F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to
ensure medical appointments were timely scheduled as physician ordered. This affected one (Resident
#36) of two residents reviewed for appointments. The facility census was 75. Findings include:Review of the
medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic ischemic
heart disease and acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure (CHF). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data
Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan
dated 08/18/25 revealed Resident #36 had altered cardiovascular status related to CHF and hypertension.
Interventions included monitoring and reporting to medical providers any signs and symptoms of chest pain
or pressure especially with activity, heartburn, nausea and vomiting, shortness of breath, excessive
sweating, dependent edema, changes in capillary refill, color or warmth of extremities. Review of the
progress note dated 05/26/25 revealed Resident #36 was having shortness of breath and chest pain. The
facility called a triage Nurse Practitioner (NP), and the NP spoke to Resident #36 via video call. The NP
determined Resident #36 did not need to be sent to the emergency room. The NP progress note dated
05/27/25 revealed Resident #36 was seen for chest pain and dizziness. An electrocardiogram (EKG) was
ordered as well as follow up with cardiologist based on findings. The progress note dated 05/28/25 at 11:45
A.M. revealed new orders for Resident #36 to have an EKG due to orthostatic blood pressure and
consultation with cardiology. The progress notes dated 07/28/25 revealed the facility faxed Resident #36's
consultation to cardiology on 07/08/25 and 07/28/25. There was no evidence in Resident #36's medical
record that a cardiology appointment was scheduled nor seen by a cardiologist from 05/28/25 to 09/23/25.
During an interview on 09/24/25 at 8:59 A.M., Resident #36 revealed she was waiting to see a cardiologist
due to having CHF. Resident #36 stated a couple months ago, the Director of Nursing (DON) told Resident
#36 she needed to see a cardiologist, but the appointment had not been made. Interview on 09/24/25 at
9:37 A.M. with Transportation Aide (TA) #304 revealed prior to starting the position of appointments and
transportation in June 2025, the facility had issues with residents missing appointments. TA #304 stated
Resident #36 had a referral to cardiology; however, there were issues with cardiology receiving the referral
from the facility. TA #304 confirmed that since 07/28/25, no further attempts were made to make the
appointment. Interview on 09/24/25 at 9:50 A.M. with the DON confirmed Resident #36 should have had a
cardiology consult scheduled due to concerns of chest pain, shortness and diagnoses of CHF. Review of
the facility policy titled Transportation dated 04/28/25 revealed the facility staff will receive the appointment
from the resident, family, transportation company or doctors' office. The staff will schedule transportation to
and from the appointment as needed. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under
Complaint Number 2604984.
Residents Affected - Few
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
365837
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365837
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/25/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Oak Grove Manor
1670 Crider Rd
Mansfield, OH 44903
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0804
Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the
facility failed to ensure food was palatable and appropriate temperature. This had the potential to affect all
75 residents residing in the facility who receive food from the kitchen. Findings include:Review of the
resident council meeting for 09/08/25 revealed residents did not like most of the food due to having the
same food, dry meat, and food not being seasoned. Under the area that reads status update on the
resident council minutes revealed the concern was not resolved. Interview on 09/24/25 at 1:39 P.M. with
Resident #53 revealed breakfast was always cold so he no longer eats breakfast. Resident #53 stated he
has reported it to the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs); however, nothing has changed. Resident #53
stated the CNAs would offer to reheat the food; however that was not preferred. Interview on 09/24/25 at
2:00 P.M. with Resident #4 revealed the food was frequently cold by the times the trays were passed.
Resident #4 stated she eats the food because she was hungry, however she would prefer her food to be
warmer. Observation on 09/25/25 at 7:30 A.M. revealed Dietary Manager (DM) #529 taking food
temperatures for breakfast. Temperature of sausage patties were 172 degrees Fahrenheit (F), waffles were
136 degrees F, and oatmeal was 165 degrees F. Observation on 09/25/25 at 7:55 A.M. revealed the hallway
trays being transported to the 100-hallway. Trays began being distributed at 8:01 A.M. with the last tray
being passed at 8:11 A.M. The last hallway tray temperature was obtained and revealed the sausage
patties were 101 degrees F, and the waffles were 88 degrees F. A test tray was obtained at this time from
DM #529. The sausage patty was lukewarm and was dry, and difficult to swallow. The waffles were cool to
taste and dry as well. Interview on 09/25/25 at 8:20 A.M. with DM #529 confirmed the sausage and waffles
were not warm and the sausage patties were dry. DM #529 stated they used to use plate warmers;
however, the machine was too hot for the staff to handle. DM #529 stated special gloves were supposed to
be ordered for staff to use but were never followed through. Interview on 09/25/25 at 11:15 A.M. with the
Administrator revealed the staff should have been using plate warmers to keep the food warm. Review of
the facility policy titled Food Temperatures dated 2021 revealed hot food items may not fall below 135
degrees F after cooking. Temperatures should be taken periodically to ensure hot foods stay above 135
degrees F during the holding and plating process. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated
under Complaint Number 2604984 and Complaint Number 2565327.
Residents Affected - Many
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365837
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2