F 0641
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS)
assessments were accurate related to special treatments, procedures and programs for 3 of 3 residents
reviewed for accuracy of assessments, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#4, #8 and #46).
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, chronic respiratory
failure with hypoxia, and tracheostomy status.
Review of the MDS quarterly assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) 2/21/25 revealed resident
#4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated she was cognitively intact.
The assessment indicated resident #4 received tracheostomy (a hole in the throat for breathing) care and
dialysis.
On 5/06/25 at 11:53 AM, resident #4 was reclined in bed with the head of the bed elevated. Resident #4
stated she did not go to dialysis. Resident #4 clarified she did not receive dialysis and had never received
dialysis.
2. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including nontraumatic brain bleed,
acute respiratory failure with low oxygen and encounter for attention to tracheostomy.
Review of the MDS quarterly assessment with ARD 1/25/25 revealed resident #8 had long-term and
short-term memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The
assessment indicated resident #8 received tracheostomy care and had an invasive mechanical ventilator
for breathing.
On 5/06/25 at 10:25 AM, resident #8 was reclined in bed with the head of the bed slightly elevated.
Tracheostomy tubing was in place. No ventilator tubing or equipment for a mechanical ventilator was seen
in the room.
On 5/07/25 at 10:28 AM, in resident #8's room, the MDS Coordinator and the A Wing Unit Manager verified
resident #8 had a tracheostomy but did not use a ventilator for breathing.
3. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bladder inflammation
with blood in the urine.
Review of the MDS admission assessment with ARD 3/28/25 revealed resident #46 had a BIMS score of
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
105706
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105706
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Vivo Healthcare West Orange
1556 Maguire Rd
Ocoee, FL 34761
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
14/15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated resident #46 received dialysis.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
On 5/05/25 at 11:29 AM, resident #46 was lying in his bed in his room. Resident #46 in response to what
days he went to dialysis, stated he did not go to dialysis at all. He clarified he had never been on dialysis.
Residents Affected - Few
On 5/07/25 at 10:32 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated she was the head of the MDS department. She
reviewed the medical records for residents #4, #8 and #46. The MDS Coordinator compared each
resident's diagnoses and care plans to the identified MDS assessment for each resident. She verified each
MDS assessment was coded incorrectly. She was unable to explain why they were coded incorrectly. The
MDS Coordinator explained the other MDS staff person completed those assessments. The MDS
Coordinator stated the other MDS staff was not at the facility to explain why they MDS was coded
incorrectly, and did not know when she would return. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged each resident's
assessment should accurately reflect their status at the time of the assessment.
The facility policy and procedure for Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment implemented 10/01/22
indicated the purpose of the policy was to ensure all residents received an accurate assessment. The form
defined accuracy of assessment meant that appropriate health care professionals correctly documented
the resident's medical, functional and psychosocial problems. The form read, Each individual who
completes a portion of the assessment will sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105706
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105706
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Vivo Healthcare West Orange
1556 Maguire Rd
Ocoee, FL 34761
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0921
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and
the public.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment by failing to
replace a cracked bedside floor mat for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for environmental concerns, of a total of
40 sampled residents, (#70).
Findings:
Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a history of falling, abnormal posture, unspecified
lack of coordination.
Review of resident #70's care plan with revision date of 7/11/23, indicated he was at risk for falls related to
deconditioning, weakness, and having a history of a fracture. Interventions included fall mats at bedside,
dated 12/30/24.
On 5/05/25 at 3:23 PM, resident #70 was lying in bed, a beside fall mat was on the floor. The surface was
cracked and split along its entire length which revealed the layer underneath the surface.
On 5/06/25 at 8:40 AM, the beside fall mat was observed on the floor at the side of resident #70's bed. The
surface remained cracked and split along its entire length which revealed the layer underneath the surface.
On 5/06/25 at 3:25 PM, the Director of Maintenance confirmed the cracked surface of the fall mat on the
floor next to resident #70's bed. The Director of Maintenance explained nursing staff was responsible to
change out any fall mats in use by residents that were in disrepair.
On 5/06/25 at 3:30 PM, the B side Unit Manager agreed resident #70's bedside fall mat had a cracked
surface along its length which exposed the interior of the mat. The B side Unit Manager confirmed the mat
was old, and referred to it as the older version. She verified a new beside fall mat had not been obtained
from central supply nor had a service request been entered into the electronic maintenance service request
system for a new mat. She acknowledged because the surface of the mat was cracked and split it could not
be cleaned properly.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105706
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3