F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall
prevention interventions were implemented as care planned. This affected one (#74) of three residents
sampled for falls. The facility census was 89.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed
Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple fractures of ribs
(09/24/25), unspecified bipolar disorder, recurrent major depressive disorder, unspecified anxiety disorder,
chronic pain syndrome, repeated falls, and stage IV chronic kidney disease.Review of the annual Minimum
Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no
behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander.Review of the care plan dated 08/14/24 revealed
Resident #74 was at risk for falls related to the resident refusing to have environmental modifications in
room to reduce falls, self-medicating, using alcohol, using mobility devices, and having clutter in the room.
Interventions included cushion in wheelchair, anti-roll backs to wheelchair, encourage to use call light, new
bed/mattress, educating on appropriate footwear, encouraging the resident to keep bed in lowest position,
non-skid strips to floor next to the bed (09/24/25), and family to declutter room.Observation on 01/27/26 at
12:07 P.M. revealed Resident #74 did not have nonskid strips on the floor beside her bed.During an
interview on 01/27/26 at 12:07 P.M. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #151 verified Resident #74 had no
non-skid strips on the floor beside her bed.During an interview on 01/27/26 at 3:54 P.M. Maintenance #204
verified Resident #74 did not have non-skid strips on the floor in her room and stated they would have to be
ordered because there were none available in the facility.During an interview on 01/28/26 at 1:52 P.M. the
Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #74 did not have non-skid strips on her floor at the bedside as
care planned.Review of policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans dated March 2022
revealed each resident had a comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet the resident's
physical, psychological, and functional needs.This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under
Complaint Number 2716105 and is a recite to the annual survey completed 12/23/25.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
365044
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365044
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/10/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Arc at Cincinnati
4001 Rosslyn Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45209
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, review of the hospital records, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to
ensure timely treatment of a left leg fracture. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #91 complained
of a new onset of left leg pain on 12/18/25. After examination, Nurse Practitioner (NP) #235 ordered X-rays
for the wrong limb. Upon realizing the error, NP #235 ordered X-rays for the correct limb on 12/19/25;
however, the X-rays were not completed until 12/21/25, revealing Resident #91 had a suspected bicondylar
fracture of the left distal femur. Resident #91 was sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment on
12/22/25 where the resident required surgery for an Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) on
12/24/25. This affected one (#91) of three residents reviewed for care post fall. The facility census was
89.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE] and was discharged on 01/06/26. Diagnoses included unspecified nutritional deficiency, displaced
fracture of the lateral condyle of the left femur, other fracture to the lower end of the left femur, major
depressive disorder, ischemic cardiomyopathy, unspecified cerebral infarction of the right middle cerebral
artery, type II diabetes, and unspecified heart failure.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0
assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition, had verbal behaviors, did
not reject care, and did not wander. Resident #91 was dependent on staff for toileting, mechanical lift
transfers, and bed mobility.Review of the care plan dated 10/04/24 revealed Resident #91 was at risk for
pain. Interventions included evaluating the effectiveness of pain interventions.Review of a progress note
dated 12/18/25 at an unspecified time revealed NP #235 documented she acutely evaluated Resident #91
for reports of a possible fall out of bed prior to the current shift. Resident #91 reported he rolled out of bed
onto the floor on his right side with knees colliding together. There was no nursing documentation reflecting
a fall or change-in-plane status. Notes pertaining to the left leg evaluation were contradictory. The
documentation read, no crepitus or difficulty with range of motion (ROM) in the knee or the ankle with
passive motion. Resident #91 reported pain with passive ROM and does not participate in active ROM.
Completed adduction and abduction of left hip with continued complaints of discomfort. Left leg is stiff with
upper leg muscle contractions. The assessment and plan included a possible fall occurring within the last
24 hours without supporting documentation from nursing staff. Resident #91 reported pain in the left leg
with no participation in active ROM. No abnormalities with passive ROM. STAT (at once) imaging ordered.
Verbal orders were given to the nursing staff for the resident to receive one gram of acetaminophen (pain
reliever) now and apply Lidocaine (pain reliever) patch. Will re-evaluate Resident #91 in the
morning.Review of a progress note dated 12/18/25 at 4:10 P.M. revealed Resident #91 reported an
unwitnessed fall occurring on the previous shift. Resident #91 complained of pain to the left knee which
upon assessment appeared swollen. Registered Nurse (RN) #104 notified NP #235 who assessed and
found Resident #91 was unable to participate in ROM to the left leg due to pain. New orders were placed
and entered by NP #235 for an X-ray to the left leg, a one-time dose for Tylenol (acetaminophen) and a
lidocaine patch to the left leg. Pain medications were administered and were effective.Review of the
medical record revealed Resident #91 had physician orders dated 12/18/25 for an X-ray of the right hip two
views STAT for pain, acetaminophen 500 milligrams (mg) give two tablets by mouth for pain now, and
Lidocaine External four percent patch topically to the right posterior hip for twelve hours and remove for
twelve hours.Review of the X-ray results dated 12/18/25 revealed Resident #91 had an X-ray to the right
knee completed at 9:00 P.M. and reported on 12/18/25 at 10:13 P.M. which revealed modest arthritis of the
right knee. Additionally, on 12/18/25
Residents Affected - Few
Note: The nursing home is
disputing this citation.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365044
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365044
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/10/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Arc at Cincinnati
4001 Rosslyn Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45209
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Note: The nursing home is
disputing this citation.
Resident #91 had an X-ray completed of the right hip at 9:03 P.M., and reported at 9:32 P.M., which showed
modest osteoarthritis of the right hip.Review of the progress note dated 12/19/25 and untimed, revealed
Resident #91 had left knee swelling for an unwitnessed fall on 12/18/25 was treated topically. Review of an
X-ray of the right hip noted osteoarthritis. New orders were placed for medications including oral
anti-inflammatory twice daily and a muscle relaxer for seven days and X-rays of the left hip and
knee.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #91 had physician orders dated 12/19/25 for an X-ray
of the left hip two views for pain and an X-ray of the left knee two views for pain. Additionally, the physician
discontinued the ordered Lidocaine patch to the posterior right hip. New orders for Lidocaine four percent
topical patch to the left posterior hip for pain (on 12 hours, off 12 hours), Ibuprofen 600 mg by mouth three
times daily for osteoarthritis of the knee for seven days, and methocarbamol (a muscle relaxer) 750 mg by
mouth twice daily for osteoarthritis of the knee for 10 days.Review of the X-ray results dated 12/21/25
revealed Resident #91 had X-rays of the left knee and the left hip at 12:51 P.M. Results reported on
12/21/25 at 6:00 P.M. revealed the left knee was highly suspicious for a minimally displaced distal femoral
metaphyseal fracture only seen in the lateral view. The X-ray of the left hip showed mild degenerative
changes without acute fracture or dislocation.Review of a progress note dated 12/22/25 at 10:27 A.M.
revealed NP #235 reviewed the X-ray results for the left side as previously ordered post fall. Resident #91
was sent to the hospital due to a suspicious, non-confirmed fracture of the left leg.Review of a progress
note dated 12/22/25 at 1:22 P.M. revealed therapy notified nursing that Resident #91 was being transferred
to the hospital for further evaluation for suspicion of a left leg fracture. Emergency Medical Services (EMS)
personnel transported Resident #91 to the hospital where he was admitted for evaluation of a possible left
distal femur fracture and bradycardia.Review of hospital documentation dated 12/26/25 revealed Resident
#91 was admitted on [DATE] and treated for a closed bicondylar fracture of the left distal femur with Open
Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) on 12/24/25. The fracture was of unknown morphology. The resident
stated he had fallen out of his bed on the left side while at the facility but was unable to provide more
information due to baseline dementia. The hospital was unable to contact the nursing facility staff for further
information.During an interview on 01/28/26 at 8:35 A.M., NP #235 said she arrived at the facility on
12/18/25 around 8:35 A.M., Resident #91 was seated in his wheelchair in the dining room and had not
complained of pain or appeared to be in any pain. Around 4:00 P.M., RN #104 reported Resident #91 was
complaining of pain and needed to be assessed. Upon arrival in the room, Resident #91 was already in
bed. He was complaining of pain in the left leg. NP #235 stated she placed the orders for him to have
X-rays of the right hip by mistake and had not realized the mistake until she saw the results the next day.
On Friday, 12/19/25, she ordered X-rays to the left hip and knee, and routine oral pain medications
including Ibuprofen and Robaxin for pain. NP #235 stated when she arrived at the facility on Monday
morning. She checked the facsimile (fax) machine; Resident #91's X-ray results, dated 12/21/25, were on
the fax machine and indicated he had a fracture. Resident #91 had not appeared to have uncontrolled pain
on Monday morning when she saw him. NP #235 stated she sent Resident #91 to the hospital for further
evaluation and treatment.During an interview on 01/29/26 at 11:50 A.M., the facility Medical Doctor (MD)
#245 stated he was not informed of Resident #91's alleged fall, fractured leg requiring ORIF, or of NP
#235's incorrect orders until 01/29/26.During an interview on 02/10/26 at 12:14 P.M., Regional Consultant
#242 stated she had spoken with NP #235's direct supervisor, no specified date, and asked her to educate
NP #235 regarding professional standards related to the delay in care.During a telephone interview on
02/10/26 at 1:37 P.M. Regional Director of Med Elite of Ohio #255 stated she spoke with NP #235 in
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365044
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365044
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/10/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Arc at Cincinnati
4001 Rosslyn Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45209
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Note: The nursing home is
disputing this citation.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
December 2025, date not specified, regarding errors in physician orders which resulted in a delay of care
for Resident #91. She stated they discussed how important accuracy of orders was related to patient safety
and care. The regional director stated they spoke about having the appropriate practices in place to ensure
orders were created for correct limb. The NP #235 acknowledged her error and owned up to her mistake.
The regional director stated she might have some notes written down in her office about the conversation,
but she was unable to provide more details as she was out of town at a medical conference.During a
follow-up interview on 02/10/26 at 2:49 P.M., Regional Consultant #242 stated she was unaware of any
additional corrective actions the facility had taken regarding the delay of care which affected Resident
#91.Review of a policy titled Attending Physician Responsibilities dated August 2014 revealed attending
physicians were responsible for providing appropriate and timely medical orders and treatments to enable
safe, effective continuing care and to support facility compliance with regulations and care standards.This
deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Complaint Number 2716105.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365044
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4