Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

AMBASSADOR NURSING & REHAB CENTERCMS #1453431 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0558 Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to make reasonable accommodations toward assisting one resident, R1 of three R5, R6 residents to maintain independent functioning and well being with R1's own needs and preferences. Residents Affected - Few Findings inlude, R1's clinical record indicates in part, R1 is an eighty-five-year-old admitted with medical diagnosis of transient cerebral ischemic attack, vitamin D deficiency, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, weakness and retention of urine. R1's minimum data set indicates R1 is cognitively intact. On 8/27/24 at 1:45 PM, R1 stated I have back pain and need to use my cane for short distance. I use my walker for long distances. I have not hit anyone with my cane. I have not fallen since I been here in the facility. One day the social worker lady took my cane and did not tell me why. Therapy told me I could use my cane for short distance and use the wheelchair for long distance. I do not know why the social worker took my cane; she did not tell me the reason. I came here with my own cane that I paid for, she had no right taking my cane. I been crying over my cane; they gave me a walker that I do not use it makes my shoulder hurt and makes me stiff. I almost fell a few times because I did not have my cane to go to the bathroom. The social worker took my cane, for no reason. I have never used my cane as a weapon, nor have I ever hit anyone with my cane. I have used my cane for years to help me get around independently and safely. I have been asking V1 (Administrator) for my cane back, but he has nothing to say, nor has he gave it back to me. On 8/28/24 at 10:00 AM, V20 (Director of Therapy) stated, When R1 was admitted she came to the facility with her own cane. R1 started physical therapy on 3/29/24 thru 6/24/24. With the use of her walker at the beginning of therapy, she could walk with her cane, for 25 feet, but needed staff minimal assistance. For longer distance, R1 needed to use her wheelchair. R1 was also given a front wheel walker to use at her convivence for short distance but did not need any staff assistance. R1 has three assistive devices she can use. Its all what R1 prefers. R1 has not had any falls or hit anyone with the cane to my understanding. I was told that her cane was taken away, because R1 was walking with the cane up in the air and not on the ground. Upon R1 completing physical therapy she was much stronger than she was at the start of therapy, R1's mobility had improved. R1 was safe to use her cane. The goal for all residents is to keep them at their highest level of mobility. If a resident is able to walk with a cane, they should use their cane to keep their strength and mobility functioning properly. If resident mobility assistive devices are not being used it could decrease their mobility and make the resident potentially weaker. On 8/29/24 at 11:33 AM, V21 (Restorative Nurse) stated, R1 is alert and oriented x3. R1 used her (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 145343 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 145343 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/30/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Ambassador Nursing & Rehab Center 4900 North Bernard Chicago, IL 60625 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0558 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm wheelchair for long distance and uses her walker for short distance. R1 did have her own cane, I am not sure what happened. R1 has not fallen or hit anyone with her cane, I am not sure why she doesn't have her cane. If R1 uses a wheelchair or walker, and is capable of using her cane, it could potentially cause R1 strength and mobility to decrease or worsen. The main goal is to keep all the residents at their highest level of functioning. Residents Affected - Few On 8/29/24 at 12:14 PM, V18 (Social Service Director) stated, I took the cane from R1 in June. R1 was using the cane to help herself propel the wheelchair. R1 would hold the cane up and down to help push herself in the wheelchair. I did not want R1 to accidently hit anyone with the cane. R1 has not hit anyone with the cane, nor has R1 used her cane as a weapon. R1 and I had a conversation that she could not use the cane to help her propel in the wheelchair, because the cane may hit someone, she said okay, but she continued to use the cane. I took the cane from her, and it is in my office. I did not call or notify R1's family that I took her cane. There were no interventions implemented before I took R1's cane. I did not recommend for therapy to show R1, how to self -propel in the wheelchair. I did not care plan R1's behavior in regard to her cane. I was responsible to care plan her behavior, but I forgot to care plan it before in June. R1's behavior with the cane was just care planned on 8/27/24, after I heard it was a concern regarding R1's cane. On 8/29/24 at 3:22PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, R1's cane was removed, because she would also use the cane to self-propel the wheelchair. Holding the cane up in the air then down. Administration team asked V18 to remove R1's cane. The team did not implement any interventions before the team decided to take R1's cane. R1 did not hit anyone with the cane nor did R1 have a fall while using the cane. On 8/29/24 V1 (Administrator) stated, R1's cane was taken away because she was using the cane as a paddle raising the cane up in the air. R1 did not hit anyone with cane. R1 was upset that her cane was taken away, but it was best for everyones safety. Policy document in part: Resident's Rights Your facility must provide services to keep your physical and mental health at the highest practical level. You have the right to refuse any medical treatment. If you refuse a treatment your facility must tell you what may happen because of you refusal and tell you other possible treatments. This is called a negotiated risk agreement and must be documented in your careplan. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 145343 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0558GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F558 - The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 30, 2024 survey of AMBASSADOR NURSING & REHAB CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of AMBASSADOR NURSING & REHAB CENTER on August 30, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at AMBASSADOR NURSING & REHAB CENTER on August 30, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.