F 0558
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on medical record review, observation, family interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy,
the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for three (#45, #57, #65) of 24 residents reviewed for
accommodation of needs. The facility census was 119.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings include:
1. Review of medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 05/28/16. Diagnoses included
hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease,
muscle weakness, ataxic gait, and cognitive communication deficit.
Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/28/19, revealed Resident #45 was
moderately cognitively impaired with behaviors that fluctuate in severity. Resident #45 was assessed as
needing extensive assistance for function of bed mobility, transfers, and locomotion. The MDS revealed
Resident #45 was assessed as needing extensive assistance for dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal
hygiene.
Observation on 02/03/20 at 09:53 A.M. revealed Resident #45 was sitting in a recliner with his back to the
door. Resident #45's call light was not in reach and was on the resident's bed about nine feet away from the
resident.
Interview on 02/03/20 at 09:53 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #44 confirmed Resident #45's call
light was not in reach, and the call light was attached to top corner of bed.
Review of a facility policy titled Call Light, dated 1999 and revised June 2008, revealed the staff are to be
sure a resident's call light was positioned conveniently for the resident to use and have the resident
demonstrate the use of the call light to be sure he/she understands the instructions.
2. Review of medical record for the Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 12/06/19. Diagnoses
included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, cognitive communication deficit, chronic kidney
disease, difficulty in walking, and need for assistance with personal care.
Observation on 02/04/20 at 11:29 A.M. revealed Resident #57 was in bed. The call light was pinned
between the wall and the bed, lying on the floor.
Interview on 02/04/20 at 11:30 A.M. with Resident #57's nephew revealed the call light was located
between the bed and the wall, lying on the floor when he arrived.
Interview on 02/04/20 at 11:32 A.M. with LPN #44 verified Resident #57's call light was on the
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 8
Event ID:
366072
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366072
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/06/2020
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Meadows at Osborn Park
3916 Perkins Ave
Huron, OH 44839
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0558
floor and not in the resident's reach.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
3. Review of medical record for the Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 03/06/19. Diagnoses
included schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, and
major depressive disorder.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of the annual MDS assessment, dated 12/19/19, revealed Resident #65 was severely cognitively
impaired and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living.
Observation on 02/04/20 at 11:35 A.M. revealed Resident #65 was reclined in her wheelchair. Her spouse
was sitting on the bed. The resident's call light was looped around the call light box hung on the wall.
Interview on 02/04/20 at 11:39 A.M. with the Maintenance Director (MD) #72 confirmed the call light was
hung on the wall.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366072
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366072
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/06/2020
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Meadows at Osborn Park
3916 Perkins Ave
Huron, OH 44839
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0561
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through
support of resident choice.
Based on observations, medical records review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to
honor resident choice on roommates and who to eat meals with for two (#62 and #85) of 24 sampled
residents. The facility census was 119.
Findings include:
Review of Resident #62's medical records identified admission to the facility occurred on 11/19/19. Medical
diagnoses included dysphasia, anemia, and schizo-affective disorder. The record identified prior to
admission to the facility Resident #62 lived with her sister (Resident #85) in the community.
Interview on 02/03/20 at 9:28 A.M., Resident #62 identified her sister, Resident #85, was admitted to the
facility in December and she wanted to be roommates with her. Resident #62 identified the facility has not
made any efforts to try to accommodate the residents' wishes to room together. Resident #62 also stated
when her sister and her go to the dinning room they were not permitted to sit next to one another because
she required staff to fed her meals. Resident #62 confirmed she would like to sit next to her sister while they
eat meals.
Interview on 02/04/20 at 1:24 P.M., Resident #85 identified she was admitted in December 2019 and was
not offered to live in the same room with her sister (Resident #62). Resident #85 identified she lived with
Resident #62 prior to admission and really would like to be in the same room with her now.
Observation of the breakfast meal on 02/05/20 at 8:14 A.M. identified Resident #62 was placed at the table
with other resident's who need staff to feed them their meal. Resident #85, who was capable to feeding
herself, was placed at a different table.
Interview on 02/05/20 at 9:11 A.M., facility Social Worker #87 identified Resident #62 and Resident #85
were separated as the facility thought this was the best for them. Social Worker #87 confirmed Resident
#62 and Resident #85 were not provided the right to room together and or choices regarding where they sit
in the dinning room.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366072
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366072
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/06/2020
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Meadows at Osborn Park
3916 Perkins Ave
Huron, OH 44839
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0625
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the
resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, review of facility policy, family interview, review of financial records, and staff
interview, the facility failed provide the notice of bedhold policy upon discharge to the hospital for one
(#166) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 119.
Findings include:
Review of Resident #166's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 11/30/19. The
record identified on 01/17/20 Resident #166 was sent to the hospital and admitted with a fractured hip. The
record revealed a lack of bed hold policy notification at the time of hospital discharge. The record identified
Resident #166 remained in the hospital from [DATE] through 01/22/20.
Review of Resident #166's financial records revealed the resident paid privately for her nursing home stay.
She was charged a bed hold for each day she was not in the facility during her hospital admission.
Interview on 02/05/20 at 2:06 P.M., Fiscal Office [NAME] #71 stated she was only responsible to complete
bed hold notifications for residents whom receive Medicaid. Fiscal Office [NAME] #71 confirmed she has no
evidence Resident #166 and or her family had approved and or requested for her bed to be held, however
she was charged the bed hold while she was in the hospital.
Interview with Resident #166's daughter on 02/05/20 at 3:20 P.M. confirmed neither herself or Resident
#166 were provided the bed hold policy and choice if they wanted to hold Resident #166's bed at the time
of her discharge. Resident #166's daughter indicated she would not want to pay $200 a day, when her
mother was not in the building getting care.
Review of the facility policy titled Bed Hold Policy, dated 04/19, identified if the resident's payer source is
one other than Medicaid, the resident or their sponsor will contact the facility if they will be holding the bed
via telephone and or in person on the next business date following admission to the hospital. Facility at that
time inform them of their financial responsibility in regards to the bed hold option.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366072
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366072
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/06/2020
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Meadows at Osborn Park
3916 Perkins Ave
Huron, OH 44839
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0657
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed,
and revised by a team of health professionals.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, resident interview, family interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure
residents were invited to participate in their care planning meetings. This affected one (#166) of four
residents reviewed for participation in care planning. The facility census was 119.
Findings include:
Review of Resident #166's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 11/30/19 following
hospitalization. Diagnosis included pathological fractures of the right foot, The facility admission
assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #166 was cognitively intact. The record contained no evidence
Resident #166 had been invited to participate in care planning.
Interview on 02/03/20 at 3:13 P.M., Resident #166 stated she had never been invited nor attended her care
plan meetings, but would if she was asked.
Interview on 02/05/20 at 9:18 A.M., Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #87 identified the Minimum Data Set
nurse completed the schedule for care planning conferences and she was in charge of inviting
residents/families to the meetings. LSW #87 confirmed she a care plan meeting occurred for Resident #166
on 12/18/19. There was no evidence the family and or Resident #166 attended and or was invited to
participate in the meeting. LSW #87 identified the care planning meetings are usually completed in the
computer chart, however there were none in the computer for Resident #166.
A telephone interview with Resident #166's daughter on 02/05/20 at 3:14 P.M. confirmed she had never
been invited to attend any meetings regarding her mother's care. Resident #166's daughter stated her and
her mother would attend any meetings regarding care and/or treatment.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366072
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366072
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/06/2020
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Meadows at Osborn Park
3916 Perkins Ave
Huron, OH 44839
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physician
orders for the application of a boot to the lower extremity for one (#1) of five residents reviewed for skin
conditions. The facility census was 119.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings include:
Review of Resident #1's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 06/17/17. Diagnoses
included diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, above the knee amputation and hemiplegia.
Review of Resident #1's physician orders identified the use of a zero gravity boot to the left foot at all times.
Observation on 02/04/20 at 11:22 A.M. revealed Resident #1 was sitting in a tilt back wheelchair which had
medal foot pedals on both sides of the chair. Resident #1 did not have a zero gravity boot on the left foot.
Resident #1 left foot was turning into the right side and is toes were hitting the right foot pedal.
Interview on 02/04/20 at 11:36 A.M., State Tested Nursing Assist (STNA) #48 confirmed Resident #1
should have a zero gravity boot on his left foot. The STNA stated she had placed the boot in the laundry this
morning and she could not locate another one to place on the resident. The STNA confirmed Resident #1
has all the skin torn off the top of his third toe on the left foot.
Observation on 02/04/20 at 2:07 P.M. revealed Resident #1 had a dressing to his left third toe.
Interview on 02/04/20 at 2:07 P.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #107 confirmed Resident #1 did not
have a current physician order for a dressing and she was not aware of when the dressing was applied. The
interview confirmed Resident #1 has the skin removed from the top of his left third toe.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366072
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366072
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/06/2020
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Meadows at Osborn Park
3916 Perkins Ave
Huron, OH 44839
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0685
Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based of review of a nurse's note, review of a vision provider note, review of an Eye Glass Tracker form,
review of a Vision Care form, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, revealed the facility failed to
timely follow up with a vision care provider regarding ordered eye glasses not yet received. This affected
one (#91) of one resident reviewed for vision care services. The facility census was 119.
Residents Affected - Few
Finding included
Review of the medical record revealed Resident #91 had an admission date of 02/07/18. Diagnoses
included heart failure, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, and diabetes mellitus type two.
Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/01/20, revealed the resident had
impaired cognition. Further review of the assessment noted resident had no corrective lenses.
Review of a nurse's note dated 10/15/19 10:09 A.M. revealed laundry staff found the resident's eye glasses
in the dryer. A screw was missing and one of the lenses was missing.
Review of a vision provider note dated 10/17/19 revealed the resident was seen for a diabetic eye exam.
The resident was evaluated for blurry vision in the right and left eyes. Eye glasses were ordered for the
resident pending insurance/payor approval.
Review of a facility Eye Glass Tracker form, dated 10/17/19, revealed Resident #91 was one of three
residents who had ordered glasses from the facility's eye care provider. Two of the three residents had
received their eye glasses. Resident #91 had not received her eye glasses. Review of a hand written note
on the form documented Never got, lost.
Review of a Vision Care form revealed the facility checked on the status of the glasses on 11/28/19 and
noted the glasses were still in process. Further review of the Vision Care form revealed the facility had not
followed up with the vision provider regarding the status of the resident's glasses until 01/28/20. The facility
noted on 02/04/20 the glasses would not arrive for another seven to ten days.
Interview on 02/04/20 at 1:48 P.M. with Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #87 revealed Resident #91's new
eye glasses were ordered in 10/2019. LSW #87 verified the resident had not yet received her eyeglasses.
Interview on 02/04/20 at 2:24 P.M. with the Medical Records Supervisor (MRS) #81 revealed the resident's
glasses were ordered on 10/17/19. MRS #81 verified the resident had not received the new eyeglasses.
MRS #81 verified the facility had not followed up with the vision provider from 11/22/19 until 01/28/20. MRS
#81 first stated the glasses were in process, then MRS #81 stated the vision provider indicated the glasses
were sent to the facility but were lost. MRS #81 later revealed the new eye glasses had not been lost but
there was an issue with the laboratory manufacture of the eyeglasses.
Review of the policy titled Vision Services, dated 05/2018, revealed routine and emergency vision services
were available to meet the resident's vision health services in accordance with the resident's assessment
and plan of care. Further review of the policy revealed social services personnel would be responsible for
assisting the resident/family with vision services.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366072
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366072
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/06/2020
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Meadows at Osborn Park
3916 Perkins Ave
Huron, OH 44839
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0803
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be
updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Based on observations, review of dietary menus, review of dietary spreadsheets, and staff interviews, the
facility failed to serve the identified portion sizes of pureed chicken to 12 residents (#4, #5, #9, #16, #23,
#57, #59, #65, #76, #80, #93 and #94) who received pureed diets. The facility census was 119.
Findings include:
Review of the menu for the lunch meal on 02/03/20 identified the facility was serving chicken, mashed
potatoes and green beans.
Review of the spreadsheets for the lunch meal on 02/03/20 revealed pureed diets should receive a #10
scoop of pureed chicken. The facility provided a listing that identified size #10 scoop is equal to 3/8 cup or 3
ounce.
Observation on 02/05/20 at 11:49 A.M., [NAME] #114 was plating the noon meal. [NAME] #114 was
observed to be utilizing a two ounce scoop for the pureed chicken for each of the residents receiving
pureed diets.
Interview on 02/05/20 at 12:02 P.M., [NAME] #114 confirmed she was not aware the facility menus had
portion sizes listed and she just uses the same scoops for each meal.
Interview on 02/05/20 at 12:04 P.M., Dietary Manager #115 confirmed the staff were not following the menu
and spreadsheet for proper portion sizes.
The facility identified 12 residents (#4, #5, #9, #16, #23, #57, #59, #65, #76, #80, #93 and #94) who
received pureed diets.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366072
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 8