F 0563
Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents (R1) in the sample of 7
reviewed for visitation rights were allowed to receive their chosen visitors.The findings include:On 8/22/25
at 11:37 AM, V4, Social Services Director, said V13 is R1's significant other/girlfriend. V4 said V13 is not
allowed to visit R1 any longer. V4 said V13 calls the facility almost every day trying to come to the facility. V4
said R1's guardians, V9, would go back and forth about allowing V13 to visit R1. V4 said currently the
decision to not allow V13 to visit has been made by the facility and the police.On 8/22/25 at 10:32 AM, V3,
Receptionist, said V13 is not allowed to visit R1 at all. V3 said V4 came and told all the receptionists not to
allow V13 to visit. V3 said she is supposed to ask V13 to leave and if she won't leave, they are supposed to
get the police involved. V3 said V13 calls frequently and asks when she can visit again. V3 said she tells
V13 to call V9. V3 said the electronic kiosk at the front desk even says, Access denied when V13 tries to
check in to visit.On 8/22/25 at 12:35 PM, V1, Administrator, said V13 has not been in the facility since he
has been the administrator (eight weeks). V1 said he just got caught up to speed on everything regarding
V13 in relation to visiting R1 today since you (IDPH) came in and asked questions. V1 said he would never
stop V13 from coming to visit R1. V1 said unless there is an order of protection, they cannot restrict a
visitor. V1 said it's the resident's right to have visitors.R1's admission Record dated 8/22/25 shows V13 is
his significant other.The facility was unable to provide any legal documents which prohibit V13 from visiting
R1.The facility's Visitation Guidelines Policy (reviewed May 2025) shows the facility supports and
encourages visitation for all residents in accordance with CMS federal regulations. Residents have the right
to receive visitors. Any concerns, incidents, or restriction of visitation must be documented and reported to
the Administrator.R1's current care plan provided by the facility does not address any restricted/limited
visitation needs.
Residents Affected - Few
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
145269
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
145269
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/22/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hope Creek Nursing & Rehab
4343 Kennedy Drive
East Moline, IL 61244
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0808
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or
licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility to ensure a resident's therapeutic diet was
provided. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for diets in the sample of 7.The findings include:On
8/22/25 at 12:40 PM, R3 was in the dining room eating his noon meal. R3 was served one corndog, pasta
salad, watermelon and cottage cheese. R3's neon colored diet card shows he is on regular diet, low
concentrated sweets, no pork and double protein. R3 said he was served one corndog and should receive
double protein.On 8/22/25 at 12:54 PM, V6 (Dietary Manager) said R3 is on regular diet, low concentrated
sweets and no pork. V6 said the corn dogs are made with turkey and chicken. R3 should receive double
protein with each meal and should have received two corn dogs. The cooks in the kitchen are new and she
will in-service the staff to ensure residents receive their correct diet.R3's Physician Order Sheets dated
through August 2025 shows his diet order is cardiac low concentrated sweets, provide 1/2 portion carbs
and double proteins with meals and no pork.The facility's Therapeutic Diets undated Policy states,
therapeutic diets are prepared and served as ordered by the attending physician.residents' trays will be
clearly identified by a color-coded tray card, The tray card information is to include residents name, diet
order and room number.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
145269
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2