F 0640
Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was
transmitted within the required 7 day time frame for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for assessments of a total
sample of 46 residents, (#2).
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
Review of resident #2's medical record documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was
transferred to the hospital 11/04/21. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated MDS assessment dated
[DATE] revealed the assessment was completed but not transmitted to the National MDS database at
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
On 04/20/22 at 9:38 AM, MDS Supervisor D stated resident #2's MDS assessment had been completed
but was not transmitted to CMS within the required 7 days. She said the assessment should have been
transmitted to CMS on 11/11/21, it was our error.
According to CMS.gov, The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical
assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a
comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps the nursing home staff
identify health problems.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 8
Event ID:
105731
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/21/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Commons at Orlando Lutheran Towers
210 Lake Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0694
Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for midline
Intravenous (IV) catheters according to standards of practice and plan of care for 2 of 3 residents reviewed
for IV catheters of a total sample of 46 residents, (#59 and #67).
Residents Affected - Some
Findings:
1. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently re-admitted on [DATE] from an
acute care hospital. His diagnoses included acquired end stage renal disease, lymphedema, history of
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infection, diabetes mellitus and diabetic peripheral angiopathy.
Review of the Minimum Data Set Five-day assessment with assessment reference date [DATE] revealed
resident #59 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 which indicated he was cognitively intact.
Additionally, the assessment revealed the resident did not reject care from staff and received dialysis.
On [DATE] at 10:05 AM, resident #59 was seated in his wheelchair waiting for transportation to dialysis. A
midline IV catheter was visible to his right upper arm. The clear adhesive dressing was not dated and
unlabeled, with a piece of clear tape across the bottom holding the dressing down. The resident stated he
had not received any medications in the IV for about a week and he didn't know why he still had the midline.
His right hand was swollen, and the resident explained it had been like that for about a week.
A midline catheter is put into a vein by the bend in your elbow or your upper arm . The midline tube ends in
a vein below your armpit .midline catheter may allow you to receive long-term IV medicine or treatments
.(retrieved [DATE] www.drugs.com).
On [DATE] at 4:37 PM, resident #59 was awake and alert, sitting up in bed. He had the midline IV in his
right upper arm with the clear dressing that was undated and unlabeled with clear tape on the bottom edge
of the dressing. There was dark brown blood in the tubing. He explained the doctor told him the IV should
be removed since it was not being used, and said, No one has done it.
On [DATE] at 12:11 PM, resident #59's wife was at the bedside. He had the same midline IV catheter in his
right arm with the clear dressing undated and dried blood still in the tubing. The resident reported the nurse
hadn't looked at his IV at all today, and no one had changed the dressing for a while. Resident #59's wife
stated she asked staff last week why he still had the IV, but they never gave her an answer.
On [DATE] at 12:16 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) acknowledged the resident's unlabeled
and undated midline IV catheter with the dark brown blood in the tubing underneath the dressing. She
indicated the dressing should have been dated and initialed by the nurse and that nurses were responsible
to assess the IV catheter site every shift. The ADON reviewed resident's physician orders and stated there
were no active orders for midline IV. She conveyed there were no orders for flushes, dressing changes, or
assessments. She noted resident #59's midline IV catheter was inserted at the beginning of April and the
nurse who entered the order for the midline did not enter any orders for the care of the midline IV. The
ADON explained orders to assess the midline catheter and IV site
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105731
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/21/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Commons at Orlando Lutheran Towers
210 Lake Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0694
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
and dressing changes would normally be a part of the care nurses provided for a midline IV. She said the
resident had orders for IV antibiotics and flushes but those orders expired after antibiotic therapy was
completed. The ADON indicated the protocol was for the nurse to ask the physician for orders to
discontinue the IV when the IV antibiotic medications were completed. She said if the IV was to be left in
place, orders would be given for flushes, dressing changes and assessments. The ADON acknowledged
midline IV catheters were an infection risk, especially for someone who received hemodialysis. They ADON
confirmed there was no documentation in the resident's medical record to indicate the midline catheter
dressing was changed or assessed since it was inserted on [DATE].
Review of resident'#59's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an order completed for Have
midline inserted every evening shift until [DATE] 23:59 which started on [DATE] at 3:00 PM. The MAR
showed orders for antibiotic and flushes which the resident received via midline IV catheter on [DATE]
through [DATE]. There were no other orders documented by nurses in April for midline IV catheter care
including dressing changes, or for nurses to assess the midline catheter for infection or complications.
Resident #59 had a care plan for intravenous lines, Receiving IV therapy and at risk for complications,the
type of IV access was left blank. The goal was for resident #59's IV line to remain patent and have no
complications. Interventions for resident #59's IV line were for staff to administer fluids as ordered, educate
resident and family about central line associated bloodstream infection prevention, explain purpose of IV
and procedure prior to start, observe for complications, dislodgment of IV catheter, swelling, redness, pain,
separation of IV lines, shortness of breath, drainage or soiled IV dressing, phlebitis, infiltration, or bleeding.
Further interventions included Provide IV site care as ordered.
Review of the Nurse Progress Notes revealed no documentation of midline IV catheter dressing changes or
assessments from the date the midline catheter was inserted on [DATE] until the line was discontinued on
[DATE].
On [DATE] at 11:37 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN) C said she had cared for resident #59 on the
previous Monday and Tuesday shifts. She stated she knew to check the IV catheter based on the report she
received from the previous nurse or based on the orders in the computer. She confirmed standard orders
for midline IV catheters included flushes, and assessment of the IV catheter site usually every shift. LPN C
explained when the IV medications were complete, she knew to call the physician and ask if midline was to
be discontinued. She indicated she did not get report on the previous Monday or Tuesday about the IV
catheter from the previous shift and there were no orders in the electronic record for the care of the IV. She
that if the resident had an IV, that should be communicated by the nurses in the shift change report. She
stated, That is something you would tell the next nurse, part of the information you would give and expect to
get.
On [DATE] at 12:04 PM, LPN D said she usually cared for resident #59 on her assignment. She reported he
had the midline catheter inserted at the beginning of April to receive IV antibiotics for a urinary tract
infection. LPN D explained she thought midline IV catheter dressings should be changed every seven days
and the dressing needed to be labeled with a date and initialed. LPN D recalled the past Sunday that
resident #59 still had the IV so she told the night nurse during report to call the doctor and get order to
discontinue the IV but did not explain why she did not call the physician herself. LPN D noted the night
nurse did not do it. LPN D stated the nurse should know to call the physician and get the IV discontinued
when the IV medication order was completed.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105731
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/21/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Commons at Orlando Lutheran Towers
210 Lake Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0694
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
On [DATE] at 10:50 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the nurse should put in the orders for care of
the midline IV catheter when it was inserted. She said for a clear dressing on a midline IV catheter such as
resident #59's, the standard of care was to change the dressing every five to seven days or more often as
needed. She conveyed a midline catheter was supposed to be flushed at least daily if no meds were going
through it, and nurses should assess the site every shift for problems with the IV or the dressing. The DON
explained if the nurse found a problem with the midline IV catheter such as patency, they would call the
contracted IV team to come in and assess the line. She explained nurses should not use tape to hold down
the IV dressing, instead the dressing should be changed, dated, initialed and documented in the medical
record. She acknowledged that while the IV was not being used for medications, it would still need care
from nurses such as flushing the line, changing the dressing, and assessing the IV for signs and symptoms
of infection or other complications. She explained the IV team came on the evening of [DATE] to see
resident #59's midline IV catheter once it had been brought to their attention by the surveyor. She stated
the IV team was not able to salvage resident #5''s midline IV catheter because of dried blood in the line.
Review of the Insertion of Peripheral IV Catheter dated 4/17 revealed general guidelines to, change
dressing and perform site care if dressing becomes soiled, is no longer intact. The guidelines indicated the
label on the dressing should include the date and time of dressing placement, initials, gauge size and
length of catheter. The document directed that the IV catheter should be removed when there is suspected
contamination, complication or when therapy is discontinued.
Review of the document, Flushing Midline and Central Line IV Catheters dated 4/17 revealed the general
guideline that midline IV catheters will be flushed at regular intervals to maintain patency.
Review of the document Midline Dressing Changes dated 4/17 revealed general guidelines to change
midline catheter dressing every five to seven days or more often it is wet, dirty, not intact or compromised in
any way using sterile technique. The document also instructed staff to record the date and time the
dressing was changed in the resident's medical record along with the signature and title of the person
recording the data.
2. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses including
recent sepsis, acute stress reaction and brain abscess. She had a Midline IV line inserted [DATE] in the
right arm for administration of IV antibiotics and the line was re-inserted in the same location on [DATE] as
it was not functioning properly. She received Merrem (IV antibiotic) every 6 hours for brain abscess through
[DATE]. There was a prior order dated [DATE] to discontinue PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter)
line but no new orders were entered post Midline IV insertion [DATE] or [DATE] regarding new IV type and
care. There were prior orders in effect dated [DATE] for catheter site dressing changes every week and as
needed that were not specific to the type of IV present nor the location.
On [DATE] at 10:35 AM, resident #67 was observed sitting up in wheelchair at the bedside. She had a
gauze dressing with transparent dressing over the right upper arm midline IV site. There was no visible date
noted on the IV dressing. The resident was alert and oriented to person and place. She said, I was
receiving IV antibiotics for brain infection.
On [DATE] at 9:35 AM, resident #67 was observed sitting up in wheelchair and the midline IV in her right
upper arm appeared same as yesterday's observation. There was no date on gauze dressing and the IV
insertion site could not be visualized due to the presence of gauze.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105731
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/21/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Commons at Orlando Lutheran Towers
210 Lake Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0694
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
On [DATE] at 10:15 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) B was in the resident's room and observed the residents's
midline dressing on right upper arm without a date. RN B validated observation of gauze dressing present
without date and stated, when gauze is present dressing should be changed at minimum every 2 days.
On [DATE] at 10:25 AM, the Unit Manager (UM) stated the resident had a midline inserted in her right arm
on [DATE] and due to complications, she had another visit by the IV team on [DATE]. The UM added, the IV
team would have applied new dressing on [DATE]. The UM indicated she could not find any evidence in the
medical record to show the nurses changed IV site since [DATE]. The UM said she thought that if gauze
was present then the IV site dressing needed to be changed every 2-3 days.
On [DATE] at 10:45 AM the UM provided the facility policy for Midline Dressing Changes and validated the
policy was to change dressing every 2 days/48 hours if gauze present. The UM added, the reason an IV
site should be changed at least every 2 days as there was increased risk of infection due to moisture when
gauze was present
On [DATE] at 10:57 AM, the DON said the standard of practice was for nurses was to change gauze
dressing every 48 hours and transparent film dressing every 5-7 days. The DON added, the nurses should
have changed it 24 hours after the initial insertion and re-insertion of IV because there could be blood on
the gauze which could lead to increased risk infection if not removed.
According to the facility Midline Dressing Changes policy dated [DATE], Change midline catheter dressing
24 hours after insertion if placed with gauze .Use a sterile, transparent, semi-permeable membrane (TSM)
or gauze dressing. If gauze dressing is used cover with a TSM dressing and change the dressing every 48
hours .
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105731
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/21/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Commons at Orlando Lutheran Towers
210 Lake Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0695
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory therapy was administered
as per physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen (O2) therapy of a total sample of 46
residents, (#29).
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia, Parkinson's
disease, morbid obesity, and dependence on supplemental oxygen.
Review of the resident's physician orders revealed an active order dated 2/28/22 for oxygen via nasal
canula (n/c) at 2 liters/minute.
On 4/19/22 at 1:43 PM, resident #29 was observed lying in bed without oxygen nasal canula nor any
oxygen at the bedside.
On 4/19/22 at 3:15, the Unit Manager (UM) acknowledged resident #29 was not receiving oxygen and the
oxygen concentrator was across the room against the wall. She stated the oxygen was ordered as needed
(PRN) and the concentrator was in the room in case the resident needed it. The UM reviewed the physician
orders and acknowledged resident #29 should have been on oxygen at 2 liters via n/c continuously. She
stated the resident was on hospice and continued to review the chart for a hospice order for prn oxygen .
The UM was only able to find documentation in the hospice care plans and comprehensive assessment
which indicated the resident was on 2 liters of oxygen prn. She stated, no, these are not orders.
On 4/19/22 at 3:50 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed resident #29's physician orders and
reported an order dated 2/28/22 for oxygen at 2 liters n/c continuous. The DON stated the nurse probably
forgot to add the continuous when the oxygen orders were ordered.
Review of resident #29's care plans revealed a care plan for altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing
related to shortness of breath. The goal noted the resident would not experience complication related to
shortness of breath with an intervention to administer oxygen at 2 liters as ordered.
Review of the Treatment Administration Record for April 2022, revealed an order for Oxygen via n/c at 2
liters/min every shift. The start date was 2/28/22, which the nurses signed every shift as being
administered.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105731
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/21/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Commons at Orlando Lutheran Towers
210 Lake Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0759
Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent medication administration error rate of
5% or greater for 2 of 8 residents sampled for medication administration, (#279 and #84). There were 2
medication errors in 27 opportunities for a medication error rate of 7.41%.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
1. On 4/18/22 at 9:17 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A prepared resident #279's scheduled
medications. He removed 1 tablet Multivitamin (MTV) with Mineral from the cart stock medication bottle and
placed it in a pill cup with the resident's other oral medications. He then proceeded to administer the
medications to the resident who was in her room.
Review of the medical record for resident #279 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A
current physician order dated 4/14/22 was for MTV give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement.
The order did not include Mineral to be given with MTV.
On 4/18/22 at 11 AM, LPN A in the presence of the 7th floor Unit Manager (UM) showed his medication
cart drawer only contained MTV with Mineral and no plain MTV. The UM acknowledged LPN A made a
mediation error by giving the cart stock MTV that also contained mineral as the order was for plain MTV.
LPN A indicated he was not aware there was difference between plain MTV and MTV with Mineral.
2. On 4/18/22 at 11:25 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) B was observed checking resident #84's blood sugar
which was 312. RN B stated, since the resident's blood sugar is over 100 he can have insulin. RN B
proceeded to prepare the insulin pen Admelog SoloStar 100 units/milliliter (ml) and dialed the dose to 10
units. RN B then administered 10 units of insulin subcutaneous (SQ) into the resident's left abdomen.
Admelog is a fast-acting mealtime insulin that works to control blood sugar when you eat.
(https://www.admelog.com)
Review of the medical record for resident #84 revealed he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with
diagnosis including diabetes mellitus (DM) type 1. A current physician order dated 2/11/22 was for Admelog
SoloStar Solution Pen-Injector 100 units/ml SQ one time a day at 1 PM for DM without complications.
On 4/18/22 at 1:04 PM, the 7th floor UM reviewed resident #84's physician orders and stated, I do not know
why the nurse gave 10 units prior to lunch as he is supposed to get 14 units of insulin after lunch at 1 PM.
The UM validated the nurse gave the wrong dose of insulin at the wrong time.
On 4/18/22 at 1:46 PM, RN B stated, I got confused because they just recently changed his insulin orders
and we usually give insulin prior to meals not after. The UM added, the nurses should check the orders in
the electronic medical record (EMR) and if not clear then double check the paper chart.
On 4/21/22 at 10:50 AM, the Director of Nursing acknowledged the 2 medication errors regarding resident
#279 and #84. She indicated the facility had plain MTV and MTV with Minerals on hand for medication cart
stock and that nurses needed to triple check their medications to avoid errors.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105731
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/21/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Commons at Orlando Lutheran Towers
210 Lake Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0759
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Review of the facility's policy and procedures for Medication Administration General Guidelines revised
April 2018 read, Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles
and practice Five Rights- Right resident, right drug, right dose, right route and right time Medications are
administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber Medications are administered within 60
minutes of scheduled time, except before, with or after meals orders, which are administered based on
mealtimes
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105731
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 8