F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate
catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper indwelling urinary catheter care
and services for 1 of 3 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to assess for and or attempt to
discontinue the indwelling urinary catheter for Resident #1.
The findings included:
Review of the record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after hospitalization for
back surgery. Review of the hospital record revealed the indwelling urinary catheter was placed at the time
of the surgery. The hospital discharge instructions lacked any documentation related to the indwelling
urinary catheter. The hospital record lacked any documented attempt at removal of the device. Review of
the transfer form dated 09/04/24 from the hospital documented Resident #1 had a Foley catheter
(indwelling urinary catheter) in place but lacked any indication for use and lacked information as to if the
hospital made an attempt to remove the device.
Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident
was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale,
indicating intact cognition. This MDS also documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter for
neurogenic bladder, as did an order dated 09/06/24. The admission nursing assessment dated [DATE]
documented Resident #1 was admitted with the indwelling urinary catheter.
Review of all nursing and physician progress notes, along with all physician orders, lacked any documented
assessment to remove the indwelling urinary catheter, or rationale as to why it needed to remain. The
record also lacked a documented voiding trial, a process where the urinary catheter would be removed to
allow the resident to urinate. The progress notes and orders also lacked any need for a urinary consult.
Review of the record revealed an order for a surgical follow-up appointment scheduled for 09/26/24 at the
physician's office. A progress note dated 09/26/24 at 2:15 PM documented Resident #1 was transported to
the hospital following a doctor's appointment.
Review of the post-operative progress note from the Resident's follow-up appointment documented, in part,
that Resident #1 still had the Foley catheter in place. This note revealed Resident #1 told the nursing staff
and doctors at the SNF (skilled nursing facility) that the catheter was meant to be removed and that she
had not had any voiding trial. This note documented the Foley catheter was to be removed two to three
days after admission to the facility.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
106091
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
106091
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/13/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe at Wellington Rehabilitation Center The
10330 Nuvista Avenue
Wellington, FL 33414
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
During a side-by-side review of the record and interview on 11/13/24 at 4:47 PM, when asked if there had
been an assessment or attempt to remove the indwelling urinary catheter for Resident #1, the First Floor
Unit Manager stated she could not find anything in the electronic record. When asked the process to ensure
a resident does not have a urinary catheter longer than needed, the Unit Manager stated typically the
physician would order a voiding trial shortly after admission.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
106091
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
106091
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/13/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe at Wellington Rehabilitation Center The
10330 Nuvista Avenue
Wellington, FL 33414
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0694
Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
policy review, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper care and
services for the intravenous line for 1 of 1 sampled resident, as evidenced by the lack of dressing changes
as per order for Resident #2.
Residents Affected - Few
The findings included:
Review of the policy Central Lines revised 05/2024 documented, in part, Procedure: . 2. Ensure infection
control standards are maintained during the care of the central line including but not limited to: a. Change
dressing routinely and per physician orders.
Review of the policy Documentation revised 01/2024 documented, in part, Procedure: . 4. documentation in
the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate.
Review of the record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the orders
revealed the resident had had several peripheral IVs (intravenous access devices) placed throughout his
stay at the facility, with the most recent being a midline (specific type of central line intravenous catheter)
that was placed on 10/28/24. This order instructed the nurses to change the dressing every Tuesday and as
needed using sterile technique. An order dated 10/28/24 also instructed the nurses to flush the midline
twice daily with normal saline.
Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented the same nurse changed the midline
dressing on 10/29/24, 11/05/24, and 11/12/24. The MARs also documented nurses were flushing the
midline twice daily starting on 10/28/24 through the survey date.
During an observation on 11/13/24 at 12:10 PM, Resident #2 was in bed and the midline IV access was
noted to his right upper arm. The top edge of the dressing was loose and pulling back from the skin. The
label on the dressing had a nurse's initials, different from the nurse who had documented the provision of
care on the MAR, and the date was from October, but unable to read the specific day of the month. Review
of the employee roster revealed there was no current facility nurse with the initials documented on the
midline dressing, which would indicate the observed dressing was from the technician who inserted the line
on 10/28/24.
During a side-by-side review of the record and interview, when told of the observation of the midline
dressing for Resident #2, the First Floor Unit Manager stated she agreed with the findings. The Unit
Manager stated the nurses were flushing the line twice daily and should have noted the need for a new
dressing for the midline.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
106091
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3