Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

RICHLAND NURSING & REHABCMS #1451351 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency, 1 of them serious (actual harm or immediate jeopardy). The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0689 Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper resident supervision during ambulation for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 falling and sustaining a fracture to the right arm and elbow. Findings included: R1's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 8/25/2025 and diagnoses including unsteadiness on feet, metabolic encephalopathy, nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, wedge compression fracture of thoracic11-12 vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented in section C, that R1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 7 indicating R1 had severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS documented under section GG- Mobility that R1 is dependent, which means helper does all of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete activity, or the assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity.R1's Care Plan documented a focus area of Falls with a start date of 8/26/25. Resident at risk for falling related to: history or falls, cognitive impairments, communication impairments, decreased safety awareness, difficulty using call light and/or requesting staff assistance, requires ADL (Activities of Daily Living) with transfers and mobility, incontinence, decreased strength and endurance and use of psychotropic drugs.R1's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documented resident as a high risk for falls. R1's Physical Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated 8/26/2025 documented under function mobility assessment of R1, walk 10 feet; dependent, distance; not applicable; assistive device; two-wheeled walker; assistance needed = max assistance x2, walk 50 feet with two turns; dependent, walk 150 feet; dependent, walking 10 feet on uneven surfaces; not applicable.The facility's Incident Report dated 9/1/2025 with the final investigation documented R1 had a witnessed fall in hallway staff was unable to reach resident to prevent fall. R1 sent to local emergency room at 4:02pm and sent back to the facility with a cast to right arm and orthopedic to follow.The local emergency room After Summary visit dated 9/1/2025 documented an imaging result of R1's right elbow with a comminuted fracture of the proximal humerus and mildly displaced fracture at the base of the olecranon process at the elbow. R1's Progress Note by V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) dated 9/1/2025 at 4:11 AM documented at 1:50 AM, V5 (CNA) notified her that R1 had a fall in the hallway outside of his room. V4 documented that V5 stated, R1 stood up and fell before he could get to him with his walker. R1's Progress Note by V6 (LPN) dated 9/1/2025 at 4:06 PM, documents she had received a call from the imaging company that R1 did have a fracture present in elbow and shoulder. V6 documented ambulance was contacted at 1:50 PM and R1 left the facility via ambulance to local emergency room. On 9/11/2025 at 12:30 PM, V3 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated, she did work the night R1 did have his fall on 9/1/2025. V3 stated, she had been up at the nurses' station around 1:50 AM on (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 145135 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 145135 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 09/12/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Richland Nursing & Rehab 900 East Scott Street Olney, IL 62450 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete 9/1/2025, after completing resident bed checks and documenting her rounds while V5 (CNA) had been with R1 in the hallway down by R1's room. V3 stated, R1 had stood up from his wheelchair and had been walking. V3 stated, V5 (CNA) did attempt to get R1's walker, but R1 stumbled and fell into the handrail. V3 stated, V5 did reach out to grab R1 after he hit the handrail, so he did not hit the floor. On 9/11/2025 at 12:47 PM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN), stated she had been the nurse working the night R1 had his fall on 9/1/2025. V4 stated, she had been taking care of another resident when V4 (CNA) came to get her to assess R1. V4 stated, R1 had been sitting in the hallway with his feet stretched out in front of him on the floor. V4 stated, she was notified by V5 (CNA) that R1 stood up from his wheelchair while holding the handrail and when V5 turned to go get R1's walker from his room, he noticed R1 stumbled and fell into the handrail. On 9/11/2025 at 1:30 PM, V6 (LPN) stated, she did have direct patient care with R1 the day he had his fall event on 9/1/2025. V6 stated, she was given report by V13 (LPN) that R1 had fallen on the night shift and had been complaining of right arm pain and swelling present. On 9/11/2025 at 2:16 PM, V5 (CNA) stated, he did work on the night R1 had his fall event on 9/11/2025. V5 stated, around 1:50 AM, he was trying to get R1 to sit back down in his wheelchair while walking in the hallway. V5 stated, R1 was standing and had a grip on the handrail. V5 stated, he then moved the wheelchair behind R1 and locked the wheels. V5 stated, he took 2 steps towards R1's room that is a couple of feet away, behind where R1 had been standing to get R1's walker. V5 stated, when he was a few feet away from R1, R1 stumbled and hit his right elbow on the handle rail. V5 stated, R1 is unsteady on his feet and requires assistance with mobility. On 9/11/2025 at 11:24 AM, V12 (Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant/COTA) stated, she actively works with R1 in therapy services. V12 stated, R1 had been admitted to the facility with a right hip and back fracture related to a fall. V12 stated, R1 is not safe to be left to self-ambulate and in her opinion R1 should not be left alone when attempting to stand or while standing. On 9/11/2025 at 2:45 PM, V6 (LPN) stated, R1 is unsteady on his feet and very impulsive. V6 stated, R1 should not be left unassisted while standing or walking. On 9/11/2025 at 2:54 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, R1 is unsteady on his feet. V1 stated, it would be her expectation that V5 (CNA) remained with R1 and had another staff member bring him R1's walker. On 9/11/2025 at 3:10 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated, R1 is not steady on his feet and should not be left unassisted when standing or walking. On 9/11/2025 at 3:18 PM, V7 (Physician) stated, R1 is unsteady on his feet and should not be walking or standing without assistance. V7 stated, V5 (CNA) should have remained at R1's side and not left him unassisted. The facility's Fall Management Policy (revised 2018) documented under Policy: it is the policy of (Name of Facility) to have a Fall Prevention Program to assure the safety of all residents in the facility, when possible. The program will include measure which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. Sample interventions for high-risk patients.use gait belts for all non-mechanical lifts and assists with transfers . Event ID: Facility ID: 145135 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689SeriousS&S Gactual harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 12, 2025 survey of RICHLAND NURSING & REHAB?

This was a inspection survey of RICHLAND NURSING & REHAB on September 12, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at RICHLAND NURSING & REHAB on September 12, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.