F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were
implemented and contained resident specific goals and preferences regarding discharges. This affected two
(#53 and #54) of seven residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 51.Findings include:1.
Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 06/02/25 and discharge date
of 08/01/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic pain
disorder, and major depressive disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]
revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact.Review of the care plan dated 06/03/25 revealed Resident
#53's discharge plan included interventions for social services to assist with discharge planning. The care
plan was not specific to the resident's preference and potential for future discharge and lacked evidence the
facility determined the resident's desire to return to the community. 2. Review of the medical record for
Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 09/11/25 and discharge date of 10/13/25. Diagnoses included
but were not limited to pneumonia, kidney transplant status, end stage renal disease, and anemia.Review
of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 was cognitively intact.Review of the care plan
dated 09/11/25 revealed no specific care plan to address Resident #54's discharge planning was
initiated.Interview on 10/23/25 at 11:16 A.M. with MDS Nurse #122 revealed care plans are updated at a
minimum of quarterly, with significant changes, new orders, falls, and other events during interdisciplinary
team (IDT) meetings. MDS Nurse #122 stated the dietary, social services, and activity departments
completed their own care plans. MDS Nurse #122 verified Resident #53 and Resident #54 did not have a
completed discharge care plan that was resident specific as to the goal of discharge location. Review of
policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan, revised on 05/16/24, revealed the purpose was to develop and
implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident/patient, consistent with
resident/patient rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's/patient's
medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's/patient's
comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: the
resident's/patient's goals for admission, desired outcomes, and preferences for future discharge and
resident/patient specific interventions that reflect the resident's/patient's need and preferences and align
with the resident's/patient's cultural identity, as indicated.This deficiency represents non-compliance
investigated under Complaint Number 2630192.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 7
Event ID:
365624
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365624
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Perrysburg
28546 Starbright Blvd
Perrysburg, OH 43551
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure falls were thoroughly
investigated to determine a root cause, documented in the medical record, and immediate interventions
were put in place which were appropriate. This affected three (#5, #13, and #54) of three residents
reviewed for falls. The facility census was 51.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident
#5 revealed an admission date of 12/08/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia mild with
agitation, syncope and collapse, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and cognitive communication
deficit.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had severe
cognitive impairment and required supervision or touching assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and
ambulation.Review of the care plan dated 09/03/25 revealed Resident #5 was at risk for falls related to
dementia, side effects of medications, diagnosis of syncope and collapse, muscle weakness, and cognitive
communication deficit. Interventions included to encourage call light use, encourage use of a walker,
frequent checks, instruction on safety measures for a new environment, medication review for increased
agitation in the afternoon, monitor closely while in the bathroom, provide activities for distraction, antibiotic
therapy, and be sure the resident's call light was within reach and encourage the resident to use it for
assistance as needed, the resident needed prompt response to all requests for assistance, maintain the
bed in low position, collect urinalysis for culture and sensitivity, encourage to use a wheelchair, a floor mat,
non-skid socks (09/04/25), provide a gait belt when walking with staff, identification that the resident puts
self on the floor (10/06/25), and therapy evaluation.Review of Resident #5's fall follow-up note dated
09/05/25 revealed the interdisciplinary team (IDT) met and discussed the fall that occurred on 09/04/25.
Resident #5 was found on the floor and was unable to explain what happened. The resident was assessed
and no injuries were noted. The resident was assisted off the floor. The immediate intervention was to don
non-skid socks on the feet. Neurological checks were initiated and the physician and family were notified of
fall. The current care plan was reviewed and noted that appropriate interventions were in place. A new
intervention implemented was to ensure the resident had non-skid socks on and the care plan was
updated.Review of an alert note dated 09/27/25 revealed Resident #5 fell in the dining room. The resident
was noted to be sitting on his bottom. There were no injuries noted and range of motion was within normal
limits in all extremities. The resident denied any pain or discomfort and all parties were notified. Further
review revealed no documentation of an immediate intervention was put in to place.Review of a fall
follow-up note dated 09/29/25 revealed the IDT met and discussed Resident #5 fall that occurred on
09/27/25. The resident was found on the floor in the dining room and the resident was unable to explain
what occurred due to diagnoses. Resident #5 was assessed and no injuries were noted from the fall. An
immediate intervention was to place non-skid socks on the resident. Neurological checks were initiated and
the physician and Power of Attorney (POA) were notified. The current care plan was reviewed and a new
intervention for therapy to assess the resident was added.Review of a general progress note dated
09/30/25 revealed Resident #5 was found lying down on the floor face up in his room. There were no
injuries, pain, or discomfort noted and neurological checks were initiated. The resident's Guardian,
physician, and unit manager were notified. There was no documentation of an immediate intervention put
into place.Review of a general progress note dated 10/04/25 revealed Resident #5 was found sitting on the
floor in the activity room. The resident voiced no complaints of pain or discomfort. It was noted the resident
sustained a skin tear to the right wrist. A new dressing was applied to the right wrist, neurological checks
were initiated, and
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365624
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365624
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Perrysburg
28546 Starbright Blvd
Perrysburg, OH 43551
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
the Director of Nursing (DON), unit manager, physician, and Guardian notified. There was no
documentation of an immediate intervention put into place per the note.Review of a fall follow-up note dated
10/06/25 revealed the IDT met and discussed Resident #5's fall that occurred on 10/04/25. The resident
was found on the floor in the activity room and was unable to say what happened. Resident #5 was
assessed and noted to have a skin tear to the right wrist. The resident was assisted off the floor and taken
to his room. An immediate intervention was to place non-skid socks on the resident's feet. Neurological
checks were initiated and the physician and POA were notified. The current care plan was reviewed and a
new intervention to encourage the resident to use a wheelchair was implemented.Review of all fall follow-up
progress notes from 09/04/25 through 10/13/25 for Resident #5 revealed no root cause analysis or
thorough investigation of the falls.2. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission
date of 01/21/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, anxiety disorder, and neurocognitive
disorders with Lewy bodies.Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had
severe cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximal assistance for transfers.Review of the care
plan dated 01/22/25 revealed Resident #13 was at risk for injury related to falls. Interventions included to
assess medications for side effects, collect urinalysis and culture and sensitivity, encourage the resident to
be in the common area while awake, encourage the resident to wear shoes during waking hours, frequent
rounding, label the walker, maintain a low bed, offer the resident the bathroom throughout the shift to
decrease incontinence, provide activities for distraction, provide daily activities of daily living as soon as the
resident wakes up, rearrange the bed for safe parameters, remind the resident to use a walker, remind staff
to use a walker during showers, therapy to evaluate, and use gait belt in shower room.Further review of the
care plan revealed Resident #13 was at risk for falls or fall related injury related to impaired cognition, poor
safety awareness, recurrent falls, high risk medications, impaired mobility, and history of falls. Interventions
included for staff to ensure a walker was within reach at all times/redirect resident to go get a walker when
she forgets it, encourage the resident to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for
strengthening and improved mobility, encourage and assist the resident to wear appropriate non-skid
footwear, ensure assistive devices are working properly, ensure the bed was made when the resident was
up, keep the call light and frequently used personal items within reach, keep pathways clear and well lit,
medication review, provide a pillow for positioning, allow the resident periods of rest when becoming
combative with care, therapy evaluation, assist with toileting, and assist with transfers.Review of Resident
#13's general progress notes and incident notes revealed no nursing documentation for the falls the
resident sustained on 05/01/25 and 05/26/25.Review of Resident #13's fall follow-up notes revealed none
were completed for the falls occurring on 05/23/25 and 07/06/25.Review of Resident #13's fall follow-up
notes from 04/23/25 through 08/25/25 revealed no root cause analysis or complete and thorough
investigations were completed.3. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission
date of 09/11/25 and discharge date of 10/13/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to cervical disk
disorder at C5-C6 and C6-C7 levels with radiculopathy, cervical disc displacement at C4-C5 and C5-C6
levels, and kyphosis cervical region.Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54
was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate assistance for transfers, supervision or touching
assistance for ambulation, and was independent in the wheelchair.Review of Resident #54's fall risk
assessments dated 09/11/25, 09/22/25, and 10/02/25 revealed the resident was at high risk of falling.
Review of the care plan dated 09/11/25 revealed Resident #54 was at risk for falls or fall related injury.
Interventions included non-skid material to the wheelchair and to send to the emergency room for
evaluation
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365624
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365624
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Perrysburg
28546 Starbright Blvd
Perrysburg, OH 43551
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
due to weakness.Review of a fall follow-up note dated 09/22/25 revealed the IDT met and discussed
Resident #54's fall that occurred on 09/20/25. The resident was in the bathroom and while attempting to get
out of the wheelchair the resident slid to the floor. The resident was assessed and it was noted there were
no injuries related to the fall. Resident #54 was assisted off of the floor. An immediate intervention was
implemented to educate the resident to use the call light for assistance. Neurological checks were initiated
and the physician and the resident's family were notified. Resident #54's current care plan was reviewed
and a new intervention for non-skid material to placed on wheelchair seat was initiated.Review of a general
progress note dated 09/22/25 revealed the nurse was called into Resident #54's room via the nurse aide
due to how weak the resident was. The nurse entered the resident's room and the the resident request to
be sent to the emergency room. Laboratory values (labs) were drawn and lab results were pending. The
resident's wife was notified about the change in condition.Review of a fall follow-up note dated 09/23/25
revealed the IDT met and discussed Resident #54's fall that occurred on 09/22/25. The resident was
ambulating back to bed from the bathroom when his leg went weak and he fell to the floor. The resident was
assessed and it was noted there were no injuries related to the fall. The resident was assisted off the floor
and assisted back to bed. An immediate intervention was to ensure the call light was in reach of the
resident. Neurological checks were initiated and the physician and family were notified. Resident #54
continued to complain about his leg feeling weak and requested to go to the emergency room for
evaluation. The care plan was updated and there was no documentation of an intervention was put into
place for this fall.Interview on 10/23/25 at 1:45 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the IDT meets to
discuss falls during risk management and includes going to the resident's rooms to assess the situation
following fall incidents. The Administrator stated the nurses are to enter risk management into the computer
after a fall.Interview on 10/23/25 at 2:19 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no
evidence of an immediate intervention for Resident #5 following the resident's falls on 09/27/25 and
09/30/25. The DON also confirmed duplicate interventions (non-skid socks) were implemented following
two separate falls when the intervention should have already been in place from the previous fall, and there
was no evidence the facility completed throughout investigations to determine root causes for each of
Resident #5's falls between 09/04/25 and 10/13/25. Continued interview with the DON verified Resident
#13's medical record lacked documentation for falls on 05/01/25 and 05/26/25, no fall follow-up
documentation was completed for falls on 05/23/25 and 07/06/25, and no thorough investigations or root
causes were determined for each of Resident #13's falls between 04/23/25 and 08/25/25. The DON also
confirmed there was no documentation of an intervention implemented following Resident #54's fall on
09/22/25 to prevent future falls.Review of policy titled, Incidents, Accidents and Supervision, dated
01/02/24, revealed the purpose of incident reporting can include assuring that appropriate and immediate
interventions are implemented and corrective actions are taken to prevent recurrences and improve the
management of resident care. Conducting root cause analysis to ascertain causative/contributing factors as
part of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) to avoid further occurrences. The following
incidents/accidents require an incident/accident report but are not limited to falls. In the event of an
unwitnessed fall of a non-interviewable resident or head injury for any resident, the nurse will initiate
neurological checks. The nurse will enter the incident/accident information into the appropriate form/system
within 24 hours of occurrence and will document all pertinent information. Documentation should include
the date, time, nature of the incident, location, initial findings, immediate interventions, notifications and
orders obtained or follow-up interventions.Review of policy titled, Fall Prevention, dated 01/02/24, revealed
when any resident
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365624
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365624
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Perrysburg
28546 Starbright Blvd
Perrysburg, OH 43551
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
experiences a fall, the facility will assess the resident, complete a post-fall assessment, complete an
incident report, notify the physician and family, review the resident's care plan and update as indicated,
document all assessments and actions, and obtain witness statements in the case of injury.This deficiency
represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2630192.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365624
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365624
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Perrysburg
28546 Starbright Blvd
Perrysburg, OH 43551
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0806
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies,
intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, observation, review of meal tickets, resident and staff interview, and policy review,
the facility failed to ensure nutritional assessments were completed timely to determine dietary preferences
and failed to ensure food preferences were honored. This affected two (#32 and #54) of four residents
reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 51.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for
Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 02/27/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to congestive
heart failure, Parkinsonism, type two diabetes mellitus, weakness, hypertension, and malignant neoplasm
of the prostate.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32
had moderate cognitive impairment.Review of a care plan dated 02/27/25 revealed Resident #32 presented
with a potential nutritional risk related to a therapeutic diet and diabetes with interventions included to honor
food/fluid preferences, and provide and serve diet as ordered. There was no specified intervention
indicating the resident requested no pork or beef. Review of a nutrition interview document dated 03/04/25
revealed Resident #32 liked chicken and fish and dislikes or avoids pork and beef.Review of Resident #32's
current physician orders revealed a diet order for a regular diet with thin liquids and no mention of the
resident requesting no pork or beef.Review of a nutrition/dietary note dated 03/05/25 revealed the dietician
met with Resident #32 related to the resident being a new admission. The resident indicated he has a good
appetite and was eating well at the facility with no issues. The resident also identified he liked chicken and
fish. Further review revealed the resident's current diet order was a regular diet, regular texture, and thin
liquids, with good oral intakes. Review of a meal ticket for Resident #32 dated 10/23/25 revealed an
indication for no pork and beef.Interview on 10/22/25 at 11:29 A.M. with Resident #32 stated he does not
want any beef or pork because it messes with his stomach. Resident #32 stated he preferred chicken and
fish and verified he had received beef and pork on his tray on occasion. Observation on 10/22/25 at 12:00
P.M. of Resident #32 in the family room on the 200 hall revealed the resident had beef brisket, mashed
potatoes, carrots, and a corn muffin on his plate. Interview on 10/22/25 at 12:02 P.M. with Unit Manager
(UM) #200 verified Resident #32 had beef brisket, mashed potatoes, carrots, and corn muffin on his plate
at lunch.2. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 09/11/25 and
discharge date of 10/13/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to kidney transplant status, end stage
renal disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, anemia, and diabetes.Review of the MDS assessment
dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 was cognitively intact.Review of a nutrition/dietary note dated 09/17/25
revealed the dietician met with Resident #54 on that date and determined the resident's current diet order
was a two gram sodium diet, with regular texture, thin liquids, and no pork. Resident #54 reiterated
immediately he did not want any pork with his meals. Resident #54 also requested a controlled
carbohydrate diet.Interview on 10/22/25 at 9:15 A.M. via telephone with Resident #54 revealed he did not
want pork on his trays due to religious reasons and he would get pork on his tray. Resident #54 stated he
would have send the meal trays it back to get something else. Resident #54 stated it never got completely
fixed and he would still get pork on his tray on occasion after the dietician was made aware.Interview on
10/23/25 at 11:47 A.M. with Dietary [NAME] (DC) #256 stated she had been doing tray line for so long it
was routine to her so she did not look at the meal tickets thoroughly. DC #256 stated she just glanced at the
tickets. DC #256 stated she made cheat sheets on the rack above the tray line for reference and for new
staff to help assist them. Observation of the cheat sheets, during interview with DC #256, confirmed
Resident #32's sheet revealed to serve no pork and had no
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365624
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365624
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Perrysburg
28546 Starbright Blvd
Perrysburg, OH 43551
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0806
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
mention of not serving beef.Interview on 10/23/25 at 1:45 P.M. with the Administrator revealed dietary
preferences are put into the meal suite and are sent to the kitchen. The Administrator stated when she
interviewed Resident #32 he verbally told her he did not like pork and did not mention not liking beef. The
Administrator verified it was not documented anywhere and his meal tickets contained the notation for no
pork or beef. The Administrator verified no nutritional interview was completed for Resident #54 upon
admission to determine food preferences. The Administrator stated sometimes the residents think they are
getting pork but it was not pork. For example, they served turkey sausage on 10/22/25 and the residents
thought it was pork sausage.Review of the policy titled, Nutrition Assessment, dated 08/01/25, revealed
each resident/patient will be interviewed within 72 hours of admission to determine food and meal
preferences as well as to assess nutrition status and factors that may put the resident/patient at risk for
altered nutrition. A registered dietician will assess the nutritional status of each resident/patient at a
minimum at time of admission, with significant change in condition, and annually. Food
allergies/intolerances will be confirmed and entered into the electronic medical record. The
resident's/patient's nutrition care plan will be updated with each MDS assessment and as
needs/interventions change.This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint
Number 2630192.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365624
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 7