F 0657
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed,
and revised by a team of health professionals.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive resident-centered
care plan for one resident (R2) out of four residents reviewed for care plan revision.
Findings Include:
R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows he is cognitively impaired.
R2's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was
[AGE] years old with diagnoses of, but not limited to unspecified fall, subsequent encounter, malignant
neoplasm of bladder, heart failure, unspecified atrial fibrillation, hypertension, unsteadiness on feet, muscle
weakness generalized, chronic kidney disease, diverticulitis of intestine with perforation and abscess with
bleeding.
On 6/3/25 at 3:30 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/Fall Coordinator) stated she has been in the facility since
August 2024, she collaborates with the care plan coordinator to update the care plan with new interventions
to prevent further falls. On 6/4/25 at 2:44 PM, V2 state if a resident falls once that resident is at high risk for
fall, R2 had two falls prior, so he is at high risk, and a resident centered care plan should be updated
accordingly to prevent further falls. Surveyor showed V2 that R2's falls of 2/18/25 and 4/5/25 were both
initiated on 6/2/25, she stated she expects the care plan coordinator to update but she is planning to review
all care plans.
On 6/4/25 at 12:15 PM, V14 (Minimum Data Set/MDS/Care Plan Coordinator) stated that she has been
working in the facility since 2022, she does the care plan for the diagnoses, medications, readmission,
admission, quarterly, significant change, and helps with the fall care plan. The purpose of care plan is to set
goals for the resident and for the staff to know how to care for the resident. Care plan should be updated
post fall with appropriate interventions, R2's care plan should have been updated with the interventions to
prevent further fall.
Documents reviewed are not limited to the following:
R2' Face Sheet, POS, Section C, GG, and of MDS.
R2's fall care plan was initiated on 6/2/25 for fall of 2/18/25 and 4/5/25.
Care Plan-Comprehensive Policy dated 1/2024, documents read in part: assessments of resident are
ongoing, and care plans are revised as clinical information about the residents and if the residents'
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
146165
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
146165
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Admiral at the Lake, The
933 West Foster Avenue
Chicago, IL 60640
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0657
conditions change.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
146165
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
146165
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Admiral at the Lake, The
933 West Foster Avenue
Chicago, IL 60640
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, and record review facility failed to perform accurate fall risk assessment for a resident with a
known fall history, develop and implement post fall interventions to prevent future falls and failed to monitor,
document, and send resident to hospital in a timely manner post fall incident for one resident (R2) out of
four residents reviewed for accident and supervision. This failure led to R2 falling in the facility sustaining
multiple acute fractures.
Findings Include:
R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows he is cognitively impaired.
R2's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was
[AGE] years old with diagnoses of, but not limited to unspecified fall, subsequent encounter, malignant
neoplasm of bladder, heart failure, unspecified atrial fibrillation, hypertension, unsteadiness on feet, muscle
weakness generalized, chronic kidney disease, diverticulitis of intestine with perforation and abscess with
bleeding.
On 6/3/25 at 1:53 PM, via telephone interview, V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that he observed
R2 in a sitting position on the floor in his room on 5/12/25 at about 1:15 AM, he denied pain, or hitting his
head, the vital signs were stable, he is not aware that R2 was on Eliquis, but the doctor ordered lab and to
monitor since he did not hit his head. V11 also stated that there should be seventy-two hours post fall
documentation every shift to monitor the resident for any changes and to prevent medical complication, but
he did not work with R2 after the incident.
R2's fall investigation summary form documents At around 1:15 AM resident observed on the floor, sitting
position, by the bedside and call light is within reach. Resident verbalized I lost my balance while trying to
get out of bed.
On 6/3/25 at 3:30 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/Fall Coordinator) stated that she has been in the facility since
August 2024, she completes the fall risk assessment based on the root cause of the fall and collaborate
with the care plan coordinator to update the care plan with new interventions to prevent further falls. V2 also
stated that there should be seventy-two hours post fall documentation every shift to monitor R2 for any
changes, to provide timely care and to prevent complication.
On 6/4/25 at 2:44 PM, V2 stated that R2 was sent to the hospital on 5/16/25 due to neck pain with
diagnosis of multiple acute fracture, he is at high risk for fall due to the history of fall prior to admission
because he had a fall on 2/18/25. The fall risk assessment of 3/5/25 shows a score of 65, and on 4/9/25
with a score of 80 shows that R2 continues to be at an increased high risk for falls. He should be accurately
documented and care planned to prevent further falls, but the readmission falls risk assessment of 4/21/25
shows a score of 3 (low risk). V2 stated that R2 was not accurately assessed to prevent the fall of 5/12/25
which resulted to multiple neck fractures, and when fall risk assessment is not accurately done, appropriate
intervention will not be in place and resident safety will be compromised.
On 6/4/25 at 12:15 PM, V14 (Minimum Data Set/MDS/Care Plan Coordinator) stated that she has been
working in the facility since 2022, she does the care plan for the diagnoses, medications,
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
146165
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
146165
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Admiral at the Lake, The
933 West Foster Avenue
Chicago, IL 60640
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Actual harm
readmission, admission, quarterly, significant change, and helps with the fall care plan. The purpose of care
plan is to set goals for the resident and for the staff to know how to care for the resident. Care plan should
be updated post fall with appropriate interventions, R2 is at high risk for fall, his fall assessment should
reflect high risk, inaccurate fall assessment will lead to ineffective care plan and potentially another falls.
Residents Affected - Few
On 6/4/25 at 1:16 PM, V15 (Medical Director) stated that he has been taking care of R2 for two years, he
was substantially getting weaker, dependent on staff for activity of daily living, he is at high risk for fall, he
had a big fall on 4/5/25, and another fall on 5/12/25. R2 was on Eliquis but according to the nurse report R2
denied hitting his head so there was no need to send him to the hospital on 5/12/25, however it is his
expectation that nurses will continue to monitor him every shift and document to rule out any complication.
Documents reviewed but are not limited to the following:
R2' Face Sheet, POS, Section C, GG, and of MDS.
R2's progress notes document on 5/16/25 at 1:30PM care partner and (NOD-nurse on duty) were assisting
the care, the resident was screaming when the resident was moving in bed. (Physician) notified, per MD
send (R2) out for further evaluation. Resident admitted with diagnosis of multiple acute fracture at C4, C5
and C6.
R2's clinical records had no documentation showing that 72 hours post fall monitoring/supervision was
done post fall of 5/12/25.
R2's Fall risk assessment dated [DATE] with a score of 65 = high risk
R2's Fall risk assessment dated [DATE] with a score of 80 =high risk
R2' Fall risk assessment dated [DATE] with a score of 3 =low risk.
Safety and supervision of residents' policy dated 12/2024, documents read in part: Resident supervision is
a core component of the systems approach to safety.
Fall Risk Prevention Policy dated 4/4/2025, documents read in part: Staff will try attempt interventions,
based on the assessment.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
146165
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4