Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

SHEPHERD OF THE VALLEY-BOARDMANCMS #3655801 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure Resident #40 received a post-surgical follow up visit with her surgeon in a timely manner. This affected one resident (Resident #40) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 39. Residents Affected - Few Finding include: Record review for Resident #40 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for post-surgical aftercare and rehabilitation following spinal surgery on 05/05/23. Her list of diagnoses upon admission included sepsis, type two diabetes mellitus, spinal stenosis, cirrhosis of the liver, chronic kidney disease stage three, history of bacteremia, multidrug resistant organisms, urinary tract infection, splenial megaly, anemia and hypothyroidism. Resident #40 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] at the request of her family for an evaluation. Review of physician orders from 05/09/23 to 05/26/23 revealed an order for the facility to call Resident #40's surgeon's office on 05/10/23 to set up a follow-up appointment as soon as possible. The order did not specify if the appointment needed to be in-person or via telehealth appointment. There were no other orders to reflect an actual appointment date had been set with the surgeon either via telehealth visit or in-person office visit for Resident #40 through 05/26/23. Review of the facility document provided to the surveyor by Medical Records (MR) #310 revealed MR #310 kept a calendar of medical appointments scheduled for residents at the facility. On this calendar she had written the cost to transport Resident #40 by ambulance would be a rate of $742.00. An appointment was scheduled on 05/18/23 at 9:15 A.M. then was cancelled by the facility. The appointment was moved to 06/08/23 with notes on the calendar reflecting the facility was trying to make a telehealth appointment due to the expense of transportation by ambulance. Review of progress notes dated 05/09/23 to 05/26/23 revealed no evidence the facility had asked Resident #40 or her family if they still wanted to proceed with the ambulance ride to the follow-up appointment on 05/18/23 with the surgeon despite the out-of-pocket cost nor were any alternative options for transportation or a telehealth option documented as discussed with the resident or her family. Review of nurse practitioner visit notes dated 05/11/23 and 05/25/23 and authored by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #329 revealed Resident #40 had a surgical incision on her back with sutures (a row of stitches holding a surgical wound together) and the surgeon would need to give orders regarding the status of the sutures. (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 365580 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365580 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/01/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Shepherd of the Valley-Boardman 7148 West Blvd Youngstown, OH 44512 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Review of the plan of care meeting notes dated 05/17/23 revealed a plan of care meeting was held with Resident #40 and her family. The note was silent from any discussion regarding when or how Resident #40 would be transported to her follow-up appointment with her surgeon or when a follow-up appointment would take place. Review of the progress note dated 05/26/23 revealed the family insisted Resident #40 be sent to the hospital for an evaluation. The facility had her transferred via ambulance on 05/26/23. Interview was conducted on 07/31/23 at 4:08 P.M. with NP #329 who explained sutures do not get removed until the surgeon gives an order to remove the sutures. NP #329 verified as of 05/25/23 Resident #40 had no orders from the surgeon regarding the sutures. Interview was conducted on 08/01/23 at 9:30 A.M. with MR #310 who verified she was responsible to schedule Resident #40's follow up appointment and there was a physician order to call the surgeon's office on 05/10/23 and have a follow-up appointment scheduled as soon as possible. MR #310 also verified an appointment was successfully scheduled with the surgeon on 05/18/23 but the facility cancelled the appointment due to the cost of ambulance transportation and instead was seeking a telehealth appointment on 06/08/23. Interview was conducted on 08/01/23 at 11:55 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #300 who identified herself as the skin nurse at the facility. LPN #300 verified Resident #40 had still not been seen for a post-surgery follow-up visit by the surgeon prior to her discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. Interview was conducted on 08/01/23 at 1:55 P.M. via telephone with Employee #969 from Resident #40's surgeon's office who verified the facility had called their office on 05/11/23 and secured a follow-up appointment for Resident #40 on 05/18/23 then called back to cancel it related to the cost to transport Resident #40 to the appointment. Employee #969 said the surgeon took time off every year around Memorial day so the follow-up appointment was re-scheduled for 06/08/23 via telehealth. This deficiency represents non-compliance as an incidental finding during the investigation of Complaint Number OH00144797. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 365580 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 1, 2023 survey of SHEPHERD OF THE VALLEY-BOARDMAN?

This was a inspection survey of SHEPHERD OF THE VALLEY-BOARDMAN on August 1, 2023. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at SHEPHERD OF THE VALLEY-BOARDMAN on August 1, 2023?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.