Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

TAMARACK RIDGE HEALTH AND REHABILITATIONCMS #3664972 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

366497 12/23/2025 Tamarack Ridge Health and Rehabilitation 5113 State Route 43 Kent, OH 44240
F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #23's skin care was completed as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (Resident #23) of three residents reviewed for care and services. The facility census was 95.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 07/20/23. Diagnoses included paralysis affecting the left non-dominant side, bipolar disorder, depression, muscle weakness, insomnia and respiratory failure.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. He required supervision for eating, partial assistance for oral hygiene, substantial assistance for personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for toileting and showering. He had no noted skin issues.Review of the care plan dated 10/10/25 revealed Resident #23 had an alteration in skin integrity as evidenced by a rash to his left inner thigh/groin area. Interventions included assessing the area for size, color and drainage as needed, providing treatment per physician's orders and assessing for pain.Review of the physician's orders for December 2025 revealed in order to cleanse Resident #23's left inner thigh/groin area with soap and water, pat dry and apply house stock powder (miconazole), an antifungal powder, to the area every shift for a rash. The order began on 06/29/25.Review of the treatment administration record (TAR) for December 2025 revealed the ordered treatment of miconazole powder to Resident #23's left inner thigh/groin area was not signed off as completed per physician's orders on day shift on 12/09/25, 12/11/25, 12/13/25, 12/14/25, 12/18/25, and 12/20/25. Interview and observation on 12/22/25 at 8:08 A.M. with Resident #23 revealed he received a powder to his upper left thigh because it was itchy at times. He revealed some staff were better than others at making sure he received it every day. Observation at the time of the interview revealed a large, red area approximately three inches long by two inches wide on Resident #23's left thigh.Interview on 12/22/25 at 10:09 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #202 revealed she was aware Resident #23 had some issues with skin integrity related to his groin and legs. She revealed the facility was responsible for applying treatments as ordered, since Resident #23 was unable to do so himself.Interview on 12/23/25 at 9:58 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed she could provide no other evidence the skin treatment ordered for Resident #23 had been completed as ordered.Review of the facility policy titled Skin Assessment, dated 03/15/24, revealed the facility would ensure necessary treatment and services were provided for the completion and documentation of skin integrity. Areas of altered skin integrity would be treated according to medical direction and would be followed conscientiously.This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Complaint Number 2649255. Residents Affected - Few Page 1 of 4 366497 366497 12/23/2025 Tamarack Ridge Health and Rehabilitation 5113 State Route 43 Kent, OH 44240
F 0697 Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #96's physician orders were followed and care planned interventions were implemented to administer Resident #96's pain medication timely. This affected one resident (Resident #96) out of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 95.Findings include:Review of Resident #96's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/22/25 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, chronic pain syndrome and restless leg syndrome.Review of Resident #96's admission Assessment and Baseline Care Plan dated 12/22/25 included Resident #96 was a new admission and was alert and oriented. Resident #96 used an electric wheelchair and was non-ambulatory. Resident #96 required assistance with physical function, and set-up, supervision with bathing, grooming, and toileting.Review of Resident #96's Pain assessment dated [DATE] included in the last five days Resident #96 was on a scheduled pain medication regimen. Resident #96 received as needed pain medication. Non-medication interventions for pain used were rest and repositioning. Resident #96 had chronic, dull, throbbing bilateral lower extremity pain. Over the last five days Resident #96 frequently experienced pain, pain frequently made it hard for him to sleep at night, and he frequently limited his participation in rehabilitation therapy sessions due to pain. Resident #96 frequently limited his day-to-day activities because of pain. Resident #96 stated rest, mood and emotions were affected by pain. Resident #96's worst pain over the past five days was rated at an eight out of a 10, zero being no pain and 10 being the worst pain. Review of Resident #96's physician orders dated 12/22/25 at 1:11 P.M. revealed pregabalin oral capsule 100 milligrams (mg) (medication to treat nerve pain), give 100 mg by mouth two times a day for pain.Review of Resident #96's physician orders dated 12/22/25 at 1:11 P.M. revealed hydrocodone-acetaminophen (Norco) oral tablet 5-325 mg (opioid pain medication), give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Attempt and document non-pharmacological interventions prior to medication administration.Review of Resident #96's progress notes dated 12/22/25 at 4:39 P.M. included Resident #96 denied pain at this time and stated he had pain in his back and neck at times and required pain medication for relief. Review of Resident #96's progress notes dated 12/22/25 at 6:57 P.M. revealed a message was sent to the Nurse Practitioner (NP) #210 requesting a prescription for Norco be sent to the pharmacy.Review of Resident #96's progress notes dated 12/22/25 at 9:14 P.M. revealed an authorization to pull request for Norco was sent to the pharmacy.Review of Resident #96's Pain Level Summary dated 12/23/25 at 2:23 A.M. revealed Resident #96 had a pain level rated a three out of 10.Review of Resident #96's progress notes dated 12/23/25 at 2:24 A.M. included acetaminophen tablet (Tylenol) 325 mg (analgesic), give two tablets by mouth every four hours as needed for pain was given.Review of Resident #96's progress notes dated 12/23/25 at 2:24 A.M. revealed pregabalin oral capsule 100 mg, give 100 mg by mouth two times a day for pain was not available.Review of Resident #96's progress notes dated 12/23/25 at 3:18 A.M. included Biofreeze cool external gel four percent (topical pain relief), apply to bilateral legs topically every eight hours as needed for pain.Review of Resident #96's progress notes dated 12/23/25 at 4:57 A.M. included acetaminophen 325 mg , two tablets follow up pain scale was one and the Tylenol was effective.Review of Resident #96's progress notes dated 12/23/25 at 4:58 A.M. revealed Biofreeze was effective.Observation on 12/23/25 at 8:10 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #211 was preparing Resident #96's medications for administration. RN #211 stated Resident #96 was admitted yesterday. Resident #96 was sitting in a wheelchair and stated, what can I do to get my Norco (hydrocodone-acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325 mg), I am in pain. RN #211 stated Resident #96 did not come with a script for Residents Affected - Few 366497 Page 2 of 4 366497 12/23/2025 Tamarack Ridge Health and Rehabilitation 5113 State Route 43 Kent, OH 44240
F 0697 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Norco, and the night nurse asked the pharmacy to reach out to NP #210 for a prescription. RN #211 stated Resident #96 should have an order to administer Norco every six hours as needed, but they did not have a prescription for it. RN #211 stated Resident #96 had Biofreeze at 3:18 A.M. and she was preparing acetaminophen 325 mg tablets and was going to administer two tablets now. RN #211 indicated after 5:00 P.M. the on-call NP or Physician had to be called if anything was needed for the residents. Review of Resident #96's Pain Level Summary dated 12/23/25 at 8:17 A.M. revealed Resident #96's pain level was rated a six out of 10.Review of Resident #96's progress notes dated 12/23/25 at 8:17 A.M. included acetaminophen tablet 325 mg, give two tablets by mouth every four hours as needed for mild pain was given.Observation on 12/23/25 at 9:35 A.M. of RN #211 revealed she was preparing Resident #96's pain medication, Norco 5-325 mg, for administration. Resident #96 was lying on his left side and when he rolled onto his back, then to a sitting position he had facial grimacing. Resident #96 appeared to be in pain and when RN #211 asked what his pain level was Resident #96 rated his pain level at a seven out of 10. Resident #96 stated had been asking for his pain medication since he was admitted on [DATE] and he did not sleep well because he had back pain and restless leg syndrome. Resident #96 stated this his first Norco pill since he was admitted .Review of Resident #96's Pain Level Summary dated 12/23/25 at 9:35 A.M. revealed Resident #96's pain level was rated at a seven out of 10.Review of Resident #96's progress notes dated 12/23/25 at 9:35 A.M. included hydrocodone acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325 mg, give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain.Review of Resident #96's progress notes dated 12/23/25 at 11:12 A.M. revealed pregabalin oral capsule, give 100 mg by mouth two times a day for pain. NP #210 would order the pregabalin when she was at the facility today.Resident #96's care plan dated 12/23/25 included Resident #96 was at risk for alteration in comfort related to back pain, stenosis, arthritis, peripheral vascular disease, neuropathy, and restless leg syndrome. Resident #96's complaints and signs and symptoms of discomfort would be reduced or resolved following intervention. Interventions included administering medications as ordered; medications as ordered to manage pain; monitor for increased levels of pain and notify the physician.Interview on 12/23/25 at 11:42 A.M. of RN #212 revealed she worked on 12/22/25 from 6:00 P.M. until 6:00 A.M. on 12/23/25 and was assigned to care for Resident #96. RN #212 stated she tried to get a prescription for Resident #96's Norco pain medication and sent a message to NP #210 to have her send a prescription to the pharmacy but did not get a response. RN #212 indicated she called the pharmacy in the morning before her shift ended on 12/23/25 and the pharmacy staff told her they were trying to reach out for a script. RN #212 stated she did not call the on-call Physician or NP for Resident #96's prescription because my honest answer is I was doing a million things, and I was going 100 miles an hour from start to finish. RN #212 stated she was frustrated because I was not getting the Norco. RN #212 indicated she explained to Resident #96 why he did not have his Norco, she talked to him at length, and he did not appear to be upset. RN #212 stated she did not try to get a prescription for Resident #96's pregabalin because she did not realize the pregabalin was due, and she was so focused on his Norco. RN #212 confirmed Resident #96 needed a prescription for pregabalin. RN #212 stated she administered acetaminophen and Biofreeze to Resident #96 and it seemed to help his pain.Interview on 12/23/25 at 12:39 P.M. of the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the nurses were responsible to make sure Resident #96 had a prescription for Norco and pregabalin, and when Resident #96's orders were verified with NP #210 they might not have realized they needed a prescription. The DON stated RN #212 sent a fax to the pharmacy on 12/22/25 at 9:14 P.M. asking for authorization to pull Norco and RN #211 followed up this morning.Interview on 12/23/25 at 1:25 P.M. of NP #210 revealed Resident #96 was admitted on [DATE], and she had not seen him yet. NP #210 stated she 366497 Page 3 of 4 366497 12/23/2025 Tamarack Ridge Health and Rehabilitation 5113 State Route 43 Kent, OH 44240
F 0697 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few was contacted early this morning about Resident #96's Norco and pregabalin, and she sent prescriptions for both to the pharmacy. NP #210 stated she was not contacted on 12/22/25 about Resident #96's Norco or pregabalin and maybe the on-call NP or Physician was contacted. NP #210 confirmed she verified Resident #96's medications with a nurse from the facility, but the nurse did not tell her prescriptions were needed for pregabalin and Norco, and if the nurse did not tell her a prescription was needed then I don't know'.Review of the facility policy titled Pain Assessment and Management, dated 03/31/16, included assessment and adequate treatment of pain was central to the management of the physical and psychological well-being of residents. 366497 Page 4 of 4

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • 0697GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F697 - Pain Management

    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 23, 2025 survey of TAMARACK RIDGE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION?

This was a inspection survey of TAMARACK RIDGE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION on December 23, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at TAMARACK RIDGE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION on December 23, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.