Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

GENERATIONS AT REGENCYCMS #1452371 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0622 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record, the facility failed to meet the requirement to transfer 1 (R2) of 4 residents reviewed for involuntary discharge notice in the sample. This failure resulted in R2 being refused back to the facility where he resided since May of 2023. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old resident with diagnosis of vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, hypertension, Atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease. Dementia Care Plan dated 5/29/23 reads in part, I display cognitive challenges including poor awareness, poor concentration, poor energy and impaired attention. My insight is disrupted/poor, as is my judgment. I have reduced cognitive processing speed and deficits in executive functions such as abstract reasoning, planning, problem-solving, impaired conversational skills, impulsivity, lack of initiation and poor social judgment. I need cues/supervision to make daily decisions. I have a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia. On 12/11/23, R2 was involuntarily discharged to a psychiatric hospital for treatment and was denied readmission back to the facility. A State notice form titled, Notice of Involuntary Transfer or Discharge and Opportunity for Hearing for Nursing Home Residents marked the rationale for this discharge as being due to, The safety of individuals in this facility is endangered. On 2/13/24 at 10:15 AM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated, We had to discharge R2 because he was a danger to himself and others. He became violent and aggressive and tried on many occasions to elope from the facility. On the day we transferred him to the psychiatric hospital, he was trying to jump out of the window Surveyor asked if V2 witnessed this herself, V2 stated, No. I was told this by staff because the window was cracked open, although it would be impossible to jump out because it has a safety feature and can only be cracked open several inches. Surveyor asked which staff member reported this to her, V2 stated, This was reported to me by V3 (LPN), but I can provide you with other staff members who witnessed R2's behavior. On 2/13/24 at 10:20 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, I had spoken to the hospital discharge planner and explained (R2) was coming and I would not be able to take him back due to the safety risk. The discharge planner asked to fax over the involuntary discharge form although we sent the packet with the residents discharge and provided to the EMT's when they got here. Observations on 10:35 AM of R2's previous room and other rooms on the floor showed the windows (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 145237 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 145237 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/15/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Generations at Regency 6631 Milwaukee Avenue Niles, IL 60714 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0622 being very difficult to open and only opened several inches. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm On 2/13/24 at 2:35 PM, V3 (LPN) stated, I was the nurse the day we discharged the resident, so yes I remember him. The first couple of days he (R2) was moved up to my floor, he was doing much better than he did on his previous floor. But then he didn't like it at all, and he wanted to go somewhere, and he said he felt like he was in prison. Surveyor asked the type of floor R2 was placed on, V3 stated, It's a locked dementia floor. Surveyor asked if R2 was given time to get acclimated to his new surroundings, V3 stated, Maybe he was, I don't know. Surveyor asked if she received any dementia training, V3 stated, Yes but it was quite a while ago. Surveyor asked about R2's alleged aggressive behavior, V3 stated, He was agitated sometimes and sometimes he would refuse his medications. Surveyor asked if R2 ever tried to hit her or demonstrate any physical violence towards her or anyone, V3 stated, He never hit me or anyone I know of, but he did try to swing at me because he didn't like his roommate. Surveyor asked what would trigger this type of response and how she intervened, V3 stated, I don't know why he did this, and I don't remember what I did. Surveyor asked if she saw R2 trying to jump out the window, V3 stated, I never saw this happen, but he blocked the door and when I tried to come in, I saw the window was cracked open. The resident must have opened the window. Surveyor asked if R2 could get out the window. V3 stated, No, it can't be opened wide enough. Surveyor asked about V3's allegation that the resident tried to put his fingers in an electrical outlet. V3 stated, I never said this or saw this, but other staff said he put his fingers in the electrical outlet. Surveyor asked if anyone reported to maintenance so they could put plastic guards on the outlets, V3 stated, No we didn't think of that. Surveyor asked if she ever felt endangered by R2, V3 stated, No sir, not at all. Residents Affected - Few On 2/13/24 at 2:50 PM, V5 (LPN) stated, (R2) used to be a resident on the 4th floor and he escaped from there, so he was transferred to the 5th floor. During time on the 5th floor, (R2) didn't escape from the 5th floor, so it probably was a better floor for him. Surveyor asked if V5 could recall any time R2 became physically or verbally aggressive towards him or any other residents, V5 stated, There were times there he would say some words like Leave me alone, get out of my face. Surveyor asked if V5 ever felt endangered by R2, V5 stated, No, never. Surveyor asked about any type of physical violence R2 may have exhibited. V5 stated, One time on the day we were going to discharge him, (R2) tried to grab one of the ambulance people who came here, and he fought with them. Surveyor clarified that V5 saw R2 grabbing and fighting with the ambulance people, V5 stated, Yes I did. Ambulance dispatch report dated 12/11/23 disputes V5's statement about R2's behavior and reads in part, Basic Life Support unit responding to an [AGE] year-old male for a non-emergent transfer from nursing home to hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. Crew donned PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and found the patient in standing position alert and oriented times 3. Crew assessed patient on scene and obtained vital signs within normal limits. The patient was seated onto the stretcher with no assistance all by himself. The patient was safely loaded into the ambulance and was monitored enroute to the destination hospital. Enroute to the destination, the patient's health acuity did not change. At all times appropriate. On 2/13/24 at 3:00 PM, V8 (CNA Coordinator) stated, I knew (R2) when he was on both units. (R2) was very stubborn, he wanted his way, and it was hard redirecting him. (R2) became aggressive and he to tried to injure himself. Surveyor asked V8 to elaborate on this self-injurious behavior. V8 stated, He (R2) tries to punch himself on his body. Surveyor asked if V8 observed this behavior and how she intervened when this happened. V8 stated, I don't remember, but I know he tried hitting himself. Surveyor asked if R2 hit himself in the face or other body part. V8 stated, I think on his arm, I don't remember. He also pushed the bed to the door. I tried to open the door, but he would not let us (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 145237 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 145237 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/15/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Generations at Regency 6631 Milwaukee Avenue Niles, IL 60714 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0622 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few in. When we got in, I saw the window was open, and the screen was moved up. He (R2) admitted to opening the window. He didn't exactly say he was trying to get out of the window because you can't open it but 5 inches. (R2) is at times aggressive. He tried to push me, but he did not touch me. He didn't do anything to me. Surveyor clarified whether the resident made physical contact with V8 or threatened V8 in any way. V8 stated, No he didn't but he did push the nurse (V3) and she was pregnant at the time. Surveyor asked when V8 saw this happen, V8 stated, When we were trying to discharge the resident, he pushed V3 and she's pregnant. Review of MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/28/23 and 11/27/23 of Section E for behaviors showed R2 with no indicators of psychosis, no behavioral symptoms that were present or with frequency. No physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others, no verbal behavioral symptoms direct toward others and no rejection of care that was present including wandering behavior. On 2/14/24 at 2:05 PM, V7 (CNA) stated, Most of the time (R2) was not confused and he knew what he was doing. I was on duty that day he was sent out. He barricaded himself around noon time. I was in the dining room at the time. Surveyor asked why V7 came to talk to the surveyor. V7 stated, The DON asked me to talk to you because I know (R2). I was not part of the staff trying to get him out of the room. Surveyor asked if V7 saw R2 hit the nurse or any other staff or residents. V7 stated, I never saw (R2) hit anyone. Surveyor asked if presented any danger to herself, V7 stated, No. On 2/14/24 at 3:15 PM, V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) both affirmed R2 never physically nor verbally threatened or endangered the lives of any residents or staff in the facility. V1 indicated she was told that her staff were no longer able to manage R2's behavior. V1affirmed never witnessing any of R2's behaviors that endangered staff or residents as listed in the form used to discharge R2. Surveyor asked V1 if the hospital social worker was told R2 could not return, V1 indicated no recollection of what was said. However, on 2/13/24 at 10:30 AM, V10 (hospital discharge planner) indicated that she needed to seek alternative placement for R2 because the facility refused to accept the resident back to the facility. Per surveyor's record review there was no physician's entry in R2's notes regarding how the facility was unable to meet R2's behavioral needs. There were no interventions noted in the care plan from the facility to modify R2's behavior to safely remain at the facility. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 145237 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0622GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F622 - Transfer and discharge-

    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 15, 2024 survey of GENERATIONS AT REGENCY?

This was a inspection survey of GENERATIONS AT REGENCY on February 15, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at GENERATIONS AT REGENCY on February 15, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific info..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.