F 0584
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited
to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable
environment for all residents. This affected 27 (Resident #13, #21, #22, #26, #33, #35, #43, #48, #52, #63,
#67, #79, #81, #93, #96, #100, #104, #107, #112, #123, #129, #130, #131, #131, #133, #138, #147)
currently residing on the 600 unit. The facility census was 147.
Findings include:
1. Observation on 01/12/20 at 10:09 A.M. of the 600 hallway between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] revealed
an overwhelming, highly offensive, musky, odor lingering in hallway.
Interview on 01/12/19 at 3:34 P.M. with 10:56 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #455 verified the
odor was presently strong and was persistent, but fluctuated from weak to strong.
Interviews from 01/13/20 at 3:30 P.M. through 01/15/19 at 10:33 A.M. with staff five staff members Licensed
Practical Nurse (LPN) #454, LPN #451, State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #492 and STNA #529 revealed
the residents in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] (Residents #63, #93, #43 and #112) were compliant with care
and received showers, and housekeeping cleaned the rooms daily, but the odor coming from the rooms
persisted.
Interview with the Administrator on 01/15/20 at 4:15 P.M. revealed he was aware of the persistent odor on
the 600 unit. The Administrator confirmed the residents were provided care and received their showers, but
despite several attempts to remove it the odor remained offensive and pervasive on the 600 unit.
2. An environmental tour conducted on 01/15/20 at 12:00 P.M. with Maintenance Director #475 and
Housekeeping Supervisor #442 revealed the following concerns which were verified at the time of the
observation Resident #48's room revealed a torn patch of wallpaper approximately four inches by four
inches above the night stand.
Interview on 01/15/20 at 4:15 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the 600 hallway was a behavioral unit.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 5
Event ID:
365134
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365134
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/15/2020
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hickory Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
721 Hickory St
Akron, OH 44303
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized meal plan to meet
Resident #22's needs. This affected one (Resident #22) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings include:
Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses
including Huntington's disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, dementia
with behavioral disturbance, mild protein calorie malnutrition, mood disorder, chronic migraines and major
depressive disorder.
Review of the comprehensive assessment (MDS 3.0) dated 10/03/19 indicated Resident #22 was alert,
oriented and independent in daily decision making ability. He had indications of delusions and rejected care
on one to three days of the assessment period. He required supervision and setup help only for eating. He
was provided a therapeutic diet.
Review of the nutrition assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #22 had a body mass index of 19.
Supplement orders included med pass 120 milliliters (ml) three times daily. The resident's meal intake
ranged from 75-100%, with supplement intake of 50-75%. The comments indicated the average intake was
84% with refusal at times. Also noted was a history of the behavior of not eating to get what he wanted. The
ideal body weight was 154 pounds. The goal was for gradual weight gain. Review of the dietary assessment
narrative dated 01/02/20 at 9:15 P.M. indicated the fortified cereal at breakfast provided 536 calories, 14
grams of protein and the med pass 2.0 provided 720 calories and 30 grams or protein. He was noted to
refuse 100%.
Review of the nutrition plan of care indicated the interventions included providing the diet per current
orders, honor food preferences as able, offer an evening snack, provide adaptive equipment, may have one
energy drink every day, recommend diet pop in place of regular if consuming multiple per day, supplements
and fortified foods per orders.
Review of weights revealed from 06/05/19 to 01/02/20 the resident's weight went from 132 pounds to 125
pounds. A total weight loss of 5.3 percent over a seven month period of time.
Review of meal intakes for the last 30 days revealed the resident had one meal during typical breakfast
hours on 12/26/19 and missed all three meals on five days (12/19/19, 12/20/19, 12/24/19, 01/06/20 and
01/11/20).
Interview with Resident #22 on 01/12/20 at 3:30 P.M. revealed he didn't like the food very much. He had his
own whey powder and used it to make his own shakes. He could not say how often he did that. Review of
the nutrition assessment revealed it did not take into account his own supplement.
Numerous observations of Resident #22 on 01/12/20 at 3:30 P.M. and throughout the survey through
01/15/20 revealed he appeared to be very thin and was in constant motion.
Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #465 on 01/13/20 at 3:03 P.M. reported the resident never
ate breakfast. Resident #22 said when he ate it slowed him down and he became tired. He would eat
double portions of chicken fingers, macaroni and cheese, but absolutely hated turkey. His intake
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365134
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365134
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/15/2020
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hickory Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
721 Hickory St
Akron, OH 44303
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
of ordered supplements was hit or miss.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Interview with Dietary Manager #427 on 01/13/20 at 2:34 P.M. revealed Resident #22 ate pretty well
occasionally. She reported his mother brought food in for him. The resident was changed from a regular
supplement to a very high calorie supplement on 01/02/20 to increase calories. Dietary Manager #427 was
aware of his occasional use of the whey supplement but could not count it because it was so sporadic.
Residents Affected - Few
Interview with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #527 on 01/14/20 at 2:05 P.M. revealed the resident always
refused breakfast because he did not get up until after noon, and sometimes refused lunch. He would have
eaten the biscuits and gravy they had for breakfast that morning, but none was reserved for him. He was
very picky about foods and they offered him an alternate but when he did not like the alternate either he
wouldn't eat anything. The alternates included burgers and salads but didn't include foods the resident liked
such as macaroni and cheese, tuna fish, fried chicken, chicken fingers and sloppy joe. STNA #527 reported
if she requested a food Resident #22 liked, but it was not on the alternate list, she was told that's not
scheduled and he would not receive it. STNA #527 felt it would be good for the the kitchen manager, diet
technician and dietitian to get together so they could meet Resident #22's needs. STNA #527 said the
resident sometimes missed many meals in a row.
Interview with Resident #22 on 01/14/20 at 2:10 P.M. verified he had no breakfast or lunch this day. He said
he requested his energy drink and had yet to receive it. He verified missing many meals because he slept
until after noon and because they served him foods he did not like. He listed the foods STNA #527
identified as his favorites and said he had a strong dislike of turkey but loved sloppy joe.
Interview with Registered Dietitian (RD) #543 on 01/14/20 at 3:02 P.M. reported she only consulted with the
facility one day a month. She said if a resident refused meals they had a whole kitchen full of foods that
could be made to accommodate them. RD #543 said there were a number of ways to handle Resident
#22's frequent refusals. They could talk with him, could hold his breakfast until later and could serve him a
heavy evening snack.
Interview was conducted with the Diet Technician #427, Dietary Manager #426 and the Administrator on
01/14/20 at 03:26 P.M. and they were informed there was no individualized meal plan set up for Resident
#22, and no evidence his likes or dislikes were obtained. They reported his likes and dislikes were listed on
his meal ticket. Review of Resident #22's meal ticket indicated he liked fortified cereal, cheeseburgers and
macaroni and cheese. No food dislikes were listed.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365134
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365134
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/15/2020
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hickory Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
721 Hickory St
Akron, OH 44303
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0693
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and
provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medication was properly
administered via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (peg) tube. This affected one resident (Resident
#139) of four residents observed for medication administration. There was only one resident identified with
a gastrostomy tube in the facility.
Findings include:
Resident #139 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses included type II diabetes,
cerebral infarction, aphasia, epilepsy, hypertension, Alzheimer's disease and adult failure to thrive.
Review of a Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and
was totally dependent on staff for eating due to the resident having a peg tube (a tube inserted into the
abdomen for the purpose of providing medications and nutrition for those unable to take these by mouth).
Review of the physician order dated 08/08/18 revealed the resident was to receive liquid Potassium
Chloride (a supplement) 20 milliequivalents (mEq) via peg tube three times a day.
Observation on 01/14/20 at 9:00 A.M. during medication administration for Resident #139 revealed
Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #453 entered Resident #139's room and administered the Potassium
Chloride 20 mEq. At the time of the observation the tube feeding bag was empty but still attached to the
resident's gastrostomy tube. LPN #453 stated a bolus of tube feeding solution had just finished infusing.
There was no tube feeding solution visibly remaining in the bag or tubing. LPN #453 proceeded to pour the
potassium chloride liquid into the feeding bag and let it infuse by gravity into the resident's stomach. He
then poured 20 cubic centimeters (cc) of water into the feeding bag and let the water infuse into the
resident's stomach. When this was done he disconnected the tubing of the feeding bag from the
gastrostomy tube.
On 01/14/20 at 9:15 A.M. LPN #453 verified he did not check placement or for residual before giving the
Potassium Chloride because he had done so before giving the bolus feeding. When asked why he did not
disconnect the feeding bag tubing and administer the medication medication directly into the peg tube, LPN
#453 said he did not have an order to push the medication in via syringe. LPN #453 also verified he did not
flush the peg tube with a full 30 ccs of water prior to and then again after administration of the medication.
Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administered Through an Enteral Tube dated 01/22/13
revealed after unclamping the tube, the nurse should check placement by inserting a small amount of air
into the tube with a syringe and listen with a stethoscope for placement and/or insert the syringe in the tube
and pull back the plunger to aspirate gastric contents. The nurse was then to administer 30 cc of warm
water or per the physician's order, then pour the medication into the syringe. The medication was to flow in
via gravity from the syringe. At the end of the administration of the medication the nurse was to flush the
feeding tube with 30 cc of warm water.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365134
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365134
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/15/2020
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hickory Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
721 Hickory St
Akron, OH 44303
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0812
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Many
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve
food in accordance with professional standards.
Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen floor, storage
areas and equipment was maintained in a clean manner, foods were properly stored in the refrigerator and
freezer, and foods were served to the residents in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 146
residents currently residing in the facility who received food prepared in the kitchen.
Findings include:
1. Initial tour of the kitchen on 01/12/20 at 9:00 A.M. revealed papers, multiple food crumbs, and a piece of
plastic silverware on the floor in the hallway where the freezer and refrigerator were kept. Behind the ice
machine, which was located in the same area there was an accumulation of dust, dirt and a disposable
plastic cup. Additionally, food crumbs were observed inside the microwave.
2. Observation of the freezer revealed three sheet pans containing frozen breadsticks, and a bag containing
cooked hamburger patties that were not labeled with a date or time. Additional items not labeled with a date
or time found in the refrigerator included three steam table pans filled with frozen mixed vegetables on a
cart, a large plastic container filled with chocolate pudding on a second cart, and a large metal bowl with
hamburger buns on the top shelf.
Interview with Dietary Manager #426 and Dietician Tech #427 on 01/12/20 at 10:00 A.M. verified the above
findings.
3. Observation during the dinner meal on 01/14/19 in the main dining room at 5:35 P.M. revealed Dietary
Aide (DA) #419 plating foods from the steam table. DA #419 was observed using her bare hands to put
french fries onto a resident's plate. DA #419 was also observed obtaining plates from the lower shelf under
the steam table, and handling meal tickets brought into the kitchen from resident tables the dining room. DA
#419 did not wash her hands after obtaining plates or handling meal tickets and continued to plate the
french fries with her bare hands.
Interview with Dietary Manager #426 on 01/20/20 at 5:45 P.M. DA #419 was plating foods with her bare
hands and did not wash her hands appropriately.
Review of the facility policy titled Food Storage-Labeling and Dating dated 07/18 revealed items must be
dated after opening with an open date and a Use by Date.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365134
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 5