F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
medical record review, staff interview, nurse practitioner (NP) interview, and review of facility policy, the
facility failed to ensure adequate follow up to a critically low laboratory result. This affected (#74) of four
closed records reviewed. The census was 71.Findings Include:Review of Resident #74's closed medical
record revealed an admission date of 05/14/25. Diagnoses listed bacterial pneumonia, type two diabetes
mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obesity. Resident #74 was discharged on
05/31/25.Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 was
cognitively intact.Review of laboratory results dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 potassium level was
critically low at 2.5 milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L) on 05/29/25. The normal range for potassium was 3.5
to 5.3 mEq/L.Review of physician orders revealed Resident #74 was given 40 mEq of Potassium Chloride
by mouth at two different times on 05/19/25. A daily dose of Potassium Chloride was changed from 20 mEq
to 40 mEq.Review of discharge paperwork dated 05/31/25 revealed no instructions for Resident #74 to
have any laboratory test completed.Review of progress notes revealed Resident #74 and family were called
on 05/31/25 and told to go the hospital for a critical potassium level of 2.5 mEq/L.Review of hospital records
dated 05/31/25 revealed Resident #74's potassium level was at a critical level of 2.9 mEq/L. Resident #74
was admitted for hypokalemia (low potassium) and stayed in the hospital until discharge on
[DATE].Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 08/20/25
at 8:00 A.M. revealed Nurse Practitioner (NP) #112 was called on 05/29/25 for the Resident #74's critical
potassium level and medications changes were made. The DON stated Resident #74 was called by the
former ADON on 05/31/25 when the critical potassium level from 05/29/25 of 2.5 mEq/L was received again
from the laboratory. The former ADON did not realize medication changes had been made. The DON
confirmed Resident #74's potassium level was not re-checked after 05/29/25 before the resident discharged
home on [DATE].Phone interview with NP #112 on 08/20/25 at 11:07 A.M. revealed he made medications
changes to attempt correct Resident #74's low potassium level. NP #112 wanted a metabolic panel
collected to re-check Resident #74's potassium level. NP #112 was not informed that Resident #74 was
discharging on 05/31/25 or he stated he would have had her potassium level re-checked sooner and before
Resident #74's discharge. Review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan dated October
2022 revealed when a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharge plan
will be developed to assist the resident to adjust to his/her new living environment. The facility must permit
each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge.This deficiency represents
non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 1281294.
Residents Affected - Few
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
366245
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
366245
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/26/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Forest Glen Health Campus
2150 Montego Drive
Springfield, OH 45503
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0812
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve
food in accordance with professional standards.
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to distribute meals in a
sanitary manner in the memory care unit. This had the potential to affect all 20 residents that eat in the
memory care unit. The census was 71. Findings Include:Observation of lunch being served in memory care
unit on 08/19/25 at 11:28 A.M. revealed meals are served from a plastic table set up in the hallway outside
the dining area. Utensils used to serve food, plates, cups, and pitchers of drinks were sat directly on the
table. The table was not observed to be sanitized before the start of meals service.Food was brought to the
hall by a heated carrier at 11:50 A.M. Metal pans of mashed potatoes, salisbury steak, and brussel sprouts
were set directly on the table by Activity Assistant (AA) #102. There was not a steam table or any appliance
to maintain food temperatures.At 11:52 A.M. the meals were started to be served by AA #102. No food
temperatures were taken before meal service. Food was served from the pan on the table using utensils
that were sat directly on the plastic table. At 12:10 P.M. Resident #50 requested more food. Certified
Nursing Assistant (CNA) #104 brought Resident #50's used lunch plate to AA #102 who scooped more
portions of each item onto the plate. Interview with AA #102 and CNA #103 on 08/19/25 at 12:15 P.M.
confirmed the table was not sanitized right before meals being served. The table is cleaned by dietary staff
when meals are cleaned up, but that would have been right after breakfast. The table is in the hallway and
can be touched by staff, residents, or visitors between meals. AA #102 confirmed food temperatures are not
taken when food arrives at the hall and before food is served to residents. AA#102 also confirmed she had
scooped food onto Resident #50's used lunch plate.Review of the facility's policy titled Food handling dated
September 2021 revealed food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of foodborne
illness minimized.The facility identified Residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #25, #29, #34, #38, #40, #42, #44, #50,
#52, #54, #58, #59, #62, #65, #66, and #67) as eating in the memory care unit.This deficiency represents
an incidental finding discovered during the course of the complaint investigation.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
366245
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2