F 0610
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, and interview, the facility failed to complete thorough
investigations after allegations of abuse. This had the potential to affect one resident (#131) of two residents
reviewed for allegations of abuse. The facility census was 133.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings include:
Record review revealed Resident #131 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including seizures
and other specified disorders of the brain.
Review of a care plan last revised on 11/14/24 revealed Resident #131 did not have any behaviors.
Review of a SRI investigation dated 05/11/25 revealed resident questionnaires were completed and
Resident #131 indicated he had been mistreated. There was no evidence of any follow-up questions to
determine how or when Resident #131 had been mistreated.
Review of a minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #131's cognition
remained intact and he had no behaviors.
Interview on 06/18/25 at 3:00 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the questionnaire
completed by Resident #131 indicated he had been mistreated and a skin check was completed with no
findings, but there was no evidence Resident #131 was asked questions to determine how or when he was
mistreated. The DON confirmed investigations should be completed at the time such allegations are made.
Review of a statement dated 06/18/25 by Resident #131 revealed he had not been mistreated.
Review of a policy titled Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident
Property (dated 10/2022) revealed during the investigation, residents who were on the same unit the
allegations were made should be interviewed as well as the resident who made the allegations.
Mistreatment was defined as inappropriate treatment to the resident.
This deficiency represents an incidental finding of non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number
OH00166557.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 14
Event ID:
365344
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0627
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for
a safe transfer/discharge.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, staff interview, policy review, and guardian interview, the facility failed to have
evidence that a transfer from the facility was necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs
could not be met in the facility. This affected one resident (#135) of three residents reviewed who were
transferred to other nursing facilities. The facility census was 133.
Findings include:
Review of the closed medical record for Resident #135 revealed an admission date of 01/04/25 and
diagnoses including Schizophrenia, hypertension, benign neoplasm of cranial nerves, and hearing loss. His
brother was his legal guardian.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 04/01/25 revealed he had a Brief Interview
for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It also indicated he was
independent with mobility. An elopement assessment completed 01/04/25 indicated the resident was not at
risk for elopement.
Review of nursing progress notes revealed no evidence of any attempts to elope from the facility until
05/18/25. On 05/18/25 at 12:30 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #209 documented that Resident #135 exited
the facility and was returned by facility staff. There was no further documentation in the medical record
regarding the details of the elopement.
Interview with the Administrator on 06/16/25 at 8:02 A.M. revealed the facility has a secured unit in the
[NAME] building. (However, Resident #135 did not reside on the secured unit). All exit doors in the [NAME]
and [NAME] buildings are locked against going out. The doors require a key card that staff carry or the
receptionist near the front door of each building is able to unlock the front exit doors. The facility has a
receptionist on duty for 10 hours each day (8:30 AM to 7:00 PM) in each building.
Review of a QAPI Performance Improvement Project form dated 05/19/25 revealed a resident (Resident
#135) eloped from the building while the fire panel was alarming. Root cause analysis: Lack of education of
staff not knowing to supervise residents while the alarm was going off. All exit doors become unlocked
while the fire panel alarmed. The resident pushed on a door and left. Goal and Objective: Once the fire
panel alarms, staff will monitor units and exit doors until maintenance is alerted and addresses the alarm.
Further review of the record revealed on 05/20/25 at 12:05 P.M. it was documented that a referral was sent
to another nursing facility (a sister facility that was located approximately 170 miles, 2.5 hours away). There
was no further information documented in the nursing progress notes until 05/29/25 at 8:25 A.M. when it
was documented that discharge paperwork was completed, attached medication list, facesheet, and most
recent labs. It did not indicate where the resident was discharged to.
Review of a Discharge Recap of care form signed by Registered Nurse (RN) #209 on 05/29/25 revealed
Resident #135's primary language was Nepali. Date of discharge or transfer notice given to resident or
representative: 05/23/25. discharge date : [DATE]. Facility transfer necessary for resident's safety with
wandering. Reason for discharge/transfer: Necessary for the resident's welfare and the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0627
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
needs could not be met in the facility. Discharging to another SNF/long term care. The name of facility
discharging to was the facility that the referral was sent to on 05/20/25. Who initiated discharge? Facility
was check marked. Is this resident discharging while an appeal is in process? No was marked. Most recent
BIMS score- 0. Does not display mood or behavior patterns. Both verbal and non verbal were marked. Local
contact agency notified: No. Date of statement of appeal rights given to resident or representative:
05/29/25.
There was no evidence in the record that the basis for the transfer/discharge was documented, why the
resident's needs could not be met in the facility, or any attempts to meet the resident's needs. There was no
documentation to indicate how the facility he was transferred to could better meet his needs or was different
from the current facility (current facility with all locked doors). There was no evidence of any attempts to find
a facility closer to the resident's guardian (facility transferred to is approximately 2.5 hours from the
guardian). There was no evidence of any documentation by the physician about the basis for the
transfer/discharge, what needs could not be met, efforts to meet those needs, and the specific services the
receiving facility would provide to meet the needs of the resident that could not be met at the current facility.
There was no evidence the facility involved the resident's guardian in choosing a facility to transfer to.
Interview with Regional Administrator #352 on 06/17/25 at 8:55 A.M. revealed former Administrator #350
had spoken with Resident #135's brother and the brother had asked for a place that was better suited for
him. Former Administrator #350 then told him of the sister facility that is 2.5 hours away. He stated the
resident was transferred to the other facility as it was safer and a younger population. He gave no further
information on how it was safer. He confirmed there was nothing documented in the medical record about
the decision to transfer.
Review of a note provided by the facility and signed by former Administrator #350, the Director of Nursing,
and Assistant Director of Nursing #265 revealed a care conference was held with Resident #135's brother
on 05/20/25 via phone regarding the issue that occurred on 05/18/25. The brother stated he was thankful
for the great work the nursing staff did in getting his brother back to the building and ensuring his safety. He
did mention if there was a building that would be able to handle his brother's needs more. We stated we
have a sister facility and can send a referral there and see what happens. Explained the facility handles
more mental health residents and is equipped with a more secure environment that would be appropriate
for his needs. He stated he would like his brother to try it out. A referral will be sent today.
Interview with former Administrator #350 on 06/17/25 at 12:31 P.M. confirmed she had spoken to Resident
#135's brother. She stated that she had approached him with the idea to transfer. She stated she thought
referrals to other facility's were done but she was not sure about where. She stated the facility he was
transferred to was the only one that would take him. She confirmed she did not document in the medical
record anything related to the transfer/discharge. She stated that it was a facility initiated discharge but the
brother agreed.
Interview with the Director of Nursing on 06/17/25 at 3:22 P.M. confirmed, besides the note of referral to
another facility, there were no notes related to the reason for the discharge, how his needs could not be
met, attempts to meet needs, or how the new facility could meet his needs. She stated former Administrator
#350 was the one who spoke to Resident #135's guardian.
Interview with Resident #135's guardian on 06/16/25 at 3:39 P.M. revealed he did not want the resident to
move from the facility. He stated the facility he was transferred to is too far for him to
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0627
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
visit. He stated he now has to go 2-3 weeks between visits and has only seen him once since he was
transferred. He stated the facility called him and said they can't take care of him anymore. He stated he felt
like he did not have a choice in the transfer and the facility had already made the plans to transfer him to
the facility that is 2.5 hours away. They said it was the only choice. He stated he went to visit for the first
time recently and did not like the facility. He stated it was dirty and stunk. He stated he did not know how
that facility is different or could meet his needs better.
Review of the facility policy titled Facility Discharge and Transfer Policy (dated December 2024 and Revised
January 2025) revealed the facility will only initiate a discharge or transfer of a resident for appropriate
reasons, ensure proper documentation, provide advance notice, and facilitate coordination with receiving
providers or services. Notice requirements include: written notice must be provided to the resident and
representative at least 30 days in advance of a planned discharge or transfer, unless an emergency
situation applies. Residents have the right to appeal an involuntary discharge.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00166557.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or
bed-hold policies.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, staff interview, policy review, and guardian interview, the facility failed to provide
notice before transfer to another facility to include the reason for the transfer and include appeal rights This
affected one resident (#135) of three residents reviewed who were transferred to other nursing facilities.
The facility census was 133.
Findings include:
Review of the closed medical record for Resident #135 revealed an admission date of 01/04/25 and
diagnoses including Schizophrenia, hypertension, benign neoplasm of cranial nerves, and hearing loss. His
brother was his legal guardian.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 04/01/25 revealed he had a Brief Interview
for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It also indicated he was
independent with mobility. An elopement assessment completed 01/04/25 indicated the resident was not at
risk for elopement. Review of nursing progress notes revealed no evidence of any attempts to elope from
the facility until 05/18/25. On 05/18/25 at 12:30 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #209 documented that
Resident #135 exited the facility and was returned by facility staff. There was no further documentation in
the medical record regarding the details of the elopement.
Interview with the Administrator on 06/16/25 at 8:02 A.M. revealed the facility has a secured unit in the
[NAME] building. (However, Resident #135 did not reside on the secured unit). All exit doors in the [NAME]
and [NAME] buildings are locked against going out. The doors require a key card that staff carry or the
receptionist near the front door of each building is able to unlock the front exit doors. The facility has a
receptionist on duty for 10 hours each day (8:30 A.M. to 7:00 P.M.) in each building.
Review of a QAPI Performance Improvement Project form dated 05/19/25 revealed a resident (Resident
#135) eloped from the building while the fire panel was alarming. Root cause analysis: Lack of education of
staff not knowing to supervise residents while the alarm was going off. All exit doors become unlocked
while the fire panel alarmed. The resident pushed on a door and left. Goal and Objective: Once the fire
panel alarms, staff will monitor units and exit doors until maintenance is alerted and addresses the alarm.
Further review of the record revealed on 05/20/25 at 12:05 P.M. it was documented that a referral was sent
to another nursing facility (a sister facility that was located approximately 170 miles, 2.5 hours away). There
was no further information documented in the nursing progress notes until 05/29/25 at 8:25 A.M. when it
was documented that discharge paperwork was completed, attached medication list, facesheet, and most
recent labs. It did not indicate where the resident was discharged to.
Review of a Discharge Recap of care form signed by Registered Nurse (RN) #209 on 05/29/25 revealed
Resident #135's primary language was Nepali. Date of discharge or transfer notice given to resident or
representative: 05/23/25. discharge date : [DATE]. Facility transfer necessary for resident's safety with
wandering. Reason for discharge/transfer: Necessary for the resident's welfare and the needs could not be
met in the facility. Discharging to another SNF/long term care. The name of facility discharging to was the
facility that the referral was sent to on 05/20/25. Who initiated discharge?
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Facility was check marked. Is this resident discharging while an appeal is in process? No was marked. Most
recent BIMS score- 0. Does not display mood or behavior patterns. Both verbal and non verbal were
marked. Local contact agency notified: No. Date of statement of appeal rights given to resident or
representative: 05/29/25.
There was no evidence in the record that the basis for the transfer/discharge was documented. There was
also no evidence that before transfer, the resident's guardian was provided notice of transfer with the
reason, effective date, location of transfer, appeal rights and Ombudsman information.
Interview with Regional Administrator #352 on 06/17/25 at 8:55 A.M. revealed former Administrator #350
had spoken with Resident #135's brother and the brother had asked for a place that was better suited for
him. Former Administrator #350 then told him of the sister facility that is 2.5 hours away. He stated the
resident was transferred to the other facility as it was safer and a younger population. He gave no further
information on how it was safer. He confirmed there was nothing documented in the medical record about
the decision to transfer.
Review of a note provided by the facility and signed by former Administrator #350, the Director of Nursing,
and Assistant Director of Nursing #265 revealed a care conference was held with Resident #135's brother
on 05/20/25 via phone regarding the issue that occurred on 05/18/25. The brother stated he was thankful
for the great work the nursing staff did in getting his brother back to the building and ensuring his safety. He
did mention if there was a building that would be able to handle his brother's needs more. We stated we
have a sister facility and can send a referral there and see what happens. Explained the facility handles
more mental health residents and is equipped with a more secure environment that would be appropriate
for his needs. He stated he would like his brother to try it out. A referral will be sent today.
Interview with former Administrator #350 on 06/17/25 at 12:31 P.M. confirmed she had spoken to Resident
#135's brother. She stated that she had approached him with the idea to transfer. She stated she thought
referrals to other facility's were done but she was not sure about where. She stated the facility he was
transferred to was the only one that would take him. She confirmed she did not document in the medical
record anything related to the transfer/discharge. She stated that it was a facility initiated discharge but the
brother agreed. She confirmed a discharge notice with required information was not provided to the
guardian.
Interview with the Director of Nursing on 06/17/25 at 3:22 P.M. confirmed, besides the note of referral to
another facility, there were no notes related to the reason for the discharge. She stated former Administrator
#350 was the one who spoke to Resident #135's guardian.
Interview with Resident #135's guardian on 06/16/25 at 3:39 P.M. revealed he did not want the resident to
move from the facility. He stated the facility he was transferred to is too far for him to visit. He stated he now
has to go 2-3 weeks between visits and has only seen him once since he was transferred. He stated the
facility called him and said they can't take care of him anymore. He stated he felt like he did not have a
choice in the transfer and the facility had already made the plans to transfer him to the facility that is 2.5
hours away. They said it was the only choice. He stated he went to visit for the first time recently and did not
like the facility. He stated it was dirty and stunk. He stated he did not know how that facility is different or
could meet his needs better. He confirmed he was not provided with a discharge notice, information on how
to appeal, or contact information for the Ombudsman.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Review of the facility policy titled Facility Discharge and Transfer Policy (dated December 2024 and Revised
January 2025) revealed the facility will only initiate a discharge or transfer of a resident for appropriate
reasons, ensure proper documentation, provide advance notice, and facilitate coordination with receiving
providers or services. Notice requirements include: written notice must be provided to the resident and
representative at least 30 days in advance of a planned discharge or transfer, unless an emergency
situation applies. Residents have the right to appeal an involuntary discharge.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00166557.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Record
review revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia,
muscle weakness, and hypertension.
Review of a quarterly MDS 04/01/25 revealed Resident #18 had moderately impaired cognition and had no
behaviors.
Review of a care plan updated on 06/14/25 revealed Resident #18 was at risk for falls related to cognitive
function, decreased mobility, current hospital stay, weakness, acute chronic encephalopathy, hypertension,
hypocalcemia, cognitive impairment, and self-care deficit with a goal to be free from injury. Interventions
included but were not limited to keep urinal at bedside (06/14/25), place a bedside toilet in room (06/04/25),
and a please call don't fall sign in room (02/23/25).
Observation on 06/18/25 at 12:34 P.M. revealed Resident #18 was sitting in his bed, eating. Resident #18
did not have a urinal at bedside, a bedside toilet, or a please call don't fall sign in his room.
Interview on 06/18/25 at 1:28 P.M. with DON confirmed the fall interventions were not in place at the time of
the survey.
Review of a policy titled Fall Prevention and Management dated 11/2024 revealed post fall, the facility will
assess the resident, investigate and determine the root cause of the fall, and notify the resident's physician
and responsible party of the fall and new interventions.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00166557 and
Complaint Number OH00166254.
Based on observations, record review, review of a facility investigation, and staff interviews, the facility failed
to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent an elopement for
Resident #135 and to prevent falls for Resident #18. This affected one of three residents reviewed for
elopement (Resident #135) and one of four residents reviewed for falls (Resident #18). The facility census
was 133.
Findings include:
1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #135 revealed an admission date of 01/04/25 and
diagnoses including Schizophrenia, hypertension, benign neoplasm of cranial nerves, and hearing loss. His
brother was his legal guardian.
Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment completed 04/01/25 revealed he had a Brief Interview for
Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It also indicated he was
independent with mobility. An elopement assessment completed 01/04/25 indicated the resident was not at
risk for elopement.
Review of nursing progress notes revealed no evidence of any attempts to elope from the facility until
05/18/25. On 05/18/25 at 12:30 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #209 documented that Resident #135
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
exited the facility and was returned by facility staff. There was no further documentation in the medical
record regarding the details of the elopement.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Review of a facility investigation timeline titled Elopement of Resident #135 05/18/25 revealed the following:
Residents Affected - Few
05/18/25 at 12:10 A.M. Staff doing rounds noticed the resident was missing. Fire Panel alarming.
05/18/25 at 12:20 A.M. A staff nurse driving by and saw resident walking. Called the facility nurse and said
she is bringing the resident back to the facility.
05/18/25 at 12:25 A.M. Staff nurse and nursing assistant escorted the resident back into the building. Fire
panel continued to buzz/alarm.
05/18/25 12:40 A.M. Staff nurse assessed the resident for injury and no injuries noted. Staff nurse called on
call nurse manager and explained what happened. Resident was immediately placed on 1:1.
05/18/25 at 1:00 A.M. Fire department showed up. Maintenance also showed up.
05/18/25 at 1:15 A.M. Total house head count was completed. All residents present and accounted for.
Egress doors checked and all locking properly. Staff interviews conducted. Cause of elopement determined
to be the resident eloped out of the [NAME] wing door while the fire panel was buzzing/alarming, allowing
all doors to be unlocked.
05/18/25 at 2:00 A.M. Whole house education started.
05/19/25 Maintenance completed all egress door audit to ensure in proper working order.
05/19/25 Whole house elopement risk assessments started.
05/19/25 Updated elopement risk assessments and reported to QAPI team.
05/19/25 Elopement books updated.
05/19/25 Elopement audits started.
Interview with the Administrator on 06/16/25 at 8:02 A.M. revealed the facility has a secured unit in the
[NAME] building. (However, Resident #135 did not reside on the secured unit). All exit doors in the [NAME]
and [NAME] buildings are locked against going out. The doors require a key card that staff carry or the
receptionist near the front door of each building is able to unlock the front exit doors. The facility has a
receptionist on duty for 10 hours each day (8:30 am to 7 pm) in each building.
Review of the schedule for 05/17/25 (included staff working after midnight to include 05/18/25) revealed
there was one nurse and one nursing assistant scheduled for the 200 hall on [NAME] where Resident #135
resided. This included Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #199 and Nursing Assistant #187.
Review of the facility investigation reports revealed there was not a statement from LPN #199 regarding the
elopement of Resident #135. A written witness statement from Nursing Assistant #187 only
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
stated that she was doing a round, came up front to the stock room and last saw Resident #135 eating
snacks and watching tv in the front room. The time of the incident was noted to be 11:00 P.M. to 11:30 P.M.
There was no statement regarding the actual elopement. There were two other staff witness statements as
part of the investigation. LPN #201 documented that she was the nurse on the 400 hall of [NAME] that night
and was passing medications on her hall. No further information provided. Nursing Assistant #191 (who
was working the night shift on 100 hall of [NAME]) stated she last saw Resident #135 in the lobby at 10:00
P.M.
Review of a QAPI Performance Improvement Project form dated 05/19/25 revealed a resident eloped from
the building while the fire panel was alarming. Root cause analysis: Lack of education of staff not knowing
to supervise residents while the alarm was going off. All exit doors become unlocked while the fire panel
alarmed. The resident pushed on a door and left. Goal and Objective: Once the fire panel alarms, staff will
monitor units and exit doors until maintenance is alerted and addresses the alarm. Maintenance will then
make sure the doors are locked once the fire alarm is set back in place. Action items included: Educate the
staff on what to do when the fire alarm panel is going off. Complete whole house elopement assessments
on all residents. Update elopement books with residents new scores. Audit staff response towards fire panel
buzzing/alarming five times a week on different shifts for four weeks. Maintenance to ensure all egress
doors are in proper working order. All estimated completion dates were 05/19/25 except education
estimated completion 05/26/25 and audits of staff response estimated completion 06/19/25.
Resident #135 was transferred to another facility on 05/29/25.
Review of a log of the fire alarm panel provided by the alarm monitoring company revealed no evidence of
any issues with the fire alarm system until 05/18/25 at 12:23 A.M. when a trouble alarm was noted (The
facility timeline indicated that the fire panel was alarming at 12:10 A.M. when Resident #135 was noted
missing and the resident was escorted back into the building at 12:25 A.M.). The log further indicated a fire
alarm activated on 05/18/25 at 1:26 A.M. (after Resident #135 was already back in the facility).
The following staff interviews were conducted by the surveyor:
a. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #190 on 06/17/25 at 8:48 A.M. (worked on [NAME] 100 hall on the
night of the elopement) revealed he did not know Resident #135 was gone until LPN #199 told him and the
resident was already back. He stated she told him after midnight but he did not remember when and did not
know how the resident got out. He stated he did not hear the fire alarm at all that night. He did not
remember maintenance or the unit manager coming in that night.
b. Interview with LPN #201 on 06/17/25 at 9:00 A.M. (worked on [NAME] 400 hall on the night of the
elopement and had provided a written statement noted above) revealed the nurse working on 200 hall in
the [NAME] building (RN #231) had told her Resident #135 was outside around midnight and he was still
out. She was told that RN #248 was bringing some food to RN #231 and saw Resident #135 outside. RN
#248 called RN #231 and said she was bringing him back. LPN #201 stated she did not know how he got
out. She stated the fire alarm had went off however there was no sound and only the strobe lights were
flashing. She stated she did not know what time that was. She stated she did not know if the fire
department was there and she did not see maintenance that night.
d. Interview with RN #231 on 06/17/25 at 10:17 A.M. revealed she was routinely the night shift supervisor
but on the night Resident #135 eloped, she worked the floor on 200 hall in the [NAME]
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 10 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
building. She stated she was not aware Resident #135 was gone until RN #248 called her and said she saw
the resident near the train tracks close to the [NAME] grocery store. (Approximately 1.8 miles from the
facility). She stated RN #248 was not working that night but was bringing her some food. RN #231 stated
she then notified Resident #135's nurse (LPN #199) that the resident had eloped. She stated LPN #199
was not aware that he was gone. RN #248 then brought the resident back to the facility. RN #231 stated
she went to the parking lot and was there when RN #248 brought him back in her car. She stated she then
told LPN #199 to call the unit manager and she went back to the [NAME] building. She stated she did not
know how the resident got outside. She stated the fire alarm did not go off until 30 minutes after the
resident returned. She stated she did not know if the fire department came that night. She stated
maintenance did come in and shut off the alarm.
e. Interview with RN #248 on 06/17/25 at 10:31 A.M. revealed she was not working the night of
05/17-05/18/25. She stated she was on her way to the facility to drop off something to a nurse around 12:30
A.M.-12:45 A.M. when she saw a person walking that she thought looked like Resident #135. She stated
she verified it was him. She stated he was near the train tracks across the road from the [NAME] grocery
store. She stated she then called RN #231. She stated she got Resident #135 into her car and took him
back to the facility. She stated it took about five minutes to return. She stated when she got to the facility
parking lot, RN #231 and Nursing Assistant #187 were there but not LPN #199. The resident was taken
inside the building.
f. Interview with Nursing Assistant #187 on 06/17/25 at 2:53 P.M. revealed she and LPN #199 were working
on the unit where Resident #135 resided on the night of 05/17/25 into 05/18/25. She stated she last saw
Resident #135 in the lobby eating snacks between 11:00 P.M. and 12:00 A.M. She stated she was doing
rounds and noticed that he was not in his room. She stated she went up front to look for him and could not
find him. She stated her and LPN #199 were looking for the resident when RN #248 showed up with him
around 12:00 A.M. She stated she was not sure how he got out of the facility. She stated some residents go
out to smoke but must be let out by staff. She stated she did not remember letting anyone out. She stated
staff sometimes go out to smoke or for breaks. She stated she did not go out at all that night. She stated the
nurse goes out to smoke sometimes. She did not mention the fire alarm until questioned by the surveyor.
She stated the fire alarm had went off in the other building ([NAME]) but not in the [NAME] building. She
stated she did not know when the alarm went off. She stated she was not aware that the exit doors release
if the fire alarm goes off.
g. Interview with Unit Manager RN #209 on 06/23/25 at 7:46 A.M. revealed she was on call the weekend
Resident #135 eloped. She stated LPN #199 called her around 12:30 P.M. and said he got out but was back
in the facility. She stated she lives close and came in around 12:50 A.M. She stated when she arrived an
alarm was going off on the fire alarm panel in the [NAME] building. She stated it was not the main fire alarm
going off. She stated the fire department was there in the [NAME] building when she arrived. She stated
maintenance came in also. She stated she thought he got out the door that was unlocked due to the alarm.
She stated Resident #135 was placed on 1-1 staffing. She stated she stayed about two hours then went
home. She verified that the monitoring company log did not indicate trouble with the system until 12:23 A.M.
(Resident #135 was already back to the facility at 12:30 A.M. per her interview).
h. Interview with Environmental and Safety Director #285 on 06/17/25 at 11:35 A.M. revealed that when a
trouble alarm activates, it comes up on the fire panel and the panel will beep but the overall fire alarm does
not sound. He stated the exit doors would not release until the fire alarm went off. He confirmed the log
from the monitoring company indicated a trouble alarm on 05/18/25 at 12:23 A.M. and a fire alarm on
05/18/25 at 1:26 A.M. He stated there is a fire panel in each building. In
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 11 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
[NAME] it is behind the receptionist desk and in [NAME] it is on the wall to the right of the receptionist desk.
He stated staff may not hear the beeping on the panel with a trouble alarm if they are not near the
receptionist desk. He stated once the fire alarm goes off, then the loud alarm and strobes could be heard in
both buildings. He stated if a staff person silenced the fire alarm, that would leave only the strobes on. He
stated he was notified by the monitoring company of the trouble signal. He then started to go to the facility.
He stated the fire alarm then sounded (documented on log as 1:26 A.M.) He said the fire alarm went off
again because they tried to reset the panel but the issue was not fixed so the fire alarm went off again. He
stated there was a leak in the sprinkler system that he repaired. He stated the system was restored on
05/18/25 at 6:12 A.M. On 06/17/25 at 3:39 P.M. Environmental and Safety Director #285 stated that the
trouble alarm would cause the exit doors to release. Information was requested by the surveyor from the
either the monitoring company or the company that services the fire panel to verify that the exit doors would
release with the trouble signal. Interview with Environmental and Safety Director #285 on 06/23/25 at 8:20
A.M. revealed the facility had no further evidence that the exit doors would release with a trouble alarm only
and not the fire alarm.
i. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 06/17/25 at 3:22 P.M. revealed she had completed the timeline
investigation for the elopement of Resident #135. She confirmed the facility did not obtain a statement from
the nurse responsible for Resident #135 that night (LPN #199). She confirmed the only documentation in
the medical record regarding the elopement was the one note from RN #209 that stated he exited the
facility and was returned by staff.
Review of the facility policy on Elopements dated 2001 and revised December 2007 revealed staff shall
investigate and report all cases of missing residents. When a departing individual returns to the facility,
document the event in the resident's medical record. The policy further stated to document relevant
information in the resident's medical record upon return.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 12 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on review of facility open payables log, review of Administrator job description, and interviews, the
facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources
effectively and efficiently including compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care to attain
and maintain the highest practicable well being of each resident. This affected 133 of 133 residents residing
in the facility.
Residents Affected - Many
Findings include:
1. Review of information received from two anonymous complaints on 06/11/25 revealed: 1: The facility did
not get the food truck because they did not pay the bill and 2: Food service was cut off until payment was
made as the facility owed $86,000.00.
a. Interview with Dietary Aide #294 on 06/16/25 at 9:35 A.M. revealed the food delivery truck did not come
on Friday 06/06/25 to deliver the facility food supply. She stated they had to change the menu over the
weekend but the facility had sufficient food. She stated the food delivery truck then came on Tuesday
6/10/25 with a food delivery.
b. Interview with Dietary Manager #234 on 06/16/25 at 9:38 A.M. revealed the food delivery truck did not
come on Friday 06/06/25. She stated the facility normally gets food delivery's on Tuesdays and Fridays. She
stated the delivery did not come on 06/06/25 due to the bill not being paid. She stated a check was sent to
the food delivery company (Sysco) and food delivery service resumed on 06/10/25. She confirmed the
menu had to be altered between 06/07/25 and 06/10/25 as the planned menu items were not available.
c. Interview with Business Office Manager (BOM) #287 on 06/16/25 at 3:10 P.M. revealed the facility uses
an outside company to pay their vendor bills. She stated the vendor invoices come in the mail or by email.
She then uploads them into the system and they go to the outside company that pays the bills. She stated
she had no way to know the total amount owed to any vendor, including the food supply vendor. Interview
with BOM #287 on 06/23/25 at 1:30 P.M. revealed she had no invoices available to show how much was
owed to the food supply company or the last payments made.
d. Interview with Account Manager #351 for Sysco (Food suppliers to facility) on 06/17/25 at 1:29 P.M.
revealed he needed to get permission to provide information to the State Survey Agency regarding how
much the facility owed on their food supply invoices or any other information related to food delivery
service. As of 06/23/25, Sysco did not reply with any information regarding how much the facility owed on
their food service bill or if there was a potential for food delivery service to be suspended again.
e. Facility Regional Administrator #352 provided a log of vendor open payables dated 06/17/25. It indicated
that the facility owed $25,863.41 for the past 0-30 days and $35,047.97 for the past 31-60 days for a total of
$60,911.38 to Sysco, the food supply vendor. As of 06/23/25 at 3:10 P.M., the facility did not provide any
Sysco invoices for amounts due and did not provide any evidence of the last time payments were made to
Sysco for food service.
f. Review of the undated Administrator job description revealed the general responsibilities of the
administrator included: Ensure compliance with Local, State, and Federal Regulations, ensure safety
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 13 of 14
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365344
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center
957 Becks Knob Road
Lancaster, OH 43130
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
for the residents and employees, monitor the staffing and PPD budgeted for each department, make facility
rounds every day and follow up on any concerns or issues, and negotiate contracts and rates with the
providers and vendors with CEO approval.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00166557.
Residents Affected - Many
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365344
If continuation sheet
Page 14 of 14