F 0695
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor a resident's oxygen
saturations in accordance with physician orders. This affected one (Resident #44) of three residents
reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 87.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings include:
Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure,
congestive heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea, and atherosclerotic heart disease. A physician order
dated 05/17/24 revealed Resident #44 had an order for continuous oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal
cannula. Instructions revealed to check placement and record oxygen saturation every shift. The only
oxygen saturation able to be located between 08/15/24 and 08/26/24 revealed one oxygen saturation level
was recorded on 08/23/24 at 4:32 A.M. and recorded as 97%.
Observations on 08/28/24 at 2:05 P.M. revealed Resident #44's oxygen saturation level was 98% with
oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula.
During an interview on 08/27/24 at 2:24 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #110 verified she was unable to
locate any additional evidence of oxygen saturations being monitored. RN #110 stated Resident #44 was
stable on her ordered oxygen and staff would monitor if she had signs of distress. The area on the order
which would have resulted in the need for monitoring oxygen saturation levels on the Medication
Administration Record (MAR) had not been activated in the electronic medical record.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00156489.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
365482
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365482
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/28/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Altercare of Navarre Ctr for Rehab & Nrsg Care
517 Park Street NW
Navarre, OH 44662
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0803
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be
updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Based on observation, review of resident diet orders, review of menus/spreadsheets, and interview, the
facility failed to ensure proper portion sizes of food were served to residents on a carbohydrate controlled
(CCHO)/low concentrated sweet (LCS) diet. This affected six (Residents #32, #35, #36, #39, #40, and #43)
of 30 residents on the 200 hall who had trays served.
Findings include:
Review of the menu and spreadsheet for lunch on 08/27/24 revealed the only difference between the
regular diets and carbohydrate controlled (low concentrated sweet) diet was the portion size. The regular
diet included a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of au gratin potatoes and four ounces of mixed vegetables. The
carbohydrate controlled diet called for a #10 scoop (3/8 cup) of au gratin potatoes and a three ounce
serving of mixed vegetables.
On 08/27/24 between 11:22 A.M. and 11:40 A.M. observations were made of the tray line. All residents who
received au gratin potatoes and mixed vegetables were provided the same amount with the same utensils
utilized to measure out the food.
On 08/27/24 at 11:35 A.M., Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) #100 verified staff had served ½ cup of
au gratin potatoes to residents on the carbohydrate controlled diets instead of 3/8 cup as indicated on the
spreadsheet. CDM #100 verified each resident was provided four ounces of mixed vegetables. After looking
for a three ounce spoodle to serve the correct amount of mixed vegetables, CDM #100 stated there was no
three ounce spoodle available to measure the correct portion. CDM #100 verified the trays which were
observed being prepared were for service to the 200 hall residents.
The facility identified residents on the 200 hall with orders for the low concentrated sweet (carbohydrate
controlled) diets as Residents #32, #35, #36, #39, #40, and #43.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00156489.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365482
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2