Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ALDEN OF WATERFORDCMS #1460081 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

146008 12/05/2024 Alden of Waterford 2021 Randi Drive Aurora, IL 60505
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff safely transferred a resident by not using a gait belt for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet printed on 12/5/24 showed R1 was a [AGE] year-old female that was diagnosed with abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness, and history of falls. R1's fall Care Plan with an initiated date of 10/18/24 showed R1 was at risk for falls related to generalized weakness, activity intolerance, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, spinal stenosis, history of falls, and needing assistance with activities of daily living. The facility's Incidents report with a date range of 9/5/24- 12/5/24 showed R1 had a fall on 11/3/24, 11/12/24, and 11/17/24. R1's Progress Note dated 11/17/24 showed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was walking R1 to the bathroom and R1 lost her balance and fell. The CNA attempted to lower R1 to the ground, but a gait belt was not in use. On 12/5/24 at 11:45 AM, V7 (Restorative Nurse) said she was involved with R1's fall on 11/17/24. V7 said V11(CNA) was assisting R1 to the bathroom when R1 fell. V7 said she went to assess R1. V7 said she found R1 on the floor near the foot of R1's bed. V7 said R1 did not have a gait belt on. V7 said staff should have used a gait belt when assisting R1 to walk. V7 added that a gait belt is used to help stabilize a resident when walking and possibly be used to lower a resident to the ground if needed. On 12/5/24 at 12:52 PM, V11 said on 11/17/24 R1's call light was on. V11 said she entered R1's room and found R1 sitting on the side of the bed wanting to go to the bathroom. V11 said she helped R1 to stand. According to V11, R1 was walking to the bathroom when R1's right leg gave out causing R1 to lose her balance and fell to the ground landing on her right side. V11 said she tried to ease R1 to the ground but R1 did not have a gait belt on. V11 said R1 was a resident that required a gait belt. On 12/524 at 10:13 AM, V10 (Therapy Director) said R1 required assistance from staff to walk and staff should have used a gait belt when assisting R1 to walk. Page 1 of 2 146008 146008 12/05/2024 Alden of Waterford 2021 Randi Drive Aurora, IL 60505
F 0689 A facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 required supervision or touch assistance with ambulating. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm The facility's Gait Belt/Transfer Belt policy dated 9/2020 showed a gait belt will be used with weight bearing residents who require hands on assistance. Residents Affected - Few 146008 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 5, 2024 survey of ALDEN OF WATERFORD?

This was a inspection survey of ALDEN OF WATERFORD on December 5, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ALDEN OF WATERFORD on December 5, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.