Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

PEARL OF HILLSIDE,THECMS #1459461 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0610 Respond appropriately to all alleged violations. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough and credible investigation was conducted for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility's investigative process failed to: 1) Reconcile conflicting evidence between a staff member's motive and the resident's initial allegation of being 'hit'; 2) Include critical witness testimony from the first clinician on the scene (V4 Agency RN) in reports provided to law enforcement; 3) Conduct a clinical review to assess the feasibility of a catastrophic orbital globe rupture and depressed fracture being caused by a minor 'accidental' strike; and 4) Factor the resident's Mild Alzheimer's and high-risk use of Eliquis into the evaluation of the incident and subsequent 'recantation.' As a result of this incomplete investigative process, the facility provided a medically implausible and incomplete narrative to law enforcement, which contributed to the premature closure of an abuse investigation into a life-altering injury. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Abuse Prevention Training Program, stated in part but not limited to: Abuse means any physical or mental injury inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Abuse is also the willful infliction of injury, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish to a resident. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse . Physical Abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means and that requires medical attention. The policy further states that Abuse is most likely to happen in situations that result in frustration, annoyance, and anger, and directs staff to manage these situations with self-control and to remove themselves from the situation when in doubt. Residents Affected - Few Review of the facility's final investigative file regarding the incident on 11/08/25 revealed that the facility neglected to document or include critical testimony and clinical evidence: During an interview on 01/16/26 at 11:55 AM, V4 Agency RN stated he was the first clinician on the scene and documented R1's immediate allegation that the CNA hit me. V4 also observed the CNA's agitated state and perceived anger toward R1 over a broken necklace as a possible motive. V4 stated he reported these findings to the Administrator and management, yet the facility's formal report to Law Enforcement did not include these observations and the fact that a staff member had reported the incident as an assault via a 911 call. The facility concluded R1's injury was accidental, suggesting the resident's eye was struck by the resident himself and did not include the possibility that the necklace chain or pendent may have been the contributing blunt object. Review of the hospital discharge summary confirmed a depressed orbital floor fracture and left orbital globe rupture requiring emergent surgical intervention. There was no evidence the facility consulted a medical professional to determine if a swinging pendant or a self-inflicted blow from an elderly resident with Mild Alzheimer's could generate the force required to fracture the bony orbit. (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 145946 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 145946 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 01/18/2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Pearl of Hillside,the 4600 North Frontage Road Hillside, IL 60162 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0610 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm There was no evidence that R1's use of Eliquis (Apixaban) and the associated risk of hemorrhage were evaluated. Clinical literature indicates that geriatric patients on anticoagulant therapy are at an increased risk for sight-threatening retrobulbar hemorrhages following blunt trauma. Despite R1 requiring emergent surgery for severe hemorrhaging, the facility did not conduct a clinical review to reconcile how a minor accident could lead to such a catastrophic emergency. Residents Affected - Few Review of Police Report #25-002908 indicated the Administrator (V1) provided a statement asserting the resident recanted the allegation. However, the facility's records do not indicate that R1's cognitive impairment (Mild Alzheimer's) or potential suggestibility following traumatic injury were considered when evaluating the validity of this recantation. Furthermore, the facility did not demonstrate that a neutral advocate or social worker was present during the interview where the recantation occurred. A review of the facility's internal abuse investigation procedures revealed that the facility lacked a thorough and complete investigative process as required by Federal regulations. Specifically, by omitting documented allegations of physical assault from the formal report and failing to clinically validate the feasibility of the injury, the facility lacked a thorough implementation of a system that ensures residents are protected. This facility's investigative process mischaracterized a major physical assault as an accident, resulting in profound clinical and legal consequences for R1. The resident sustained a permanent left orbital globe rupture and total loss of vision in the affected eye. Additionally, the apparent incomplete narrative provided to law enforcement resulted in the closure of the criminal investigation without charges, depriving a resident with Mild Alzheimer's of the legal recourse and protective oversight necessary following a life-altering injury. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 145946 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0610GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F610 - In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 18, 2026 survey of PEARL OF HILLSIDE,THE?

This was a inspection survey of PEARL OF HILLSIDE,THE on January 18, 2026. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at PEARL OF HILLSIDE,THE on January 18, 2026?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Respond appropriately to all alleged violations."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.