F 0686
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident
#56 received care and services to prevent prolonged pressure to her bilateral buttocks resulting in pressure
injury.
Residents Affected - Few
Actual Harm occurred on 06/24/24 at 10:00 A.M. when Resident #56, who was at risk for developing
pressure ulcers and required assistance on staff for incontinence care, was left on a bed pan for a unknown
length of time resulting in a deep tissue pressure injury (a serious type of pressure injury that occurred
when prolonged pressure and shear forces damage the tissues beneath the skin) to her bilateral buttocks.
This affected one resident (Resident #56) out of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility
census was 110.
Findings include:
Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/21/24 and diagnoses included
atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unstable angina pectoris, type two diabetes,
wedge compression fracture of T5-T6 vertebra, and moderate protein calorie malnutrition.
Review of Resident #56's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 06/21/24 revealed
Resident #56's risk was very high.
Review of Resident #56's Pressure Injury Investigation dated 06/24/24 at 6:53 P.M. included Resident #56's
Pressure Ulcer was discovered on 06/24/24, was a new area and in house acquired, the location of the
wound was her bilateral buttocks and measurements were length 23.2 cm, width 30.0 cm, and depth was
UTD (unable to be determined). The new wound was unstageable related to suspected Deep Tissue Injury
(DTI). Area to bilateral buttocks, full thickness, 10 percent pink, 40 percent purple, maroon discoloration, 50
percent epithelial tissue, no drainage, peri wound moist, macerated, no signs and symptoms of infection.
Unable to determine progress related to new area. Treatment ordered was cleanse with normal saline, pat
dry, apply zinc oxide, leave open to air, apply every shift and as needed. Resident #56 had chronic bowel
incontinence and continuous urinary incontinence or voiding dysfunction. Resident #56's HOB (head of
bed) was elevated most days due to medical necessity. Resident #56 was receiving routine prevention daily
(turning and repositioning, pressure relief, skin care, kept clean and dry), her care plan was appropriate
and implemented consistently, and Resident #56 was compliant with her care. The section under Summary
Statement of Wound was not completed. Resident #56's risk was very high for Braden Scale for Predicting
Pressure Sore Risk. Resident #56's physician and family were notified. Initial evaluation with Wound Nurse
Practitioner (WNP) #209 was completed, follow up in one week.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 13
Event ID:
365865
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Review of Resident #56's late entry progress notes dated 06/25/24 at 9:56 P.M. for 06/24/24 at 9:48 A.M.
revealed Resident #56's admission skin assessment was completed with WNP #209. During assessment it
was noted that Resident #56 had an area to her bilateral buttocks caused by the bed pan. Treatment orders
and interventions were put in place. Nurse Practitioner (NP) #210, the care team, and Resident #56's son
were notified. Resident #56's Braden Scale was 9 (very high risk for developing a pressure ulcer, injury).
Review of Resident #56's Wound Care Notes dated 06/24/24 at 10:00 A.M. and completed by WNP #209
included Resident #56 was being seen today for an initial consultation for wound care services in the
setting of a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). Resident #56 was a [AGE] year-old female, and was a new admit
from the hospital. Resident #56 had a fall and broke her T6. Resident #56 had urinary retention and a Foley
(indwelling) catheter. Resident #56 was pleasantly confused, resting in bed and agreeable to care. Further
review revealed Resident #56 had a DTPI (Deep Tissue Pressure Injury) to her bilateral buttocks. Depth
Exposure was full thickness. Wound size measurements were length 23.2 cm (centimeters), width 30.0 cm,
depth was UTD, clustered wound with intact skin bridge present. Wound base was 10 percent pink, 40
percent purple or maroon discoloration, 50 percent epithelial. There was no exudate, the peri wound was
moist, macerated. The wound status was initial evaluation, linear purple discoloration from left to right
buttock. Skin had a moist and macerated appearance with a small area of exposed pink tissue to the left
buttock. Skin was dry in between with no exposed tissue to right buttock. Treatment was cleanse area with
normal saline, apply zinc oxide to protect skin and keep dry, and leave open to air every shift and as
needed. The treatment was chosen to help promote autolytic (breakdown of cells or tissues by enzymes
produced by the cells themselves) debridement of the wound.
Review of Resident #56's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed
Resident #56 was unable to complete the interview for Brief Interview for Mental Status. Resident #56 was
dependent for toileting hygiene, bathing, and lower body dressing. Resident #56 was dependent to roll left
and right, sit to lying, lying to sitting on side of bed, chair, bed-to-chair transfers and toilet transfers.
Resident #56 had an indwelling catheter and was occasionally incontinent of bowel. Resident #56 had a
pressure ulcer, injury and was at risk of developing pressure ulcer, injuries.
Review of Resident #56's care plan dated 06/28/24 included Resident #56 had impairment of skin integrity
related to weakness, impaired mobility, DTI of her bilateral buttocks. Resident #56's skin interventions,
preventative measures were maintained. Resident #56 would have no avoidable skin breakdown.
Interventions included turn and reposition every two hours while in bed (initiated 06/25/24); minimize
pressure on bony prominences, pressure reducing mattress to bed (initiated 06/25/24). Further review did
not reveal a care plan related to noncompliance with interventions related to DTPI of her bilateral buttocks.
Review of Resident #56's Wound Report dated 07/01/24 at 12:30 P.M. revealed Resident #56 had an
unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough
(yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) and/or eschar (tan, brown or black) in the wound bed), originated as
DTPI, was full thickness, measurements were length 20.1 cm, width 18.7 cm, and UTD depth, it was a
clustered wound, with intact skin bridge present. Wound base was 20 percent granulation, 20 percent
slough, 20 percent purple or maroon discoloration, 40 percent epithelial, with moderate serosanguinous
drainage, peri wound was moist, macerated. The wound status had declined, Resident #56 was poorly
compliant with offloading, poor nutritional intake, dementia, confusion, incontinence, and overall poor
medical condition making the presence of the wound unavoidable (although the resident was identified to
be on a bedpan contributing to the wound). Left buttock with dark purple
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Level of Harm - Actual harm
discoloration as well as granulation tissue exposed. There was an area of slough to the upper left buttock
which was debrided today. The wound was now more accurately identified as unstageable. Apply alginate
silver to decrease bacterial colonization and manage drainage and apply zinc oxide to peri wound to protect
skin and keep dry.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of Resident #56's progress notes Wound Track documentation dated 08/26/24 at 8:52 A.M. included
Resident #56's unstageable pressure ulcer related to suspected DTI had a length of 1.6 cm, width 0.5 cm,
depth 0.2 cm, was in house acquired on 06/24/24, was unavoidable and Resident #56 was not compliant
with interventions, had a red, yellow wound bed with scant amount of serous drainage, slough 30 percent,
70 percent granulation.
Review of Resident #56's progress notes dated 07/28/24 through 08/27/24 revealed no evidence in the
nursing progress notes or care plan Resident #56 was not compliant with interventions.
Review of Resident #56's aide charting in the electronic record dated 08/26/24 at 6:41 P.M. through
08/28/24 at 4:15 P.M. did not reveal evidence Resident #56 was turned and repositioned.
Review of Resident #56's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 08/27/24 revealed it was
documented on day shift by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #214 that Resident #56 was turned and
repositioned.
Observation on 08/27/24 from 10:00 A.M. through 1:00 P.M. revealed Resident #56 was in bed, lying on her
back with her eyes closed. There was no observation of any staff entering Resident #56's room and offering
to turn and reposition her.
Interview on 08/27/24 at 1:04 P.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #212 revealed she worked in the
facility Assisted Living area and sometimes helped out in the Nursing Home. STNA #212 stated on
08/27/24, day shift, she was assigned to work in the Assisted Living area, but went to the Nursing Home
nursing unit Resident #56 resided on to help from 8:00 A.M. until 10:00 A.M. STNA #212 stated while she
was assigned to the nursing unit Resident #56 resided on, she did not check or change Resident #56's
incontinence brief or turn and reposition her.
Observation on 08/27/24 from 1:07 P.M. until 1:57 P.M. of Resident #56 revealed Resident #56 was lying on
her back, the head of her bed was elevated, and her eyes were closed. No staff entered Resident #56's
room and offered to turn and reposition her.
Observation on 08/27/24 from 2:11 P.M. through 2:58 P.M. of Resident #56 revealed she was lying on her
back, the head of her bed elevated, eyes closed. No staff entered Resident #56's room and offered to turn
and reposition her.
Observation on 08/27/24 at 2:58 P.M. revealed STNA #213 gathered incontinence care supplies and
entered Resident #56's room to provide care. STNA #213 stated she arrived for work at 10:00 A.M. today,
and this was the first time she entered Resident #56's room to provide care including turning and
repositioning. STNA #213 stated she was too busy until now to assist Resident #56 with turning and
repositioning and incontinence care. STNA #213 proceeded to provide Resident #56's incontinence care,
and during the observation a long curving line on Resident #56's left buttock could be seen. The line was a
purplish red in color and along the line about midway a small opening about a half inch by three quarters of
an inch could be seen, and the wound bed was dark red. Resident #56's right buttock was reddened with
no open area. Resident #56 did not resist or refuse to have STNA #213 provide
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
incontinence care.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Interview on 08/28/24 at 9:08 P.M. with Nurse #215 revealed on 06/24/24 Resident #56 was found lying on
a bedpan when WNP #209 entered her room with Nurse #215 to evaluate Resident #56's pressure injuries
which were present on admission to the facility. Nurse #215 stated the length of time Resident #56 was on
the bedpan was unknown because it was first thing in the morning and when they entered Resident #56's
room to assess her they found her with the bedpan underneath her. Nurse #215 stated the bedpan was left
underneath Resident #56 from the night shift, and with the amount of agency staff in the building it could
not be determined how the situation happened, or who caused the situation. Nurse #215 stated Resident
#56 was treated for the injury caused by the bedpan. Nurse #215 stated we were both pretty mortified that
something like that could happen, and the marks on her left buttock had the impression from the bedpan.
Nurse #215 stated the injury was a DTI which progressed.
Residents Affected - Few
Interview on 08/28/24 at 9:23 A.M. with NP #210 confirmed Resident #56 was found on a bedpan which
caused a pressure injury. NP #210 stated she did not know the details, and did not look at the wound
because WNP #209 was taking care of it and ordered treatments.
Interview on 08/28/24 at 10:46 A.M. with STNA #216 revealed she was assigned to care for Resident #56
today and had taken care of her previously. STNA #216 stated Resident #56 was compliant with her care
and she lets us do what we need to do.
Interview on 08/28/24 at 2:06 P.M. with WNP #209 revealed on 06/24/24 she was at the facility in the
morning to evaluate Resident #56's wound. WNP #209 stated she was told about the bedpan and her job
was to evaluate the wound. WNP #209 stated Resident #56 had a DTI on her buttocks which was caused
by prolonged pressure for an extended period of time. WNP #209 stated anything that pushes could cause
a DTI. WNP #209 stated Resident #56 had issues with declining health, something could have happened
with the bedpan, and she heard Resident #56 was on the bedpan for a prolonged period of time, and I am
sure it contributed.
Review of the facility policy titled Wound Prevention and Management Policy dated 10/2022 included a
Wound Track Assessment would be documented at the time of discovery of the skin breakdown and then
weekly thereafter. A care plan would be initiated and updated as necessary until the area was resolved. A
preventative plan of care and intervention would be initiated for any residents determined to be at risk, to
reduce the possibility of further breakdown.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00156926.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions
were implemented to treat Resident #75's substance abuse. This affected one resident (Resident #75) out
of three residents reviewed for substance abuse. The facility census was 110.
Findings include:
Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/12/24 and diagnoses included
congestive heart failure (CHF), alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced mood disorder, and bipolar
disorder.
Review of Resident #75's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed
Resident #75 was cognitively intact. Resident #75 required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting
hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, and putting on and taking off footwear. Resident #75 required partial
to moderate assistance to walk 10 feet, walking further and car transfer was not attempted due to medical
condition or safety concerns.
Review of Resident #75's physician orders dated 07/08/24 revealed no LOA (leave of absence) except for
Dr. appointments until further notice per MD #216. The order was discontinued on 08/16/24.
Review of Resident #75's progress notes dated 07/30/24 at 6:50 P.M. included after Resident #75's
girlfriend was at the facility for a visit Resident #75 was sleeping in his room. After dinner Resident #75
woke up and appeared to be inebriated. Resident #75 stated his girlfriend gave him a bottle. There was an
empty water bottle in Resident #75's trash that smelled of liquor. Information passed on to the nightshift
nurse and Physician made aware.
Review of Resident #75's progress notes dated 07/30/24 at 10:00 P.M. included the nightshift nurse was
informed Resident #75 was intoxicated, went to happy hour and may have had one drink. Resident #75 told
the nurse he had one drink. The nurse told Resident #75 she needed an honest answer for his safety.
Resident #75 stated his girlfriend came to visit, and asked him to go to her car because she had a gift.
Resident #75's caretaker gave him a bottle with vodka in it when he went with her to the car. Resident #75
pointed to the empty water bottle in his trash when asked where the bottle was. The nurse removed the
water bottle which smelled like alcohol. Resident #75's nurse practitioner was made aware and he was
being watched for safety. Call light within reach.
Review of Resident #75's care plan with a target date of 10/03/24 included Resident #75 had a risk for
harm, injury to self, non compliance. Resident #75 drinks ETOH (alcohol) to excess and had a physician
order to only have one to two beers at happy hour, which was discontinued on 08/19/24. Resident #75's
resident rights would be respected, Resident #75 would accept reason why to be compliant, Resident #75
would have decreased episodes of non compliance and his safety would be maintained. Interventions
included one to one visit as needed, involve family and make referrals as needed; acknowledge Resident
#75's right to not comply, provide positive feedback for compliance; identify reasons for noncompliance
such as lack of understanding, cultural differences and emphasize positives. The care plan was revised and
included Resident #75 remained non compliant with ETOH use despite education on negative effects,
continued to go on LOA where ETOH was potentially involved, MD prefers LOA be only for medical
appointment. The Goal and Interventions were unchanged.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Review of Resident #75's medical record including orders and progress notes dated 07/30/24 through
08/15/24 did not reveal evidence of care planned interventions being implemented after Resident #75 used
alcohol on 07/30/24.
Review of Resident #75's progress notes dated 08/16/24 at 5:16 P.M. revealed a call was placed to MD
#217's office regarding Resident #75's request to have LOA and to fishing this weekend. Return call
received and orders noted that resident may resume LOA's. Resident #75 was educated on safety on LOA
and dangers of consuming alcohol excessively. Resident #75 verbalized understanding.
Review of Resident #75's physician orders dated 08/16/24 through 08/28/24 did not reveal further orders
related to Resident #75's LOA's, including MD prefers Resident #75 to only go on medical appointments.
Interview on 08/28/24 at 2:41 P.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she only knew about one
episode of Resident #75 drinking, was not aware Resident #75 had another episode of inebriation, and did
not know about Resident #75's girlfriend bringing him vodka in a water bottle on 07/30/24. The DON stated
she spoke with Resident #75 today, and he stated he had no problem, saw an outside psych counselor, and
did not want to see anyone else.
Interview on 08/28/24 at 3:19 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #220 revealed she worked night
shift on 07/30/24 and was told by the day shift nurse Resident #75 went to happy hour, seemed like he had
more than one drink, was very intoxicated and not able to stand. Resident #75 stated the nurse told her
there was an empty water bottle in his room that smelled like alcohol. LPN #220 stated Resident #75's
caretaker brought the water bottle with vodka when she came to visit, and Resident #75's physician was
notified of the situation and did not give further instructions or orders.
Interview on 08/28/24 at 3:57 P.M. with Social Services Designee (SSD) #221 revealed Resident #75 had a
drinking problem in the past, and he said he was an alcoholic. SSD #221 stated she was aware of one
situation where Resident #75 became drunk, and she had to follow up with him, but did not know he had
another episode of drinking on 07/30/24. SSD #221 stated when she talked to MD #217 she was told MD
#217 was restricting LOA's until further notice, but Resident #75 could participate in happy hour at the
facility because alcohol consumption was limited. SSD #221 indicated she did not offer Resident #75 psych
services because she only knew of one time when Resident #75 became drunk, thought it was a one time
issue, and if she knew about the second episode she would have offered services including a psychology
consult. Resident #75 received psych services from an outside hospital and SSD #221 would have
contacted his outside provider social worker so the appropriate services could be provided. SSD #221
stated she was not notified the second drinking situation happened, and usually nursing reviewed progress
notes and the DON would bring it to her attention.
Interview on 08/28/24 at 4:19 P.M. with MD #217 revealed she was notified about Resident #75's caretaker
bringing him vodka on 07/30/24. MD #217 stated Resident #75's LOA should have been revoked, and he
should not have been allowed to go on LOA for a fishing trip due to safety reasons. MD #217 stated she did
not know who called from her office and told the facility Resident #75 could go on a LOA for a fishing trip.
A request was made for the facility substance abuse treatment policy and an illegal substance policy was
provided. A substance abuse treatment policy was not provided for review.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00156926.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate
catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, record review and review of the manufacturers instructions and facility policy the
facility failed to ensure appropriate incontinence care was provided for Resident's #43, #48 and #56. This
affected three residents (#43, #48, and #56) and had the potential to affect resident residing in the facility
who were incontinent. The facility census was 110.
Findings include:
1. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/07/24 and diagnoses
included type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and alcohol abuse.
Review of Resident #48's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed
Resident #48 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #48 was dependent for toileting hygiene and
was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel.
Observation on 08/27/24 at 1:26 P.M. of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #213 revealed she
gathered supplies and entered Resident #48's room to provide incontinence care. Resident #48 stated she
was getting really frustrated because she needed incontinence care and wanted to go to the activity with
animals, and she was afraid she was going to miss the activity, and she really loved animals. STNA #213
asked Resident #48 how much help she needed and Resident #48 stated she could not lift her bottom, she
had not been changed today, and was wearing a liner and a pull up for incontinence. STNA #213
proceeded to provide Resident #48 incontinence care, and observation of her bottom revealed a small
open abrasion area on her right lower buttocks. Resident #48 stated she did not get changed timely and
that was why she wanted two liners in her pull up before she went to see the animals. Resident #48 stated
she often had to wait a long time before her call light was answered and her incontinence pull up and liners
were changed, and if she only had one liner her leggings would be soaked by the time someone came to
change her. Resident #48 stated she did not want her leggings to get wet and that was why she requested
two liners. Resident #48 stated by the time she peed three times the urine gets on her leggings. Resident
#48 indicated the two liners in her pull up made it look like she had a penis, but that was okay because she
would be dry.
Review of the facility incontinence liners manufacturers instructions included two incontinence liners should
not be worn at the same time, and you should not wear more than one liner at a time. Wearing multiple
pads could cause hard edges that could damage skin and be uncomfortable. Using more than one pad did
not provide extra absorbency. Leakage from the first product would overflow into the second product,
causing both products to leak more quickly. The first product would leak onto the second and both would
become less absorbent. Wearing more than one pad was considered bad practice.
Review of the facility policy titled Protocol Related to Assessment of Bowel and Bladder Incontinence
revised 10/2014 included the policy was a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate
treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore as much normal bladder function as
possible. If continence assessment identified a resident as incontinent of bowel, bladder, the facility would
initiate appropriate interventions to help maintain dryness and the resident's right to dignity.
2. Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/21/24 and diagnoses
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
included atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unstable angina pectoris, type two
diabetes, wedge compression fracture of T5-T6 vertebra, and moderate protein calorie malnutrition.
Review of Resident #56's admission MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 was unable
to complete the interview for mental status. Resident #56 was dependent for toileting hygiene.
Residents Affected - Some
Review of Resident #56's aide charting in the electronic record from 08/26/24 at 6:42 P.M. through 08/28/24
at 4:15 P.M. revealed there was no evidence Resident #56 was provided incontinence care and her
incontinence brief and liners were changed.
Observation on 08/27/24 at 2:58 P.M. of STNA #213 revealed she gathered incontinence supplies and
entered Resident #56's room to provide incontinence care. STNA #213 proceeded to provide incontinence
care and Resident #56 was observed to have one incontinence brief and two liners on inside her brief. The
incontinence liners and incontinence brief were wet with urine. Resident #56's perineal area and buttocks
were red and irritated looking. STNA #213 stated she arrived to work at 10:00 A.M. and this was the first
time she checked and changed Resident #56's incontinence brief and liners. STNA #213 was unable to
complete Resident #56's incontinence care without help because Resident #56 was afraid of falling on the
floor. STNA #213 made Resident #56 comfortable and left the room to find someone to assist her.
Observation on 08/27/24 at 3:33 P.M. STNA #213 arrived back to Resident #56's room with the Director of
Nursing (DON) to help her complete Resident #56's incontinence care. STNA #213 placed two
incontinence liners on Resident #56, and did not use panties. The Director of Nursing confirmed Resident
#56 was wearing two incontinence liners.
Interview on 08/27/24 at 4:24 P.M. with the DON and Wound Nurse (WN) #222 revealed Resident #56
preferred an incontinence liner over a brief. When asked if two incontinence liners was appropriate the DON
did not answer the question directly.
Review of the facility incontinence liners manufacturers instructions included two incontinence liners should
not be worn at the same time, and you should not wear more than one liner at a time. Wearing multiple
pads could cause hard edges that could damage skin and be uncomfortable. Using more than one pad did
not provide extra absorbency. Leakage from the first product would overflow into the second product,
causing both products to leak more quickly. The first product would leak onto the second and both would
become less absorbent. Wearing more than one pad was considered bad practice.
Review of the facility policy titled Protocol Related to Assessment of Bowel and Bladder Incontinence
revised 10/2014 included the policy was a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate
treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore as much normal bladder function as
possible. If continence assessment identified a resident as incontinent of bowel, bladder, the facility would
initiate appropriate interventions to help maintain dryness and the resident's right to dignity.
3. Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/01/21 and diagnoses
included Alzheimer's Disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and retention of urine.
Review of Resident #43's Quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had severe
cognitive impairment. Resident #43 was dependent for bathing, personal hygiene and toileting
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
hygiene. Resident #43 was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Observation on 08/27/24 at 3:43 P.M. of STNA's #213 and #223 revealed they entered Resident #43's room
to provide incontinence care. STNA #213 stated this was the first time since she arrived to work at 10:00
A.M. that she checked Resident for incontinence and changed her incontinence brief. STNA's #213 and
#223 proceeded to provide Resident #43's incontinence care, and when the soiled incontinence brief was
removed a soiled incontinence liner was observed. Resident #43's bottom was reddened over most of her
perineum and buttocks, and she had a moderate bowel movement and it looked like feces was dried on her
skin, and STNA #223 had to scrub back and forth on Resident #43's skin to remove the feces. STNA #223
stated the bowel movement looked fresh to her. STNA's #213 and #223 finished with Resident #43's care
and placed a clean incontinence brief and incontinence liner on her.
Residents Affected - Some
Review of the facility incontinence liners manufacturers instructions included two incontinence liners should
not be worn at the same time, and you should not wear more than one liner at a time. Wearing multiple
pads could cause hard edges that could damage skin and be uncomfortable. Using more than one pad did
not provide extra absorbency. Leakage from the first product would overflow into the second product,
causing both products to leak more quickly. The first product would leak onto the second and both would
become less absorbent. Wearing more than one pad was considered bad practice.
Review of the facility policy titled Protocol Related to Assessment of Bowel and Bladder Incontinence
revised 10/2014 included the policy was a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate
treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore as much normal bladder function as
possible. If continence assessment identified a resident as incontinent of bowel, bladder, the facility would
initiate appropriate interventions to help maintain dryness and the resident's right to dignity.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00156926.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0743
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a resident does not develop patterns of decreased social interaction and/or increased
withdrawn, angry, or depressive behaviors, unless unavoidable.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure appropriate placement and
interventions were in place to ensure Resident #111's choice and safety were maximized. This affected one
resident (Resident #111) out of three residents reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility census
was 110.
Findings include:
Review of Resident #111's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/24/24 and diagnoses included
Parkinson's Disease without dyskinesia, without mention of fluctuations, dementia with agitation,
hallucinations, and wedge compression fracture of third lumbar vertebra. Resident #111 was discharged
from the facility on 08/09/24.
Review of Resident #111's hospital notes for his admission from 07/17/24 through 07/24/24 included
Resident #111 was brought to the ED for wandering away from his home. Resident #111 had Parkinson's
disease and dementia, and his ton stated Resident #111 was not very compliant with his medications. EMS
stated they were called to the home because Resident #111 was found wandering. On arrival to the ED
Resident #111 was awake, alert, oriented, he knew where he was. Resident #111's son stated Resident
#111 cooked, cleaned and seemed to take care of himself very well, but did have an occasional instance
where he had hallucinations and wandered away from home. Resident #111's son stated at this time he felt
Resident #111 was safe to reside in his home by himself, they checked on him periodically. Resident #111's
son was given information for services that could provide additional assistance with the home. Resident
#111's son stated he felt there were no acute findings today and Resident #111 could be discharged and
return to his home. Resident #111 was referred to follow up with his family physician for reevaluation or
placement if desired in the future.
Review of Resident #111's After Visit Summary for hospital stay 07/16/24 through 07/24/24 included
Resident #111 was unable to ambulate. Resident #111's mental status was disoriented, alert, and wax and
wane. Resident #111 used a walker and needed assistance with walking. Safety concerns were
sundowners syndrome, history of falls in past 30 days and was at risk for falls. Resident #111 was
discharged to the facility due to he required a Skilled Nursing Facility for less than 30 days. There were no
orders for Resident #111 to be placed in a secured nursing unit.
Review of Resident #111's physician orders dated 07/24/24 revealed MD (Medical Doctor) #217 approved
placement, continued placement in secured unit.
Review of Resident #111's Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #111 was not at
risk for elopement.
Review of Resident #111's progress notes admission assessment dated [DATE] at 6:16 P.M. included
Resident #111 was alert and oriented times three (time, place, person), MD #217 notified of admission and
orders verified. Resident #111 was able to explain his current diagnosis of Parkinson's disease and he was
at the facility to receive therapy and get his strength back up.
Review of Resident #111's care plan dated 07/25/24 included Resident #111 had the potential for impaired
adjustment. Resident #111 identified inability to adequately adjust and cope. Resident #111
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 10 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0743
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
would adjust to new environment with minimal frustration. Interventions included to assess Resident #111's
interests and strengths and encourage activity particiation; to encourage expression of feelings; one on one
visits as needed, allow to vent feelings related to placement, involve family in care and update as needed.
Review of Resident #111's progress notes dated 07/27/24 at 11:03 P.M. included Resident #111 was alert
and oriented times two (person, place), and at times seemed to be oriented times two to three. Resident
#111 voiced being able to leave and go home. Resident #111 was reminded he needed to be at the facility
to get stronger.
Review of Resident #111's progress notes dated 07/28/24 at 10:20 A.M. revealed Resident #111 was alert
and oriented times one to two. Resident #111 insisted he needed to call his bank to check on his account. It
was explained to Resident #111 that his son would be handling all his financial needs while he was in the
facility. Resident #111 was very upset and stated he had to get out of here,and continuously paced
throughout the secured unit.
Review of Resident #111's progress notes dated 07/28/24 at 4:18 P.M. revealed at approximately 3:15 P.M.
Resident #111 was alert and oriented times four (person, place, time, situation) went to walk outside the
facility for air and did not notify the nurse or staff. Resident #111 returned and the leave of absence policy
was reviewed by the nurse and Resident #111 was educated on courtyard adherence. Resident #111 was
last seen at the nurse's station at around 2:30 P.M., was asking to use the telephone and call the bank.
Resident #111's sons and MD #217 were notified.
Review of Resident #111's progress notes dated 07/28/24 at 6:03 P.M. revealed Resident #111 was not
confused and family aware Resident #111 calling bank was normal behavior for financial concerns. Family
and MD #217 noted Resident #111 did not need to be on a dementia unit at this time and at no risk at
present.
Review of Resident #111's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed
Resident #111 was cognitively intact. Resident #111 used a walker, and required supervision or touching
assistance for toileting and personal hygiene, and lower body dressing. Resident #111 was independent for
putting on and taking off footwear, and upper body dressing. Resident #111 required supervision with
assistance for walking 10 feet to 150 feet. Resident #111's ability to walk 10 feet on uneven surfaces was
not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns.
Observation on 08/27/24 at 10:17 A.M. of Resident #111's former room with Assistant Director of Nursing
(ADON) #202 revealed there were two metal brackets secured to the window frame on both sides of the
window, and above the metal brackets on both sides of the window revealed two black brackets attached
above the metal brackets. ADON #202 stated the metal brackets and the black brackets were to prevent the
window from being opened. ADON #202 stated we thought Resident #111 was an elopement risk and
needed the secured unit. ADON #202 indicated Resident #111 could do things on his own, could manage
his money and after a lengthy conversation it was noticed Resident #111 was a bit confused. ADON #202
stated Resident #111 was adamant about moving, got out and said he was not like these people. ADON
#202 stated Resident #111 was found wandering at home and taken to the hospital.
Interview on 08/27/24 at 10:43 A.M. of Maintenance Assistant (MA) #208 revealed the Maintenance
Supervisor was on vacation and she was called into the facility when Resident #111 left via his window. MA
#208 stated he was not sure how Resident #111 opened his window and exited the facility, but he put a
second set of black brackets on the window. MA #208 stated the Maintenance Supervisor put new
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 11 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0743
metal brackets on the window until the black brackets could be installed.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Interview on 08/27/24 at 12:23 P.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #206 revealed she was working the
day Resident #111 left the secured unit via his window. LPN #206 stated the metal brackets on the window
were very loose and Resident #111 was able to move them and push the window up. LPN #206 stated she
saw Resident #111 when he was coming back in the window and she saw his foot come in through the
window. LPN #206 indicated Resident #111 told her he was only gone a short time, only went to the
parking lot and back, and just needed some air. LPN #206 stated Resident #111 was not exit concerned,
he was more tired of other residents, and said he was not like these people and why am I here on this unit.
LPN #206 indicated Resident #111 was upset and stated he had to get out of here. LPN #206 stated the
Director of Nursing (DON) told her to move Resident #111 out of the secured unit because he should not
be on the unit due to a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 14. LPN #206 stated Resident #111 did
not have an order to be on the unit and MD #217 told her it was okay to move him. LPN #206 indicated
Resident #111 told her they were restraining me and had to let me go.
Residents Affected - Few
Interview on 08/27/24 at 4:45 P.M. of MD #217 revealed Resident #111 was placed in a secured unit and he
was transferred out of the unit to have the ability to have more freedom and would be less restless. MD
#217 stated Resident #111 had a BIMS of 14 and was automatically placed on admission in the secured
unit. MD #217 stated wherever he came from must have requested a secured unit, it must have been
requested by the hospital, and she did not order him to be on a secured unit.
Interview on 08/27/24 at 4:58 P.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #218 revealed Resident #111 was placed on a
secured unit because he was wandering at home, and admissions made the decision to place him on the
unit. RN #218 stated she verified Resident #111's medication orders with MD #217, but not the secured unit
order. RN #218 stated she did not take an order from MD #217 to place Resident #111 on the secured unit.
RN #218 indicated she might have sent MD #217 a message stating Resident #111 was on the secured
unit. RN #218 stated she did not know if the secured unit admission form was signed, and was not
responsible to make sure the form was signed. RN #218 stated the secured unit order was a standard
batch order, Resident #111 was admitted to the secured unit and batch orders were placed. RN #218
indicated an order for the secured unit was automatically placed under Resident #111's primary care
providers name (MD #217).
Interview on 08/27/24 at 5:06 P.M. of Admissions Director (AD) #205 revealed the hospital staff told
Hospital Liason (HL) #219 that Resident #111 needed a secured unit, and HL #219 told her he needed the
secured unit. AD #205 stated she had no written documentation Resident #111 needed a secured unit, and
it was all done verbally.
Interview on 08/27/24 at 5:10 P.M. of HL #219 revealed revealed Resident #111 was in the hospital for
altered mental status. HL #219 stated there was some back and forth communication with the facility
regarding the high cost of a medication, but she did not tell the facility Resident #111 needed to be in a
secured unit, and the hospital did not say Resident #111 needed a secured unit. HL #219 stated Resident
Rights were important and she would have requested psych notes, but the hospital did not think psych
needed to be involved so she did not request them.
Interview on 08/28/24 at 9:47 A.M. of the DON revealed Resident #111 was alert and oriented most of the
time he was in the facility, and was independent. The DON stated she was called when Resident #111 left
his room via the window, and when he returned she spoke to him and he told her he wanted to go outside
for a breath of fresh air, walked up and down the sidewalk then came back in his window. Resident #111
stated he wanted to call the bank and pay his bills, and the DON spoke to his son who
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 12 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
365865
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/03/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Main Street Care Center
500 Community Drive
Avon Lake, OH 44012
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0743
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
told her Resident #111 took care of his business at home and was fine to do it while he resided in the
facility. Resident #111's son told the DON the only reason he was in the facility was because he needed
therapy to get stronger, then he was going home. The DON stated Resident #111 was moved off the
secured unit. The DON stated the hospital said he was noted walking around the community, he was
confused, his labs were off, and the hospital treated him. The DON stated Resident #111's son felt he
needed therapy, he was admitted to the facility for therapy, and the facility wanted to keep him safe and felt
the secured unit was appropriate. The DON stated the family gave verbal consent for Resident #111 to be
placed in the secured unit. The DON confirmed Resident #111 was placed in the secured nursing unit for
four days.
Interview on 08/28/24 at 3:10 P.M. of the Administrator revealed AD #205 forgot she had a signed form for
Resident #111 to be in the secured unit and just found it. The Administrator handed a signed Secured Unit
form to the surveyor which was dated 07/24/24 and electronically signed by Resident #111.
Review of Resident #111's medical record dated 07/24/24 through 08/09/24 revealed although Resident
#111 electronically signed the Secured Unit form there was no evidence it was clinically indicated he
needed a secured unit.
Review of the policy titled Secured Unit Placement Assessment dated 04/2022 included Residents with a
diagnosis of dementia, behaviors, memory impairment and, or those resident that were exit seeking would
be considered for placement on the secured unit. The resident representative, responsible party, POA,
would sign the secured unit consent prior to placement on the unit, unless placement was needed in an
emergency situation.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00156926.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
365865
If continuation sheet
Page 13 of 13