Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ROYAL OAK NURSING & REHAB CTRCMS #3657532 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0561 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to honor Resident #72's preferences for showers. This affected one resident (#72) of two residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus, and muscle weakness. Review of the undated shower schedule revealed Resident #72 received her showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays from 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. Review of the shower sheet dated 03/09/24 revealed Resident #72 refused her shower on afternoons and wanted her showers in the mornings. Review of the nursing progress note dated 03/12/24 revealed Resident #72 wanted to change her shower times from the evenings to the mornings. Interview on 03/25/24 at 9:44 A.M. with Resident #72 revealed she wanted her showers earlier in the day. She stated she had asked the facility staff, and they told her she had to take them later in the day. Interview on 03/26/24 at 3:30 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #331 verified Resident #72's showers were scheduled on Wednesdays and Saturdays on the evening shift. Review of the shower sheet dated 03/09/24 and nursing progress note dated 03/12/24 with RN #331 verified Resident #72 wanted her showers in the mornings. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Care, revised June 2018, revealed the facility staff would provide general care as necessary for each resident per their preferences when able and per physician orders. The policy stated residents would be bathed or assisted to shower or bathe routinely and as needed per their preference. Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 365753 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365753 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 03/28/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Royal Oak Nursing & Rehab Ctr 6973 Pearl Rd Middleburg Heights, OH 44130 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to document weekly weights in the medical record for Resident #9. This affected one resident (#9) of four residents reviewed for nutrition services. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 08/30/06 with diagnoses including aphasia, right non-dominant side hemiplegia, hypokalemia, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 02/28/24 Resident #9 was to have weekly weights on Wednesdays. Review the Weight Summary revealed on 02/28/24 Resident #9 weighed 162.4 pounds and on 03/06/24 Resident #9 weighed 147.3 pounds. There were no additional weights recorded for 03/13/24 and 03/20/24. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for March 2024 revealed missing weight documentation for 03/13/24 and 03/20/24. Review of the Medical Nutrition and Hydration assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had significant weight loss over one month and six months. The dietitian noted Resident #9 needed a re-weight to confirm weight loss and was on weekly weights for monitoring. Interview on 03/27/24 at 2:43 P.M. with Registered Dietitian (RD) #340 confirmed there were no weekly weights completed for Resident #9 on 03/13/24 and 03/20/24 as ordered. RD #340 indicated he was unsure why the weights were not completed. Interview on 03/28/24 at 1:20 P.M. with Regional Director of Clinical Services #331 revealed the staff reported they had completed the weights but were unable to locate the actual documentation. Interview on 03/28/24 at 2:22 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #287 revealed she was the unit manager for Resident #9's unit. LPN #287 indicated on 03/20/24 Resident #9 refused to be weighed; however, indicated the refusal was not documented in the medical record. Follow up interview on 03/28/24 at 2:35 P.M. with LPN #287 revealed she had contacted the nurse's aide who obtained Resident #9's weight on 03/13/24. LPN #9 indicated the aide reported Resident #9 weighed between 148 and 149 pounds. The aide was unable to remember the exact weight. LPN #287 confirmed the weight was documented in the medical record. LPN #287 indicated she was responsible for ensuring weights were completed and documented as ordered. Review of the facility policy Weight Policy, dated 03/01/22, revealed weights would be obtained in a timely and accurate manner, documented and responded to appropriately. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 365753 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0561GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F561 - Self-determination

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • 0842GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F842 - Resident-identifiable information

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 28, 2024 survey of ROYAL OAK NURSING & REHAB CTR?

This was a inspection survey of ROYAL OAK NURSING & REHAB CTR on March 28, 2024. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ROYAL OAK NURSING & REHAB CTR on March 28, 2024?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support o..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.