F 0689
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement interventions per resident's care plans and
care assessment in preventing falls; and failed to follow policy related to fall investigation for two (R1 and
R5) of five residents reviewed for accidents and falls. These deficiencies resulted in R1 sustaining a fall that
resulted in bruising to the left side of the head and R1 being transferred to the local hospital for treatment
after being found sitting on the floor with left arm hanging on the left bedrail with head slouched over to the
left side. R5 who is confused with unsteady gait; had a fall requiring emergent transfer to the hospital and
was diagnosed with acute nondisplaced fracture to the left parietal calvarium.Findings include:R5 is a
[AGE] year old, female, admitted in the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Traumatic Subdural
Hemorrhage without Loss of Consciousness, Subsequent Encounter; Syncope and Collapse; Muscle
Wasting and Atrophy, Not Elsewhere Classified, Multiple Sites; Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity,
with other Behavioral Disturbance; Contusion of Unspecified Part of Head, Subsequent Encounter; Other
Fracture of Base of Skull, Subsequent Encounter of Fracture with Routine Healing; Traumatic Subarachnoid
Hemorrhage without loss of Consciousness, Subsequent Encounter; History of Falling and Unsteadiness
on Feet. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated [DATE] documented:Section C: BIMS (Brief Interview for
Mental Status) score of 7, which means severe cognitive impairment.Sec GG - Needs partial/moderate
assistance when sitting to standing, in walking 10 feet; and dependent on staff when walking 50 feet. R5
uses a manual wheelchair. R5's Fall Risk Evaluations recorded the following scores:[DATE] - 13, high
risk[DATE] - 15, high risk[DATE] - 12, high risk[DATE] - 12, high riskFacility's final incident report dated
[DATE] documented that on [DATE] at approximately 7:30 PM, R5 was observed laying on the floor in the
hallway near her room stating that she was walking to make her normal rounds when she slipped and fell.
She complained of pain to her head. V10 (Physician) was notified and ordered R5 to be sent out to the
hospital. She (R5) was admitted to the hospital and was diagnosed with an acute nondisplaced fracture to
the left parietal calvarium. On [DATE] at 2:41 PM, V7 (Registered Nurse, Agency) was asked regarding R5's
fall incident on [DATE]. V7 stated, That day, [DATE] was my first day of meeting her. I was endorsed that she
is a wanderer and needs redirection. I was at the nurses' station that time, the CNA (Certified Nurse Aide)
said, I tried to catch her, but I couldn't catch her. The aide who reported was not my aide. I and the other
nurse went there, and she (R5) was sitting on the floor, she (R5) said she hit her head but not enough to
knock her out. I assessed her (R5) and she's able to move. We put her on the wheelchair and brought her
to the nurses' station. I called physician and was ordered to send her out because she is on blood thinner. I
called paramedics. Upon assessment, she didn't complain of any pain, her ROM (range of motion) was still
intact. Paramedics came; she was not in pain. She was transported to the hospital. I was told she is a high
risk for falls and told me she does walk but needs redirection. I didn't hear any alarm. Her room was not
closed to nurses' station
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
145700
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
145700
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/18/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avantara Chicago Ridge
10300 Southwest Highway
Chicago Ridge, IL 60415
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
but close enough that I would be able to hear any alarm at the time. I was not aware about the alarm. The
nurse who helped me said she has a bed alarm. The aide told me she was not sure if the alarm was on
since V11 (Family Member) was still with her when she last saw her. V7 was also asked if R5 uses any type
of assistive device to help with locomotion. V7 mentioned, She is alert, oriented to self and place. She is
able to verbalize needs and wants but mostly confused during afternoon and night. She is ambulatory, she
does not use any walker or wheelchair, I have not seen her using one.According to change of condition
progress notes dated [DATE], R5 complained of moderate head pain.On [DATE] at 3:10 PM, V8 (Registered
Nurse, RN) was interviewed regarding R5. V8 replied, She is confused, I helped V7 last [DATE] when she
(R5) had the fall. I saw her (R5) walking in the hallway without any assistive devices. I told V7 that she (R5)
was walking by herself. I wasn't sure if she is supposed to be walking or not, so I called her (V7) attention. I
don't know if she (V7) heard me or not. She (V7) was at the nurses' station. After a while, they called me to
help because she (R5) was on the floor. I came, she was laying on the floor, by the door of another
resident's room. She (V7) did the assessment. At the time, I didn't hear any alarm gone off. I sometimes see
R5 walking in the hallway by herself, with unsteady gait. I think she is supposed to have a bed/chair
alarm.On [DATE] at 3:20 PM, V9 (CNA) was also asked regarding R5's fall incident on [DATE]. V9
verbalized, On [DATE], last time I checked on her, I put her to bed. I put two blankets on her per her
request. She was sleeping in bed and bed alarm was on. When I came back from break, I was informed
that she had a fall. She has bed and chair alarm. She uses wheelchair. She likes to walk but she needs to
use a wheelchair.R5's medical professional progress notes dated [DATE], documented: Current functional
status: wheelchairOn [DATE] at 11:21 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) was asked regarding R5. V2 stated, She
is able to ambulate but for safety we don't want her to ambulate alone. She has a wheelchair that she uses
for locomotion. She did have a bed/chair alarm, nurses and CNAs are responsible to check for the
functionality of the alarm. Staff must ensure fall interventions are in placed properly. If they see something
that resident is doing that is not safe, they have to redirect residents and report any safety hazard, safety
concerns. R5 can ambulate but unsteady with her feet so she needs assistance when ambulating, she
needs to use her wheelchair. She is very confused all the time. She has unsteadied feet. That time she had
a fall on [DATE], she (R5) was seen by V8 walking and tried to catch her not to fall. V9 was the CNA and
was on break at the time.Progress notes dated [DATE] indicated R5 was admitted to the hospital due to
skull fracture.R5's care plan regarding at risk for falls, dated [DATE] documented:Interventions:Encourage
R5 to use her wheelchair when trying to ambulate around the unit to promote safety.Provide bed/chair
alarm, and redirect R5 when seen restless or anxious. R1 is a [AGE] year-old, male, originally admitted in
the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Malignant Neoplasm of Oropharynx, Unspecified; Malignant
Neoplasm of Prostate; Secondary and Unspecified Malignant Neoplasm of Lymph Nodes of Head, Face
and Neck; Polyneuropathy, Unspecified; Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Region and History of Falling. MDS dated
[DATE] documented R1's BIMS score is 11, which means moderate impairment in cognition. R1 requires
supervision or touching assistance during sit to stand; chair/bed to chair transfer; walking 10, 50 and 150
feet. He has no impairment on both upper and lower extremity but uses walker for locomotion. Fall incident
report dated [DATE] recorded R1 was observed on the floor with left arm hanging on the left bedrail with
head slouched over to the left side. An attempt was made to arouse R1 but did not verbally respond, only
with eyes closed and opened. His level of consciousness was stuporous and only responsive to vigorous
stimulation. On [DATE] at 12:25PM, V4 (CNA) was interviewed regarding R1 and R's fall on [DATE]. V4
replied, On [DATE], I went back to his room after giving morning shower to the other resident. He (R1) was
sleeping. I went back
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
145700
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
145700
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/18/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avantara Chicago Ridge
10300 Southwest Highway
Chicago Ridge, IL 60415
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
in there after lunch, and he was on the floor on the left side of bed. He was sitting up on the floor. I asked
him and he did not respond. He was still alert but not verbally responsive. I called the nurse. He was on a
low air loss mattress; his left hand was in the rail.V5 (RN, Agency) was also interviewed regarding R1 on
[DATE] at 12:52PM. V5 stated, On [DATE] morning shift, the CNA (V4) reported to me he was sitting on the
floor. When I saw him, his arm was still holding the side rail. His head was slumped to the side of left side
rail. I did head to toe assessment, he was not verbally talking, he can open his eyes a bit but not saying
anything. He was sitting on the floor. I don't know if he slid down. He wouldn't keep his eyes open when I
call his name. I called paramedics. He kept on grunting and kept closing his eyes. I noticed mild swelling on
the left side of his face, by the eyes. There was no laceration, no issues with his eyes. He was not verbally
responsive, his mental status is my focus, that is why I called emergency. I saw him on the floor and my first
thing is to call paramedics because he was not responding.According to ambulance report dated [DATE],
paramedics found patient (R1) lying in bed, alert to painful stimuli only. Nursing staff stated that they were in
the room, left for about 5-10 minutes and when they came back, they found patient (R1) half on the floor
with his arm wrapped around the side rail of bed. Staff stated the patient (R1) normally alert, oriented to
self, time, place and situation and able to hold conversations. Patient (R1) was spitting up mucous and
bruising was noted to the left side of his face and his left eye pupil was in a slit and rotated. No other
injuries were noted.Emergency department attending physician notes dated [DATE] recorded R1 has
bruising to the left side of head; and left eye is irregularly shaped, not circular, linear, not reactive.On
[DATE] at 12:19 PM, V2 was asked on what was the cause of R1's fall. V2 verbalized, Based on what I
received there was no injury related to the fall. He had a fall; he was observed on the floor by the CNA who
reported to the nurse. And upon the nurse entering the room, she noted him not be responding. I did his fall
investigation I have witness statements only, but there was no injury noted upon assessment prior to
sending out to the hospital. The nurse said she did not know any swelling, nothing pretty much. Facility
presented two witness statements related to R1's fall on [DATE], as follows:V5 was asked about
representative notification; any bruising; hospital endorsement; last time R1 was seen and how long R1 was
transferred to the hospital. V4 was asked when was the last time R1 was seen and his condition; and if she
(V4) was the staff who observed R1 on the floor.There was no specific investigation related to the cause of
his (R1) fall and how he fell. On [DATE] at 10:38 AM, V10 (Physician) was interviewed regarding R1 and
R5. V10 stated, R5 has dementia, had traumatic subdural hematoma and has history of syncope and
collapse. On [DATE], I was informed that she had a fall. She was sent to the hospital. R1 has multiple
significant medical issues. Alert, he has cancer of the head and neck and was getting treatment from the
hospital. He has cancer of the prostate, chronic kidney disease and multiple several medical issues: chronic
or acute. He is getting blood thinners. On [DATE], I was notified that he had a change of condition, so he
was sent out to the hospital, and he had a fall. The assumption was he had a fall, and he needs to go to
emergency room. Staff should make all efforts to prevent falls. The goal is to prevent falls. Fall interventions
should be patient centered. Facility's policy titled Fall Occurrence dated [DATE] stated in part but not limited
to the following:Policy Statement: It is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents are assessed for risk
for falls, that interventions are put in place, and interventions are reevaluated and revised as necessary.
Procedure:5. The Falls Coordinator will review the incident report and may conduct his/her own fall
investigation to determine the reasonable cause of fall.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
145700
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3