Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

BLUE ASH HEALTH & REHABCMS #3652183 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 3 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

365218 04/16/2025 Blue Ash Care Center 4900 Cooper Road Cincinnati, OH 45242
F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided the correct diet texture. This affected one (Resident #52) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 55. Residents Affected - Few Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed admission date 05/25/24. Diagnoses included pneumonitis, anxiety disorder, type two diabetes, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis. Review of plan of care dated 12/10/24 revealed Resident #52 was at risk for nutrition and hydration problems related to diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar, need for nutritional supplements, supervision for all meals, nosey cup with drinks, and need for mechanically altered diet and thickened liquids. Interventions include allowing residents to make choices, or preferences, observe any signs and symptoms of choking, provide assisted devices with meals, obtain weights as ordered, speech therapy screen as need, and weekly weights. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/04/25, revealed that Resident #52 was severely cognitively impaired and required partial to moderate assistance meal assistance. Review of progress note dated 02/01/25 at 6:40 P.M. by unknown nurse stated another resident notified this nurse that the resident was choking. The nurse and another nurse ran to Resident #52 and noted her unable to make any noise, no coughing, no talking, and showing signs and symptoms of choking. Both nurses initiated the Heimlich Maneuver to Resident #52. Resident #52 coughed up the food and was able to speak. 911 arrived but did not take Resident #52 because she was responsive. Review of progress note dated 02/01/25 at 7:01 P.M. by unknown nurse stated Resident #52 was assessed and vitals as follows: blood pressure 136/78, heart rate 78 beats per minute, oxygen saturation 97 percent, blood sugar was 111, and temperature was 97.8 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident #52 was assessed for pain. Resident #52 stated she had not had pain or hurting at any time in the last five days. Review of progress note 02/01/25 at 7:21 P.M. by unknown nurse stated she notified the on call physician of choking event. The physician gave orders to assess her vitals once a shift until seen by physician next week. Review of the facility incident document dated 02/01/25 revealed Resident #52 was choking on a food item in the dining room. Agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #330 and another nurse administered the Heimlich Maneuver to Resident #52, who was coughing. Resident #52 coughed up an item and began to speak. Resident #52 denied pain or discomfort. Resident #52 stated she was trying to eat a sweet Page 1 of 5 365218 365218 04/16/2025 Blue Ash Care Center 4900 Cooper Road Cincinnati, OH 45242
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few cake. Resident #52 had vitals assessed, assessed for pain. LPN #330 helped Resident #52 change her clothes. Resident #52's diet was reviewed. Resident #52 was to eat meals in the dining room with assistance. There was an order for consultation with speech therapy. A respiratory assessment was completed and a new order for a chest X-ray. LPN #330 stated there were no signs and symptoms of respiratory distress. LPN #330 notified the Director of Nursing (DON), guardian, and medical director. Resident #52 refused to be taken to the hospital. The predisposing environmental factor that affected Resident #52 was crowding. No injuries observed post incident of choking. Review of physician order dated 02/03/25 revealed Resident #52 had an order for a regular pureed diet with nectar thick liquids and a STAT chest X-ray for two views. Review of the facility chest X-ray result dated 02/03/25 revealed that Resident #52 had a chest x-ray impression that stated with comparison study from prior chest -ray done on date 10/28/24, Resident #52 had right basilar infiltrate developed since last X-ray. Review of physician order dated 02/05/25 revealed Resident #52 had an upgraded diet to mechanical textures, regular diet, nectar thick liquids, with ordered staff supervision during meals. Review of physician order dated 02/05/25 revealed Resident #52 was to have a speech evaluation. Review of physician order dated 02/17/25 revealed Resident #52 to have consistent carbohydrate diet, pureed texture, and nectar thick liquids. During an interview on 03/24/25 at 11:48 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated Resident #52 was aware she was on an altered diet. She took the corn bread from the resident sitting next to her. Resident #52 asked Nurse Supervisor (NS) #202 to open the corn bread, which was wrapped. NS #202 educated Resident #52 her diet, that she was a puree diet and could not have the corn bread. Resident #52 then found another piece of corn bread from another resident's food plate and asked Agency LPN #330 to open it for her. LPN #330 opened for Resident #30 and gave it to her without checking her diet. DON stated that Resident #52 ate it, and she began to choke. Nurse Supervisor (NS) #202 and LPN #330 performed the Heimlich maneuver on Resident #52. The emergency medical service arrived, and Resident #52 refused to be evaluated at the hospital. Resident #52's guardian was told she refused, and the guardian was ok with the resident's refusal to go out to the hospital. The DON stated Resident #52 was noncompliant in her diet and had since made her a one on one with all her meals. At this time, Resident #52 was compliant with the one-on-one staff at meals. During an interview on 03/25/25 at 5:50 P.M., LPN #330 stated she did give Resident #52 corn bread and did not look up or ask what Resident #52's diet was. Ten minutes later Resident #30 was in her wheelchair choking. LPN #330 tried to give her Heimlich, then another nurse assisted to help and the choking was resolved. LPN #52 stated she had never taken care of Resident #52 before and should have looked up her diet. Review of facility document titled Dietary Supervision of Resident's Nutrition, undated, revealed the facility personnel are responsible for assuring the Residents' are served the correct food tray. Prior to serving the food tray, the nurse aid must check the diet card to assure that the correct food tray was being served to the Resident. If there was doubt, the nurse supervisor or charge nurse will check the written physician's order. If an error has been made, report it to the dietary supervisor so that a new food tray can be issued. Residents needing assistance in eating must be promptly assisted upon being served. Self-help devices must be provided to those who need this assistance. The 365218 Page 2 of 5 365218 04/16/2025 Blue Ash Care Center 4900 Cooper Road Cincinnati, OH 45242
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm food and fluid intake must be observed by nursing personnel at each meal. The amount eaten must be recorded and or reported to the charge nurse. Deviations from the normal patterns must be recorded in the Resident's chart. The Director of Nursing and the Dietary Manager, with input from the consultant dietician, must review the Resident's nutritional problem and coordinate all resolutions. Recommendations must be presented to the attending physician for his or her approval. Residents Affected - Few This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00162245. 365218 Page 3 of 5 365218 04/16/2025 Blue Ash Care Center 4900 Cooper Road Cincinnati, OH 45242
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for residents. This affected one (Resident #46) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Schizophrenia disorder, disturbance psychotic disorder, anxiety disorder, irritable bowel syndrome, dementia, and pseudobulbar affect. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/18/24, revealed that Resident #46 was cognitively impaired. Resident #46 required maximal assistance for meals, oral care, personal hygiene, and dressing upper body. Resident #46 was dependent for dressing lower body, bathing, placing shoes on and off, and toileting hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 02/07/25 revealed Resident #46 was at risk for falls related to Alzheimer's disease, impaired gait balance, impaired vision, schizophrenia, and seizure disorder. Interventions included floor mat placed to open side of bed while bed was occupied, close supervision by staff, encourage residents to lie down after lunch, fall risk assessment, ensure resident was wearing nonskid footwear, and left side of bed against the wall. Review of non-compliance that was resistant to assistance with care revealed that Resident #46 interventions was encouraged to keep call light in reach and encouraged to use assistance. During an observation on 03/24/25 at 3:54 P.M., Resident #46 was in bed, and had no call light in reach. Resident #46's call light was under the bed, at the wall. Resident #46 did not have his bedside table near him with personal items. There was no floor mat next to the bed. During an interview on 03/24/25 at 3:58 P.M., Nurse Supervisor (NS) #202 verified that Resident #46's call light was out of reach, that his personal items were out of reach and no fall mat was next to the bed. Review of facility document titled Call Light Policy and Procedure dated 12/2020 revealed the policy of the facility was to ensure timely response to resident call light to ensure needs are met. The call light was used by a resident to notify staff of the nursing facility that the resident had a need that he would like addressed. Staff will ensure that the resident was in a comfortable position and that the call light was within reach of the resident before leaving the resident's room. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00163300. 365218 Page 4 of 5 365218 04/16/2025 Blue Ash Care Center 4900 Cooper Road Cincinnati, OH 45242
F 0812 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Many Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards. Based on observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide clean, sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 55 residents residing in the facility who receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an observations of the kitchen on 03/25/25 at 11:08 A.M., the floor was dirty with food crumbs scattered on floor, cracks on the floor, dirt was smeared all over the floor, the trash can which was full of trash had no lid. A hair net was lying on the floor next to the trash can. There was a dirty bath blanket and four towels with black unknown substance on them in a pile under the kitchen sink next to prep table. Interview on 03/25/25 at 11:30 A.M. with [NAME] #134 verified there was a blanket and towels under the sink. [NAME] #234 stated there was a big accident in the kitchen and there was spillage on the floor. Review of the policy titled Dietary Food Preparation Area, undated, revealed the facility will maintain a clean, sanitary and safe food preparation area. The facility was to have a sink hot water and soap disposable, hand towel rack, and step-on trash can. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00162245. 365218 Page 5 of 5

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

3 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • 0812GeneralS&S Fpotential for harm

    F812 - Food safety requirements

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 16, 2025 survey of BLUE ASH HEALTH & REHAB?

This was a inspection survey of BLUE ASH HEALTH & REHAB on April 16, 2025. The surveyor cited 3 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at BLUE ASH HEALTH & REHAB on April 16, 2025?

Yes, 3 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.