Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

AVIATA AT CORAL BAYCMS #1057951 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide follow-up care for a surgical wound in a timely manner as evidenced by not attending to follow up surgical appointment and not informing the surgeon of the worsening condition of the resident's wound for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1).The findings included:Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Right Below the Knee Amputation, status post left foot toes amputation. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate assistance with activities of daily living. A review of Resident #1's care plan revealed the resident did not have a care plan for the left foot surgical wound. A review of Resident #1's orders revealed an order dated 03/10/25 for intravenous (IV) antibiotics for 25 days (until 04/05/25) , and an order dated 03/12/25 to follow up with the surgeon and infectious disease.A review of Resident #1's records did not reveal any documentation of the resident's left foot surgical wound's condition, or any treatment provided from admission on [DATE] until 03/17/25. Further review of Resident #1's orders revealed an order dated 03/17/25 for wound care to cleanse the foot surgical wound with Normal Saline and apply a dry dressing one time only. An order dated 03/19/25 documented for a dressing change to left foot to cleanse with Normal Saline, and apply a wound vacuum-assisted closure (vac) three times a week on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. A review of Resident #1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed that the dressing change and wound vac were applied on 03/21/25. However, there is no documentation indicating that the treatment was performed on 03/24/25 and 03/26/25. Additionally, no explanation was provided for the missed treatments on those dates.Record review revealed an order dated 03/20/25 for an appointment with the surgeon on 03/27/25 at 3:15 PM. An order dated 03/25/25 documented an appointment with infectious disease on 04/01/25 at 2:30 PM. A review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed a note dated 03/27/25 at 8:02 PM that documented Resident #1 went to a doctor visit for his wound today. No new orders received. Resident has a follow up appointment on 04/10/2025 at 2:30 PM. Plan of care ongoing.A review of a progress note dated 04/01/25 at 9:53 PM documented Resident #1 returned from a doctor's appointment. Orders received to continue IV antibiotics until 04/05/25, then remove IV line. A follow up with podiatrist (surgeon) will be necessary.Further record review did not reveal any documentation of the resident's left foot surgical wound's condition, or any treatment provided until 04/26/25. A progress note dated 04/26/25 at 3:32 PM documented Resident #1's left foot wound culture was positive for Pseudomonas, antibiotics were changed and the resident was to continue to follow up with the surgeon. Record review did not provide any evidence that Resident #1 went to his scheduled surgeon appointment on 04/10/25. Furthermore there was no evidence Resident #1's surgeon was notified of a change in the condition of the resident's wound.A review of Resident #1's progress notes dated 04/30/25 revealed the resident had an appointment with infectious disease, and an IV antibiotic was initiated. Again, there was Residents Affected - Few (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 105795 Printed: 05/28/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 105795 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 07/02/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Aviata at Coral Bay 2939 S Haverhill Rd West Palm Beach, FL 33415 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete no evidence that Resident #1's surgeon was notified of a change in the resident's wound.A review of a physician progress note dated 05/02/25 at 2:28 PM documented: Wound is reviewed with wound care nurse, wound vac was on place, after removed showed infected tissue, fetid (bad smelling), with bone exposure and discoloration and soft area of bone consistent with osteomyelitis, purulent discharge, foul smell, Meropenen (antibiotic) on IV BID (twice daily) X 10 days, follow up with ID (infectious disease) and foot surgeon will be arranged by nursing.Further record review revealed Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for evaluation of the left foot wound. Resident #1 returned to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documentation of Resident #1's surgeon being notified of the change in the resident's wound.Record review revealed an order dated 05/05/25 for an appointment with resident #1's surgeon on 05/07/25 at 2:15 PM.A review of Resident #1's progress notes dated 05/07/25 at 3:55 PM documented Resident #1 returned back from the doctor's office with an order to send the resident to the hospital for evaluation.An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/02/25 at 3:00 PM. The DON acknowledged the above. Event ID: Facility ID: 105795 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 2, 2025 survey of AVIATA AT CORAL BAY?

This was a inspection survey of AVIATA AT CORAL BAY on July 2, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at AVIATA AT CORAL BAY on July 2, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.