F 0804
Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, review of resident council meeting minutes, and
policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served warm and palatable. This had the potential to
affect all but two (#27 and #93) residents who did not receive food from the facility's kitchen. The facility
census was 150.
Residents Affected - Some
Findings include:
Observation of the kitchen on 02/01/24 at 8:20 A.M. revealed a test tray went out on the 2B unit cart. All
trays were retrieved from the meal cart on 07/03/23 at 8:34 A.M. The scrambled eggs, served on a
Styrofoam plate and covered with an insulated lid, were 110 degrees Fahrenheit and cold to taste.
Interview on 02/01/24 at 8:35 A.M., Account Manager (AM) #315 verified the scrambled eggs were cold
and not palatable. AM #315 further stated the facility's dishwasher had been out since 12/22/23 and the
facility often had to serve on disposable dinner ware.
Interview on 02/01/24 at 10:11 A.M. Resident #69 stated the food was usually served cold.
Interview on 02/01/24 at 10:21 A.M., Resident #52 stated the food was often served cold.
Interview on 02/01/24 at 10:28 A.M., Resident #75 stated the food is always served cold.
Interview on 02/01/24 at 10:44 A.M., Resident #17 stated the food was only sometimes hot enough and
further stated the eggs were not hot that morning.
Interview on 02/01/24 at 10:45 A.M., Resident #22 stated the food was not hot enough and always luke
warm.
Review of the resident council meeting minutes dated 12/20/23 revealed the residents stated the food was
cold on trays.
Review of the resident council meeting minutes dated 01/25/24 revealed the residents stated food can be
cold on trays.
Review of the facility policy titled, Food: Quality and Palatability, dated 02/2023, revealed food was to be
served palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00150427.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
365396
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365396
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/01/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Fairfield LLC
5200 Camelot Drive
Fairfield, OH 45014
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0837
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Many
Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for
managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for
managing the facility.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
review of Board of Executives of Long-Term Services and Support (BELTSS) documentation, review of the
Enhanced Information Dissemination and Collection (EIDC), interview with a BELTSS Representative, and
staff interview, the facility governing body failed to appoint an administrator, licensed in the State of Ohio
who was responsible for the management of the facility. This had the potential to affect all 150 residents
residing in the facility.
Findings include:
On [DATE], review of the State Agency EIDC System revealed Administrator #400 was listed as the facility
current and primary Administrator with an effective date of [DATE].
On [DATE], review of the BELTSS system revealed Administrator #400's license was inactive.
Interview with BELTSS Representative #100 on [DATE] at 10:44 A.M. indicated their website
(https://prod.beltss.age.ohio.gov/) for licensure verification was up to date and had no system issues.
BELTSS #100 representative verified the Administrator was not active and the license expired on [DATE].
Interview on [DATE] at 12:54 P.M., Administrator #400 verified he was the Administrator of record for the
facility. Administrator #400 stated he was unaware his license was not active.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365396
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2