Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ROSE LANE NURSING AND REHABILITATIONCMS #3652892 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0726 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being. Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all agency staff were oriented to the call light system to assist residents timely. This affected 13 residents (Resident #8, #13, #27, #36, #49, #57, #83, #88, #91, #95, #106, #121 and #123) of 58 residents reviewed for resident call system. Finding Include: Interview on 08/14/23 at 2:10 P.M. with agency State Tested Nurses Assistant (STNA) #307 revealed she was the only aide on the 600-Hall, for 13 residents. STNA #307 stated she has been in all of her resident's rooms every two hours. STNA #307 was asked if call lights were being answered timely and she responded, no call lights have gone off. STNA #307 verified she did not realize the lights above the resident doors did not work and that she was supposed to have a call light phone with her. STNA #307 stated this was her first day in the building as she was contracted through a staffing agency, and no one told her that she was to have a call light phone with her and that the lights above resident doors do not work. STNA #307 stated she just found out about the call light phone a few minutes ago (12:00 P.M.) and she has been on the floor since 9:00 AM. STNA #307 stated the nurse on the 500-Hall came over to her to see why her call lights were not being answered. STNA #307 revealed there was a monitor on the 500-Hall nurses' station that will show when a call light came on and if it had not been answered, she did not know this prior to the nurse telling her. When the call light phone was given to her by STNA #306, she was unable to get the phone to work properly due to the reception in the facility was spotty. STNA #307 stated STNA #306 took her personnel cell number and was texting her when a call light on her hall, was on, so she could answer the call light. Observation of the call light monitor on the 500-Hall revealed three call lights on the 600-Hall had been on for more than 30 minutes from 9:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. Resident #36 call light had been on 48 minutes; Resident #95 call light had been on for one hour and three minutes and Resident #27 call light had been on for 41 minutes. Interview on 08/14/23 at 2:30 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #309 verified that on the 500-Hall call light monitor, showed 600-Hall had three call lights that had not been answered. Interview on 08/14/23 at 3:39 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) stated there was two different call lights in the facility. The call lights system on the 500, 600, 700 and 800 halls use the same call light system. The aide is to carry the call light phone, that shows if a call lights is ringing and that there was only one call light monitor for the four hall, on the 500-Hall. The DON stated the wifi does not always work well and the aide will have to go to the 500 hall to see if she has a (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 4 Event ID: 365289 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365289 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/15/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Rose Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation 5425 High Mill Avenue NW Massillon, OH 44646 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0726 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some call light on. DON verified the call lights above the resident's rooms did not work with this system. DON verified she did not realize the agency aide on the 600-Hall did not know this and was not watching for call lights. DON revealed the previous STNA should have oriented agency staff being to the facility call light system. There was no evidence agency staff was oriented to the facility call light system. Interview on 08/14/23 at 1:35 P.M. with Resident #36 revealed he had to go to the bathroom and turn his light on, the STNA came in and assisted him. It was unknown if the call light was not answered timely or not turned off when the resident was assisted. Interview on 08/14/23 at 1:45 P.M. with Resident #95 revealed his call light must have been hit by accident because he has been out to an appointment and did not put the call light on. Interview on 08/14/23 at 1:50 P.M. with Resident #27 revealed he needed to use the restroom and it took the aide a while to come in and assist him. It was unknown if the call light was not answered timely or not turned off when the resident was assisted. Review of the facility census revealed 13 residents (Resident #8, #13, #27, #36, #49, #57, #83, #88, #91, #95, #106, #121 and #123) resided on the facility 600-Hall. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00144980. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 365289 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 4 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365289 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/15/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Rose Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation 5425 High Mill Avenue NW Massillon, OH 44646 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0919 Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure the resident call light system was functioning properly at all times. This affected 13 residents (Resident #8, #13, #27, #36, #49, #57, #83, #88, #91, #95, #106, #121 and #123) of 58 residents reviewed for resident call system. Residents Affected - Some Finding Include: Interview on 08/14/23 at 2:10 P.M. with agency State Tested Nurses Assistant (STNA) #307 revealed she was the only aide on the 600-Hall, for 13 residents. STNA #307 stated she has been in all of her resident's rooms every two hours. STNA #307 was asked if call lights were being answered timely and she responded, no call lights have gone off. STNA #307 verified she did not realize the lights above the resident doors did not work and that she was supposed to have a call light phone with her. STNA #307 stated this was her first day in the building and no one told her that she was to have a call light phone with her and that the lights above resident doors do not work. STNA #307 stated she just found out about the call light phone a few minutes ago (12:00 P.M.) and she has been on the floor since 9:00 AM. STNA #307 stated the nurse on the 500-Hall came over to her to see why her call lights were not being answered. STNA #307 revealed there was a monitor on the 500-Hall nurses' station that will show when a call light came on and if it had not been answered, she did not know this prior to the nurse telling her. When the call light phone was given to her by STNA #306, she was unable to get the phone to work properly due to the reception in the facility was spotty. STNA #307 stated STNA #306 took her personnel cell number and was texting her when a call light on her hall, was on, so she could answer the call light. Observation of the call light monitor on the 500-Hall revealed three call lights on the 600-Hall had been on for more than 30 minutes from 9:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. Resident #36 call light had been on 48 minutes; Resident #95 call light had been on for one hour and three minutes and Resident #27 call light had been on for 41 minutes. Interview on 08/14/23 at 2:30 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #309 verified that on the 500-Hall call light monitor, showed 600-Hall had three call lights that had not been answered. LPN #309 revealed call light phones are used but sometimes the Wi-Fi was not working, so the call light phones would not work. LPN #309 stated when the call light phones are not working the staff have to go to the 500-Hall nurses' station, and look at the monitor, to see if they have a call light on to answer. Interview on 08/14/23 at 3:39 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) stated there was two different call lights in the facility. The call lights system on the 500, 600, 700 and 800 halls use the same call light system. The aide is to carry the call light phone, that shows if a call lights is ringing and that there was only one call light monitor for the four hall, on the 500-Hall. The DON stated the wifi does not always work well and the aide will have to go to the 500 hall to see if she has a call light on. DON verified the call lights above the resident's rooms did not work with this system. DON verified she did not realize the agency aide on the 600-Hall did not know this and was not watching for call lights. Interview on 08/14/23 at 1:35 P.M. with Resident #36 revealed he had to go to the bathroom and turn his light on, the STNA came in and assisted him. It was unknown if the call light was not answered timely or not turned off when the resident was assisted. (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 365289 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 4 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365289 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/15/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Rose Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation 5425 High Mill Avenue NW Massillon, OH 44646 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0919 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Interview on 08/14/23 at 1:45 P.M. with Resident #95 revealed his call light must have been hit by accident because he has been out to an appointment and did not put the call light on. Interview on 08/14/23 at 1:50 P.M. with Resident #27 revealed he needed to use the restroom and it took the aide a while to come in and assist him. It was unknown if the call light was not answered timely or not turned off when the resident was assisted. Review of the facility census revealed 13 residents (Resident #8, #13, #27, #36, #49, #57, #83, #88, #91, #95, #106, #121 and #123) resided on the facility 600-Hall. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00144980. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 365289 If continuation sheet Page 4 of 4

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0726GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F726 - Nursing Services

    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.

  • 0919GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F919 - Resident Call System

    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 15, 2023 survey of ROSE LANE NURSING AND REHABILITATION?

This was a inspection survey of ROSE LANE NURSING AND REHABILITATION on August 15, 2023. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ROSE LANE NURSING AND REHABILITATION on August 15, 2023?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes ..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.