F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for
services as needed.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and records review, the facility failed to refer five (R2, R3, R4, R5, R6) of five residents reviewed
for newly or possible serious mental disorders for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR)
Level I and II in a sample of five.
Findings include:
On [DATE], at 9:53AM, V4 (Director of social Services) stated R2's PASARR 1 ended on [DATE]st, 2023.
Another Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) 1 should have been renewed when R2
come back from the hospital on [DATE], and a PASSAR II should also have been done because R2 had
serious mental illness. V4 stated to date, R2 does not have a PASARR II. R2 has a notification/red flag in
assessment tool census stating R2 should be assessed for level II PASARR. V4 stated after surveyor and
V4 reviewed documents that showed R2 was flagged for assessment, created a PASARR screening
notification for R2 to be assessed for level II by the appointed screening agency. V4 stated R3's assessment
tool documents R3 was approved for PASARR level II on [DATE]th, 2023, it expired on [DATE]rd, 2023,
therefore, another level II PASARR should have been completed for his renewal before [DATE]rd, 2023. V4
stated the assessment tool website sent notification to facility via email on [DATE]th, 2023, and another
reminder on [DATE]th, 2023, that another level II PASARR needed to be completed for R3.
R2's face sheet documents R2's diagnosis with onset date of [DATE], to include but not limited to anxiety
disorder, unspecified and schizoaffective disorder, unspecified. R2's initial admission date as [DATE]. R2's
admission date is [DATE].
R3's face sheet documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], and R2's
diagnosis dated [DATE] include but not limited to Major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified,
schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and [DATE], bipolar disorder unspecified.
V4 stated R4's PASARR II was approved from previous facility on [DATE], and was approved for 180 days
-short term. It termed on [DATE]th, 2023. The assessment tool tracker sent a service matter letter to the
facility on [DATE], notifying the facility that another PASSAR II for R4 was required. The evaluation request
should have been completed before [DATE]th, 2023.
R4's current face sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE], and his
medical diagnoses dated [DATE] include but not limited to: Major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe
psychotic symptoms, Auditory hallucinations, suicidal ideations, bipolar 11 disorder.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
145885
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
145885
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/25/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Complete Care at the Boulevard
5905 West Washington
Chicago, IL 60644
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
V4 stated R5 was approved for level II PASARR for 60 days on [DATE]th, 2023, was renewed on Dec, 1st
2023, for 30 days and expired [DATE], therefore, R5 needed another level II PASARR, and someone (No
name provided) should have requested another PASARR completion. Instead a referral for a Specialized
Mental Health Rehabilitation Facility (SMHRF) was completed. But R4 was denied SMHRF, therefore, R5's
PASARR II should been renewed by the facility before [DATE]st, 2023, because R5 remained in the facility.
Residents Affected - Some
R5's current face sheet documents R5's admission date as [DATE], readmission was [DATE], and his
diagnosis, dated [DATE], include but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, unspecified, bipolar disorder,
current episode mixed unspecified, depression, unspecified, schizophrenia, unspecified, attention -deficit
hyperactive disorder, unspecified type.
V4 stated R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6 was discharged to the community on [DATE] and
readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. R6's PASARR level II was done in the hospital on
[DATE]. It was approved for 180 days, and the approval ended on [DATE], therefore R6's PASARR II should
have been renewed.
V4 stated a service letter, which stated R6's PASARR level II should be renewed was sent to the facility on
[DATE], but the facility did not follow up on the assessments needed.
R6's current face sheet documents R6 initial admission date as [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and
documents R6's diagnosis dated [DATE], as major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified, anxiety
disorder unspecified, [DATE]-violent behavior, suicidal ideations.
V4 stated she sent the renewal assessments for R2, R3, R4, R5, R6 yesterday ([DATE]) after interview with
surveyor on [DATE]. She was not aware before then that these residents needed a PASARR II screening
because she was new at the facility, and further stated she has now created an assessment tool for R2, R3,
R4, R5, R6 to be reviewed by the appointed screening agency.
V4 stated it was important for PASARRs to be completed on time to assure the residents are receiving their
specialized programs and treatment goals and to make sure the residents are in the right environment
related to their diagnosis. V4 further stated if the PASARRs are not completed, the resident will not get the
services they need and are in a stand still position because the facility will not know what the resident's
rehabilitation needs are. Therefore, these needs will not be met, and the resident might not be stabilized.
On [DATE], at 10:37AM, V4 (Social Services Director) stated newly admitted residents should come with a
Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level 1 from the hospital. PASARR level 11 is
completed for residents who have Serious Mental Illness (SMI), Intellectual Disability (ID), or
Developmental Disability (DD) or significant change in mental condition. V4 further said the facility's social
services department is responsible of entering a resident's information into the assessment tool of the
appointed screening agency so that the screening agency can access and review the date and schedule a
time to come to the facility to assess the resident for PASARR 11 within 48-72 hours.
On [DATE], at 1:16 PM V5 (Business office manager) stated when a resident is admitted to the facility, the
business office adds the resident's information into the online assessment tool so that the newly admitted
residents needing PASARR II, can be screened by appointed screening agency within 15 days of
admission to the facility. V5 stated that some PASARR II's were not completed because there
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
145885
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
145885
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/25/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Complete Care at the Boulevard
5905 West Washington
Chicago, IL 60644
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
was a transition period in social services and the facility did not have a Social Services Director to enter
resident PASARR information into the assessment tool which alerts the appointed screening agency that a
resident need to be assessed for PASARR 1 or 11.
V5 stated new social services director (V4) started on [DATE], and is training on entering the assessments
into the assessment tool on-line. V5 stated it is the facility's responsibility to update the screenings and to
notify the appointed screening agency when a staff member who collaborates the residents need for
PASARR assessments is no longer working in the facility and give appointed agency the new contact
information to reach the right worker at the facility for residents' assessments needs. V5 stated the
appointed screening agency was sending service matters request for reviews for the residents, but there
was no response from the facility since the social services director was no longer working at the facility.
V4 stated when a resident comes to the facility from the hospital with a new diagnosis of a severe mental
health issue, social services is supposed to use the online assessment tool within 12-48 hours so that the
appointed screening agency can come to the facility to screen the resident for level II PASARR. V5 stated
the appointed screening agency comes within 24-48 hours to assess the complete the resident
assessment.
V4 stated if the resident is not reviewed and assessed on time, they are not getting the services they need
such as programs/interventions for their psychiatric diagnosis.
Document titled: Path Tracker Census documents dates with exclamation mark residents needing PASARR
review attention.
Policy titled: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, no date, documents:
-PASRR can also advance person-centered care planning by assuring that psychological, psychiatric, and
functional needed considered along with personal goals and preferences in planning long-term care.
- In brief, the PASRR process requires that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be given
preliminary assessment to determine whether they might have SMI or ID. This is called Level 1 screen.
Those individuals who test positive at level 1 are then evaluated in depth, called Level 11 PASRR. The
results of this evaluation result in a determination of need, determination of appropriate setting, and a set of
recommendations for the services to inform the individual's plan of care.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
145885
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3