Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

WAUKEGAN HEALTH AND REHABCMS #1456212 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0610 Respond appropriately to all alleged violations. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately investigate an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7. Residents Affected - Few The findings include: R1's face sheet printed on 11/9/23 showed diagnosis including but not limited to cerebrovascular disease, ataxia (muscle movement impairment), aphasia (speech impairment), and vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment. The assessment showed total staff assistance required for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The same assessment showed R1 is always incontinent of urine and bowel. R1's care plan showed a focus area related to incontinence. Interventions included check pads or briefs every two hours and report any red areas to the nurse. R1's progress note dated 11/7/23 (Tuesday) showed around 6:30 AM a CNA reported a bruise to R1's lower abdomen/pubic area. The writer checked on R1 and was noted with purplish discoloration to the pubic/lower abdomen area measuring approximately 10 x 6 centimeters. The nurse practitioner and director of nursing checked on resident. No complaints of pain or discomfort made known, resident is alert, non-verbal, contracted to both upper and lower extremities. Appears comfortable and smiling. On 11/9/23 at 11:45 AM, V5 (CNA-Certified Nurse Aide) stated she was providing incontinence care for R1 about one week ago and found a bruise on R1's pelvic/pubic area. It was dark purple and approximately the size of a grapefruit. V5 said she found it after breakfast on 11/3/23 (Friday). V5 said she reported the bruise to the floor nurse (V4), the CNA supervisor (V6), and the wound care nurse (V7). V5 said she went to the room with V6 and V7 and all three of them viewed the pelvic area together. V5 said they were next to the bed and the brief was open for V7 to examine the bruising. V5 said she continued to care for R1 over the weekend and saw the same bruise on Saturday and Sunday. At 1:15 PM, V5 was interviewed again and was certain she saw and reported the bruising on 11/3/23. On 11/9/23 at 12:50 PM, V6 (CNA Supervisor) was interviewed regarding V5's report of bruising on 11/3/23. V6 said he did not remember any report or see any bruising. V6 said he did see V7 (WCN-wound care nurse) and V5 (CNA) in R1's room that Friday. They were at R1's bedside while looking at her arm and discussing a bruise. V6 said he remembered they were having a conversation about something in the room, at the bedside. On 11/9/23 at 12:55 PM, V7 (Wound Care Nurse) stated she did not know anything about a bruise to R1's body until 11/7/23 (Tuesday). V7 said she did not remember being in R1's room with V5 on that Friday, four days prior. (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 4 Event ID: 145621 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 145621 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 11/15/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Pavilion of Waukegan 2217 Washington Street Waukegan, IL 60085 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0610 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few On 11/9/23 at 1:09 PM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she did not know anything about R1's bruised pelvic area until 11/7/23 (Tuesday). On 11/14/23 at 10:18 AM, V2 (Director of Nurses) stated she was notified of a bruise to R1's lower abdomen/pelvic area on 11/7/23 in the morning. V2 said the night CNA (V9) reported it to the floor nurse. V2 said she went and looked at the area with V10 (Nurse Practitioner). The pelvic bruise was palm-size and a yellowish, purplish, greenish color. V2 said she could not determine how many days old the bruise was. V2 said an investigation was begun that day. V2 said during staff interviews, V5 stated she had found the bruise four days earlier and reported it to the floor nurse, wound care nurse, and CNA supervisor. V2 said V5 was uncertain of the exact reporting date until she looked at her cell phone calendar for verification. On 11/15/23 at 7:12 AM, V10 (Nurse Practitioner) stated she assessed R1's bruising with V2 on 11/7/23 (Tuesday). The pelvic area was light purple and appeared to have been there a few days. V10 said it was fading in color and not a new bruise. V10 said new bruises are a dark purple-reddish color. R1's bruise was lighter and spreading in a manner that indicated it was older. V10 estimated the bruise was approximately 3 days old. On 11/15/23 at 6:45 AM, V9 (CNA) stated she cared for R1 overnight 11/6 to 11/7. V9 said she did check R1's for incontinence during the night. V9 said she used the hallway light to limit the activity and not disturb resident sleep. V9 said she saw the pelvic bruising for the first time in the morning and reported it. V9 said the pelvic bruise was light purple and not super dark like new ones. V9 said the bruise looked old and was starting to fade away. On 11/15/23 at 10:25 AM, V2 (DON) stated new resident bruises should be investigated immediately after being discovered. It is a team effort to determine why and how it happened. V2 said R1's bruise was absolutely an injury of unknown origin based on the unusual location and size. It is important to investigate immediately to determine if abuse is occurring. The investigation determines if other residents or staff are involved and protects the residents. The facility's initial incident report to the Illinois Department of Public Health and the start of the investigation was dated 11/7/23 (four days after being discovered). The facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy date 2/7/17 states under the Internal Investigation section: If classified as an 'injury of unknown origin' the person gathering facts will document the injury, the location and time it was observed, any treatment given and notification of the resident's physician, responsible party. The Department of Public Health will be notified. Time frames for reporting and investigating the abuse will be followed. The policy states under the reporting section: The nursing staff is responsible for reporting the appearance of suspicious bruises, lacerations, or other abnormalities of an unknown origin as soon as it is discovered. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 145621 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 4 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 145621 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 11/15/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Pavilion of Waukegan 2217 Washington Street Waukegan, IL 60085 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement neurological assessments following an unwitnessed fall. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for falls in the sample of 7. Residents Affected - Few The findings include: R2's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an original admission date of 8/29/23. The Face Sheet showed diagnoses to include traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (a bleed in the space surrounding the brain due to a traumatic event); injuries due to a motor vehicle accident; schizoaffective disorder; and altered mental status. R2's 9/5/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed he had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of 12 out of 15. The MDS showed he required limited assistance of one person for walking in his room. The MDS showed he used a walker and wheelchair for mobility. On 11/14/23 at 11:13 AM, V14 Speech Therapist stated R2 and the room next to his share a bathroom. V14 said she was working in the adjoining room when she heard a bang and R2 had opened the bathroom door with his back as he fell to the ground. V14 said she notified the nurse immediately. V14 stated R2 was one of her patient's and she had seen R2 prior to his fall. V14 said, R2 had complained of a headache the day of his fall. On 11/9/23 at 1:53 PM, V12 Registered Nurse stated she was R2's nurse on 9/28/23, the day of his fall. V12 said the fall was not witnessed. V12 said the fall happened at around 1:00 PM. V12 said R2 stated he had gotten up to the go to the bathroom and then fell in the bathroom. V12 said R2 was known to have headaches. V12 said neurological checks (neurochecks) should be done on unwitnessed falls every 15 minutes for 2 hours. V12 said the neuro checks will continue for 72 hours at a tapered frequency. V12 said she would have documented R2's neurochecks in the electronic charting system. V12 was unable to locate any neurochecks for R2, other than her head to toe assessment on 9/28/23. (The assessment did not specify neurochecks were completed and did not mention a headache.) V12 said she did not do neurochecks at that time because she believed she only needed to do them once a shift. V12 said the 15-minute neurocheck interventions was not implemented for an unwitnessed fall until after R2's fall. On 11/9/23 at 2:25 PM V13 Certified Nursing Assistant stated R2 fell about 5 minutes after she delivered his lunch tray. V13 said this was between 12:30 PM and 1:00 PM. V13 said the fall was not witnessed. On 11/9/23 at 2:36 PM, V8 Registered Nurse stated she has been a nurse at the facility for several months and neurochecks are done every 15 minutes for 2 hours for an unwitnessed fall. V8 said this policy has been in place since she began her employment at the facility. On 11/9/23 at 1:09 PM, V11 Restorative Nurse/Falls Coordinator stated almost all unwitnessed falls are sent to the emergency department for evaluation. V11 said this is a precaution. V11 said if the resident remains in the facility after an unwitnessed fall the nurse should initiate neurochecks. V11 said neurochecks should be done every 15 minutes for the first several hours. V11 said the purpose of neurochecks is because certain problems like a brain blead can take a while to develop and show symptoms. V11 said the neurocheck intervention for falls is not apart of the facility's policy; (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 145621 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 4 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 145621 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 11/15/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Pavilion of Waukegan 2217 Washington Street Waukegan, IL 60085 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 however, the nursing staff have been trained on it. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm On 11/14/23 at 11:39 AM, V11 stated neurochecks every 15 minutes for 2 hours has been in place for months, for quite a while. V11 said R2 was at an elevated risk for another brain bleed due to his recent history. V11 said given R2's recent history of brain bleed and the fall was unwitnessed; he would have done neurochecks every 15 minutes for two hours then continue with them per the facility training. V11 said R2 was sent out to the hospital for evaluation the day of his fall because he was not able to sit unsupported at the edge of his bed. V11 said this was a change for R2 who was expected to be discharged home in a few days. Residents Affected - Few R2's 9/28/23 Nurses Note from 3:10 PM showed R2 was transported to the hospital. (Approximately two hours after his fall.) R2's 9/28/23 Nurses Note from 2:29 PM showed R2 had slipped in the bathroom and a physical examination was completed. (The note did not mention neurological status.) The facility's Fall Prevention Program (Revision 5/2023) does not address unwitnessed falls or neurochecks. On 11/15/23 at 12:35 PM, 15 minute neurochecks from 9/28/23 were requested and not provided. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 145621 If continuation sheet Page 4 of 4

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • 0610GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F610 - In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 15, 2023 survey of WAUKEGAN HEALTH AND REHAB?

This was a inspection survey of WAUKEGAN HEALTH AND REHAB on November 15, 2023. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at WAUKEGAN HEALTH AND REHAB on November 15, 2023?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.