Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ASTORIA SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATIONCMS #3663911 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency, 1 of them serious (actual harm or immediate jeopardy). The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0689 Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed medical record review, review of a facility investigation, employee file review, manufacturer guideline review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #100 was transferred safely with a mechanical (Hoyer) sling lift resulting in a fall with major injury.Actual harm occurred on 09/11/25 when Resident #100, who was dependent on two staff members and the use of a mechanical sling lift with transfers, sustained a fall and a right hip fracture when being transferred from his bed to wheelchair with only the assistance of one staff member, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #50 and the Hoyer lift. During the transfer, the lift tipped, Resident #100 fell to the floor, was emergently transferred to hospital and admitted with a closed right hip fracture. The resident was discharged from the hospital and admitted to another facility. This affected one resident (#100) of five residents reviewed for accidents/falls. The facility census was 65.Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident # 100, revealed an admission date of 08/23/22 and a discharge date of 09/11/25 with diagnoses including multiple fractures of ribs, unspecified side, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, syncope and collapse, and anxiety disorder.Review of Resident #100's care plan, revised 07/09/24, revealed Resident #100 had an activity of daily living (ADL) deficit. An intervention (dated 12/09/24) included in the care plan indicated the resident required a mechanical lift for transfers.Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was at high risk for falls. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 out of 15. The resident was assessed to be dependent on staff with the use of a mechanical (Hoyer) lift for all transfers, and dependent on staff for bed mobility.Review of a nursing progress note dated 09/11/25 at 9:27 A.M., authored by Registered Nurse (RN) #5, revealed the nurse was called to the resident's room. Upon arrival the resident was lying on the floor with the Hoyer pad under him. Pain was noted when the resident tried to move his leg. Review of a facility investigation report, dated 09/11/25, revealed Resident #100 was being transferred via mechanical lift on 09/11/25 by CNA #50. During the transfer, the Hoyer lift tipped over resulting in Resident #100 falling to the floor. Nursing staff were immediately called to the resident's room to assess him for injuries; Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were called, and Resident #100 was transferred to the hospital.Review of CNA #50's witness statement dated 09/11/25 revealed she was transferring Resident #100 alone and the Hoyer lift tipped over. In review of the findings, the facility confirmed CNA #50 was self-transferring Resident #100 with the use of a Hoyer lift. (This was not the facility procedure to transfer residents with the Hoyer/mechanical lift using one staff).Interview on 10/30/25 at 9:39 A.M. with CNA #30 revealed she was working with CNA #50 on 09/11/25, but not on the same unit. CNA #50 did not ask CNA #30 for assistance with Hoyer lift transfers. However, after the incident occurred, (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 366391 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 366391 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 11/05/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Astoria Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation 3537 12th Street, NW Canton, OH 44708 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few CNA #50 asked CNA #30 for assistance getting Resident #100 up off the floor. CNA #30, CNA #50 and CNA #20 went to Resident #100's room and immediately called for the nurse, RN #5. Interview on 10/30/25 at 9:49 A.M. with CNA #20 revealed she was working with CNA #50 on 09/11/25 but not on the same unit. CNA #50 did not ask CNA #20 for assistance with Hoyer lift transfers. However, CNA #30 and CNA #50 did ask CNA #20 for assistance with Resident #100 after the incident occurred. Upon entering the room, they immediately called for the nurse, RN #5. Interview on 10/30/25 at 4:19 P.M. with RN #5 revealed CNA #50 was working the same unit as RN #5 on 09/11/25 and the CNA did not ask for assistance with transferring Resident #100 with the Hoyer lift. The CNAs working did notify her Resident #100 was on the floor and RN #5 immediately assessed him and called for the Director of Nursing (DON). Resident #100 was transferred to the ER.Interview with the DON on 10/30/25 at 11:06 A.M. confirmed Resident #100 fell while he was being transferred by staff using a Hoyer lift. She stated, based on the facility investigation, CNA #50 was using the Hoyer lift to transfer Resident #100 by herself, which was not the guidance provided in the manufacturer's guidelines and not according to facility policy, the lift tipped and Resident #100 fell to the floor resulting in a right hip fracture. The DON verified the resident did not return after hospital discharge but was admitted to another facility. The DON shared, following the incident, the facility completed the investigation, and initiated a plan of correction for this situation, which included education for nurses and CNAs, audit of residents who required mechanical lifts to ensure the lifts were being used appropriately, and mechanical lift transfer audits three times a week for four weeks with concerns being shared with Quality Assurance (QA) Committee. The DON revealed the corrective actions had been completed.Review of CNA #50's employee file revealed a hire date of 08/27/25 and acknowledgement of facility policies and procedures dated 08/27/25. Further review revealed a suspension disciplinary action dated 09/11/25 for the employee being in violation of prohibited behavior as described in the employee handbook. The violation was of an established policy, procedure or risk. Also contained in the employee file was a termination disciplinary action dated 09/15/25 with the nature of the disciplinary action to be the employee was in violation of prohibited behavior as described in the employee handbook for failure to follow the Hoyer lift policy. Review of facility policy titled Using a Mechanical Lifting Machine revised July 2017 revealed the purpose of this procedure is to establish the general principles of safe lifting using a mechanical lifting device. It was not a substitute for manufacturer's training or instructions. General guidelines at least two nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift.Review of the facility policy titled Managing Falls and Fall Risk revised March 2018 revealed based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff would identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Review of facility's mechanical lift manual dated 2022, for Invacare Reliant 450/600 revealed Although Invacare recommends that two assistants be used for all lifting preparation and transferring from and transferring to procedures, the equipment will permit proper operation by one assistant. The use of one assistant is based on the evaluation of the healthcare professional for each individual case.The deficient practice was corrected on 10/10/25, when the facility completed the following corrective actions: On 09/11/25, CNA #50 who was responsible for the error was immediately educated on transferring a resident with a mechanical lift and had a transferring competency completed by the DON with no new variances identified.On 09/11/25, CNA #50 was suspended by the DON and Administrator. As a result of the employee's failure to follow the Hoyer Lift policy, CNA #50 was terminated on 09/15/25.On 09/11/25, the MDS coordinator completed a full audit of residents (#10, #11, #13, #14, #15, #27, #29, #52, #56, #58, #59 and #100) with (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 366391 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 366391 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 11/05/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Astoria Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation 3537 12th Street, NW Canton, OH 44708 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete mechanical lifts to ensure mechanical lifts were being used appropriately and per policy by staff.On 09/11/25 direct care staff; 10 RNs, 11 LPNs, and 37 CNAs were educated on proper transferring. Staff were required to complete a mechanical lift demonstration by DON/designee. A plan for new staff to be educated upon hire as part of orientation was also implemented. Beginning 09/12/25 the DON/designee began auditing mechanical lift transfers for three residents, three times a week, for four weeks. The audits were completed on 10/10/25.Variances were corrected immediately upon discovery and education provided as needed. The results of the audits were reported to the facility quality assurance (QA) committee monthly. On-going compliance would be maintained through recommendations of the committee. No transfer injuries occurred between 09/12/25 and 10/30/25. This deficiency demonstrates non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number 2620511 and Complaint Number 2615493. Event ID: Facility ID: 366391 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689SeriousS&S Gactual harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 5, 2025 survey of ASTORIA SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION?

This was a inspection survey of ASTORIA SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION on November 5, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ASTORIA SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION on November 5, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.