Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

BLUE ASH HEALTH & REHABCMS #3652183 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 3 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

365218 01/20/2025 Blue Ash Care Center 4900 Cooper Road Cincinnati, OH 45242
F 0622 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged. Based on medical record review, resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility discharged a resident from the facility without a physician's order or proper documentation of a rationale for the facility-initiated discharge. This affected one (Resident #42) of two residents reviewed for transfer or discharge. The facility census was 51 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 08/18/23 with diagnoses including unspecified encephalopathy, dementia, mood affective disorder and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42 dated 10/03/24 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the progress notes for Resident #42 dated 08/18/24 to 01/10/25 revealed they did not include documentation of a discharge notice from the facility to the resident nor did they include any documentation of a reason for discharge. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #42 dated 08/18/24 to 01/10/25 revealed there was no discharge order for the resident. Review of social services progress note for Resident #42 dated 01/10/25 per Social Service Director (SSD) #31 revealed the resident was transferred on 01/10/25 to another facility. Resident #42 was picked up by receiving facility transport and the resident's responsible party was notified. Review of the facility initiated thirty-day discharge notice for Resident #42 dated 01/10/25 revealed the notice was sent to Resident #42 and Resident #42's responsible party via certified mail on 01/13/25. Review of the notice revealed Resident #42 was being discharged immediately because the safety of other individuals in the facility was endangered. Interview on 01/13/25 at 9:46 A.M. with Resident #42's responsible party revealed SSD #31 called the resident's brother on 01/08/25 and told him the facility was discharging the resident to another nursing home immediately. Resident #42's responsible party confirmed he did not speak directly with anyone from the facility but received a text message from the resident's brother on 01/08/25 indicating the facility informed him the resident would be discharged to another local nursing facility on 01/10/25. Resident #42's responsible party confirmed the facility did not provide any written notice Page 1 of 6 365218 365218 01/20/2025 Blue Ash Care Center 4900 Cooper Road Cincinnati, OH 45242
F 0622 the resident would be discharged . Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Interview on 01/13/25 at 11:00 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility sent a 30-day discharge notice via certified mail to Resident #42's responsible party on 01/13/25 after the resident had already been discharged from the facility. Residents Affected - Few Interview on 01/15/25 at 9:20 A.M. with the Medical Director (MD) confirmed the either the Administrator or the Director of Nursing (DON) had called her the week prior and notified her of Resident #42's discharge. The MD confirmed she did not make a note in the resident's medical record stating the basis for the resident's discharge from the facility nor did she write a discharge order. Review of the facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge revised 01/13/25 revealed the facility would permit each resident to remain in the facility and would not initiate transfers or discharges for the residents from the facility, except in limited circumstances. For non-emergency transfers or discharges the facility would document the reasons for the transfer or discharge in the resident's medical record. The facility staff would document any danger to the health or safety of the resident or other individuals that failure to transfer or discharge would pose. The physician should document medical reasons for transfer or discharge in the medical record, when the reason for transfer or discharge was for any reason other than nonpayment of the stay or the facility ceasing to operate. A copy of the physician's order for the discharge should be attached to the discharge notice. 365218 Page 2 of 6 365218 01/20/2025 Blue Ash Care Center 4900 Cooper Road Cincinnati, OH 45242
F 0623 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights. Based on medical record review, resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility discharged a resident from the facility and failed to a written notice of discharge to the resident and resident representative before the discharge. This affected one (Resident #42) of two residents reviewed for transfer or discharge. The facility census was 51 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 08/18/23 with diagnoses including unspecified encephalopathy, dementia, mood affective disorder and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42 dated 10/03/24 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the progress notes for Resident #42 dated 08/18/24 to 01/10/25 revealed they did not include documentation of a discharge notice from the facility to the resident nor did they include any documentation of a reason for discharge. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #42 dated 08/18/24 to 01/10/25 revealed there was no discharge order for the resident. Review of social services progress note for Resident #42 dated 01/10/25 per Social Service Director (SSD) #31 revealed the resident was transferred on 01/10/25 to another facility. Resident #42 was picked up by receiving facility transport and the resident's responsible party was notified. Review of the facility initiated thirty-day discharge notice for Resident #42 dated 01/10/25 revealed the notice was sent to Resident #42 and Resident #42's responsible party via certified mail on 01/13/25. Review of the notice revealed Resident #42 was being discharged immediately because the safety of other individuals in the facility was endangered. Interview on 01/13/25 at 9:46 A.M. with Resident #42's responsible party revealed SSD #31 called the resident's brother on 01/08/25 and told him the facility was discharging the resident to another nursing home immediately. Resident #42's responsible party confirmed he did not speak directly with anyone from the facility but received a text message from the resident's brother on 01/08/25 indicating the facility informed him the resident would be discharged to another local nursing facility on 01/10/25. Resident #42's responsible party confirmed the facility did not provide any written notice the resident would be discharged . Interview on 01/13/25 at 11:00 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility sent a 30-day discharge notice via certified mail to Resident #42's responsible party on 01/13/25 after the resident had already been discharged from the facility. Interview on 01/15/25 at 9:20 A.M. with the Medical Director (MD) confirmed the either the Administrator or the Director of Nursing (DON) had called her the week prior and notified her of Resident #42's discharge. The MD confirmed she did not make a note in the resident's medical record stating the 365218 Page 3 of 6 365218 01/20/2025 Blue Ash Care Center 4900 Cooper Road Cincinnati, OH 45242
F 0623 basis for the resident's discharge from the facility nor did she write a discharge order. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Review of the facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge revised 01/13/25 revealed the facility would provide written notice of the discharge to the resident and the resident's representative of the discharge as soon as practicable before the discharge. Residents Affected - Few 365218 Page 4 of 6 365218 01/20/2025 Blue Ash Care Center 4900 Cooper Road Cincinnati, OH 45242
F 0695 Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered by a physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice for respiratory care. This affected three (Residents #3, #14, and #18) of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility census was 51 residents. Residents Affected - Some Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 11/20/24 with diagnoses including acute infarction of intestine due to gunshot wound, cocaine abuse, opioid dependence, bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, severe protein-calorie malnutrition and pulmonary hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14 dated 12/01/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the plan of care for Resident #14 dated 12/18/24 revealed the resident had altered respiratory status related to COPD with a goal to maintain a normal breathing pattern. The primary interventions included administration of inhaler as ordered, medications as ordered, and oxygen as ordered. Review of physician's orders for Resident #14 revealed an order dated 11/21/24 for the resident to receive oxygen at two to four liters per minute (LPM) per nasal cannula (NC) to keep oxygenation levels above 92 percent (%) and for the oxygen tubing to be changed every week and dated. Observation on 01/13/25 at 8:45 A.M. revealed Resident #14 was in bed and receiving oxygen via NC at two LPM. The tubing and NC were dated 01/03/25 and there was no signage on the door that indicated oxygen was in use. Interview on 01/13/25 at 8:45 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #77 confirmed Resident #14's oxygen tubing and NC were outdated and there was no signage on the door indicating oxygen was in use. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 11/11/24 with diagnoses including COPD, hypertension, alcohol dependence and depression. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #18 dated 11/18/24 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision and assistance with ADLs. Review of the care plan for Resident #18 dated 11/14/24 revealed the resident was at risk due to altered respiratory status related to COPD with a goal to maintain normal a breathing pattern. The primary interventions included administration of medications as ordered, elevated head of bed as needed for shortness of breath, observe for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and notify the physician as needed, and teach resident relaxation techniques. Review of physician's orders for Resident #18 revealed an order dated 01/02/25 for the resident to receive oxygen at two LPM per nasal cannula. There was no order to change the oxygen tubing and nasal cannula. 365218 Page 5 of 6 365218 01/20/2025 Blue Ash Care Center 4900 Cooper Road Cincinnati, OH 45242
F 0695 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Observation on 01/13/25 at 9:00 A.M. revealed Resident #18 was receiving oxygen at two LPM and oxygen tubing and nasal cannula were undated. There was no sign on the door that indicated oxygen was in use. Interview on 01/13/25 at 9:00 A.M. with RN #77 confirmed Resident #18 did not have a physician order for the tubing and nasal cannula to be changed every seven days. RN #77 confirmed Resident #18's tubing and nasal cannula were undated and she was unsure when they were due to be changed and there was no signage on the door indicating oxygen was in use. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 05/03/23 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, morbid obesity, hypertension, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidemia, asthma and chronic viral hepatitis C. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #3 dated 10/27/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with ADLs. Review of the care plan for Resident #3 dated 05/18/23 revealed the resident was at risk due to altered cardiac output related to congestive heart failure, hypertension and hyperlipidemia with a goal to be free of signs and symptoms of cardiac complications. The primary interventions were to administer medications and oxygen as ordered. Review of physician's orders for Resident #3 revealed the resident did not have an order for the administration of oxygen nor did the resident have an order to have the tubing and NC changed every seven days. Observation on 01/13/25 at 9:10 A.M. revealed Resident #3 was in his room in his wheelchair and was receiving oxygen via an oxygen concentrator at four LPM with oxygen tubing and NC dated 11/29/24. There was no sign on the door that indicated oxygen was in use. Interview on 01/13/25 at 9:05 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #77 confirmed Resident #3 did not have physician orders for the administration of oxygen or for the oxygen tubing and NC to be changed. RN #77 confirmed Resident #3 was receiving oxygen at four LPM and the tubing was outdated and there was no signage on the door that indicated oxygen was in use. Interview on 01/14/25 at 3:55 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed oxygen tubing and nasal cannula are to be changed and dated every seven days. Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration revised October 2010 revealed the facility would provide safe oxygen administration which included to verify there was a physician's order in place for oxygen administration and to place an oxygen in use sign outside the resident's door. 365218 Page 6 of 6

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

3 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0622GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F622 - Transfer and discharge-

    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.

  • 0623GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F623 - Transfer and discharge-

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • 0695GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F695 - Respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 20, 2025 survey of BLUE ASH HEALTH & REHAB?

This was a inspection survey of BLUE ASH HEALTH & REHAB on January 20, 2025. The surveyor cited 3 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at BLUE ASH HEALTH & REHAB on January 20, 2025?

Yes, 3 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific info..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.