Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

BELLBROOK HEALTH AND REHABCMS #3656261 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0628 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a proper discharge. This affected one (#100) of the three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility also failed to ensure the discharges were reported to the local ombudsman office. This affected one (#100) of the three residents reviewed. The facility census was 33.Findings include: 1) Review of the medial record or Resident #100 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to his home on [DATE]. Diagnoses included orthostatic hypotension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dehydration, dysphagia, and anxiety disorder.Review of the Care Plans dated 04/18/25 for Resident #100, revealed no care plan developed for discharge planning.Review of the April and May 2025 physician orders for Resident #100, revealed no orders for the resident to be discharge from the facility.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #100 was cognitively intact. Resident #100 was dependent on staff for medication administration and required set-up assistance for other activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of a progress note for Resident #100 dated 05/05/25, revealed a referral was faxed to Queen City Home Health per the resident's request. Review of a progress note for Resident #100 dated 05/15/25 at 6:15 P.M., revealed the resident and sister were aware that the appeal was denied and the resident declined to complete another appeal. The resident wanted to discharge home tomorrow. Resident #100 would be discharged home on [DATE] with the home health care agency referral in place.Review of Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note for Resident #100 dated 05/15/25, revealed the resident was seen related to a discharge visit. Notes indicated the resident resided in an Assisted Living Facility (ALF) and was receiving primary care services. The resident was planned on being discharged tomorrow but expressed discomfort with the discharge plan. The resident was stable but stated he felt as if he was not being adequately monitored and was unsure if he was ready to go home and did not feel comfortable administering his insulin. Review of a progress note dated 05/16/25 at 12:06 P.M., revealed the social worker contacted the resident's sister to schedule a discharge time. The resident's sister stated she would pick up the resident today at 5:15 P.M. Review of a progress note for Resident #100 dated 05/16/25 at 5:10 P.M., revealed the resident was discharged home with his personal belongings and medications including 19 tablets of Lomotil (anti-diarrhea) and 27 oxycodone (narcotic pain relief) five milligrams (mg). Diabetes teaching was completed, medications were discussed, and the nurse instructed the resident to follow-up with his primary care physician. All questioners were answered, and the resident left in private vehicle with no distress. There were no additional progress notes about a discharge summary being completed or being provided to the resident. Review of the Recapitulation of Stay dated 05/16/25 for Resident #100, revealed the only section completed was section two (Social Services). Social Services noted a referral was made to a home health agency and sent a referral to obtain a primary care physician. The admission information, discharge information, summary of stay, (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 365626 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365626 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 11/17/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Bellbrook Health and Rehab 1957 North Lakeman Drive Bellbrook, OH 45305 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete nursing services, dietary services, activities, and rehabilitation services were all blank, and the form was not signed. Interview on 10/29/25 at 9:20 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) #52 from the ALF community where the resident was listed as being discharged to, revealed Resident #100 never resided in the ALF. DON #52 stated Resident #100 had always lived in an independent living apartment and was discharged back to his independent living apartment from the facility. Interview on 10/29/25 at 9:53 A.M. with Nurse Practitioner (NP) #501 revealed Resident #100 expressed concerns about not being ready to go home related to his insulin. NP #501 stated she thought Resident #100 was discharged to an ALF and was surprised to learn Resident #100 was discharged to an independent living apartment. NP #501 stated she was certain Resident #100 went home with home health referral because a home health care nurse called her to ask for a prescription for insulin because the resident was discharged without any insulin and without having a primary care physician in place.Interview on 10/29/25 at 10:25 A.M. with Home Health Care Registered Nurse (RN) #504 stated Resident #100 was discharged from the facility to an independent living apartment with no primary care physician to follow him. RN #504 stated she visited Resident #100 on 05/17/25 and the resident did not have any insulin in his apartment. RN #504 stated she reached out to NP #501 because Resident #100 did not have a primary care physician to contact. RN #504 requested an insulin order from NP #501 and to be sent to Resident #504's independent living apartment. RN #504 stated she had to assist Resident #504 with finding a primary care physician. Interview with the Administrator on 10/29/25 at 1:54 P.M. verified Resident #100 was discharged from the facility without a discharge summary or a discharge plan. The Administrator stated Resident #100 was discharged from the facility without a primary care physician in place or a scheduled follow up appointment with a primary care physician.Review of the facility policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan dated October 2022, revealed when a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post discharge plan is developed to assist the resident with discharge. The discharge summary of the resident's stay at the facility and final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge in accordance with established regulations governing release of resident information and permitted by the resident. A copy of the resident's post-discharge plan and discharge summary will be filed in the Residents medical record.2) Review of the May 2025 through October 2025 information sent to the Ombudsman's Office for discharges, revealed each monthly cover sheet was sent to an unknown fax number. Each cover sheet contained a list of discharges from the facility; however, there was no documented evidence that the information was sent and /or received by the Ombudsman's Office. Interview with Ombudsman #506 on 10/29/25 at 9:08 A.M,, revealed the Ombudsman's Office did not receive any notification of discharges from the facility in the past six months. Ombudsman #506 verified they were not aware Resident #100 was discharged . Ombudsman #506 stated the fax number listed on the facility's cover sheet was not a fax number for the Ombudsman's Office.Interview with the Administrator on 10/29/25 at 1:54 P.M., stated a list of the discharges were to be faxed to the local Ombudsman's Office monthly. The Administrator reported the facility was not aware of the incorrect number where the faxes were being sent. The Administrator verified the facility had no documented evidence that the Ombudsman's Office was being notified of the facility discharges. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 1367217. Event ID: Facility ID: 365626 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0628GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F628 - Documentation

    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 17, 2025 survey of BELLBROOK HEALTH AND REHAB?

This was a inspection survey of BELLBROOK HEALTH AND REHAB on November 17, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at BELLBROOK HEALTH AND REHAB on November 17, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.