Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ALLURE OF STERLINGCMS #1456151 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

145615 08/09/2025 Allure of Sterling 612 West St Mary's Street Sterling, IL 61081
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for elopement was supervised for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 3.The findings include:R3's admission record documents he was admitted on [DATE] with a diabetic foot ulcer and cellulitis. R3's elopement evaluation of 8/5/25 shows he had a history of elopement or attempted elopement while at home. Scoring a 1 for risk of elopement. No risk factors for elopement were identified, and no clinical suggestions or interventions were checked on the form.On 8/9/25 at 8:50 AM, V6 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) said on 8/5/25 R3 was observed going to the front door asking for family members to give him a ride. V6 said V8 Registered Nurse placed a wander guard bracelet on him so if he was attempting to go outside the alarm would sound. V6 did not recall where the wander guard came from or who gave it to V8 to put it on him. V6 said the next day on 8/6/25, R3 went to the front door in his wheelchair and had removed the wander guard so the alarm would not sound, and he left the facility. V6 said he was located at the gas station down the road. On 8/9/25, a message was left for V8, but no return call was received.On 8/9/25 at 8:55 AM, R3 said he was admitted to the facility for an infection to his foot, and he was on the other side of the facility for therapy. R3 stated the following: R3 can walk on his own but uses his wheelchair for longer distances. R3 was not happy his kids put him in the facility, so he left and was going to his friend's house. R3 did not tell anyone he was leaving; he just took off. R3 removed the wander guard because it would have made the door squeal when he left. R3 headed towards route 40 and made it to the gas station. R3 said he waited at the crosswalk to go across the highway. R3 said at the gas station he was put into a car and returned to the facility. R3 denied any falls, or injury and walked the entire distance without any issues. During the interview R3 was ambulating without assistance in his room. R3 had no visible injuries and spoke clearly of the event.On 8/9/25 at 1:00 PM, V9 LPN said R3 resided on the 200 wing and did not have any exit seeking behaviors. V9 said V12 CNA came to inform her R3 was asking family members to give him a ride. V9 said she completed the task she was doing and went to speak with R3, but he was not in his room or in the lobby. She said his wheelchair was by the front door and his wander guard was on the floor. V9 said she informed V6 to announce a missing resident, and all staff began to search for him. V9 said she left out the front door and went towards the east and the rest of the staff went west. Once she turned, she could see him down the road. R3 had a sack with him and was talking to a couple that were on the road. V9 said the couple assisted R3 across the highway to the gas station. Once at the gas station, V10 CNA arrived with the facility van, and V12 arrived with her mother in a private vehicle to assist with getting R3 back to the facility. V9 said R3 refused to get into the facility van but would get into the car. V9 said R3 was out of the facility for about 10 minutes total and had no injury noted upon assessment. On 8/9/25 at 2:25 PM, V1 Administrator said she was notified of the elopement around 6:00 PM, it was shift change. V1 was Page 1 of 2 145615 145615 08/09/2025 Allure of Sterling 612 West St Mary's Street Sterling, IL 61081
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few advised R3s wheelchair was found by the front door, and he had removed a wander guard. V1 said she was not aware R3 had a wander guard and could not determine who ordered it or placed it on R3. V1 said there is a process for placing a resident on such a device. It should have an assessment, care planning and orders.The facility's 4/16/21 policy for elopements and wandering residents the facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk. 145615 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 9, 2025 survey of ALLURE OF STERLING?

This was a inspection survey of ALLURE OF STERLING on August 9, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ALLURE OF STERLING on August 9, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.