Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ORANGE CITY NURSING AND REHAB CENTERCMS #1057351 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

105735 09/02/2021 Orange City Nursing and Rehab Center 2810 Enterprise Rd Debary, FL 32713
F 0641 Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for six (Resident #17, #28, #33, #38, #65 and #191) of six residents sampled for nutritional status, from a total of 26 residents in the sample. Inaccurate assessments leave residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services to ensure their highest practicable functional level and mental or psychosocial well-being. Residents Affected - Few The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 3/13/21, with a primary diagnosis of Metabolic Encephalopathy. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section K (Swallowing/Nutritional Status) was signed as completed by the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and Resident #17 was coded as being on a physician prescribed weight gain regimen. (Copy obtained) A review of Resident #17's physician orders revealed, she was on a regular diet with regular texture, 30 ml house stock protein supplement three times a day, and a nutritional treat one time a day. However, there was no active order for a physician prescribed weight-gain regimen. During an interview with the CDM on 09/02/2021 at 11:07 AM, he was asked about his process for evaluating the residents and completing the MDS. The CDM stated, he takes the information from the dietician and inputs it into the system. He goes by the recommendations of the dietician. When completing Section K of the MDS, he looks for the resident's diagnoses, along with the recommendations and answers the questions to the best of his abilities. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 10/28/17, with a primary diagnosis of acute and chronic respiratory failure. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section K was signed as completed by the CDM and Resident #28 was coded as being on a physician prescribed weight gain regimen. (Copy obtained) A review of Resident #28's physician orders revealed a fortified diet. However, there was no active order for a physician prescribed weight-gain regimen or a physician prescribed weight loss regimen. Resident #28 has a documented height of 73 inches and a weight of 235 pounds, with a body mass index (BMI) of 31, which according to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) falls into the obesity range (BMI greater than 30). 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 1/22/19 and re-admit date of 7/5/19, with diagnoses of pressure ulcer of the sacrum, obesity, and heart failure. A Page 1 of 3 105735 105735 09/02/2021 Orange City Nursing and Rehab Center 2810 Enterprise Rd Debary, FL 32713
F 0641 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section K was signed as completed by the CDM and Resident #33 was coded as being on a physician prescribed weight gain regimen. Further review of section K revealed resident was marked under Weight gain of 5% or more in the past 30 days or 10% or more in the past 6 months. (Copy obtained) Residents Affected - Few Resident #33 has a documented height of 70 inches and weight of 207 pounds, with a BMI of 31.5. Review of Resident #33's current physician orders revealed no prescribed weight gain regimen. 4. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 10/16/17 and re-admit date of 4/1/18, with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, bilateral above the knee amputations, and major depressive disorder. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section K was signed as completed by the CDM and Resident #38 was coded as being on a physician prescribed weight gain regimen. Further review of section K revealed resident was marked under Weight gain of 5% or more in the past 30 days or 10% or more in the past 6 months. (Copy obtained) Resident #38 has a documented height of 61 inches and weight of 184 pounds, with a BMI of 34.8. Review of Resident #38's current physician orders revealed no prescribed weight gain regimen. 5. Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 11/4/20, with diagnoses of dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dementia. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section K was signed as completed by the CDM and Resident #65 was coded as being on a physician prescribed weight gain regimen. Further review of section K revealed resident was marked under Weight gain of 5% or more in the past 30 days or 10% or more in the past 6 months. (Copy obtained) Resident #65 has a documented height of 64 inches and weight of 174 pounds, with a BMI of 29.9, which according to the CDC falls into the overweight range (BMI 25.0 to <30). Review of Resident #65's current physician orders revealed no prescribed weight gain regimen. 6. Review of medical record for Resident #191 revealed an admission date of 2/6/21, with diagnoses of gastro-intestinal bleed, acute kidney failure, and dementia. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section K was signed as completed by the CDM and Resident #191 was coded as being on a physician prescribed weight gain regimen. Further review of section K revealed resident was marked under Weight gain of 5% or more in the past 30 days or 10% or more in the past 6 months. (Copy obtained) Resident #191 has a documented height of 62 inches and weight of 196 pounds, with a BMI of 35.8. Review of Resident #191's current physician orders revealed no prescribed weight gain regimen. During an interview with the Registered Dietetic Technician (DTR) on 9/2/21 at 11:07 AM, he confirmed that Residents #17, #28, #33, #38, #65 and #191 were not on a physician prescribed weight gain regimen and the MDS assessment for each resident had been miscoded. During an interview with the MDS Coordinator on 9/2/21 at 11:50 AM, she confirmed the MDS assessments had been miscoded for Residents #17, #28, #33, #65 and #191. She stated, as an RN, she attests to 105735 Page 2 of 3 105735 09/02/2021 Orange City Nursing and Rehab Center 2810 Enterprise Rd Debary, FL 32713
F 0641 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm the best of her knowledge the information is accurate and complete, however, the MDS is interdisciplinary, so other disciplines fill out sections. . Residents Affected - Few 105735 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0641GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F641 - Accuracy of Assessments

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 2, 2021 survey of ORANGE CITY NURSING AND REHAB CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of ORANGE CITY NURSING AND REHAB CENTER on September 2, 2021. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ORANGE CITY NURSING AND REHAB CENTER on September 2, 2021?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.