Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

MAJESTIC CARE OF PERRYSBURGCMS #3656242 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, staff interviews, wound clinic staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments and follow-up appointments were completed as ordered. This affected three (#127, #134, and #160) of four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 58.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #127 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, and atherosclerosis of native arteries of the left leg with ulceration of the heel and midfoot. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #160 was cognitively intact and did not refuse care. Review of the current care plan for Resident #127 revealed Resident #127 had an open chest lesion. The interventions included treatment to chest per orders.Review of the physician orders and treatment administration records (TAR) for Resident #127 revealed active orders, beginning on 02/21/25, for daily wound care to his chest wound to cleanse with normal saline, pat dry and apply collagen with silver to the wound bed and cover with a boarder dressing. Further review of the TARs revealed wound care was not completed on 03/03/25, 04/23/35, 05/02/25, 05/10/25, 05/22/25, 06/03/25, 06/05/25, 06/07/25, 06/21/25, 06/22/25, 06/30/25, 07/31/25, 08/10/25, and 08/23/25. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #134 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included disorder of lipoprotein, myelodysplastic syndrome (disorder affecting bone marrow), and non-pressure chronic ulcer of the right heel and midfoot with the fat layer exposed. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #160 was moderately cognitively impaired, and he did not refuse care.Review of the current care plan for Resident #134 revealed he had impaired skin integrity. The interventions included wound treatment as ordered.Review of the physician orders and TARs for Resident #134 revealed orders beginning on 08/21/25 for daily wound care to a diabetic foot ulcer on his right foot to cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply petroleum jelly, apply Xeroform (a petroleum infused dressing), and cover with boarder gauze. Further review of the TAR revealed wound care was not completed on 08/23/25, 08/24/25, and 08/28/25.Continued review of the physician orders and TARs for Resident #134 revealed orders beginning on 08/28/25 for daily wound care to a diabetic foot ulcer on his right foot to cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply hydrogel, apply Xeroform, and cover with a foam dressing. Further review of the TAR revealed wound care was not completed on 08/28/25.Interview on 09/11/25 at 4:10 P.M. and 5:20 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed wound care was not completed for Resident #127 on 03/03/25, 04/23/35, 05/02/25, 05/10/25, 05/22/25, 06/03/25, 06/05/25, 06/07/25, 06/21/25, 06/22/25, 06/30/25, 07/31/25, 08/10/25, and 08/23/25 as ordered, and for Resident #134 on 08/23/25, 08/24/25, and 08/28/25 as ordered. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #160 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, lymphedema, and cellulitis of bilateral lower extremities. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #160 was Residents Affected - Few (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 365624 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365624 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 09/15/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Majestic Care of Perrysburg 28546 Starbright Blvd Perrysburg, OH 43551 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete cognitively intact and did not refuse care.Review of the hospitalization after visit summary dated 07/17/25 for Resident #160 revealed wound care orders for Unna boots (wound dressing wraps) to bilateral lower extremities to be changed on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Further review of the hospitalization after visit summary revealed he had a scheduled follow-up appointment at a wound clinic on 07/28/25.Review of the care plan dated 07/18/25 for Resident #160 revealed he had impaired skin integrity. The interventions included for staff to complete wound treatment as ordered.Review of physician orders and the July TAR for Resident #160 revealed wound care orders dated 07/25/25 for Unna boots to bilateral lower extremities to be changed on Mondays, Wednesday, and Fridays. Further review of the TAR revealed wound care was not completed on 07/21/25 and 07/23/25. Interview on 09/15/25 at 9:52 A.M. with the Administrator and Registered Nurse (RN) #101 confirmed Resident #160 was admitted with orders for Unna boots to his bilateral lower extremities to be changed on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Further interview confirmed the Unna boots should have been changed on 07/21/25 and 07/23/25 but were not.Interview on 09/15/25 at 10:01 A.M. with Scheduling Personnel at the wound clinic confirmed Resident #160 was scheduled for a wound care follow-up appointment on 07/28/25 and was listed as being a no show for that appointment.Interview on 09/15/25 at 10:40 A.M. with the Administrator and RN #101 confirmed Resident #160's follow-up appointment at the wound clinic on 07/28/25 was not documented in the resident's electronic health record and the resident was not taken to the appointment. Review of facility policy titled, [NAME] Care Wound Management Policy, dated 05/20/24, revealed the facility would promote the treatment and healing of skin integrity impairment and optimize healing solutions. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2575262. Event ID: Facility ID: 365624 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365624 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 09/15/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Majestic Care of Perrysburg 28546 Starbright Blvd Perrysburg, OH 43551 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686 Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were completed as ordered. This affected two (#134 and #140) of four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 58.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #134 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included disorder of lipoprotein, myelodysplastic syndrome (disorder affecting bone marrow), and non-pressure chronic ulcer of the right heel and midfoot with the fat layer exposed. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #160 was moderately cognitively impaired, and he did not refuse care.Review of the current care plan for Resident #134 revealed he had impaired skin integrity. The interventions included wound treatment as ordered.Review of the physician orders and treatment administration records (TAR) for Resident #134 revealed orders beginning on 06/21/25 for daily wound care to a pressure ulcer on his right foot to cleanse with normal saline, apply collagen, cover with an abdominal dressing, wrap with Kerlix (fluffy gauze), and secure with tape. Further review of the TARs revealed wound care was not completed on 06/06/25, 06/15/25, 06/16/25, 06/22/25, 06/23/25, 07/01/25, 07/12/25, 07/26/25, 08/01/25, 08/02/25, 08/05/25, and 08/11/25.2. Review of the medical record for Resident #140 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, intracranial abscess and granuloma, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and acquired absence of part of the head and neck.Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #140 was unable to be assessed cognitively due to a traumatic brain injury, and he did not refuse care.Review of the care plan dated 03/19/25 for Resident #140 revealed he had a pressure injury to his right outer foot. The interventions included to administer treatments as ordered.Review of the current care plan for Resident #140 revealed he had a pressure injury to his left foot. The interventions included to provide wound care per treatment orders.Review of the physician orders and TARs for Resident #140 revealed orders beginning on 12/17/24 for daily wound care to his left foot to cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply skin prep (a protective barrier), and leave open to air. Further review of the TARs revealed wound care was not completed on 03/03/25, 03/04/25, or 03/22/25. Review of the physician orders and TARs for Resident #140 revealed orders beginning on 12/18/24 for daily wound care to his right outer foot to cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply Medihoney and calcium alginate, cover with abdominal dressing, and wrap with Kerlix. Further review of the TARs revealed wound care was not completed on 03/03/25.Review of the physician orders and TARs for Resident #140 revealed orders beginning on 03/21/25 for twice daily wound care to his right outer foot to cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, and apply skin prep. Further review of the TARs revealed wound care was not completed on 03/22/25 and 03/23/25. Review of the physician orders and TARs for Resident #140 revealed orders beginning on 09/11/25 for daily wound care to his left foot to cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply skin prep, and cover with border gauze. Further review of the TARs revealed wound care was not completed on 09/12/25. Interview on 09/11/25 at 4:10 P.M. and 5:20 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed wound care was not completed for Resident #134's pressure ulcer on 06/06/25, 06/15/25, 06/16/25, 06/22/25, 06/23/25, 07/01/25, 07/12/25, 07/26/25, 08/01/25, 08/02/25, 08/05/25, and 08/11/25, and for Resident #140 on 03/03/25, 03/04/25, 03/22/25, 03/23/25, and 09/12/25.Review of facility policy titled, [NAME] Care Wound Management Policy, dated 05/20/24, revealed the facility would promote the treatment and healing of skin integrity impairment and optimize healing solutions. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2575262. Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 365624 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • 0686GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F686 - Skin Integrity

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 15, 2025 survey of MAJESTIC CARE OF PERRYSBURG?

This was a inspection survey of MAJESTIC CARE OF PERRYSBURG on September 15, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at MAJESTIC CARE OF PERRYSBURG on September 15, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.