Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

THE LAURELS OF HEATHCMS #3654661 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

365466 09/10/2024 The Laurels of Heath 717 South 30th Street Heath, OH 43056
F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on closed medical record review, review of the wound nurse practitioner (NP) progress notes, and interviews the facility failed to ensure wound notes were accurately documented to reflect current treatment orders for skin alterations. This affected one resident (#1) of three record reviewed. Findings included: 1. a. Closed medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility initially on 03/07/24 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including tracheostomy, embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of left upper extremity, acute respiratory failure, quadriplegia, dependence on respirator, and Raynaud's. Review of Resident #1's Wound NP #500's progress note dated 07/26/24 revealed new orders to cleanse the right scapula wound with 3% acetic acid. Review of Resident #1's orders revealed no evidence 3% acetic acid was ordered to cleanse the wound. Interview on 09/10/24 at 4:35 P.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Wound Licensed Practical Nurse (WLPN) #224 revealed the facility never received the order for 3% acetic acid. The WLPN #224 and DON reported the Wound NP #500 gives staff verbal orders and the staff enter the orders into the electronic medical record. The DON reported some of the orders were signed by the Wound NP #500, however some were signed by the resident's physician. Interview on 09/10/24 at 4:45 P.M., with Wound NP #500 revealed she gets distracted and may have documented the order inaccurately and would probably go by the orders the staff had entered more likely. b. Review of Resident #1's Wound NP #500's progress note dated 07/26/24, 08/02/24, and 08/09/24 revealed the resident had venous ulcers on left lateral lower leg proximal and left lower leg distal. New orders written to wrap with ace bandages daily as tolerated. Review of Resident #1's orders revealed no evidence ace bandages to the lower extremities was ever ordered. Interview on 09/10/24 at 4:35 P.M., with the DON and WLPN #224 revealed the facility never received the order to wrap the lower legs with ace bandages daily. Page 1 of 2 365466 365466 09/10/2024 The Laurels of Heath 717 South 30th Street Heath, OH 43056
F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Interview on 09/10/24 at 4:45 P.M., with Wound NP #500 revealed she gets distracted and may have documented inaccurately and would probably go by the orders the staff had entered more likely. The Wound NP #500 reported initially she wanted ace wraps but then determined it would not be beneficial. c. Review of Resident #1's Wound NP #500's progress note dated 08/02/24 revealed to cleanse the right head, right lateral calf, right and left scapula with 1/2 strength Dakin's solution. Review of Resident #1's orders revealed no evidence the 1/2 strength Dakin's solution was ordered. Interview on 09/10/24 at 4:35 P.M., with the DON and WLPN #224 revealed the facility never received the order for 1/2 strength Dakin's solution. Interview on 09/10/24 at 4:45 P.M., with Wound NP #500 revealed she gets distracted and may have documented inaccurately and would probably go by the orders the staff had entered more likely. d. Review of Resident #1's Wound NP #500's progress note dated 08/09/24 revealed to cleanse the sacrum with 1/2 strength Dakin's solution. Review of Resident #1's orders dated 08/09/24 revealed the order was changed to cleanse the sacrum wound with house wound cleanser. Interview on 09/10/24 at 4:35 P.M., with the DON and WLPN #224 revealed the resident's wound was originally being cleansed with Dakin's solution and the Wound NP #500 gave verbal orders on 08/09/24 to change to house wound cleanser. Interview on 09/10/24 at 4:45 P.M., with Wound NP #500 revealed she gets distracted and may have documented inaccurately and would probably go by the orders the staff had entered more likely. This deficiency represents incidental findings of non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00156945. 365466 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0842GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F842 - Resident-identifiable information

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 10, 2024 survey of THE LAURELS OF HEATH?

This was a inspection survey of THE LAURELS OF HEATH on September 10, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at THE LAURELS OF HEATH on September 10, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.