Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

CONTINUING HEALTHCARE AT BECKETT HOUSECMS #3661731 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0584 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all resident rooms were maintained at a comfortable temperature. This affected seven (#2, #3, #4, #6, #7, #10, and #12) of 13 residents reviewed for heating concerns, and had the potential to affect 13 of 13 residents reviewed for heating concerns. The facility census was 74. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and difficulty in walking. Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure. Record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including polyneuropathy and normal pressure hydrocephalus. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including myocardial infarction and acute respiratory failure. Record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction and anemia. Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia and anemia. Record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of temperature audits dated 11/24/25 at 7:30 A.M. revealed the outdoor ambient temperature was 53 degrees and clear weather. Temperatures of rooms were as follows (degrees Fahrenheit): 68 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 67 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 72 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 70 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 71 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 70 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 71 in room [ROOM NUMBER], and 71 in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Review of temperature audits dated 11/25/25 revealed the outdoor ambient temperature was 53 degrees and rainy weather. Temperatures of rooms were as follows (degrees Fahrenheit): 65 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 65 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 68 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 65 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 64 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 65 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 67 in room [ROOM NUMBER], and 65 in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Review of temperature audits dated 11/28/25 at 9:00 A.M. revealed the outdoor ambient temperature was 29 degrees. Temperatures of rooms were as follows (degrees Fahrenheit): not taken in room [ROOM NUMBER], 65 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 65 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 65 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 65 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 65 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 71 in room [ROOM NUMBER], and 69 in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Review of temperature audits dated 12/01/25 at 9:00 A.M. revealed the outdoor ambient temperature was 28 degrees. Temperatures of rooms were as follows (degrees Fahrenheit): 71 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 68 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 69 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 69 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 69 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 67 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 71 in room [ROOM NUMBER], 68 in room [ROOM NUMBER], and 68 in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Interview on 12/02/25 at 12:50 P.M. with Resident #7 revealed her room was cold and the heater was not working. Interview and tour on 12/02/25 starting at 2:30 P.M. and ending at 2:42 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #106 revealed he started working in the facility in the spring and was aware several heating (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 366173 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 366173 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/02/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Continuing Healthcare at Beckett House 1280 Friendship Drive New Concord, OH 43762 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0584 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete units were not functioning or were about to stop functioning. MD #106 stated he told his corporate supervisors about his concerns but they had not started working on ordering heating equipment until Monday (12/01/25). They got two separate estimates and intended to place an order for five units, then two or three additional units each month until all were replaced. MD #106 stated he has been taking the temperatures for a couple weeks to monitor the temperature of rooms without heat. During the tour, temperatures were as follows: 68 degrees in room [ROOM NUMBER], 68 degrees in room [ROOM NUMBER], 68 degrees in room [ROOM NUMBER], 69 degrees in room [ROOM NUMBER], 65 degrees in room [ROOM NUMBER], 65 degrees in room [ROOM NUMBER] (empty room), 68 degrees in room [ROOM NUMBER], and 65 degrees in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The outdoor ambient temperature was 32 degrees. MD #106 confirmed temperatures within the facility should be maintained between 71 and 81 degrees unless requested by a resident. Interview on 12/02/25 at 3:07 P.M. with Resident #4 revealed he did not have heat in his room. Resident #4 stated he wasn't cold, but he was having to use four blankets which made it hard to move around but he was comfortable laying in bed. Interview on 12/02/25 at 3:11 P.M. with Resident #6 revealed she arrived to the facility a month ago and the heat was broken before she got there. Resident #6 stated she was not cold but she dresses like this (she was wearing a turtleneck sweater, a jacket, sweatpants, long socks and tennis shoes). Resident #6 stated she also sleeps in the same outfit, which is not typical for her because she prefers to sleep in a nightgown. Interview on 12/02/25 at 3:20 P.M. with Resident #10 revealed his room was cold. Interview on 12/02/25 at 3:40 P.M. with Resident #12 revealed her room was cold but she was using extra blankets to stay warm. Review of a policy titled Temperature Extremes dated 06/2019 revealed the facility should provide a comfortable and safe temperature level maintained between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit. This deficiency represents an incidental finding of non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2645381. Event ID: Facility ID: 366173 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0584GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F584 - Safe Environment

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 2, 2025 survey of CONTINUING HEALTHCARE AT BECKETT HOUSE?

This was a inspection survey of CONTINUING HEALTHCARE AT BECKETT HOUSE on December 2, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at CONTINUING HEALTHCARE AT BECKETT HOUSE on December 2, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receivin..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.