F 0550
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or
her rights.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and review of records that facility failed to ensure personal belongings of 1 (R3) out of 3
residents were properly inventoried in accordance with facility's policy. These failures affected 1 resident
(R3) resulting in not being able to unable to account personal belonging.
Finding includes:
R3 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted in the facility on 12/17/2024. R3 medical diagnosis includes
amyloidosis, insomnia, anxiety disorder. R3 BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score dated 03/31/2025
scored at 15 means cognition is intact.
On 04/15/2025 at 11:06 AM, R3 stated that his personal belongings that includes pair of headphones, mini
wrench with screwdriver, State ID, orange extension cord with USB, titanium phone charging cord. R3
stated that he gave the list to V3 (Social Worker). On 04/16/2025 at 11:14 AM, V3 confirmed that R3 told
her about his missing personal belongings. V3 stated that a concern form was done on R3's behalf. V3
stated that R3 should have brought to the receptionist all his belongings upon first arrival in the facility.
Because R3 did not bring his belongings to receptionist his personal belongings were not inventoried. V3
stated that R3's belongings list form was not done. V3 was asked if it is the resident's responsibility or
facility staff to ensure belongings were accounted to avoid prospective confusion? V3 stated, Here at this
facility, we tell them, or the nurse explained to them. V3 was asked if she or any facility staff explained to R3
proper procedure. V3 stated No, I did not ask any of the staff if they did belongings list. We searched for it.
All of us helped R3 to find it. We did not find it.
On 04/17/2025 at 10:08 AM, V1 (Administrator) was made aware about personal belongings concern of R3.
V1 stated that per proper procedure is to fill up belongings list form. And it should be done by staff to
account resident's personal belongings. And to avoid future problem when resident will allege that they
have certain personal belongings that no one can confirm.
Personal Effects policy dated 01/2025, reads: The purpose of inventory is to limit the risk of loss of
residents' personal effects and to protect the facility from liability for loss personal effects. The inventory
shall be completed upon admission and signed by the resident or resident's responsible party. The
inventory shall be updated when items are brought to the facility for the resident or when things are
removed from the facility by the resident or resident's responsible party.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
145337
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
145337
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Ryze on the Avenue
3400 South Indiana
Chicago, IL 60616
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately assess or evaluate a resident that
are high risk for falls, failed to provide plan of care for falls. The facility failed to ensure fall preventive
measures or interventions were implemented. The facility also failed to monitor and supervise a resident to
prevent falls for 1 (R1) out of 3 residents reviewed for fall prevention program. These failures resulted in R1
falling twice. R1's first fall resulted in R1 being admitted to the hospital with an epidural brain bleed. R1's
second fall resulted in R1 sustaining a laceration to the back of his head.
Finding includes:
R1 is [AGE] years old, re-admitted in the facility on 01/07/2025 with repeated falls and traumatic subdural
hemorrhage and coagulation defect. Clinical notes of R1 dated 02/03/2025 by V11 (Registered Nurse/RN)
documents that R1 was seen on laying on the floor. R1 stated that he hit the back of his head. R1 was
transferred to the hospital with admitting diagnosis of epidural brain bleed per V24 (Licensed Practical
Nurse/LPN). On 03/18/2025 R1 fell again sustaining a laceration at the back of his head. R1 was
transferred to the hospital, currently not in the facility.
On 04/16/2025 at 12:09 PM V11 (RN) stated that she worked from 07:00 AM to 03:00 PM the day R1 fell
on [DATE]. V11 stated that it was a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) that informed her that R1 was on the
floor. V11 said, It was an unwitnessed fall. V11 said that R1 does not ambulate, non-compliant to
instruction. R1 wants to try to do things that he cannot do. He needs assistance when getting up and needs
1-to-2-person assistance. V11 stated that it was around breakfast time when R1 fell. V11 stated breakfast
starts at 07:30 AM and during that time, R1 ate breakfast in bed. V11 stated that she did not see anyone
feed R1. V11 was asked if it would be safer for R1 to be transferred to the wheelchair and monitor by staff
instead of leaving R1 in his room alone. V11 stated I am not sure if it will prevent R1 from falling. V11 stated
that R1 was not transferred to his wheelchair because he is not on the get up list. V11 stated it would be
hard for CNAs who are busy feeding another resident to come wash up R1 and place R1 in a wheelchair.
On 04/16/2025 at 1:52 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated R1 kept saying he can walk, and he tries
to maintain his independence. R1 was not on the get up list and was not scheduled to get up. Reviewed
R1's care plan with V2. R1's fall care plan does not have any fall prevention interventions prior to the fall
and was created on 02/03/2025. R1's fall care plan interventions are as follows: Encourage R1 to ask for
assistance before transferring created on 2/11/2025, floor mat in place created date 03/18/2025, R1 will
receive education related to potential fall risk and preventative measures created 02/10/2025. Per
statement by nursing staff, R1 is non-compliant with instruction. R1 insist he can walk does not follow
redirection. V2 was asked, how can these interventions help prevent R1 from falling? V2 stated the problem
was that he got up without assistance. V2 was asked about the investigation she conducted. V2 was asked
if the nursing staff, both nurses, and certified nursing assistants' whereabouts were accounted for. V2
replied, In doing our investigation we don't asked nursing staff where they are at the time of the fall or
during the fall. V22 (CNA) that was assigned to R1 does not have written statement as part of investigation.
V2 was informed that R1 fell again inside his room on 03/18/2025 sustaining laceration on the back of his
head with bleeding. V2 replied, I have to look at the records. V2 stated that other interventions can prevent
fall of R1, like putting signage or placing R1 in the get up list.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
145337
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
145337
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Ryze on the Avenue
3400 South Indiana
Chicago, IL 60616
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Actual harm
On 04/22/2025 at 11:38 AM V7 (LPN) verified that she was the nurse on the day R1 fell on [DATE]. V7
stated that R1 was trying to get in his wheelchair when he fell. V7 stated that none of the staff was in the
room. None of the staff witnessed the fall of R1. R1 had bleeding on the middle area of his head. V7 stated
it happened around 08:00 PM as it was noted in her notes.
Residents Affected - Few
R1's assessment for admission dated 01/07/2025 and re-admission dated 02/17/2025 documents that R1
is at high risk for fall with score of 16 on 01/07/2025. R1's score increased to 20 on 02/17/2025. Per
assessment instructions, any score above 10 considered as high risk for falls. Although both assessments
have scores higher than 10, staff who assessed put the score of 8 on both assessments indicating that R1
is not high fall risk. There was no baseline care plan intervention provided on both assessments.
On 04/22/2025 at 10:18 AM, reviewed R1 fall assessments, evaluations and fall care plans with V25
(Restorative Nurse/LPN) and V26 (Restorative Nurse/LPN). V25 stated that the number or score is wrong
on R1's fall assessment included during admission evaluation dated 01/07/2025 (prior to fall) and
02/17/2025 (after to fall). V25 stated that the score eight (8) represent the number of items being answered,
not the score based on fall assessment. Per fall assessment ten (10) and above means high risk of fall. R1's
score should be sixteen (16) for the assessment dated [DATE] which is a high risk of fall. R1's score for the
fall assessment dated [DATE] should have been scored 20 which is high risk for fall. V25 was made aware
that there was no baseline plan of care intervention for all fall assessments of R1. Upon reviewing the care
plan, V25 stated that R1 does not have any fall care plan prior to fall. V25 said, Nothing on 01/07/2025 care
plan for fall. V25 and V26 made aware on their policy fall assessment/evaluation and fall care plan review
should be done during admission and quarterly to prevent resident from falling. R1 does not have fall
interventions upon admission dated 01/07/2025 although he came in the facility with history of falls.
On 04/23/2025 at 09:44 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) was made aware of concerns related to R1 fall
assessments/evaluations and lack of care plan interventions prior to falls. V2 stated that it will help prevent
fall for R1 if there were interventions placed prior to the falls. V2 said, I cannot say that all falls can be
prevented. But interventions prior to fall may help prevent falls.
Fall Prevention and Management policy dated 02/2025 reads: This facility is committed to maximizing each
resident's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility will identify and evaluate those
residents at risk for falls, plan for preventive strategies, and facilitate as safe an environment as possible. All
resident falls shall be reviewed, and the resident's existing plan of care shall be evaluated and modified as
needed. All fall risk evaluation will be completed on admission, readmission, and quarterly, significant
change and after each fall. A fall risk evaluation is completed by the Nurse. A score of 10 or greater
indicates the resident is at high risk for falls; a score of less than 10 indicates at risk for fall. Care plan to be
updated with new intervention based on root cause analysis after each fall occurrence.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
145337
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3