F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or
bed-hold policies.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided
with a proper discharge. This affected one (#100) of the three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility
also failed to ensure the discharges were reported to the local ombudsman office. This affected one (#100)
of the three residents reviewed. The facility census was 33.Findings include: 1) Review of the medial record
or Resident #100 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to his home
on [DATE]. Diagnoses included orthostatic hypotension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dehydration, dysphagia,
and anxiety disorder.Review of the Care Plans dated 04/18/25 for Resident #100, revealed no care plan
developed for discharge planning.Review of the April and May 2025 physician orders for Resident #100,
revealed no orders for the resident to be discharge from the facility.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)
assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #100 was cognitively intact. Resident #100 was dependent
on staff for medication administration and required set-up assistance for other activities of daily living
(ADLs). Review of a progress note for Resident #100 dated 05/05/25, revealed a referral was faxed to
Queen City Home Health per the resident's request. Review of a progress note for Resident #100 dated
05/15/25 at 6:15 P.M., revealed the resident and sister were aware that the appeal was denied and the
resident declined to complete another appeal. The resident wanted to discharge home tomorrow. Resident
#100 would be discharged home on [DATE] with the home health care agency referral in place.Review of
Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note for Resident #100 dated 05/15/25, revealed the resident was seen
related to a discharge visit. Notes indicated the resident resided in an Assisted Living Facility (ALF) and
was receiving primary care services. The resident was planned on being discharged tomorrow but
expressed discomfort with the discharge plan. The resident was stable but stated he felt as if he was not
being adequately monitored and was unsure if he was ready to go home and did not feel comfortable
administering his insulin. Review of a progress note dated 05/16/25 at 12:06 P.M., revealed the social
worker contacted the resident's sister to schedule a discharge time. The resident's sister stated she would
pick up the resident today at 5:15 P.M. Review of a progress note for Resident #100 dated 05/16/25 at 5:10
P.M., revealed the resident was discharged home with his personal belongings and medications including
19 tablets of Lomotil (anti-diarrhea) and 27 oxycodone (narcotic pain relief) five milligrams (mg). Diabetes
teaching was completed, medications were discussed, and the nurse instructed the resident to follow-up
with his primary care physician. All questioners were answered, and the resident left in private vehicle with
no distress. There were no additional progress notes about a discharge summary being completed or being
provided to the resident. Review of the Recapitulation of Stay dated 05/16/25 for Resident #100, revealed
the only section completed was section two (Social Services). Social Services noted a referral was made to
a home health agency and sent a referral to obtain a primary care physician. The admission information,
discharge information, summary of stay,
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
365626
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365626
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/17/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Bellbrook Health and Rehab
1957 North Lakeman Drive
Bellbrook, OH 45305
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
nursing services, dietary services, activities, and rehabilitation services were all blank, and the form was
not signed. Interview on 10/29/25 at 9:20 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) #52 from the ALF
community where the resident was listed as being discharged to, revealed Resident #100 never resided in
the ALF. DON #52 stated Resident #100 had always lived in an independent living apartment and was
discharged back to his independent living apartment from the facility. Interview on 10/29/25 at 9:53 A.M.
with Nurse Practitioner (NP) #501 revealed Resident #100 expressed concerns about not being ready to go
home related to his insulin. NP #501 stated she thought Resident #100 was discharged to an ALF and was
surprised to learn Resident #100 was discharged to an independent living apartment. NP #501 stated she
was certain Resident #100 went home with home health referral because a home health care nurse called
her to ask for a prescription for insulin because the resident was discharged without any insulin and without
having a primary care physician in place.Interview on 10/29/25 at 10:25 A.M. with Home Health Care
Registered Nurse (RN) #504 stated Resident #100 was discharged from the facility to an independent living
apartment with no primary care physician to follow him. RN #504 stated she visited Resident #100 on
05/17/25 and the resident did not have any insulin in his apartment. RN #504 stated she reached out to NP
#501 because Resident #100 did not have a primary care physician to contact. RN #504 requested an
insulin order from NP #501 and to be sent to Resident #504's independent living apartment. RN #504
stated she had to assist Resident #504 with finding a primary care physician. Interview with the
Administrator on 10/29/25 at 1:54 P.M. verified Resident #100 was discharged from the facility without a
discharge summary or a discharge plan. The Administrator stated Resident #100 was discharged from the
facility without a primary care physician in place or a scheduled follow up appointment with a primary care
physician.Review of the facility policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan dated October 2022, revealed
when a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post discharge plan is developed to
assist the resident with discharge. The discharge summary of the resident's stay at the facility and final
summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge in accordance with established regulations
governing release of resident information and permitted by the resident. A copy of the resident's
post-discharge plan and discharge summary will be filed in the Residents medical record.2) Review of the
May 2025 through October 2025 information sent to the Ombudsman's Office for discharges, revealed each
monthly cover sheet was sent to an unknown fax number. Each cover sheet contained a list of discharges
from the facility; however, there was no documented evidence that the information was sent and /or
received by the Ombudsman's Office. Interview with Ombudsman #506 on 10/29/25 at 9:08 A.M,, revealed
the Ombudsman's Office did not receive any notification of discharges from the facility in the past six
months. Ombudsman #506 verified they were not aware Resident #100 was discharged . Ombudsman
#506 stated the fax number listed on the facility's cover sheet was not a fax number for the Ombudsman's
Office.Interview with the Administrator on 10/29/25 at 1:54 P.M., stated a list of the discharges were to be
faxed to the local Ombudsman's Office monthly. The Administrator reported the facility was not aware of the
incorrect number where the faxes were being sent. The Administrator verified the facility had no
documented evidence that the Ombudsman's Office was being notified of the facility discharges. This
deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 1367217.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365626
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2