Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

RYZE ON THE AVENUECMS #1453371 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0558 Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights are answered in a timely manner for one resident (R4) in the sample of 8 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R4's Face Sheet documents resident is a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses including but not limited to: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, speech and language deficits following cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder. Minimum Data Set Section (MDS) section C (dated Jun 24, 2025) documents that R4 has an Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that R4's cognition is intact.Minimum Data Set Section (MDS) section GG (dated Jun 24, 2025) documents that R4 utilizes a walker and requires supervision with toileting. Care plan (dated 12/10/2024) documents that R4 has a diagnosis of/history of cerebral vascular accident with right side residual effects. On 07/29/2025 at 11:02AM, surveyor was conducting an interview with R4. R4 verbalized that he needs staff assistance and R4 ignited the call light system at 11:05AM. Surveyor remained in the room the entire time R4 waited for staff to answer the call light. At 11:11AM, surveyor observed a staff member dressed in a purple scrub uniform (identified as a certified nursing assistant) walking past R4's room and not answering R4's call light. At 11:16AM, surveyor observed R4's call light being answered by V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing). V3 assisted R4 with his needs. R4 waited for a total of 11 minutes for his call light to be answered. On 07/29/2025 at 11:30am, R7 (R4's roommate) stated, R4 had a stroke, and he walks with a walker. R4 needs staff assistance when he goes to the restroom because he cannot put his pants on by himself. At times, R4 will put on the call light and staff will take hours to answer the call light. This happens a lot. I try to help R4 as much as I can. The nurses and certified nursing assistants bring their personal problems to work and talk about this personal issues instead of helping the residents. On 07/29/2025 at 2:57PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, The expectation for call lights is that the staff will answer the call lights within a timely manner. Sometimes staff are not able to answer the resident call lights in a timely manner because there is a code, which is understandable. I think 3 to 5 minutes is an acceptable time for a resident to wait on staff to answer a call light. I answer call lights right away and acknowledge the resident's needs immediately. I never leave a resident waiting to have their call lights answered for 11 minutes because I answer the call lights right away. It is never acceptable for any staff to walk past a resident's call light and not answer it. It is never okay to walk past a call light and not answer it. I will do an in-service with the nurses and the certified nursing assistants about making sure that resident call lights are answered promptly. On 08/01/2025 at 12:20PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, An acceptable amount of time for a resident to wait to get their call light answered is between 5 to 10 minutes, depending on the situation. The certified nursing assistants are wearing purple uniforms. It is not the facility's policy for a certified nursing assistant or any staff member to walk past a resident's call light and not answer it and see what the resident needs. Call Light Response Policy Residents Affected - Few (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 145337 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 145337 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/06/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Ryze on the Avenue 3400 South Indiana Chicago, IL 60616 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0558 (dated 01/10/2024) documents in part: To provide the staff with guidance on responding to residents' requests and needs. Answer the patient or resident's call as soon as possible. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 145337 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0558GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F558 - The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 6, 2025 survey of RYZE ON THE AVENUE?

This was a inspection survey of RYZE ON THE AVENUE on August 6, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at RYZE ON THE AVENUE on August 6, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

SourceView on CMS Care Compare

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.