F 0645
PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to review the Preadmission
Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for accuracy and update the form for 1 of 1 resident sampled
for PASARR. (Resident #50).
Residents Affected - Few
The findings include:
On 8/22/22 at approximately 3:30 PM, an observation was made of Resident #50. She was noted to have
limited cognitive, hearing, and verbal communication capabilities.
A review of the admission record for Resident #50 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]
and had been diagnosed with an intellectual disability, developmental disorder of speech and language, a
disorder of psychological development, anxiety disorder, and a mood disorder. The preadmission history
completed at the hospital revealed that the resident had been residing at a group home for individuals with
intellectual disabilities.
A review of the PASARR form dated 5/26/22 was conducted. The form had a check in the box that indicated
no diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability and Level II PASARR was not
required. Page 2 of the form had a check indicating that the resident had anxiety disorder. There is no
check indicating any sort of intellectual disability. There was not a check in any box related to functional
criteria. Additionally, there was no indication that the resident was currently receiving services for an
intellectual disability. Section II of the PASARR form did not have any information indicating that Resident
#50 had an intellectual disability.
On 8/24/22 at approximately 2:10 PM, an interview was conducted with Staff Member V, Social Services.
She was asked to explain the facility's process for reviewing PASARRs for accuracy. She explained that she
does not do the PASARR'S that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Department reviews them. If a PASARR
does require a Level II, then she sets up the needed services. At this time, an interview was also conducted
with Staff Member W, the Social Services Director, who explained that although she is new to her position,
she believes that the MDS or admissions office reviews the PASARRs for accuracy. She reviewed Resident
#50's PASARR and stated that it appeared to be incorrect based on Resident #50's reported history.
On 8/24/22 at approximately 2:20 PM, a group interview was conducted with Nurse X, MDS Nurse, and the
Director of the MDS Department. They explained that Staff Members S, Director of Community Relations,
and Staff Member T, Admissions Coordinator, review the forms upon admission. After admission the
PASARRs are reviewed by the social worker. The social services department notifies the MDS office when
revisions are necessary. They explained that the MDS office only looks at the PASARRs when
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 10
Event ID:
106117
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
106117
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/25/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center
8325 University Parkway
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0645
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
social services tells them to revise them. When a revision is necessary, the MDS office goes into the portal
and completes the necessary revisions. Both staff members agreed that Resident #50's PASARR form was
not accurate.
On 8/24/22 at approximately 2:35 PM, a group interview was conducted with the Director of Community
Relations and the Admissions Coordinator. They explained that the central admissions office gets the
PASARRs when the hospital sends them, and that the MDS office should be checking them for accuracy.
On 8/24/22 at approximately 3:00 PM, Nurse X, MDS Nurse, provided an amended PASARR form for
Resident #50 with corrections indicating that the resident had an intellectual disability.
8/25/22 at approximately 9:00 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Central Admissions who
confirmed that social services was responsible for reviewing the PASARR forms for accuracy.
A review of the facility's Preadmission Screening (PASSAR/PASSR) policy was conducted. The policy
states that a Level II PASSR must be completed if the individual has a primary or secondary diagnosis of
dementia or related neurocognitive disorder, or a suspicion or diagnosis of serious mental illness,
intellectual disability, or both.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
106117
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 10
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
106117
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/25/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center
8325 University Parkway
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to obtain and document weekly
weights as ordered by the physician for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident #44)
Residents Affected - Few
The findings include:
Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed a physician order dated 8/4/22. The order stated, monitor
weekly weights on Tuesdays prior to dialysis; every night shift on Mondays for weight loss. Weigh prior to
dialysis, with a start date of 8/8/22. Review of the documented weights in the electronic medical record,
(EMR), under the weights/vitals section was conducted on 8/23/22 which revealed the last weight
documented was on 8/3/22. The documented weight was 85 pounds. There were no further weights
documented. A review of the MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed a check mark and staff
initials on the scheduled days for weight, but no weights were documented.
On 8/23/22 at approximately 1:40 PM an interview was conducted with Staff B, LPN, (Licensed Practical
Nurse), who stated she does not know much about the nursing unit and was not sure when Resident #44
should be weighed. Staff B confirmed the weights should be in the EMR, and confirmed there was no
weight book, or weights anywhere other than the EMR.
On 8/23/22 at approximately 1:59 PM an interview was conducted with Staff F, LPN, supervisor, who stated
the nurses should be documenting the weights in the EMR. Staff F, LPN stated Resident #44 has weights
completed when she is at dialysis, so the nurses would document those weights in the medical record. Staff
F, LPN then stated the facility is having a difficult time getting the dialysis communication forms back from
the dialysis centers and stated the communication forms or dialysis treatment records are filed in the
resident's chart. Reviewed Resident #44 chart with Staff F. A dialysis communication form was found for
8/4/22 and for 8/13/22. There were no other communication forms in the record. Staff F, LPN stated she has
to call the dialysis units to get the records.
On 8/24/22 at approximately 9:39 AM an interview was conducted with the Registered Dietician who stated
she recommended weekly weights for Resident #44, due the weight loss the resident sustained while in the
hospital. The RD stated she has good communication with the dialysis center, and stated she calls the
dialysis unit in order to obtain weights on Resident #44.
On 8/24/22 at approximately 11:56 AM an interview was conducted with the DON, (Director of Nursing)
who revealed if there is an order for weekly weights, she expects the resident to be weighed weekly, and
the weight should be entered in the EMR.
On 8/25/22 at approximately 9:29 AM a joint interview was conducted with the Administrator and the DON.
The DON confirmed the facility is having a difficult time getting treatment documents from the dialysis units
and stated sometimes they do not get the documents back for days to weeks. The Administrator stated the
Registered Dietician was out the previous week, so they did not get weights from the dialysis unit.
A review of the policy, Nutrition Protocol, no date, was conducted. The policy stated, all weights will be
entered in the Electronic Medical Record on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) for daily/weekly
weights or weight vital section in the EMR for admission/monthly weights. A review of the policy,
hemodialysis, dated 1/2020 under section #10 revealed, The facility will utilize weights as provided by the
Dialysis Center to establish weights to be maintained in the resident's clinical
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
106117
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 10
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
106117
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/25/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center
8325 University Parkway
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
record, unless otherwise indicated by physician's order or other clinical indication necessitating more
frequent weights.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
106117
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 10
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
106117
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/25/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center
8325 University Parkway
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0695
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observation, staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide
appropriate respiratory care by failing to change oxygen tubing at least weekly, failing to store respiratory
equipment utilized for aerosol treatments in a clean container between uses, and failing to clean the filter on
the oxygen concentrator for 1 of 2 sampled residents. (Resident #228)
Residents Affected - Few
The findings include:
On 8/22/22 at approximately 11:45 AM, Resident #228 was observed, she was receiving oxygen via nasal
cannula at 3 liters per minute by way of an oxygen concentrator. The filter on the back of the concentrator
was covered with a thick layer of a dusty substance. (Photographic evidence obtained). The nasal cannula
did not have a date and there was no storage bag for the oxygen tubing at the bedside. Resident #228 also
had a nebulizer machine at her bedside. The nebulizer tubing and the attached aerosol mouthpiece were
stored in the top drawer of the bedside table uncovered. The nebulizer tubing was not dated, and no
storage bag was available for the nebulizer mouthpiece or the tubing.
On 8/24/22 at approximately 4:35 PM, an interview was conducted with Nurse K, Licensed Practical Nurse
(LPN), who explained that normally oxygen and nebulizer tubing is changed weekly by central supply staff.
She stated that the tubing should be stored in a bag and marked with the date the tubing was changed.
She further stated that central supply staff also check and clean the filters on the oxygen concentrators.
On 8/25/22 at approximately 10:00 AM, an interview was conducted with the facility's interim Director of
Nursing (DON). She explained that central supply staff change the oxygen tubing once a week. A storage
bag should be labeled, and the tubing should be stored in the bag. The DON agreed that the filter should
have been cleaned and there should have been storage bags available for storage and to identify when the
tubing had been changed.
A review of the facility's Cleaning and Servicing Nebulizer procedure dated February 2016 was conducted.
The procedure states that nebulizer mouthpiece should be rinsed with water and allowed to air dry on a
paper towel and stored in an approved container between uses. The policy also states that tubing should be
replaced weekly. A review of the BIPAP/CPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure/continuous positive airway
pressure) Devices/Non-Invasive Ventilation Devices procedure dated February 2016 was conducted. The
procedure stated that washable filters should be cleaned once a week, more often if necessary. Tubing
should be stored in an approved container between uses.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
106117
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 10
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
106117
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/25/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center
8325 University Parkway
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0697
Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to appropriately manage
post-surgical pain for 1 of 1 resident sampled for pain management. (Resident #235)
Residents Affected - Few
The findings include:
On 8/24/22 at approximately 8:40 AM, an observation of Resident #235, during which he was grimacing in
pain, restless, and tightly guarding his lower abdomen. He had difficulty moving up in the bed when Nurse
H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) tried to assist him up in the bed to take his medication. He complained
of pain 10 on a 1-10 pain rating scale. Resident #235 said that the last dose of pain medication was given
was about 1:00 AM, earlier that morning. He explained that he asked for pain mediation at about 4:00 AM
and the nurse told him that he was out of the pain medication, and he has not had any medication since. At
this time Nurse H, LPN explained that Resident #235 had run out of Oxycodone on night shift. The
Controlled Medication Utilization Record showed that the last dose of Oxycodone 10 milligrams (MG) with
Acetaminophen 325 MG had been signed out for Resident #235 on 8/24/22 at 1:14 AM, there were no
more Oxycodone 10 MG with Acetaminophen 325 MG tablets in stock to be taken after that dose was
given. Nurse H, LPN went to the nurse communication book and retrieved an unsigned prescription for
Oxycodone 10 MG with Acetaminophen 325 MG tablet 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed. She
explained that the new prescription had not yet been signed by a medical practitioner.
At approximately 8:54 AM, Nurse H, LPN telephoned the medical provider and obtained an order to
administer Acetaminophen 325 MG 2 tablets by mouth. She gave Resident #235 Acetaminophen (a
non-narcotic pain reliever used to treat minor aches and pains) 325 MG 2 tablets by mouth. She explained
to him that it would take a little time to obtain authorization from the medical provider and pharmacy before
she could get the Oxycodone 10 MG with Acetaminophen 325 MG, but she would bring it as soon as the
process was complete. The surveyor asked Resident #235 if he could rate what his pain was earlier when
he asked for pain medication at approximately 4:00 AM. The resident stated that his pain level was about an
8 on the 1-10 scale at that time. Nurse H, LPN forwarded the unsigned prescription to the medical provider
for signature. She completed the Pharmacy Request for Removal of Schedule II to IV Medication from the
emergency supply and faxed it to the pharmacy. At 9:23 AM, the pharmacy approved the faxed request.
Resident #235 was given Oxycodone 10 MG with Acetaminophen 325 MG 1 tablet by mouth for pain at
approximately 9:30 AM.
A review the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 8/2022 revealed that Nurse R, LPN
had administered a dose of Oxycodone 10 MG with Acetaminophen 325 MG 1 tablet at 1:12 AM on
8/24/22. The resident's reported pain level was documented to be a 10 on a 1-10 scale at the time of
administration. That dose of pain medication was documented to be effective on the Medication
Administration Record (MAR). There was no additional documentation of medication or pain measures
noted in the MAR until 9:30 AM on 8/24/22. A review of the physician orders was conducted for resident
#235. He had an order to receive Oxycodone 10 MG with Acetaminophen 325 MG 1 tablet by mouth every
4 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. The care plan for Resident #235 stated that he was at risk
for experiencing pain related to co-morbidities and recent surgery. The goal for Resident #235 was that he
would verbalize relief from pain or show no signs or symptoms of pain as evidenced by facial expression or
other non-verbal signs of pain. The listed action steps included that nurses should observe and document
type, location, severity, and pattern of pain/discomfort and notify medical doctor (MD) or nurse practitioner
(NP) of change.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
106117
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 10
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
106117
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/25/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center
8325 University Parkway
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0697
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
On 8/25/22 at approximately 10:15 AM, an interview was conducted with the Interim Director of Nursing.
She was notified that Resident #235 did not receive pain medication after requesting pain medication on
8/24/22 at approximately 4:00 AM. The resident reported that he was told by Nurse R, LPN that he was out
of medication. He did not receive pain medication until approximately 5.5 hours later, and approximately 8
hours after his last dose. The DON explained that the nurse should have called the medical provider and
pharmacy to get authorization to administer pain medication to the resident and that the information should
have been documented in the resident's record.
A review of the facility's Pain Management Policy dated 3/2020 was conducted. The policy stated that if the
resident's pain is not controlled by the current treatment regimen the practitioner should be notified. The
policy also stated that patient's pain should be reassessed regularly. The Administration of Drugs policy
updated 10/2019 stated that if a drug is withheld the physician should be notified.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
106117
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 10
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
106117
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/25/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center
8325 University Parkway
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0698
Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident
#131
Residents Affected - Some
On 4/23/22 a record review was conducted for Resident #131. The resident receives hemodialysis
treatments in the community on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. The plan of care listed the intervention
of communication between dialysis and facility to ensure the continuity of care. Returns with Dialysis
Transfer Form when returning to the facility. The record review showed there were only two Dialysis
Transforms. One for 8/1/22 and one for 8/19/22.
On 8/24/22 at approximately 10:10 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff G, Registered Nurse and
Assistant Director of Nursing, who stated there is an ongoing problem with dialyses not returning the forms.
They have communicated with dialysis center to request the forms and are told they do not have to do that.
A review of the policy Hemodialysis dated 1/2020 revealed the facility and the Dialysis Center should
maintain regular communication and should a change in condition occur before or during the dialysis
treatment, the sending facility should communicate the changes in needs to the receiving facility.
Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to establish/maintain ongoing
communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis services.
(Residents #35 and #131).
The findings include:
Resident #35
A review of Resident #35 medical record was conducted which revealed an order for hemodialysis on
Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 9:30 AM. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated
[DATE] revealed Resident #35 received dialysis services. A review was conducted of Resident #35 paper
chart, which failed to reveal dialysis communication forms, or dialysis treatment run sheets.
An interview was conducted with Staff F, LPN, Supervisor on 8/23/22 at approximately 1:59 PM who stated
the facility does not get the dialysis communication form back from the dialysis unit and stated she must
call the dialysis facility to get the records faxed. Staff F, LPN stated the nurses should fill out the top of the
dialysis communication form and send it to dialysis with the resident, then when the resident returns, the
nurse should complete the bottom for the post treatment assessment, but further stated they are not getting
the forms back. Staff F, LPN stated the nurses should take the vital signs and should assess the access site
when the resident returns. A follow-up interview was conducted with Staff F, LPN, Supervisor on 8/24/22 at
approximately 1:07 PM, who reviewed Resident #35 record and confirmed there were no dialysis
communication form or dialysis treatment run sheets, and again stated the facility is having an ongoing
problem receiving the communication from the dialysis center.
A review of the outpatient dialysis services coordination agreement between the facility and dialysis unit,
effective 6/1/18 was conducted. The agreement revealed under the subtitle, Mutual Obligations, both
parties shall ensure that there is documented evidence of collaboration of care and communication
between the Long-Term Care and End Stage Renal Dialysis Unit.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
106117
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 10
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
106117
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/25/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center
8325 University Parkway
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0698
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
An interview was conducted with the DON and the Administrator on 8/25/22 at approximately 9:29 AM. The
DON confirmed the facility has a difficult time receiving dialysis communication forms and confirmed the
facility must call the dialysis unit in order to get the dialysis treatment run sheets. The DON stated unless
there is someone at the dialysis center, they have a relationship with, they don't get the forms. The
administrator was asked if management has intervened in resolving the communication concerns, and the
administrator responded, what can we do, the residents need dialysis. The administrator stated the
Registered Dietician can get weights because she has a relationship with the Registered Dietician.
A telephone interview was conducted on 8/26/22 at approximately 10:05 AM with the Administrator of the
dialysis center Resident #35 attends for treatment, who stated she has not seen any facility communication
forms from the facility in a long while and further stated they are not allowed to complete the form. The
administrator stated they can fax the dialysis treatment run sheet, but she has not had any requests for the
documents. The administrator stated the dietician calls for weights, but she has not received any other calls.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
106117
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 10
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
106117
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/25/2022
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center
8325 University Parkway
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0756
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart,
following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist's
recommendations were acknowledged with action to be taken to address the recommendation for 1 of 5
residents reviewed for drug regimen. (Resident #35)
The findings include:
A review of Resident #35 record revealed a diagnosis of end stage renal disease with dependence on
hemodialysis. A review of Resident #35 medication orders was conducted. The facility provided ordered
medication Sevelamer and Cinacalcet, both are phosphate binders and Megestrol for appetite stimulation.
A review of the consultant pharmacy recommendation dated 8/19/22 was conducted. The recommendation
was related to Sevelamer and Cinacalcet, the recommendation was to monitor labs every six months. The
recommendation was signed by the Advanced Practice Register Nurse, (APRN), however, the APRN did
not acknowledge whether to accept or decline the recommendation. A review of the recommendation dated
7/28/22 was conducted. The recommendation was related to Megestrol with a notation the medication has
minimal effect on weight and is associated with adverse consequences. The recommendation was signed
by the Advanced Practice Register Nurse, (APRN), however, the APRN did not acknowledge whether to
accept or decline the recommendation.
An interview was conducted with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 8/25/22 at 9:29 AM, who confirmed the
two pharmacy consultant recommendation were not acknowledged with a decline or accept
recommendations.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
106117
If continuation sheet
Page 10 of 10