Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

AYDEN HEALTHCARE OF GREENVILLECMS #3655322 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician was updated regarding a wound change affecting Resident #10. The facility also failed to ensure wound treatments and assessments were obtained timely affecting two (#10, #13) of three reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 63.1.Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 04/16/25. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of mouth, tracheostomy and gastrostomy tubes, and skin graft to the right forearm. The resident was discharged on 05/09/25 to the hospital and did not return.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating impaired cognition. Resident #10 was dependent on eating and required maximum assistance for toileting hygiene, bed mobility and moderate assistance for transfers. Resident #10 was documented to be frequently incontinent of bowel and occasionally incontinent of urine and was noted to have a surgical wound. Review of Resident #10's care plan contained no reference to the resident having a surgical wound and contained no information regarding Resident #10's dressing changes.Review of the physician orders to start 04/19/25 revealed Resident #10's right forearm surgical graft site was to be cleansed daily with normal saline, covered with xeroform followed by a nonadherent surgical dressing and wrapped with rolled bandage. The right arm was then to be wrapped with a Coban wrap (an adherent wrap used to secure and protect primary dressing).Review of the weekly nurse skin assessments revealed Resident #10 had a surgical graft site to the right forearm, however the assessments contained no description of the graft site.Review of a wound assessment note completed by the wound nurse dated 05/02/25 revealed Resident #10 had a right forearm surgical skin graft, the wound measured 5.2 centimeters (cm) by 2.6 cm. The wound description stated the wound had a pink base with scattered slough.Review of the 05/08/25 hospital documentation revealed Resident #10 was sent to the Emergency Department (ED) for altered mental status changes. Resident #10 was documented as alert and oriented to person at the time of arrival in the ED. The ED assessment revealed a wound to the right forearm with purulent drainage. The right forearm wound was cleansed and redressed. Resident # 10 was given an oral antibiotic and returned to the nursing facility with an antibiotic prescription. The ED discharge summary revealed Resident #10 was diagnoses with cellulitis of the right arm and altered mental status changes.Interview on 07/01/25 at 1:32 P.M. with Wound Nurse Licensed Practical Nurse (WNLPN) #101 revealed she had been off on medical leave and had not assessed Resident #10's wound until 05/02/25. WNLPN #101 verified the right forearm wound had a pink base with scattered slough during her assessment. WNLPN #101 verified previous wound assessments completed by nursing contained measurements but no description of the wound. WNLPN #101 stated she had not communicated with the physician regarding her assessment of Resident #10's right forearm wound. Interview on 07/02/25 at 1:12 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility wound physician had not seen Resident #10 and added, the wound physician had seen a limited number of residents because Residents Affected - Few (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 365532 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365532 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 07/02/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Ayden Healthcare of Greenville 243 Marion Drive Greenville, OH 45331 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete the facility had obtained another wound company, and that company was scheduled to start in a few weeks. The DON verified the treatment and monitoring for Resident #10's wound were grouped together as one task on the Treatment Administration Record. The DON explained the expectation there should be a task for completing the wound care treatment ordered and another task for monitoring the wound site for signs and symptoms of infection. The DON verified Resident #10's progress notes and the weekly skin assessments did not contain a description of the wound and acknowledged it would be difficult to know if there were changes to a wound without such information. The DON also verified WNLPN #101 was not wound certified, however, stated WNLPN #101 did have wound care experience because she rounded with the wound physician. Interview on 07/02/25 at 3:26 P.M. with Physician #115 revealed he was unaware the wound physician had not seen Resident #10 and further stated the staff had not contacted him with any concerns regarding Resident #10's wounds. 2. Review of medical record for Resident #13 revealed admission date of 11/14/21 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type II, morbid obesity, depression and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #13 required supervision for meals and was dependent upon staff for bed mobility, transfers and toileting hygiene.Review of the 06/30/25 skin assessment completed by Registered Nurse (RN) #106 revealed documentation of a stage two pressure area to Resident #13's left buttocks. The assessment documented the area was not new. The documentation contained no measurements or any further description of the wound. Review of the current physician orders on 06/30/15 and 07/01/25 revealed no dressing treatment order for the left coccyx wound.Observation on 07/01/25 at 2:42 P.M. of care by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #108 for Resident #13 revealed CNA #108 had a bordered dressing on her left buttock. CNA #108 removed the soiled dressing in preparation of providing incontinence care. An approximate 2.5 cm by 2.0 cm area was observed with no obvious discoloration to the surrounding skin. Interview on 07/01/25 at 9:59 A.M. with RN #106 revealed she had been informed Resident #13 had an open area to her coccyx during her 06/30/25 shift. She stated during her skin assessment she observed a border dressing covering the wound. RN #106 stated, she peeled the dressing back to assess the wound and then reattached the dressing. RN #106 verified she did not measure the area, stating after her assessment she contacted WNLPN #101 to ensure she was aware of the wound. RN #106 stated WNLPN #101 had informed her she was.Interview on 07/01/25 at 1:44 P.M. with WNLPN #105 denied she had been informed of a new skin concern for Resident #13. WNLPN #105 stated Resident #13 had areas of concerns on her coccyx in the past but they had resolved.A second interview on 07/01/25 at 4:05 P.M. with WNLPN #105 revealed she had assessed Resident #13's left buttock wound and believed the area to be moisture associated skin damage, Physician #115 was notified of the new area and treatment orders were received. Interview on 07/02/25 at 1:12 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed CNA's have been educated not to remove a dressing during incontinence care. She shared it was the expectation the CNA to provide incontinence care and then get the nurse to remove the dressing, clean the area if needed and replace the dressing. The DON explained this would reduce the risk of contamination.Review of the facility policy titled Wound Care, revised 04/28/25 provided guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing and stated the resident's care plan should assess any special needs of the resident.This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 1383066. Event ID: Facility ID: 365532 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365532 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 07/02/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Ayden Healthcare of Greenville 243 Marion Drive Greenville, OH 45331 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880 Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on record review, observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed during incontinence care. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 63.Review of medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 11/14/21 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type II, morbid obesity, depression and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13 dated 04/09/25 revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #13 required supervision for meals and was dependent upon staff for bed mobility, transfers and toileting hygiene.Observation on 07/01/25 at 2:42 P.M. of incontinence care by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #108 for Resident #13 revealed CNA #108 donned required personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering the room, Resident #13 was found lying on her back in bed. CNA #108 unfastened the incontinence product and used a wipe to cleanse her peri area. Resident #13 had also been incontinent of stool. CNA #108 disposed of the wipe and assisted Resident #13 onto her left side. A soiled bordered dressing was observed on the left buttock. CNA #108 peeled the dressing off with her right hand and disposed of it in a clear trash bag. A shallow open area, approximately quarter-sized was observed. CNA #108 proceeded to grab a wipe from the package and cleanse the resident of stool. Using her right-hand CNA #108 wiped stool from resident and was observed to fold the wipe with her left hand and wiped the resident again before disposing the soiled wipe into the clear trash bag. CNA #108 then obtained another wipe from the package and was observed to wipe stool from resident #13's buttocks, fold the wipe with her left hand and then wipe over the open area on the left buttock. Just prior to the completion of care, CNA #108 wiped both the anal area and open left buttock wound in one motion with the same wipe before disposing of the wipe. CNA #108 then asked Resident #13 to return to her back and explained she would find the nurse to reapply the dressing. CNA #108 then removed her gloves, disposed of them in the trash bag, and removed the bag from the can. CNA #108 tied the trash bag and proceeded into the hallway where she opened the door to the soiled utility room and disposed of the trash bag. CNA #108 stepped back into the hall and then into Resident #13's room beside the soiled utility room and applied hand sanitizer. Interview with CNA #108 immediately after this observation, verified the dressing removed from Resident #13's left buttock had been soiled, but was intact when she removed it. CNA #108 also verified she did not perform hand hygiene immediately after care, prior to leaving Resident #13's room as she should have and further verified hand hygiene was completed after she returned to Resident #13's room after disposing of the soiled items into the soiled utility room.Interview on 07/02/25 at 1:12 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed CNA's have been educated not to remove a dressing during incontinence care. She shared it was the expectation the CNA to provide incontinence care and then get the nurse to remove the dressing, clean the area if needed and replace the dressing. The DON explained this would reduce the risk of contamination. The DON also verified hand hygiene should be completed immediately after providing care and prior to leaving a resident's room. Review of the facility policy, Incontinence Care, revised 04/28/25 documented if a resident was incontinent of feces at the time of the care, enclose the feces in a fold of incontinent product using toilet tissue, then cleanse, rinse and dry area thoroughly and remove soiled gloves and perform hand hygiene.This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 1383066. Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 365532 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • 0880GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F880 - Infection Control

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 2, 2025 survey of AYDEN HEALTHCARE OF GREENVILLE?

This was a inspection survey of AYDEN HEALTHCARE OF GREENVILLE on July 2, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at AYDEN HEALTHCARE OF GREENVILLE on July 2, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.