F 0640
Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0
assessments were completed accurately and a correction was submitted timely to reflect Resident #90's
disposition. This affected one resident (#90) out of four residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The
facility census was 94.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an
admission date of 06/17/19, with diagnoses including hypertension, cognitive communication deficit,
depression, polyneuropathy, chronic pain, dementia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), benign
prostatic hyperplasia, acquired absence of the right leg above the knee, and schizoaffective
disorder.Review of a progress note dated 03/02/25 revealed Resident #90 was enroute to a local hospital
by critical transport, and the power of attorney was notified of the intended location.Review of the
Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, completed on 03/02/25, revealed the discharge
status was coded as discharge - return anticipated and marked as an unplanned discharge.Review of an
appointment form dated 03/03/25 revealed the resident was discharged to the hospital with the intention of
going home on hospice services.Interview conducted on 08/05/25 at 11:36 A.M. with Registered Nurse
(RN) MDS Coordinator #260 revealed a correction to the MDS assessment was not completed to reflect the
discharge disposition of discharge - return not anticipated. RN MDS Coordinator #260 revealed a correction
assessment would be submitted to ensure MDS data reflected an accurate record.
Residents Affected - Few
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
365644
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365644
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/05/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Embassy of Winchester
36 Lehman Dr
Canal Winchester, OH 43110
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing devices
were free from soil. This affected one (Resident #33) out of three residents reviewed for pressure reducing
measures. The facility census was 94. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #33
revealed an admission date of 05/06/25 with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two
diabetes mellitus, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, severe sepsis with septic shock, metabolic
encephalopathy and a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the left heel.Review of the care plan dated 05/07/25
revealed Resident #33 has an actual area of skin impairment with interventions including use of an air
mattress, encouragement to wear boots on both feet, evaluation for pain, completion of wound treatments,
nursing observation of the wound dressing to ensure it remains intact, monitoring for clinical changes in the
wound and completion of skin observations on shower days and as ordered.Review of physician orders
dated 05/08/25 revealed the resident is to wear boots on both feet while in bed as tolerated for
prevention.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 05/13/25
revealed Resident #33 is moderately cognitively impaired, dependent on staff assistance for bathing and
hygiene and has one stage three pressure ulcer present upon admission.Review of the skin grid pressure
assessment completed 07/30/25 revealed Resident #33 has a skin impairment on the left heel, present
upon admission. The wound is classified as unstable measuring 5.5 centimeters (cm) by 2.3 cm with 30%
granulation and 70% slough, moderate serosanguinous and yellow/green drainage with slight odor. The
wound showed noted improvement.Observation on 08/04/25 at 3:30 P.M. during wound care with the
Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #276, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #274 and Certified Nursing
Assistant #273 revealed Resident #33 had a pressure ulcer located on the left heel. Prior to beginning
wound care, both boots were noted to have staining on the exterior bottom portion of the heel-elevating
boots. The staining appeared scattered with ring-like formations indicative of dried fluid and light pink
discoloration. Additionally, the interior portion of the right boot, specifically in the toe area, showed
shadowing or discoloration, slightly darkened but without definitive staining or wetness. LPN #274 began
the dressing change by removing the resident's left boot, noting the dressing was saturated with pale yellow
drainage. LPN #274 confirmed a large amount of drainage but denied dressing seepage through to the
boot. The boot was placed at the bedside. No concerns were noted during wound care and once
completed, the boot was replaced with the staining present.Observations on 08/05/25 at 6:34 A.M. and
11:03 A.M. of Resident #33's boots revealed both remained soiled with the same staining present.Interview
on 08/05/25 at 11:30 A.M. with LPN #238 confirmed the staining on the exterior bottom portion of Resident
#33's heel-elevating boots. LPN #238 denied performing Resident #33's wound dressing change but stated
new heel boots are needed and the old boots will be laundered.Interview on 08/05/25 at 12:40 P.M. with the
Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #33's pressure-reducing boots were soiled on the exterior
portion.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365644
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365644
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/05/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Embassy of Winchester
36 Lehman Dr
Canal Winchester, OH 43110
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0921
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Many
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and
the public.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and
comfortable living environment for residents. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The
facility census was 94. Findings include: An observation on 08/04/25 from 8:57 A.M. to 9:12 A.M. was
conducted throughout multiple hallways and common areas. Upon entrance to the building, a large stain
was noted on the ceiling tile above the second door on the right. In Hallway G, light fixtures two, six and
seven contained debris and light shades on fixtures six and seven were cracked. Peeling ceiling drywall
was observed after light fixture three. Outside Resident #74's room, the ceiling showed damaged paint and
unfinished ceiling texture. Outside Resident #72's room, peeling ceiling was identified around the fire
sprinkler and a ceiling stain was visible above the beauty shop door.Continued observation revealed in
Hallway H, damaged drywall shaped like a removed hand sanitizer dispenser was observed before the
emergency doors. Light fixture one had a cracked shade. Light fixtures two, three, four and five contained
bugs and debris. Ceiling cracks and staining were identified outside the clean linen room. In Hallway F,
ceiling vents near light fixtures one, two, four, six and seven had visible dust accumulation clinging to the
ceiling surface. Light fixtures three and eight had cracked shades. Outside Resident #42's room, damaged
drywall shaped like a removed hand sanitizer dispenser was observed. Light fixtures six, seven and eight
had light shades containing significant amounts of debris. In Hallway E, located in the resident lounge, the
ceiling was unfinished and had a ceiling curtain track along the side of the wall. In Hallway E, light fixtures
one, two, three, four, six and eight contained debris. Light fixture seven was missing its light shade. Ceiling
vents located outside rooms two, three and eight had heavy dust accumulation.Observation conducted on
08/04/25 from 2:42 P.M. to 2:55 P.M. revealed all concerns identified remained unaddressed.Interview
conducted on 08/04/25 at 2:24 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed environmental and maintenance
concerns are present. The Administrator reported the Director of Maintenance was out on leave, and a new
assistant was just hired and currently in orientation. The Administrator stated the new maintenance
assistant had minimal resources to provide or follow up on maintenance concerns or complaints at the
current time. Interview and observation on 08/05/25 at 10:55 A.M. of all previously observed locations was
conducted with the Director of Housekeeping (DOH) #257 and the Assistant Director of Housekeeping
(ADOH) #600. During this walkthrough, both DOH #257 and ADOH #600 confirmed the presence of all
identified issues. They acknowledged debris inside light fixtures G two, G six, G seven, H two, H three, H
four, H five, F six, F seven, F eight and E one, E two, E three, E four, E six and E eight, cracked shades on
G six, G seven, H one, F three and F eight and the missing shade on E seven. They confirmed the
presence of peeling and stained ceilings at G three, above the beauty shop door, outside room [ROOM
NUMBER] and outside the clean linen room, damaged drywall in hallway G outside Resident #74 room,
before the emergency doors and in F hallway outside Resident #42 room and visible dust buildup on ceiling
vents at F one, F two, F four, F six, F seven and E outside rooms two, three and eight. DOH #257 and
ADOH #600 stated cleaning of light fixtures and vents falls under housekeeping's responsibilities while
issues involving drywall and ceiling damage are referred to maintenance for resolution. Review of the policy
Safe and Homelike Environment dated 06/01/24 revealed housekeeping and maintenance services will be
provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365644
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3