F 0610
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough and credible investigation was
conducted for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility's investigative process failed
to: 1) Reconcile conflicting evidence between a staff member's motive and the resident's initial allegation of
being 'hit'; 2) Include critical witness testimony from the first clinician on the scene (V4 Agency RN) in
reports provided to law enforcement; 3) Conduct a clinical review to assess the feasibility of a catastrophic
orbital globe rupture and depressed fracture being caused by a minor 'accidental' strike; and 4) Factor the
resident's Mild Alzheimer's and high-risk use of Eliquis into the evaluation of the incident and subsequent
'recantation.' As a result of this incomplete investigative process, the facility provided a medically
implausible and incomplete narrative to law enforcement, which contributed to the premature closure of an
abuse investigation into a life-altering injury. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Abuse Prevention
Training Program, stated in part but not limited to: Abuse means any physical or mental injury inflicted upon
a resident other than by accidental means. Abuse is also the willful infliction of injury, intimidation, or
punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish to a resident. Instances of abuse of all
residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It
includes verbal abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse . Physical Abuse is the infliction of injury on a
resident that occurs other than by accidental means and that requires medical attention. The policy further
states that Abuse is most likely to happen in situations that result in frustration, annoyance, and anger, and
directs staff to manage these situations with self-control and to remove themselves from the situation when
in doubt.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of the facility's final investigative file regarding the incident on 11/08/25 revealed that the facility
neglected to document or include critical testimony and clinical evidence:
During an interview on 01/16/26 at 11:55 AM, V4 Agency RN stated he was the first clinician on the scene
and documented R1's immediate allegation that the CNA hit me. V4 also observed the CNA's agitated state
and perceived anger toward R1 over a broken necklace as a possible motive. V4 stated he reported these
findings to the Administrator and management, yet the facility's formal report to Law Enforcement did not
include these observations and the fact that a staff member had reported the incident as an assault via a
911 call.
The facility concluded R1's injury was accidental, suggesting the resident's eye was struck by the resident
himself and did not include the possibility that the necklace chain or pendent may have been the
contributing blunt object. Review of the hospital discharge summary confirmed a depressed orbital floor
fracture and left orbital globe rupture requiring emergent surgical intervention. There was no evidence the
facility consulted a medical professional to determine if a swinging pendant or a self-inflicted blow from an
elderly resident with Mild Alzheimer's could generate the force required to fracture the bony orbit.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
145946
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
145946
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/18/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Pearl of Hillside,the
4600 North Frontage Road
Hillside, IL 60162
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0610
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
There was no evidence that R1's use of Eliquis (Apixaban) and the associated risk of hemorrhage were
evaluated. Clinical literature indicates that geriatric patients on anticoagulant therapy are at an increased
risk for sight-threatening retrobulbar hemorrhages following blunt trauma. Despite R1 requiring emergent
surgery for severe hemorrhaging, the facility did not conduct a clinical review to reconcile how a minor
accident could lead to such a catastrophic emergency.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of Police Report #25-002908 indicated the Administrator (V1) provided a statement asserting the
resident recanted the allegation. However, the facility's records do not indicate that R1's cognitive
impairment (Mild Alzheimer's) or potential suggestibility following traumatic injury were considered when
evaluating the validity of this recantation. Furthermore, the facility did not demonstrate that a neutral
advocate or social worker was present during the interview where the recantation occurred.
A review of the facility's internal abuse investigation procedures revealed that the facility lacked a thorough
and complete investigative process as required by Federal regulations. Specifically, by omitting documented
allegations of physical assault from the formal report and failing to clinically validate the feasibility of the
injury, the facility lacked a thorough implementation of a system that ensures residents are protected.
This facility's investigative process mischaracterized a major physical assault as an accident, resulting in
profound clinical and legal consequences for R1. The resident sustained a permanent left orbital globe
rupture and total loss of vision in the affected eye. Additionally, the apparent incomplete narrative provided
to law enforcement resulted in the closure of the criminal investigation without charges, depriving a resident
with Mild Alzheimer's of the legal recourse and protective oversight necessary following a life-altering injury.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
145946
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2