F 0558
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a
resident's call light was in reach of the resident per the plan of care. This affected one (Resident #128) of
three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 148.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings include:
Review of the medical record for Resident #128 revealed an admission date of 01/06/23 with diagnoses
including the following: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus (DM),
encephalopathy, aphasia, benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH.)
Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #128 was cognitively
impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff with activities of daily living (ADLs.)
Review of the care plan dated 01/07/23 revealed Resident #128 was at risk for falls or fall related injury
related to impaired mobility, weakness, and hemiplegia. Interventions included to keep call light and
frequently used personal items within reach.
Observation on 05/17/23 at 9:08 A.M. revealed Resident #128 was in bed sleeping. His call light was
behind and under the bed and out of the resident's reach.
Interview and observation on 05/17/23 at 9:10 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #217
confirmed Resident #128's call light was out of the resident's reach. STNA #217 stated it didn't matter if the
call was not within Resident #128's reach because he didn't use it anyway. At 9:11 A.M., STNA #217 exited
Resident #128's room. STNA #217 did not place Resident #128's call light in reach.
Interview on 05/17/23 at 9:15 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #348 confirmed Resident #128's
call light was behind and under the bed and out of the resident's reach. LPN #348 further confirmed
Resident #128 was a fall risk and per his care plan he was supposed to have his call light in reach at all
times. LPN #348 noted the clip which was used to help attach the call light to the bed was broken. LPN
#348 confirmed this should be fixed so the call light would stay in place.
Review of the facility policy titled Call Lights-Accessibility and Timely Response, dated 2022, revealed staff
will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured as needed.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00142869.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 7
Event ID:
366120
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366120
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/17/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Cedar Village.
5467 Cedar Village Drive
Mason, OH 45040
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0609
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper
authorities.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, review of the Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), observation, resident interview, staff
interview, and review of facility documents and policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident
abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency, the Ohio Department of Health (ODH.) This affected one
(Resident #94) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 148.
Findings include:
Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 03/01/22. Diagnoses included
chronic pain syndrome, bipolar disorder, and chronic respiratory failure (CRF) with hypoxia.
Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 was cognitively
intact and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADLs.)
Review of the nursing progress note for Resident #94 dated 05/01/23 written by Unit Manager (UM) #236
revealed resident refused care when resident's call light was answered. The Director of Nursing (DON) and
Social Worker (SW) #347 were made aware.
Review of the concern form dated 05/02/23 revealed Resident #94 did not want UM #236 to answer her call
light or be part of her care team. Further review of the form revealed the resident's request was granted and
UM #236 would not be part of resident's care team. The form was signed by SW #347 and Resident #94.
Review of the facility's SRIs for April and May 2023 revealed there were no reports filed regarding alleged
emotional/verbal abuse for Resident #94.
Observation and interview on 05/17/23 at 10:13 A.M. revealed Resident #94 was alert and oriented to
person, time and place. Resident #94 became tearful during the interview. Resident #94 stated she was
afraid of UM #236, and she thought she was a bully, that she was aggressive in her approach and that she
talked to her like she was a child. Resident #94 confirmed things got worse between her and UM #236
when the nurse came into her room sometime back in April 2023 and told her that she wasn't allowed to
have a catheter and that she didn't need it. Resident #94 stated she felt the nurse was disrespectful to her
and she told the nurse to get out of her room and that she didn't want the nurse to ever come into her room
again. Resident #94 confirmed that early in May 2023, UM #236 came into her room to answer her call light
and she asked her to leave. Resident #94 confirmed UM #236 argued with her about how she had to
answer the call light and the resident told UM #236 to leave and to get someone else to help her. Resident
#94 reported her concerns to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #356. Resident #94 confirmed she was afraid
UM #236 might retaliate against her for complaining and she was upset UM #236 did not honor her request
to stay out of her room. Resident #94 confirmed she could still hear UM #236 talking in the hallway, so she
knew she was around, and it made her uneasy. Resident #94 confirmed SW #347 and the DON met with
her and told her they would move UM #236 to another unit.
Interview on 05/17/23 at 10:27 A.M. with LPN #356 confirmed early in May 2023, Resident #94 reported to
her that she was afraid of UM #236, that she was a bully and she had asked UM #236 back in April 2023 to
never come in her room again. LPN #356 confirmed Resident #94 was upset because UM #236
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366120
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366120
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/17/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Cedar Village.
5467 Cedar Village Drive
Mason, OH 45040
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0609
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
did not honor her request and came in her room anyway when the resident put her call light on, and UM
#236 said she had to answer the light. LPN #356 confirmed she reported Resident #94's concerns to the
DON. LPN #356 confirmed Resident #94 did not accuse UM #236 of verbal or emotional abuse, but calling
someone a bully could be considered an allegation of possible abuse.
Interview on 05/17/23 at 11:54 A.M. with the DON confirmed LPN #356 reported to her by phone on
05/01/23 that Resident #94 complained she didn't want UM #236 to be part of her care team anymore and
she didn't like her personality or her customer service approach. The DON stated LPN #356 did not use the
word abuse nor did she share that Resident #94 called UM #236 a bully. The DON confirmed if a resident
reported a staff member was a bully, she would consider it an abuse allegation and would handle the
situation per the facility's abuse protocol. The DON confirmed the facility had not initiated an abuse
investigation nor had the facility reported the incident to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH).
Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, dated March 2021, revealed the facility would
ensure timely and thorough investigation of all reports and allegations of abuse. Abuse included verbal
abuse-oral or written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to
residents or their families and mental abuse which included humiliation, harassment, and threats of
punishment or withholding treatments or services. The facility should also ensure the reporting and filing of
accurate documents relative to incidents of abuse.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00142514.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366120
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366120
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/17/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Cedar Village.
5467 Cedar Village Drive
Mason, OH 45040
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0610
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
record review, observation, resident and staff interview, review of facility documents and review of the
facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from
abuse during an investigation and failed to conduct a thorough abuse investigation. This resulted in
psychosocial harm for Resident #94 after the facility failed to protect and thoroughly investigate Resident
#94's allegation of emotional and verbal abuse resulting in Resident #94 being afraid to leave her room,
was agitated, and tearful. This affected one (Resident #94) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The
facility census was 148.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings include:
Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 03/01/22. Diagnoses included
chronic pain syndrome, bipolar disorder, and chronic respiratory failure (CRF) with hypoxia.
Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 was cognitively
intact and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADLs.)
Review of the nursing progress note for Resident #94 dated 05/01/23 written by Unit Manager (UM) #236
revealed resident refused care when resident's call light was answered. The Director of Nursing (DON) and
Social Worker (SW) #347 were made aware.
Review of the concern form dated 05/02/23 revealed Resident #94 did not want UM #236 to answer her call
light or be part of her care team. Further review of the form revealed the resident's request was granted and
UM #236 would not be part of resident's care team. The form was signed by SW #347 and Resident #94.
Review of interview statements of residents on the unit where Resident #94 resided dated 05/02/23
revealed the residents were asked if they ever had a negative encounter with a staff member, and if they
had any issues regarding the nurses' approach. All residents interviewed answered no to the questions.
Observation and interview on 05/17/23 at 10:13 A.M. revealed Resident #94's door was shut upon arriving
to her room. Resident #94 was alert and oriented to person, time and place. Resident #94 became tearful
during the interview. Resident #94 stated she stayed in her room and kept her door shut so she would not
have to interact with UM #236. Resident #94 stated she was afraid of UM #236, and she thought she was a
bully, that she was aggressive in her approach and that she talked to her like she was a child. Resident #94
confirmed things got worse between her and UM #236 when the nurse came into her room sometime back
in April 2023 and told her that she wasn't allowed to have a catheter and that she didn't need it. Resident
#94 stated she felt the nurse was disrespectful to her and she told the nurse to get out of her room and that
she didn't want the nurse to ever come into her room again. Resident #94 confirmed that early in May 2023,
UM #236 came into her room to answer her call light and she asked her to leave. Resident #94 confirmed
UM #236 argued with her about how she had to answer the call light and the resident told UM #236 to leave
and to get someone else to help her. Resident #94 reported her concerns to Licensed Practical Nurse
(LPN) #356. Resident #94 confirmed she was afraid UM #236 might retaliate against her for complaining
and she was upset UM #236 did not honor her request to stay out of her room. Resident #94 confirmed she
could still hear UM #236 talking in the hallway, so she knew she was around, and it made her uneasy.
Resident #94 confirmed SW #347
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366120
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366120
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/17/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Cedar Village.
5467 Cedar Village Drive
Mason, OH 45040
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0610
and the DON met with her and told her they would move UM #236 to another unit.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Interview on 05/17/23 at 10:27 A.M. with LPN #356 confirmed early in May 2023, Resident #94 reported to
her that she was afraid of UM #236, and Resident #94 called UM #236 a bully. Resident #94 had asked UM
#236 back in April 2023 to never come in her room again. LPN #356 confirmed Resident #94 was upset
because UM #236 did not honor her request and came in her room anyway when Resident #94 put her call
light on. UM #236 said she had to answer the light. LPN #356 confirmed she reported Resident #94's
concerns to the DON. LPN #356 confirmed Resident #94 did not accuse UM #236 of verbal or emotional
abuse, but calling someone a bully could be considered an allegation of possible abuse.
Residents Affected - Few
Interview on 05/17/23 at 11:54 A.M. with the DON confirmed LPN #356 reported to her by phone on
05/01/23 that Resident #94 complained she didn't want UM #236 to be part of her care team anymore and
she didn't like her personality or her customer service approach. The DON confirmed LPN #356 did not use
the word abuse nor did she share that the resident called UM #236 a bully. The DON confirmed if a resident
reported a staff member was a bully, she would consider it an abuse allegation and would handle the
situation per the facility's abuse protocol. The DON confirmed SW #347 and the DON met with Resident
#94 on 05/01/23 or 05/02/23. The DON confirmed Resident #94 told them she did not want UM #236 to
enter her room again for any reason and if her call light was on, someone else should answer it. The DON
stated the facility made the decision to move UM #236 to be manager of a different unit in the facility and
the switch was made a week ago. The DON confirmed as the facility was coordinating the switch, UM #236
continued to work on Resident #94's unit, but LPN #229 was asked to respond to any nurse management
needs for Resident #94 which involved direct interaction with the resident. The DON confirmed she had not
obtained written statements from the resident and/or staff who may have had first-hand knowledge of the
incident. The DON confirmed the facility had not initiated an abuse investigation and UM #236 was not
suspended at any time in April or May of 2023.
Interview on 05/17/23 at 1:51 P.M. with SW #347 confirmed the DON and herself interviewed Resident #94
on 05/01/23 or 05/02/23. SW #347 stated Resident #94 was agitated during the interview and said she
didn't like UM #236's personality towards her and didn't feel comfortable with her providing care and didn't
want the nurse to enter her room for any reason. SW #347 confirmed Resident #94 was reluctant to
elaborate any further but said she felt UM #236 was gruff in her mannerisms and speech.
Interview on 05/17/23 at 2:24 P.M. with UM #236 stated her relationship with Resident #94 was fine until
she went into her room and told her she needed to stop refusing her diuretics and the risk this could cause
to her health. UM #236 confirmed Resident #94 was unhappy with her because she got her indwelling
catheter discontinued. In April 2023, Resident #94 told her she thought her approach was aggressive and
she didn't want UM #236 to answer her call light, come in her room, or even speak to her. UM #236
confirmed she went to Resident #94's room sometime in May 2023 and the resident was very upset and
told her to leave the room. UM #236 confirmed she told Resident #94 she was obligated to answer call
lights, and Resident #94 told her to find someone else to assist. UM #236 confirmed she was not
suspended at any time in April or May of 2023.
Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, dated March 2021, revealed the facility should
protect residents during abuse investigations. The facility would ensure timely and thorough investigation of
all reports and allegations of abuse. Abuse included verbal abuse-oral or written or gestured language that
willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families and mental abuse which
included humiliation, harassment, and threats of punishment or withholding treatments or services. The
facility should also ensure the reporting and filing of accurate documents relative to incidents of abuse.
Employees of the facility who have been accused of
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366120
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366120
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/17/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Cedar Village.
5467 Cedar Village Drive
Mason, OH 45040
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0610
resident abuse shall be suspended from duty immediately until the results of the investigation have been
reviewed by the Administrator.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00142514.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366120
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366120
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/17/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Majestic Care of Cedar Village.
5467 Cedar Village Drive
Mason, OH 45040
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0677
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure
residents who required assistance with eating received the appropriate assistance with meals/eating. This
affected one (Resident #128) of three residents reviewed for meal assistance. The facility census was 148.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings include:
Review of the medical record for Resident #128 revealed an admission date of 01/06/23. Diagnoses
included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus (DM), and aphasia.
Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #128 was cognitively
impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with eating.
Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 05/11/23 for Resident #128 to receive a regular
diet mechanical soft texture with thin liquids.
Review of the care plan for Resident #128 dated 01/07/23 revealed the resident needed assistance with
activities of daily living related to impaired mobility, weakness and hemiplegia. Interventions included
Resident #128 required extensive assistance of one staff with eating, and staff would provide this
assistance at each meal.
Observation on 05/17/23 at 9:08 A.M. revealed Resident #128 was in bed sleeping.
Interview on 05/17/23 at 9:10 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #217 confirmed Resident
#128 required extensive assistance with eating. STNA #217 confirmed when she passed breakfast trays,
the resident was sleepy and did not want to eat.
Interview on 05/17/23 at 12:13 P.M. with STNA #217 confirmed she got Resident #128 out of bed and up in
his chair at approximately 9:45 A.M. and she offered him fluids which he accepted, but she did not offer him
breakfast or anything to eat. STNA #217 confirmed she did not know why she hadn't offered Resident #128
food once he woke up.
Interview on 05/17/23 at 11:54 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed if a resident refuses a
meal or is too sleepy to eat when the meal is served, staff should hold the meal and should reapproach the
resident later and offer them food.
Review of the facility policy titled Meal Supervision and Assistance, dated 2022, revealed if a resident
refuses to eat, staff should inform the supervisor. If a resident wishes to eat later or cannot eat when the
meal is served, staff should communicate the resident's wishes to the supervisor and other staff members
caring for the resident and set a more appropriate time for resident to receive the meal.
This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00142869.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366120
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 7