
On 2/12/25 at 11:16 AM, the DTR reviewed the nutrition assessment for resident #34 dated 1/16/25. She
acknowledged the assessment indicated the resident was not meeting her nutritional needs, her appetite
was diminished, and she was not interested in the food served at the facility, but agreed to receive the
nutrition supplement, Nepro. The DTR verified there was no indication food preferences were discussed or
an attempt to try to provide foods the resident liked to eat. The DTR confirmed the Nepro supplement had
not been ordered for the resident which she said was her error. The DTR added she believed someone on
the nursing staff explained the option to fill out menus to the residents, but she was not sure who did it.
On 2/12/25 at 9:55 AM, the Dietary Services Manager stated when residents got admitted to the facility, he
visited them to get their food preferences and let them know they could get menus from the nursing station
or their Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to select their meals. He added that the DTR or the Registered
Dietitian (RD) also then met with residents when they assessed their nutritional status and would
communicate any additional preferences to him through email. The Dietary Services Manager checked his
computer for residents #77, #403, and #34 and found no preferences, no dislikes, and no documentation
that the residents were spoken with about their food requests.
On 2/11/25 at 9:08 AM, CNA D stated the 3 PM-11 PM shift CNA's gave menus to residents when they
asked for one and put extra menus by the nursing station. She added new CNA's were trained to tell new
residents there were menus available when they got admitted .
On 2/12/25 at 5:11 PM, CNA C stated when a resident was first admitted , the CNA's explained there were
menus for selecting lunch and dinner meals, but menus were not passed to residents who were on pureed,
mechanical soft, or renal diets. She pointed out a couple of specific residents who received menus to fill out
for the next day. She acknowledged that sometimes residents may be overwhelmed when they were first
admitted , and she acknowledged it might be helpful if the information was repeated to them.
4. Resident #59 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia,
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 19 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0806
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Many
pneumonia, unspecified intracranial injury, type II diabetes mellitus, protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic
pain, muscle weakness, and major depressive disorder. Review of physician orders for February 2025
indicated she was ordered a regular diet.
Resident #59's Comprehensive Nutrition assessment dated [DATE] indicated she had a low Body Mass
Index (BMI) of 21.3, had significant weight loss in the recent past and ate her meals independently with
set-up. The assessment revealed the resident stated she was sometimes hungry between meals and
desired beneficial weight gain. The document described the resident agreed to some large portions and her
preferences were discussed.
On 2/10/25 at 5:49 PM, CNA A delivered resident #59's dinner tray into her room, set it down and indicated
to the resident the meal was there, and left the room. The resident opened the lid from her food plate and
realized what she received was not what she had ordered, which was corroborated by her menu. A few
minutes later CNA A stated staff were supposed to check the resident's menu ticket to ensure they actually
received what was on the ticket when they delivered the meals. She added she just dropped the tray off to
this resident because she knew the resident could set up her own tray and she figured the resident would
ask if something was missing. She then acknowledged she left the resident's room so quickly, the resident
hadn't had a chance to look at her meal or request what food items she hadn't received on her ticket.
On 2/12/25 at 10:28 AM, the Director Of Nursing (DON) stated when CNA's delivered meal trays to
residents, she expected them to sanitize their hands prior to getting their meal, to ensure the meal tickets
matched the resident's name and food items on their tray, and the tray included the utensils and drinks
listed on the ticket.
The facility's policy entitled, Food and Nutritional Services dated 3/02/19, indicated the facility would
provide a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met the daily nutritional and special dietary needs of
the residents, taking into consideration their preferences. The document continued that the facility employed
sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the function of food and nutrition
service.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 20 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0812
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Many
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve
food in accordance with professional standards.
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to serve food items in accordance with professional
standards for food service safety. Specifically, potentially hazardous food items were held and served while
in the temperature danger zone having the potential to affect 95 of the 98 residents at the facility.
Findings:
On 2/12/25 at 4:40 PM, the dinner tray line was in process when tuna salad sandwiches were noted to be
stacked in a full, deep sheet pan sitting in one of the wells of the steam table being used to plate hot
entrees. The heating element for the steamtable well which held the sandwiches along with the well directly
adjacent to it, were turned off but were warm to the touch as heat radiated from the other heated wells
further down on the table. The Dietary Services Regional Manager took the temperatures of the
sandwiches which recorded at 50 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The evening (PM) cook removed the tuna
sandwiches from the tray line and put them in the freezer to re-chill. The Regional Manager removed a 2nd
deep full-size steamtable pan of tuna salad sandwiches from the freezer and measured the temperature of
random sandwiches, which was found to be 46.7 degrees F, in the danger zone for potentially hazardous
foods. The Regional Manager put the 2nd steamtable pan of sandwiches back into the freezer and told the
cook and kitchen staff that the tray line should stop and was not able to continue until the sandwiches were
cooled to a safe serving temperature of at least 41 degrees F. The PM cook stated the pan of sandwiches
were usually on a bed of ice in the steamtable wells, but the ice machine was not producing ice at that time,
so no ice was available for the tray line. A few minutes later, the Dietary Service Manager provided the
temperature log that contained the pre-tray line temperatures of foods from the tray line. The cook stated
she had taken the temperatures approximately 20 minutes earlier, at the start of tray line, and the sandwich
temperature was recorded at that time as 38 degrees F.
The Dietary Services Manager stated he did not have an explanation for how sandwiches whose
temperature was recorded at 38 degrees F twenty minutes prior then placed in the freezer had actually
warmed to 46.7 degrees F. He stated at approximately 2:30 PM, he talked with the PM cook while she
prepared the sandwiches and he witnessed her put the sandwiches in the freezer around that time.
On 2/13/25 at 12:10 PM, the Dietary Services Regional Manager stated it was common at facilities to put
cold sandwiches into the freezer to chill them quickly then move them into a refrigerator when they were at
a safe temperature. He acknowledged the sandwiches that tested 46.7 degrees F in the freezer, must not
have been placed there long enough to be chilled, and were not at a safe temperature to be served.
The facility's Food and Nutrition Services policy dated 3/02/19 detailed the facility would store, prepare,
distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 21 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0847
Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the binding arbitration agreement
explicitly granted the resident or their representative the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar
days of signing it for 18 of 102 current residents who signed arbitration agreements.
Residents Affected - Many
Findings:
Review of the log provided by the facility revealed 18 of the current 102 residents signed the facility's
arbitration agreement.
On 2/13/25 at 1:59 PM, the Internal Admissions staff person verified she completed most of the admission
packets with residents or their representatives within 48 hours of admission. She stated she usually read
the Voluntary Binging Arbitration Agreement to the resident or their representative. She confirmed the
agreement was not a requirement for admission. She explained the resident or their representative could
change their mind after signing but was not sure of the time frame. The Internal Admissions staff person
reviewed the arbitration agreement and confirmed it gave the resident or their representative 30 calendars
of the resident's date of admission to rescind the agreement, not from the date of signature.
Review of the facility's Voluntary Binding Arbitration Agreement revealed the document was voluntary and
was not a requirement for admission. The document defined the parameters of an arbitration and indicated
the document could be rescinded within 30 days of the resident's date of admission to the facility.
On 2/13/25 at 2:03 PM, the Regional [NAME] President of Operations reviewed the right to change your
mind clause in the Voluntary Binding Arbitration Agreement. She acknowledged the wording did not
explicitly grant the resident/resident representative 30 days from the date of signing to rescind the
agreement. The Regional [NAME] President of Operations agreed the resident/resident representative
would not have 30 days from date of signature to rescind the agreement if it differed from the date of
admission, but stated she did not think any residents had been affected since no one had requested to
rescind the agreement.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 22 of 23
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avante at Melbourne Inc
1420 South Oak Street
Melbourne, FL 32901
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0865
Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain records, monitor, and effectively
conduct Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI)/Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAA)
activities which could affect facility wide processes impacting quality of care and quality of life for all
residents.
Residents Affected - Many
Findings:
On 2/14/25 at 8:43 AM, in a joint interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Regional Director of
Clinical Services, the Director said she initiated a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) approximately one
month prior for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). She stated in regards to
resident PASARRs, I would say maybe 25% have been looked at and some were redone. She said she had
to locate the documentation and audits to clarify.
On 2/14/25 at 10:08 AM, the Regional Director of Clinical Services explained she was unable to locate any
records for the PIPs and stated, they're not on record and not organized.
On 2/14/25 at 11:59 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) said she had been the NHA since 1/14/25.
She explained she had conducted QAPI meetings on 1/14/25 and 1/16/25. She explained the last meeting
included discussions concerning regulatory compliance and survey management. She said she initiated a
PIP for facility wide environmental concerns and maintenance repairs. The NHA checked previous records
that showed a QAPI meeting was conducted in December 2024 with notes that PIPs were implemented for
facility issues with infection control, respiratory/tracheostomy care, and PASARR. A handwritten log was
observed in the binder that noted the titles of PIPs she verbalized. No reports or documents related to the
PIPs aside from the environmental/maintenance plans were located in the NHA's QAPI records. The NHA
was unable to locate any records for clinical PIPs and said she could not speak to what occurred before
she took over. The NHA stated, there are no records for clinical; QAPI is in place to monitor, analyze, and
correct problems so residents get the care and services they need and have the right to.
Review of the Quality Assurance Meeting minutes dated 1/14/25 provided by the NHA noted there were no
QAA Committee recommendations, and read, Plan implemented based on recommendations: N/A
Review of the facility's standards and guidelines titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement
and dated 3/2/19 read, The facility will: 1. Maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of it's ongoing
QAPI program that meets the requirements of this section. This may include but is not limited to systems
and reports demonstrating systematic identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of
adverse events, and documentation demonstrating the development, implementation, and evaluation of
corrective actions or performance improvement activities . 3. Present documentation and evidence of it's
ongoing QAPI program's implementation and the facility's compliance with the requirements to a State
Survey Agency, Federal Surveyor, or CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) upon request.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105671
If continuation sheet
Page 23 of 23