Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

MEADOWBROOK MANORCMS #3659022 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0610 Respond appropriately to all alleged violations. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) and investigation review, the facility failed to ensure a SRI was thoroughly investigated related to an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This affected two residents (#16 and #49) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 05/06/24. Diagnoses included dementia, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease, restlessness and agitation, and anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 05/01/25 revealed Resident #16 wandered up and down hallways and into other resident's rooms. Interventions included engaging the resident in activities, moving him into a less stimulating area and redirecting him as needed. Resident #16 also made sexually inappropriate advances towards staff members and mistook a female resident as his wife, becoming verbally and physically aggressive when redirected. Interventions included analyzing key times, places, circumstances, and triggers and documenting, assessing, and anticipating the residents' needs, administering medication as ordered and psychiatric consultations as needed. Review of the nursing dated 06/21/25 at 6:15 P.M. revealed Resident #16 was noted to be completely naked sitting on the side of his bed. The behavior was identified as new for the resident, and he was placed on 15-minute checks while he was in his room. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was severely cognitively impaired. He required setup help for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, supervision for showering and substantial or maximum assistance for personal hygiene. He displayed behaviors including but not limited to hitting or scratching himself, pacing, public sexual acts, and disrobing in public. Review of the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) #202's note dated 07/02/25 revealed she was asked to see Resident #16 due to an episode of sexually inappropriate behavior. According to facility staff, Resident #16 was found nude and exposed himself to another resident. The Director of Nursing (DON) revealed Resident #16 had been on medication in the past for sexually inappropriate behaviors. She placed Resident #16 on Tagamet for sexually inappropriate behavior. Review of the physicians' orders for August 2025 revealed an order for Tagamet 200 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for unspecified mood disorder. The order began on 07/04/25. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 08/18/21 and a discharge date of 08/18/25. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, insomnia, depression and a need for assistance with personal care. Review of the care plan dated 06/10/25 revealed Resident #49 had a communication problem and was able to respond with general, yes or no responses. Interventions included anticipating the resident's needs, encouraging the resident to state her thoughts even if having difficulty, asking yes or no questions, and monitoring for physical or nonverbal indicators of distress. Review of the comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 was severely cognitively impaired. She was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and displayed no behaviors. Review of the nursing note dated 08/13/25 at 9:00 P.M. revealed Resident #16 was observed in Resident #49's room sitting Residents Affected - Few (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 4 Event ID: 365902 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365902 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/28/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Meadowbrook Manor 3090 Five Points Hartford Fowler, OH 44418 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0610 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete on her bed. Resident #49's incontinence brief was opened and down. Resident #16 was observed rubbing Resident #49's private area inappropriately. Resident #16 was asked to leave the room and placed on one-to-one supervision. Both Resident #16 and Resident #49's physicians and responsible parties were notified. Review of SRI tracking number 264021 dated 08/13/25 revealed on 08/13/25 at approximately 9:00 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 observed Resident #16 in Resident #49's room sitting on her bed. Resident #16 was observed rubbing Resident #49's private area inappropriately. LPN #200 asked Resident #16 to leave the room, and he was placed on one-to-one supervision. The Administrator and DON were notified. LPN #200 and the DON performed a full body assessment on Resident #49, and no injuries were noted. Resident #49's physician was notified, and she was placed on 15-minute checks. Witness statements obtained in the investigation revealed no evidence when Resident #16 was last seen or checked on by staff prior to the incident to determine how long the Resident #16 was in Resident #49's room. Interview on 08/26/25 at 10:14 A.M. with the DON revealed he received a call from LPN #200 on 08/13/25 informing him Resident #16 was sitting on Resident #49's bed. Resident #49 was described as sitting on the edge of her bed with her incontinence brief down. Resident #16 was touching her private area. LPN #200 immediately separated the residents and assessed Resident #49; no negative findings were discovered. Resident #16 was placed on one-to-one supervision, and Resident #49 was placed on 15-minute checks. Both residents' physicians and families were notified. A referral was made to a psychiatric inpatient facility for Resident #16; Resident #16 remained on one-to-one supervision until the transfer to the inpatient psychiatric facility took place. Resident #49 was seen by her psychiatric care team the following day and was assessed with no changes in psychiatric or mental status noted. The DON denied having any knowledge Resident #16 had any history of sexually inappropriate behaviors. Interview on 08/27/25 at 7:25 A.M. with Social Service Designee (SSD) #208 revealed she was aware Resident #16 had a history of wandering but was generally redirectable. She could not verify when the resident had last been checked on prior to the incident and confirmed the resident was not on any type of increased supervision or checks at the time of the incident. She verified the investigation could have been more thorough and included more specific information regarding when Resident #16 had last been seen to determine how long Resident #16 was in Resident #49's room. Interview on 08/28/25 at 3:57 P.M. with LPN #200 revealed she entered Resident #49's room to give her medications and saw Resident #16 sitting on her bed. Resident #49's incontinence brief was open, and his fingers were in her vagina. She could not recall if she asked him what he was doing or what Resident #49's reaction was to the situation. She could not verify what time she had seen either resident prior to the incident. The facility did not have a policy related to investigation of SRI's. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Complaint Number 2959789. Event ID: Facility ID: 365902 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 4 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365902 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/28/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Meadowbrook Manor 3090 Five Points Hartford Fowler, OH 44418 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16, who was cognitively impaired and had a history of wandering and sexually inappropriate behaviors, received appropriate supervision to ensure the safety of Resident #49. This affected two residents (#16 and #49) of five reviewed for abuse and behavior monitoring. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 05/06/24. Diagnoses included dementia, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease, restlessness and agitation, and anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 05/01/25 revealed Resident #16 wandered up and down hallways and into other resident's rooms. Interventions included engaging the resident in activities, moving him into a less stimulating area and redirecting him as needed. Resident #16 also made sexually inappropriate advances towards staff members and mistook a female resident as his wife, becoming verbally and physically aggressive when redirected. Interventions included analyzing key times, places, circumstances, and triggers and documenting, assessing, and anticipating the residents' needs, administering medication as ordered and psychiatric consultations as needed. Review of the nursing dated 06/21/25 at 6:15 P.M. revealed Resident #16 was noted to be completely naked sitting on the side of his bed. The behavior was identified as new for the resident, and he was placed on 15-minute checks while he was in his room. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was severely cognitively impaired. He required setup help for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, supervision for showering and substantial or maximum assistance for personal hygiene. He displayed behaviors including but not limited to hitting or scratching himself, pacing, public sexual acts, and disrobing in public. Review of the psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) #202's note dated 07/02/25 revealed she was asked to see Resident #16 due to an episode of sexually inappropriate behavior. According to facility staff, Resident #16 was found nude and exposed himself to another resident. The Director of Nursing (DON) revealed Resident #16 had been on medication in the past for sexually inappropriate behaviors. She placed Resident #16 on Tagamet for sexually inappropriate behavior. Review of the physicians' orders for August 2025 revealed an order for Tagamet 200 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for unspecified mood disorder. The order began on 07/04/25. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 08/18/21 and a discharge date of 08/18/25. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, insomnia, depression and a need for assistance with personal care. Review of the care plan dated 06/10/25 revealed Resident #49 had a communication problem and was able to respond with general, yes or no responses. Interventions included anticipating the resident's needs, encouraging the resident to state her thoughts even if having difficulty, asking yes or no questions, and monitoring for physical or nonverbal indicators of distress. Review of the comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 was severely cognitively impaired. She was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and displayed no behaviors. Review of the nursing note dated 08/13/25 at 9:00 P.M. revealed Resident #16 was observed in Resident #49's room sitting on her bed. Resident #49's incontinence brief was opened and down. Resident #16 was observed rubbing Resident #49's private area inappropriately. Resident #16 was asked to leave the room and placed on one-to-one supervision. Both Resident #16 and Resident #49's physicians and responsible parties were notified. Interview on 08/26/25 at 10:14 A.M. with the DON revealed he received a call from Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 on 08/13/25 informing him Resident #16 was sitting on Resident #49's bed. Resident #49 was described as sitting on the edge of her bed with her incontinence brief down. Resident #16 was touching her private area. LPN #200 immediately (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 365902 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 4 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365902 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/28/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Meadowbrook Manor 3090 Five Points Hartford Fowler, OH 44418 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete separated the residents and assessed Resident #49; no negative findings were discovered. Resident #16 was placed on one-to-one supervision, and Resident #49 was placed on 15-minute checks. Both residents' physicians and families were notified. A referral was made to a psychiatric inpatient facility for Resident #16; Resident #16 remained on one-to-one supervision until the transfer to the inpatient psychiatric facility took place. Resident #49 was seen by her psychiatric care team the following day and was assessed with no changes in psychiatric or mental status noted. The DON denied having any knowledge Resident #16 had any history of sexually inappropriate behaviors. Interview on 08/26/25 at 1:19 P.M. with LPN #203 revealed Resident #16 did have a history of wandering, he typically wandered into other people's bedrooms and bathrooms. She said the facility did the best they could in redirecting and monitoring him, but she had no knowledge of the resident being on any type of increased supervision prior to the incident with Resident #49. Interview on 08/26/25 at 1:25 P.M. with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #204 revealed she had no knowledge of Resident #16 ever being sexually inappropriate with any other resident; however, she was aware that he wandered and while it was difficult at times, the facility attempted to redirect him as much as possible. She confirmed there was no increased level of supervision immediately prior to the incident occurring with Resident #49, and no tracking in place to verify when Resident #16 had last been checked on. Interview on 08/26/25 at 2:07 P.M. with Resident #49's sister revealed she was aware Resident #16 had a history of wandering, and during her visits to the facility, she felt he had been wandering more frequently prior to the incident, in and out of people's rooms and sitting on their beds. She visited Resident #49 the morning after the incident was reported to her and revealed Resident #49 gave no indication of the incident the night prior and did not seem in any distress. She spoke with the former Administrator who confirmed Resident #16 was being transferred for psychiatric care but may return to the facility upon discharge. Resident #49's sister spoke with her family and felt it was in Resident #49's best interest to have her moved to a different facility. Interview on 08/27/25 at 7:25 A.M. with Social Service Designee (SSD) #208 revealed she was aware Resident #16 had a history of wandering but was generally redirectable. She could not verify when the resident had last been checked on prior to the incident on 08/13/25, and confirmed there was no discussion of the need for Resident #16 to be on any kind of increased supervision or checks after his visit from psychiatric NP #202 on 07/02/25. Interview on 08/27/25 at 12:48 P.M. with Corporate Risk Manager #207 revealed the psychiatric NP #202 note dated 07/02/25 regarding Resident #16 being sexually inappropriate was in reference to the resident being found sitting naked on his bed on 06/21/25. At that time the facility implemented 15-minute checks while the resident was in his room and discontinued those checks on 07/02/25 when psychiatric NP #202 saw him and started him on medications. Interview on 08/28/25 at 3:57 P.M. with LPN #200 revealed she entered Resident #49's room to give her medications and saw Resident #16 sitting on her bed. Resident #49's incontinence brief was open, and his fingers were in her vagina. She could not recall if she asked him what he was doing or what Resident #49's reaction was to the situation. She could not verify what time she had last seen either resident. She confirmed neither resident was on 15-minute checks, one to one supervision or any other type of additional supervision or monitoring immediately prior to this incident. Review of the facility policy titled Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring, dated March 2019, revealed The interdisciplinary team (IDT) put evaluate behavioral symptoms to determine the degree of severity, distress and potential safety risk to the resident. Safety strategies would be implemented to protect the resident and others from harm. Interventions would be adjusted based on the impact of the behavior. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Incident Number 2600512 and Complaint Number 2595789. Event ID: Facility ID: 365902 If continuation sheet Page 4 of 4

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0610GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F610 - In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 28, 2025 survey of MEADOWBROOK MANOR?

This was a inspection survey of MEADOWBROOK MANOR on August 28, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at MEADOWBROOK MANOR on August 28, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Respond appropriately to all alleged violations."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.