Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

RIDGEWOOD MANORCMS #3659521 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the medical record, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for wound treatments were clarified, accurately documented and completed per physician orders. This affected two (#11, #37) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility identified six residents with non-pressure related wounds. The facility census was 38. Residents Affected - Few Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 10/18/23. Diagnoses included hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of a nurse's note dated 05/24/25 at 1:39 P.M. revealed the resident had a skin tear to the left shin measuring 2.5 centimeters (cm) in length by 1.5 cm in width. The wound was cleansed and treated with a border form dressing. The wound care provider was notified of the new area. Review of the physician orders from 05/24/25 through 05/27/25 revealed there were no wound care treatment orders for the skin tear to the left shin. Review of the treatment administration record revealed there was no documentation the resident received wound treatments for the skin tear from 05/25/25 through 05/27/25. Review of a nurse practitioner skin wound note dated 05/28/25 revealed Resident #11 had a left shin skin tear/laceration with orders to cleanse with wound cleanser, apply oil emulsion to base of wound, secure with bordered gauze and change daily. There were no wounds noted to the left foot or ankle and no wound treatment orders for the left foot and ankle. Review of the physician orders from 05/28/25 through 06/02/25 revealed there were no wound treatment orders for the skin tear to the left shin and no wound treatment orders for the left foot/ankle. Review of the treatment administration record from 05/29/25 through 06/01/25 revealed no documentation of completed wound treatments for the left shin. Interview on 06/02/25 at 8:42 A.M., Resident #11 revealed the staff were not completing wound care dressings daily. Observation on 06/02/25 at 10:24 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #435 revealed Resident #11 had gauze dressing wrapped around the left foot/ankle and covered with an elastic bandage. LPN #435 removed an undated wound dressing to the left foot/ankle and the resident had no wounds on the (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 365952 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365952 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 06/04/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Ridgewood Manor 3231 Manley Road Maumee, OH 43537 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few left foot or ankle. Further observation revealed the resident had a border dressing on the left lower shin dated 05/28/25. Interview on 06/02/25 at 10:36 A.M., LPN #435 verified the resident had a wound dressing on the left lower shin dated 05/28/25. LPN #435 verified physician orders for the wound were not entered into the treatment administration record and the daily wound treatments had not been completed. LPN #435 also verified the resident had no wounds on his left foot/ankle and no physician orders for treatment. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 08/04/16. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, spinal stenosis, and dementia. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a nurse practitioner skin and wound note dated 05/14/25 at 1:18 P.M. revealed the resident had a skin tear to the left knee from a recent fall. The area measured two centimeters (cm) by 1.6 cm in width with no depth. Treatment recommendations included to cleanse with wound cleanser, apply bacitracin ointment to base of the wound and leave open to air. Review of a nurses note dated 05/20/25 at 3:02 P.M. revealed the resident had a skin tear on his right leg. The wound was cleansed and measured seven cm in length and four cm width. An abdominal pad was placed and wrapped with a gauze dressing. Wound care notified of the skin tear. Review of a wound nurse practitioner skin and wound note dated 05/21/25 at 11:42 A.M. revealed the resident had a skin tear improving to the left knee and a new skin tear to the right lateral lower leg. The wound to the left knee measured 1.7 cm in length by 1.5 cm in width by zero cm in depth. The wound to the right lateral lower leg measured 7.5 cm in length by 4.2 cm in width x 0.1 cm in depth. The wound NP treatment orders included to cleanse the skin tear to the left knee with wound cleanser, apply bacitracin and leave open to air. The treatment order for the right lateral lower leg skin tear was to cleanse with wound cleanser, apply non-adhering dressing to base of wound, secure with abdominal pad and rolled gauze, and change daily and as needed. Review of physician orders dated 05/21/25 revealed to cleanse the left knee with soap and water, pat dry, apply bacitracin ointment to wound bed and leave open to air every day shift. Also to cleanse the right lower extremity with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply oil emulsion non-adhering dressing to wound bed, cover with abdominal padding, then wrap with rolled dry gauze daily. Review of a nurse practitioner skin and wound note dated 05/28/25 at 7:07 P.M. revealed the skin tears to the right lower leg and left knee were healed and to continue preventative recommendations for daily emollients and prevent use of adherent tape directly to skin. The physician orders for the wound treatment for the skin tear to the left knee and right lower extremity skin tear had not been discontinued. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) from 05/22/25 through 06/01/25 revealed the wound treatments were documented as completed per physician orders. Observation on 06/02/25 at 2:06 P.M. revealed Resident #37 had an exposed scabbed area on the left knee. Further observation revealed the resident had an undated loosely wrapped gauze dressing around the lower left leg near the ankle. Further observation revealed the resident had an exposed scabbed area on the right lateral lower extremity and a loosely wrapped gauze wound dressing dated 05/31/25 (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 365952 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 365952 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 06/04/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Ridgewood Manor 3231 Manley Road Maumee, OH 43537 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 around the right ankle. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Interview on 06/02/25 at 2:06 P.M., LPN #435 revealed the resident's wounds were healed but the physician orders had not been discontinued. LPN #435 verified the treatment to the left knee was to cleanse wound, apply bacitracin and leave open to air. LPN #435 verified there were no physician orders for a wound dressing to the left knee and should not have been wrapped with gauze. LPN #435 verified the dressing on the resident's right lower extremity skin tear had slid down and was not in place over the wound. LPN #435 also verified the wound dressing for the right lower extremity skin tear was dated 05/31/25 and wound care had not been completed as documented on 06/01/25. Residents Affected - Few Interview on 06/04/25 at 10:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed after a wound was healed, the wound nurse practitioner wanted healed wounds to be padded and protected for an additional week. The DON verified there were no physician orders to pad and protect Resident #37's skin tear wounds. Interview on 06/04/25 at 11:15 A.M., Certified Wound Nurse Practitioner (CWNP) #700 revealed wound orders were continued for one additional week after a wound had healed. CWNP #700 verified she should have clarified with the facility when to discontinue Resident #37's wound care orders. Review of the facility policy Wound Care, dated 10/2010, revealed to verify a physician order for wound care. Also record in the medical record the type of wound care given, the date and time the wound care was given, and assessment data obtained when inspecting the wound. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00165739. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 365952 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 4, 2025 survey of RIDGEWOOD MANOR?

This was a inspection survey of RIDGEWOOD MANOR on June 4, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at RIDGEWOOD MANOR on June 4, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

SourceView on CMS Care Compare

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.