Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

VIERA HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTERCMS #1058851 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

105885 08/15/2024 Viera Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 8050 Spyglass Hill Rd Viera, FL 32940
F 0657 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Care Planning were offered participation in plans or revisions to their care, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#65). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #65, a [AGE] year old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted from an acute care hospital on 5/26/24 with diagnoses of malnutrition, type 2 diabetes mellitus, adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood, gastrostomy (feeding tube) status, and acute duodenal (intestine) ulcer with perforation. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission 5-day Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/02/24 noted during the look back periods, the resident scored 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) that indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. There were no signs and symptoms of delirium or rejection of care necessary to achieve health and well-being goals. The resident scored 13 out of 27 on the PHQ-2 to 9© (Resident Mood Interview) that indicated moderate depression, and she felt down, depressed, or hopeless nearly every day. The assessment showed the resident's customary routines and activities preferences were very important to her, and she required a feeding tube to sustain nutrition and hydration. The Order Summary Report included active physician's orders for nothing by mouth (NPO) diet, regular diet, regular texture, thin consistency, meat cut into bite size, sandwiches with lunch/dinner, no straw, and J (small intestine) tube/surgical site care. On 8/12/24 at 10:53 AM, resident #65 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room while her family representative visited. The resident was visibly upset when she said although she had asked staff on multiple occasions, they hadn't kept her updated about having her feeding tube removed. She stated, Maybe it's going to happen on Wednesday. Review of the Comprehensive Care Plan included focuses, goals, and interventions that included nutrition and hydration with a mechanically altered diet and tube feeding. The care plan showed resident #65 was at the facility for short term placement, and the resident/representative clearly expressed a desire to discharge from the facility. It was noted the resident had an alteration in mood as evidenced by adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and read, endorses depressed mood. During an interview on 8/12/24 at 10:54 AM, the resident's representative conveyed the resident had Page 1 of 2 105885 105885 08/15/2024 Viera Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 8050 Spyglass Hill Rd Viera, FL 32940
F 0657 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few been anxiously awaiting having the feeding tube removed as she had greatly improved and was eating regular food again. She stated, We need to know when it's happening. Review of the Care Plan Calendar Schedule provided by the MDS Coordinator documented a Care Plan Meeting had been scheduled for the resident on 5/21/24 and noted the resident had been discharged on 5/20/24. On 8/15/24 at 10:59 AM, the MDS Coordinator checked the care plan meeting schedule and explained that resident #65 had been scheduled for a care plan meeting on 5/21/24 however, she was discharged to the hospital before the meeting was held. She said when the resident returned on 5/26/24, a meeting to include the resident and/or her representative wasn't rescheduled and she stated, She should have been put back on the schedule and she was missed; we just missed it. On 8/15/24 at 2:38 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained the MDS department was responsible for scheduling regular care plan meetings. She said it was important to include the resident and representative so the facility could ensure their needs were met and they understood their plan of care and discharge plans. The DON stated, It's an opportunity for us to all meet together so they understand what's going on; it can cause depression and anxiety and it's important for everybody to feel like they're heard, and things change; it's an opportunity for those to be shared. Review of the facility's standards and guidelines titled Comprehensive Assessments and Care Plans dated 4/01/22 read, . the plan of care should be created in consultation with the resident and the resident's representative (s)- (i) The resident's goals for admission and desired outcomes. (ii) The resident's preference and potential future discharge. (iii) . The facility shall maintain the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care. 105885 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0657GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F657 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 15, 2024 survey of VIERA HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of VIERA HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER on August 15, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at VIERA HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER on August 15, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a t..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.