F 0559
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice
before a change is made.
Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were notified in writing
of a room move. This affected three residents (#110, #115, #117) of three residents reviewed for room
moves. The facility census was 50.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #110
revealed an admission date of 06/07/24 and diagnoses including dementia, congestive heart failure (CHF),
and hypertension.Review of the clinical census revealed Resident #110 had a room move on
12/31/24.Review of the progress note dated 12/31/24 revealed Resident #110 requested a room
move.Review of the medical record revealed no evidence of a written room move notification was issued.2.
Review of the medical record for Resident #115 revealed an admission date of 03/11/25 and diagnoses
including Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and dementia.Review of the
clinical census revealed Resident #115 had a room move on 04/22/25.Review of the progress note dated
04/22/25 revealed social services discussed a room move with Resident #115. Resident #115 was
agreeable to move rooms.Review of the medical record revealed no evidence of a written room move
notification was issued.3. Review of the medical record for Resident #117 revealed an admission date of
07/09/21 and diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (CKD), osteoporosis, and atrial fibrillation.Review
of the clinical census revealed Resident #117 had a room move on 05/13/25.Review of the progress note
dated 05/13/25 revealed social services contacted Resident #117's emergency contact. The facility needed
a private room for another resident who required isolation. Resident #117's emergency contact agreed to
the room move.Review of the medical record revealed no evidence of a written room move notification was
issued.Interview on 10/22/25 at 10:12 A.M. with Social Service Designee (SSD) #860 revealed when a
resident was set to move rooms, they had a verbal discussion to get confirmation. SSD #860 confirmed
there was no written notice for room moves for Residents #110, #115, or #117.Interview on 10/22/25 at
2:57 P.M. with Regional Nurse #703 revealed the facility did not have a policy on room moves.This
deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2642458.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 8
Event ID:
365731
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/28/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
East Park Care Center
8 East Park Circle
Brook Park, OH 44142
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, review of staff statements, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to
develop and implement a comprehensive and effective pressure ulcer program to ensure wound care was
provided to prevent a decline Resident #150's wound status. Actual Harm occurred beginning on 07/24/25
when Resident #150 returned from a hospitalization and wound care orders to treat a chronic right heel
wound were not transcribed into the facility's electronic health record (EHR) for implementation. Between
07/24/25 and 08/20/25, Resident #150 had no wound care orders in place and had no documented wound
dressing changes recorded. Resident #150 was seen by Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) #706 on 08/20/25
who noted the wound had deteriorated and had an increase in wound exudate. Resident #150 was
hospitalized on [DATE] and required a debridement (a medical procedure to remove dead, infected, or
damaged tissue from a wound) for gas gangrene (bacterial infection that destroys muscle tissue) of the
right foot and osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) of the right heel. The debridement procedure resulted in
significant exposure of the plantar calcaneus (bottom part of the heel). Resident #150 was admitted to the
hospital for eight days and required intravenous antibiotics to treat his wound infection. On 09/07/25 staff
identified the presence of maggots in Resident #150's right heel wound. The resident was transferred to the
hospital for treatment of infection of the area. This affected one resident (#150) of three residents reviewed
for wound care. The facility census was 50.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #150
revealed an initial admission date of 02/14/24 with diagnoses including Stage IV (a full-thickness wound
involving muscle, tendon, and/or bone) pressure ulcer of right heel, local infection of skin and subcutaneous
tissue, chronic osteomyelitis with draining sinus of left ankle and foot, non-pressure chronic ulcer of left heel
and mid foot with necrosis of bone, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, myiasis (parasitic infection of
fly larvae in human tissue), and epilepsy. Record review revealed Resident #150 had multiple
hospitalizations while residing in the facility.Review of the plan of care initiated 02/29/24 revealed Resident
#150 was at risk for pressure ulcer development related to history of pressure ulcers, decline in activities of
daily living and mobility, and incontinence status. Interventions included administer treatments as ordered,
monitor for effectiveness of treatments, educate on causes of skin breakdown, inform of any new areas of
skin breakdown, monitor dressing to ensure it is intact, monitor nutritional status, obtain labs as ordered,
and treat pain as ordered. The plan of care was cancelled on 09/01/25. An additional plan of care was
initiated on 09/03/25 and revised on 09/08/25 to include the resident had an alteration to his skin to include
osteomyelitis affecting bilateral heels. Listed interventions included administer treatments as ordered and
monitor for effectiveness, assess, record, and monitor wound leaking as ordered, pressure reducing
mattress to the bed, and assist the resident to turn and reposition as needed. The care plan did not mention
any offloading of the heels or heel boots that Resident #150 should wear. Review of the census list for
Resident #150 revealed the resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 07/03/25. Review of the Braden Scale
for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk Evaluation dated 07/04/25 revealed Resident #150 was at moderate risk
for developing pressure injuries. Review of a wound assessment report dated 07/09/25 authored by Wound
Nurse Practitioner (NP) #706 revealed Resident #150 had an unstageable (indicating a wound bed and
depth of a wound is unable to be visualized) diabetic ulcer of the right heel measuring 5.0 centimeters (cm)
in length by 5.5 cm in width with 0.1 cm depth. (This ulcer was subsequently assessed during a July 2025
hospitalization to be a pressure ulcer.) The report revealed the wound was acquired on 11/14/24. There was
90 percent (%) eschar (layer of dead tissue that forms over wound) and 10% epithelial tissue (thin layer of
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365731
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/28/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
East Park Care Center
8 East Park Circle
Brook Park, OH 44142
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
new tissue). There was no exudate (fluid that leaks out of blood vessels into surrounding tissue in response
to inflammation or injury) noted. The recommended wound treatment was to cleanse the right heel with
normal saline, apply Betadine (antiseptic solution), and abdominal (ABD) pad, and rolled gauze, change
daily and as needed. The wound was noted to be stalled. Review of a wound assessment report dated
07/16/25 authored by Wound NP #706 revealed Resident #150's right heel wound measured 5.0 cm in
length, 5.5 cm in width, and 0.1 cm depth. The wound was 90% eschar and 10% epithelial tissue. There
was no noted exudate. The wound remained stalled. The recommended treatment remained to cleanse with
normal saline, apply Betadine, and ABD pad, and rolled gauze with frequency of daily and as needed.
Review of a progress note dated 07/19/25 timed 11:15 P.M. revealed Resident #150 was having difficulty
managing his blood glucose levels and the physician recommended to send the resident to the hospital for
evaluation. An additional progress note dated 07/20/25 timed 4:17 A.M. revealed Resident #150 was
admitted to the hospital for hyperglycemia, osteomyelitis, and anemia. The resident was hospitalized until
07/24/25. Review of a hospital Physician Consultation Report dated 07/20/25 revealed Resident #150
presented to the hospital for elevated blood glucose levels. An x-ray examination of his right foot showed
soft tissue ulceration overlying the right posterior calcaneus (a bone in the foot near the heel) with
underlying cortical destruction consistent with osteomyelitis. Review of a hospital skin assessment dated
[DATE] revealed Resident #150's right heel measured 7.3 cm in length by 8.0 cm in width and had an
undetermined depth. The wound was 90% brown eschar and 10% small area of mixed yellow and red
noted caudally (towards the posterior aspect of the wound). There was moderate serosanguineous
drainage which was somewhat malodorous. Iodoflex (a wound treatment designed to absorb slough, soft
necrotic tissue, and exudate), ABD pad (a highly absorbent dressing, used for heavily draining wounds) and
rolled gauze were applied and heel lift boots were applied. Review of hospital discharge instructions dated
07/24/25 revealed Resident #150 had diagnosis of acute osteomyelitis of the right heel. Resident #150 had
an order for Vancomycin one gram intravenously every 12 hours for a duration of four weeks. There was no
evidence of wound care orders noted on the hospital discharge instructions. Review of a clinical admission
noted dated 07/25/25 revealed no note regarding Resident #150's right heel wound. Resident #150 was
noted to have a left heel diabetic foot ulcer. Review of a skilled nursing evaluation dated 07/27/25 revealed
no note regarding Resident #150's of right heel wound. The evaluation did reference Resident #150 was
noted to have a left heel diabetic foot ulcer. Review of a wound assessment report dated 07/30/25 authored
by Wound NP #706 revealed Resident #150's right heel wound measured 7.3 cm in length by 7.5 cm in
width with 0.1 cm depth. The wound was 90% eschar and 10% epithelial. There was no noted drainage. The
wound remained stalled. The recommended wound treatment remained to cleanse with normal saline,
apply Betadine, and ABD pad, and rolled gauze with a frequency of daily and as needed. Review of a
wound follow up note dated 08/01/25 authored by Wound NP #706 revealed Resident #150's right heel
wound was stable, and debridement was considered to destabilize necrotic tissue. An addendum was
added on 08/24/25 stating Resident #150's right heel diabetic wound had deteriorated and was now an
unstageable pressure injury. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment
Administration Record (TAR) for July 2025 revealed no evidence of wound care orders or evidence of any
wound care provided to Resident #150's right heel following his return to the facility from the hospital on
[DATE]. Review of a skilled nursing evaluation dated 08/03/25 revealed no note regarding Resident #150's
of right heel wound. The evaluation did reference Resident #150 was noted to have a left heel diabetic foot
ulcer. Review of a wound assessment report dated 08/06/25 authored by Wound NP #706 revealed
Resident #150's right heel wound measured 9.0 cm in length by 8.0 cm with 0.1 cm depth. The wound was
90% eschar
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365731
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/28/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
East Park Care Center
8 East Park Circle
Brook Park, OH 44142
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
and 10% epithelial tissue. There was no noted drainage. The wound was noted to have remained stalled.
The recommended wound treatment remained to cleanse with normal saline, apply Betadine, and ABD
pad, and rolled gauze with frequency of daily and as needed. Review of a wound follow up note dated
08/06/25 authored by Wound NP #706 revealed Resident #150's wound was considered stable. An
addendum was added on 08/24/25 stating Resident #150's right heel diabetic wound had deteriorated and
was now an unstageable pressure injury. Review of skilled nursing evaluation dated 08/09/25 revealed no
note regarding Resident #150's of right heel wound. The evaluation did reference Resident #150 was noted
to have a left heel diabetic foot ulcer.Review of a wound assessment report dated 08/13/25 authored by
Wound NP #706 revealed Resident #150's right heel wound measured 7.0 cm in length by 7.5 cm with 0.1
cm depth. The wound was 90% eschar and 10% epithelial. There was no noted drainage. The wound was
noted to have remained stalled. The recommended wound treatment remained to cleanse with normal
saline, apply Betadine, and ABD pad, and rolled gauze with frequency of daily and as needed. Review of
skilled nursing evaluation dated 08/18/25 revealed no note regarding Resident #150's of right heel wound.
The evaluation did reference Resident #150 was noted to have a left heel diabetic foot ulcer.Review of a
wound follow-up note dated 08/20/25 for service on 08/13/25 authored by Wound NP #706 revealed
Resident #150's wound was considered stable. Additional interventions included Prafo heel boots (pressure
relief ankle foot orthosis used to always take pressure off the back of the foot) to be worn at all times. An
addendum was added on 08/24/25 stating Resident #150's right heel diabetic wound had deteriorated and
was now an unstageable pressure injury. Review of a wound assessment report dated 08/20/25 authored
by Wound NP #706 revealed Resident #150's right heel wound measured 7.5 cm in length by 9.5 cm in
width by 0.1 cm depth. The wound was 80% eschar, 10% epithelial tissue, and 10% granulation tissue.
There was moderate serosanguinous drainage. The wound was noted to be deteriorating. The
recommended wound treatment was changed to cleanse with normal saline, apply Medi-honey (wound
ointment which helps maintain a moist wound environment, has antibacterial properties, and aids in
autolytic debridement) and Calcium Alginate (wound dressing used to manage drainage and promote a
moist wound environment), ABD pad, and rolled gauze with instructions to change daily and as needed.
Review of progress note dated 08/20/25 timed 2:19 P.M. revealed Resident #150 was sent to the hospital
for lethargy and a change in mental status. Resident #150 was noted to have blood-tinged urine, was
unable to swallow at lunch, and was difficult to rouse.Review of census list for Resident #150 Resident
#150 was hospitalized on [DATE]. Review of hospital paperwork from admission date of 08/20/25 to
discharge date of 08/28/25 revealed Resident #150 was admitted for altered mental status. Resident #150
had a debridement procedure on 08/22/25 for gas gangrene of the right foot and osteomyelitis (bone
infection) of the right heel. Cultures taken during the debridement procedure grew moderate Bacteroides
fragilis group with mixed flora isolated including mixed gram-negative rods. Resident #150 was seen by
podiatry on 08/25/25. The right heel wound measured 6.5 cm by 9.5 cm by 1.5 cm. Resident #150's wound
was noted to probe to the bone and had large amount of serous drainage. Review of podiatry follow up on
08/26/25 revealed there was significant exposure of the plantar calcaneus observed. Wounds were dressed
with Betadine and wet to dry dressing. The podiatrist noted there would likely be a need for amputation in
the future however at current to continue local wound care and long-term intravenous antibiotics. Review of
a NP wound follow up note dated 08/21/25 revealed Resident #150's wound had deteriorated. It was noted
the dressing removed during service on 08/20/25 was not the supplies ordered for treatment. It was also
noted there was no pad and protect dressing or heel boots in place. The note instructed to change
dressings as ordered, only use supplies recommended for treatment, and use heel boots at all times.
Review of the MAR and TAR for August 2025
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365731
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/28/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
East Park Care Center
8 East Park Circle
Brook Park, OH 44142
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
revealed there was no evidence of any wound care provided to Resident #150's right heel until 08/28/25,
following his return to the facility from the hospital. Starting on 08/28/25, Resident #150's right heel was
cleansed with normal saline, betadine and a wet-to-dry dressing was applied daily. Additionally, there was
no evidence that Resident #150 had orders for Prafo boots as recommended in Wound NP #706's wound
notes. Review of Order Listing Report from 07/01/25 to 08/31/25 revealed Resident #150 had no wound
care orders for treatment of the right heel wound care between 07/24/25 and 08/20/25. Review of a NP
wound assessment report dated 09/03/25 revealed Resident #150's right heel wound measured 9.0 cm by
10.0 cm by 0.5 cm. The wound was 50% epithelial and 50% granulation. There was moderate
serosanguinous drainage. The wound was noted to be deteriorating. The recommended wound treatment
was changed to cleanse with normal saline, apply Betadine followed by wet to dry dressing, ABD pad, and
rolled gauze with frequency of daily and as needed. Review of a NP wound follow up note dated 09/03/25
revealed Resident #150 had a recent hospitalization in which there was heel debridement procedure
completed. It was noted there was exposure of bone and tendon to the right heel. Additional interventions
noted to utilize a low air loss mattress and use Prafo heel boots at all times. The note stated not to use
plastic heel boots. Review of Resident #150's plan of care initiated on 09/03/25 revealed Resident #150 had
a Stage III pressure ulcer on his sacrum and osteomyelitis affecting bilateral heels. Interventions included
administer treatments as ordered, assess and monitor wound healing, assist with turning and repositioning
as needed, inspect skin daily during routine care, obtain labs as ordered, pressure reducing cushion to
chair, and pressure reducing mattress. Review of skilled nursing evaluation noted dated 09/07/25 revealed
Resident #150's bilateral heel wounds showed decline. Review of a census list for Resident #150 revealed
hospitalization from 09/07/25 to 09/17/25. Review of a progress note dated 09/07/25 timed 12:38 P.M.
revealed Resident #150 was receiving personal care and there were noted necrotic (dead tissue) areas,
warmth, and purulent drainage to the bilateral heel wounds. It was noted that Resident #150's wounds
appeared more swollen, and the resident had increased pain at the sites. The NP was notified and gave
order to send to hospital for evaluation and treatment of possible infected wounds. Review of a statement
dated 09/07/25 by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #818 revealed while changing Resident #150 it was
noted the dressing on his heel needed changed. The dressing was dated 09/05/25, was extremely
discolored, and was falling apart. CNA #818 indicated she noted movement in the wound and found
maggots crawling in the wound. CNA #818 informed both nurses on duty. Review of a statement dated
09/07/25 by CNA #857 revealed while performing care for Resident #150 it was noted the dressing was
falling off his right foot. CNA #857 stated she picked up Resident #150's right foot and saw maggots
crawling on his foot. It was also noted the dressing was dated 09/05/25. Review of a statement dated
09/07/25 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #807 revealed the aides reported during personal care for
Resident #150, his dressing to his right heel fell off. The aides reported maggots were present in the right
heel wound bed. LPN #807 went to room with another nurse to assess the area. There was a pungent odor
noted. The two nurses observed the maggots in Resident #150's right foot wound. The other nurse began
cleansing the wound. LPN #807 called 911 for emergency services due to the necrotic and foul-smelling
wound. LPN #807 contacted the Director of Nursing (DON) who instructed the nurses to cleanse and
re-wrap the wound. The NP was notified of the resident's change and need for emergency services. LPN
#807 noted the dressing on Resident #150's right heel was dated 09/05/25. Review of fire department
Prehospital Care Report Summary dated 09/07/25 revealed Resident #150 was transported by emergency
medical services (EMS) to the hospital. The chief complaint was listed as maggots in a foot wound. It was
noted facility staff stated as they were getting Resident #150 ready to transfer out of his bed, they noticed
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365731
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/28/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
East Park Care Center
8 East Park Circle
Brook Park, OH 44142
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
maggots in the pressure ulcer on the right heel. Staff stated they cleaned out the wound with sterile water
prior to EMS arrival. Review of a physician consultation report dated 09/07/25 revealed Resident #150
presented to hospital from skilled nursing facility (SNF) after staff noticed maggots, malodor, and drainage
from a right heel wound. There were no maggots seen in the right heel wound at time of hospital
observation. Examination of Resident #150's right foot revealed an extensive wound to the posterior planter
aspect of the right heel measuring 6.0 cm in length by 9.0 cm in width with depth noted to the bone. There
was significant exposure of the plantar calcaneus and noted malodor and pus in the right heel wound. The
treatment plan was listed as betadine with a wet-to-dry dressing. The note referenced the plan was for
Resident #150 to be admitted for an infected Stage IV decubitus ulcer (a full-thickness pressure ulcer with
exposed muscle, tendon, or bone) to the right heel with potential surgical intervention pending final culture
reports and x-ray examinations. Review of a critical care progress note dated 09/15/25 revealed Resident
#150 was sent to hospital from nursing home with complaints of generalized weakness. He was found to
have larvae infestation of the wound in the right lower extremity and anemia. It was noted per podiatry there
was poor outlook of the right lower extremity (RLE) and Resident #150 had previously refused a below the
knee amputation (BKA) on multiple occasions. Resident #150 had debridement procedure on 09/11/25 of
right heel bone cortex. Treatment for right heel was to apply Dakins solution (a solution used to clean and
disinfect wounds) with gauze pads, ABD pads, kerilx (rolled gauze) wrap, and ACE (compression) wraps.
During the hospital stay Resident #150 had a rapid called for altered mental status and hypothermia, with
metabolic encephalopathy in the setting of sepsis (systemic infection) suspected. Review of hospital
podiatry follow up note dated 09/15/25 revealed Resident #150's right heel wound measured 10.0 cm in
length by 7.5 cm in width with depth to the bone. The wound bed was exclusively bone of the heel. The note
referenced the resident had refused a BKA and wound care was the only option at this time to prevent
further infection. The note referenced Resident #150 was stable from a podiatry perspective with a need for
close outpatient follow up. Review of discharge summary report dated 09/16/25 revealed Resident #150
was to follow up with the podiatry office in one week and the right heel wound was to utilize Dakin's
solution, gauze pads, ABD pads, kerlix and ACE wraps to be changed daily. Review of a NP wound
assessment report dated 09/17/25 revealed Resident #150's right heel wound measured 7.0 cm in length
by 8.0 cm in width and 0.5 cm in depth. The wound was 10% eschar, 10% slough, and 80% granulation.
The wound was noted to be deteriorating. There was moderate serosanguinous drainage noted and there
was exposed tissue to adipose, muscle/fascia, tendon/ligament, and bone level. The recommended wound
treatment was changed to cleanse with normal saline, apply Dakins moistened gauze followed by ABD pad
and rolled gauze with frequency of three times per day (TID) and as needed. Review of a wound follow up
note dated 09/19/25 authored by Wound NP #706 revealed Resident #150's right heel had severely
deteriorated and was noted to be severely deformed. Additional interventions included changing dressings
as ordered, wearing heel boots at all times, and maintaining a low air loss mattress. Review of the MAR and
TAR for September 2025 revealed no order or corresponding documentation of Resident #150 utilizing a
low air loss mattress or Prafo boots as recommended in Wound NP #706's September 2025 wound notes.
Interview on 10/21/25 at 12:13 P.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #829 revealed she was the
wound nurse for the facility. ADON #829 reported Resident #150 had the right heel wound since before she
started in February 2025. ADON #829 stated they had been treating the wound in-house, however, since
September 2025 Resident #150 had been going to outside podiatry appointments for wound management.
ADON #829 stated Resident #150 had history of osteomyelitis and they had to discuss the potential for
amputation. ADON #829 stated she was notified staff had
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365731
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/28/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
East Park Care Center
8 East Park Circle
Brook Park, OH 44142
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
noted maggots in the resident's wound on 09/07/25. ADON #829 stated the wound was cleansed and
Resident #150 went to the hospital. ADON #829 stated she did not observe maggots in the wound herself
and was unsure how they would have infested the wound. A follow-up interview at 1:25 P.M. with ADON
#829 confirmed Wound NP #706 had noted Resident #150's wound was deteriorating on or about 08/20/25.
ADON #829 stated the eschar had started to come off and the wound was measuring larger. ADON #829
stated Resident #150 required extensive debridement during a recent hospitalization. Interview on 10/21/25
at 3:01 P.M. with a family member of Resident #150's revealed Resident #150 was currently in the hospital.
The family member reported Resident #150 was admitted from a podiatry appointment as he was bleeding
too much and was on Coumadin. The family member reported the facility was no longer allowed to care for
Resident #150's wound per podiatry. The family member indicated she preferred it this way as Resident
#150 had been to the hospital several times for wounds and had multiple infections due to a lack of
appropriate and necessary staff treatment. The family member indicated she had once seen Resident #150
at the facility and his wound was not taken care of. The family member stated she had to get on the facility
to make sure his wounds were taken care of appropriately. The family member indicated she was unaware
there were concerns for maggots in the wound on 09/07/25. Interview on 10/21/25 at 3:27 P.M. with LPN
#807 revealed she had cared for Resident #150 on 09/07/25. LPN #807 stated Resident #150 had very
complex wounds. LPN #807 stated she was notified by the aide there were maggots in Resident #150's
wound on this date. LPN #807 stated she did not believe the agency night nurse from the shift prior had
provided wound care as ordered. LPN #807 stated she and Registered Nurse (RN) #800 assessed the
resident's wound and cleansed the wound with normal saline. LPN #807 estimated there were
approximately 20 maggots seen in the right heel wound. LPN #807 stated she notified the Director of
Nursing (DON) and NP she was going to call 911. Interview on 10/21/25 at 4:06 P.M. with CNA #818
revealed she had cared for Resident #150 on 09/07/25. CNA #818 stated Resident #150 was dependent on
staff for all care needs. CNA #818 stated during care it was noted Resident #150's dressing (to the right
foot) was discolored and coming off. CNA #818 stated the dressing was dated 09/05/25 and was usually
done by night shift. CNA #818 noted there was a pungent odor to the wound. CNA #818 stated she notified
LPN #807 about the concerns with Resident #150's wound. Interview on 10/21/25 at 4:40 P.M. with
Podiatrist #705 revealed Resident #150 had very complicated wounds. Podiatrist #705 stated he had
discussed amputation multiple times with Resident #150. Podiatrist #705 stated Resident #150 was unable
to care for his own wounds and relied on caregivers. Podiatrist #705 stated he generally does not trust
nursing facilities to provide wound care in an appropriate manner and would prefer to provide the care for
his patients himself. Podiatrist #705 stated he had been caring for Resident #150's dressings in office since
an operation in September 2025. Podiatrist #705 stated he was consulted while Resident #150 was in the
hospital on [DATE] but did not visualize any maggots in the wound at that time. Interview on 10/22/25 at
7:34 A.M. with ADON #829 confirmed she was unable to locate any evidence Resident #150 had an order
for wound care between 07/24/25 to 08/20/25. ADON #829 stated the Wound NP #706 had seen Resident
#150 weekly during that time but was unable to locate any evidence of additional treatments provided in
Resident #150's medical record. Interview on 10/22/25 at 8:22 A.M. with the DON denied any knowledge of
missing orders or declining wounds for Resident #150. The DON indicated she was notified by LPN #807
staff saw maggots in the resident's wound on 09/07/25. The DON stated she would expect staff to clean the
wound if they observed something in the wound. Interview on 10/22/25 at 11:51 A.M. with CNA #857
revealed she had cared for Resident #150 on 09/07/25. CNA #857 confirmed she had observed maggots
crawling out from his right foot wound. CNA #857 stated she stayed with Resident #150 while CNA #818
went to get LPN #807. CNA #857
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365731
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365731
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/28/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
East Park Care Center
8 East Park Circle
Brook Park, OH 44142
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
stated Resident #150 was very compliant with care and would ask caregivers for extra clean ups at times.
Interview on 10/22/25 at 3:51 P.M. with former Wound NP #706 revealed she had been caring for Resident
#150's wounds for approximately five months at the facility. Wound NP #706 stated Resident #150 had a
stable necrotic area to right heel. Wound NP #706 stated the ulcer was a diabetic foot ulcer, and she was
treating with Betadine. Wound NP #706 verified the wound then presented as a pressure injury (unable to
recall date). Wound NP #706 stated she had noted some decline in his right heel. Wound NP #706 stated
there were some incidents when the wrong dressing was applied or the wound was not padded and
protected. Wound NP #706 stated Resident #150's wound was larger, so it was documented it was
deteriorating. Wound NP #706 stated she was unable to recall any additional information as she was no
longer employed with the company and did not have access to her notes for this resident. Interview on
10/22/25 at 4:01 P.M. with RN #800 revealed an aide had come to get her on 09/07/25 and stated Resident
#150's wound dressing had come off. They stated there were maggots in the wound. RN #800 stated she
and LPN #807 went in to assess the situation. RN #800 stated she cleansed the area as much as she
could and told LPN #807 to work on getting Resident #150 sent out [to the hospital]. RN #800 stated there
were approximately 20 maggots in the wound and stated it was disgusting. RN #800 stated the maggots
were moving within the wound. RN #800 stated she ensured Resident #150 was sent out to the hospital
and then went back to her assignment. Review of facility policy on wound care dated September 2021
revealed prior to providing wound care physician's orders should be verified. Documentation of the wound
care procedure would be completed in the resident's medical record. This deficiency represents
non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2642458 and is a recite to the complaint survey
completed on 10/14/25.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365731
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 8